iPhone 5 opening weekend sales worse than expected


Recommended Posts

Maybe. Just maybe it is a sign that iPhone users have gotten smart instead of wasting truckloads of money breaking their contracts year after year.

Honestly I think that in the big picture those who upgrade their device every year are very much in the minority. Apple would be foolish to count on yearly upgrades for the bulk of its sales. Even among previous iPhone owners I would expect the majority to be upgrading from the 3GS or 4.

Maybe during the first week or weekend there will be a large proportion of people upgrading from the iPhone 4S, but over the course of a year or two of sales for a particular model the vast majority probably come from people who never owned an iPhone before.

Weird Wall St. Journal is saying different ( kinda )

Apple Inc. sold more than five million units of the iPhone 5 during its first three days in stores, a new record that still undershot some analysts' estimates because of supply constraints.

The company has sold out of its initial inventory
, Chief Executive Tim Cook said in a statement Monday, though most customers who pre-ordered their iPhones had their devices shipped already.

"Demand for iPhone 5 has been incredible, and we are working hard to get an iPhone 5 into the hands of every customer who wants one as quickly as possible," Mr. Cook said. "While we have sold out ...

i think Boz just does random doom and gloom searches for iPhone / Apple. in my mind i picture him with the sandwich sign saying the end is near, repent, just with an Apple logo circled with a line through it

What do you base that assumption on? That's basically the same as saying in order to develop for Android you need every possible hardware configuration. That's just sillyness. I'm sure that a lot of developers upgraded to the new iPhone (or *GASP* the new iPod since the screen resolution is the same). But many rely on the emulator that comes with xcode.

Boz is rationalizing standing in line for a new iPhone,, because " its for work "

  • Like 3

Weird Wall St. Journal is saying different ( kinda )

[/size][/size][/font][/color][/indent]

i think Boz just does random doom and gloom searches for iPhone / Apple. in my mind i picture him with the sandwich sign saying the end is near, repent, just with an Apple logo circled with a line through it

Supply doesn't affect pre-orders, only how fast they ship. That's just Apple trying to trick people into thinking there's a reason why it didn't meet some analysts' estimates. You can still order now, it just won't ship for quite a while. Did the website ever say it was actually sold out? I honestly never saw because I never paid attention, but doesn't Apple just push the wait time on shipping when they start to run out of supplies rather than stopping preorders?

Supply doesn't affect pre-orders, only how fast they ship. That's just Apple trying to trick dumb people into thinking there's a reason why it didn't meet some analysts' estimates.

analyst's estimates....

so people that have no idea the internal workings of apple's supply, and going just off past history like it doesn't change at all.

Supply doesn't affect pre-orders, only how fast they ship. That's just Apple trying to trick people into thinking there's a reason why it didn't meet some analysts' estimates. You can still order now, it just won't ship for quite a while. Did the website ever say it was actually sold out? I honestly never saw because I never paid attention, but doesn't Apple just push the wait time on shipping when they start to run out of supplies rather than stopping preorders?

As far as I know Apple does not count phones ordered but not yet shipped in their sales numbers. That's why the number was so high when they announced the preorders placed in the first 24 hours (2 million) compared to the actual sales numbers we see here for the first weekend.

So when Apple's next earnings report comes in, and they show they shattered earning records, Boz will come in and say that Apple is doomed.

Yup, it was hilarious 5 years ago and its still hilarious now.

  • Like 3

FYI, iPhone 4 first weekend sales were 1.7 million. iPhone 4S was roughly what? 4 million. iPhone 5 is being reported as roughly 5 million.

I'm not sure where the logic is coming from that Apple somehow has done worse with the iPhone 5 than previous iPhones. The data certainly doesn't support it. Maybe it is based on an emerging anti-Apple ideology. Ideologies don't need supporting information.

not saying they have done worse compared to previous iPhones sales. Boz is saying that its doom and gloom because its done worse then Some person not on apples payroll said it would do

So the 4S was a major success when it sold 4millions but the 5 is a failure because it only sold 5 millions? :/

well its a tricky thing, because people were expecting alot more people to upgrade due to being out of Contract Term for the 3G and iPhone 4, they are calling it a failure because the numbers expected were based on the people upgrading from a 3G, 3 and 4 ( not 4S ).

the problem lies on the production run, and if the people that wanted to upgrade would. because of being sold out they couldn't even if they wanted to, or wanted to and couldn't. is not considered. also iOS 6 was underwelming, and didnt bring anything new from my personal standpoint, let alone the Backlash from Maps, which may also be a cause of people holding off on the new iPhone so they dont have to deal with iOS6 Maps

IMO and this is pure IMO if i had an iPhone i would probably skip it ( iPhone 5 ), because a couple additional inches of screen space for a phone is not important to me in comparison. now i do own an iPad, i use to one a 1st gen and skipped the 2nd Gen because i didnt care about a camera and a little speed bump. but i got the 3rd gen, because of a combination of all the upgrades compared to a iPad 1G it actually was worth an upgrade. and like i said in https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106591-ios-6-worth-the-update/ iOS6 isnt anything impressive

now its a garentee that when the iPhone comes back in stock, it will still sell like hotcakes. and people that wanted to upgrade will. and on same token people that don't think its a value enough wont.

Exactly. However, that doesn't make nearly as spectacular of a news story title.

Yeah, the REAL title for this article should be "Apple can't keep up with demand for iPhone 5!". But of course, that wouldn't make any sense to our resident anti-Apple trolls.

I think the thing to take away from this is the analyst don't know diddly! In good times or bad analyst say things for them to make money not consumers. They predicted 8 million and the stock jumped. They manipulate or at least try to manipulate prices.

Perhaps the reason for this is that they can't meet the demand. There have been rumours of supply issues.

That could be the case but I have not heard of anyone anywhere not being able to buy the new iPhone. Have there been reports of people going into stores and being told they were out?

I think the thing to take away from this is the analyst don't know diddly! In good times or bad analyst say things for them to make money not consumers. They predicted 8 million and the stock jumped. They manipulate or at least try to manipulate prices.

That could be the case but I have not heard of anyone anywhere not being able to buy the new iPhone. Have there been reports of people going into stores and being told they were out?

Apple dedicated a certain percentage of their stock to the stores. If a particular store doesn't sell all of theirs they don't go back into the pool. Lots of people who ordered online are still waiting for their orders to ship, so overall supply has not caught up yet.

As much as I dislike the iPhone (love the hardware, hate the software), I can't deny the numbers. The demand for the iPhone 5 has exceeded the supply and 5 million is a very impressive number for smartphones sold. I think it's safe to assume they would've sold more if the supply was there. What would have been worrying is if they sold less than 4 million iPhone 5s.

  • Like 2

Typical Boz. Spinning something good into bad because there's an Apple logo on it.

I understand that what goes up must come down, but it's not that time yet. Articles like these remind me of the articles that come out after Apple's quarterly announcements saying how the company is on the decline because they didn't hit some pie in the sky mark set by some random analysis, when I reality, they beat the record they set the previous year while other companies are slipping.

It also reminds me of all the articles that came out last year about the, "underwhelming," iPhone 4s, and we all know how that panned out...

Eventually at some point their sales will hit a plateau, but given sales figures are up from the previous generation it's a bit premature to spin this as a failure.

Though a considerable number of consumers deem the iPhone as sufficient for their needs. Naturally they'll switch away when their demands are no longer being met. Seems like that hasn't happened yet else we'd see much more dismal sales figures. Making assumptions that people's requirements are the same as yours is the classic "solution looking for a problem" scenario.

(Y)

The most well reasoned post on Neowin.

That could be the case but I have not heard of anyone anywhere not being able to buy the new iPhone. Have there been reports of people going into stores and being told they were out?

The AT&T Corporate store in my area sold out of the 70 iPhone or so iPhone 5s, and I saw people being turned away. The 3rd party AT&T store that I got mine from only got 4 (2 16GB and 2 32GB) and they were gone soon after the UPS man dropped them off...naturally...

Really? I expect to sell 10 computers. I sold 5. Yep, everything went as expected. :rolleyes:

Spin that story to meet your preconceived notion of what Apple is.

But Apple did not "expect to sell 10 computers" in your analogy. Let's try this:

I expect to sell a lot of computers. I make as many as I can ahead of time. I get 2 pre-orders before they even go on sale. I get 5 made before launch day.

Because of the 2 pre-orders, some analysts who don't work for me report that I should sell at least 10 computers in the first weekend.

When the launch day comes around, I sell all 5 of the computers I made within 3 days. I take orders for more and will get them to customers as soon as I can.

The analysts who expected that I would sell the 10 computers I didn't have built yet then post articles about how I missed their expectations and make profits from the page views.

That's how it seems to me, unless you can somehow account for several million iPhones sitting ready in a warehouse somewhere that for some reason Apple isn't shipping out to people who have ordered them.

But Apple did not "expect to sell 10 computers" in your analogy. Let's try this:

I expect to sell a lot of computers. I make as many as I can ahead of time. I get 2 pre-orders before they even go on sale. I get 5 made before launch day.

Because of the 2 pre-orders, some analysts who don't work for me report that I should sell at least 10 computers in the first weekend.

When the launch day comes around, I sell all 5 of the computers I made within 3 days. I take orders for more and will get them to customers as soon as I can.

The analysts who expected that I would sell the 10 computers I didn't have built yet then post articles about how I missed their expectations and make profits from the page views.

That's how it seems to me, unless you can somehow account for several million iPhones sitting ready in a warehouse somewhere that for some reason Apple isn't shipping out to people who have ordered them.

best analogy so far :)

also the leap from 4 to 5 was expected to be bigger; remember that there was lot of fuss when 4S was released (it was percieved as as minor update) so it was expected that the sales for the iPhone 5 were going to be better then the 4S because of that; so yeah it's selling as Apple expected but the percieved demand should be much bigger.

If you expect the ridiculous you're bound to be disappointed. Doesn't matter how Boz tries to spin this one around, at the end of the day Apple still sold a million more iPhone 5 units compared to the iPhone 4S last year in the same timeframe. That's excluding pre-orders that haven't arrived yet.

Analyst Says Perhaps Millions of iPhone 5 Pre-Orders Still in Transit, Not Included in Announced Sales

http://www.macrumors...nnounced-sales/

  • Like 2

Um.. it's obvious where Apple will end up.. I said the same thing with Android and Apple fanboys said "OMG Android will never come close to iPhone".. and we see how that ended up.

Face it.. Apple has been milking the same phone for 5 years.. they are are not innovating anything, they have a stale OS and it's inevitable.

Consumers will eventually wake up and realize "Damn, I'm buying the same thing over and over again".. unfortunately consumers are slow to realize that, and that's why Apple gets away with mediocrity and marginal improvements.

Face it. OSX has had the same interface for past 10 years and yet it's become more popular than ever. Not just for individual buyers, but for corporations as well. Ever thought about why or do you figure that if you find the interface stale, everybody else is going to follow suit? I get that you don't like Apple, but the rationale behind your opinions of how the company is going down doesn't make a lot of sense. Let's break this down for you:

1. Estimates were set by Wall Street analysts, they all have their varying ranges from very conservative to very optimistic. The company doesn't strive to break analysts targets, it strives to break its own.

2. Apple sold 5 million iPhones on their opening weekend. That's 25% more than its predecessor. In an environment where there are countless alternatives by numerous companies which are cheaper or at the same price point.

3. The new iPhones cost $40 MORE than the predecessor and still sold 25% more. You would think people would know better than to pay more for something they find stale and old, right? Don't worry, here's some consolation for you. Apple didn't make more profit per phone because they incurred more material costs that was passed to the customer. "That's because they're all iSheep." (s) Yes - millions of customers and enterprises are all sheep because you managed to show a video of 5~6 people who couldn't tell the difference between 4S and 5. (/s)

4. Apple makes more profit per phone that's sold than all your other counterparts. Having 99% of market share by volume means doesn't mean much if you're profits shrink as a result.

Now let's look at why this stale interface works.

5. Apple's approach has been to make user interface INTUITIVE for the average retail user. For better or worse, it's why they have promoted a closed walled-garden since the beginning. The average user prefers familiarity and doesn't want/care to learn new things that is outside of their comfort zone. The way average users define 'simple' is very different from how technical folks define it. For you it's easy enough to swipe a finger or pull down a menu to change settings in Android but if you give it to someone new and ask them to figure the device out, it would take them a lot longer compared to an iPhone.

5b. People are comfortable with what is familiar to them unless there is a compelling reason to change. The interface maybe stale for you but it works for the masses who know exactly where to go and what to do when they get another device or software upgrade. They don't have to spend time figuring it out. I can give my grandma an iPad and she can figure out how to use it for her purposes without teaching her anything and she can barely read/write in English (she does have one and uses it). This again is entirely subject to people's preference.

5c. Why do you think increasing number of businesses are testing iPhones and iPads now? If there is one thing businesses feel comfortable with, it is consistency. They don't have the time to keep installing and trying different interfaces. They find what works and use it for as long as possible. If they get this level of consistency from Apple, you think they are just going to drop the devices because the interface is stale? Why don't you ask Microsoft how Windows 95/XP/7 fares for them? I'd love to find out how many companies are comfortable having Android devices on their network to be used for business related uses (not being sarcastic, really would like to know).

I'm not a "fanboy" simply because of Apple's marketing tactics. I've followed the company's products, services, business practices, design ethos stock since 2004 as closely as I could have. Their screw-ups aside (MobileMe, Antennagate, hockey puck mouse, issues at Foxconn, Maps, etc etc), their market position is justified.

I've not read the whole thread, but when reading other topics regarding this "news" most people (and news articles) seem to ignore the actual growth of the smartphone market (soemthing which the Analysts did include and why they were expecting more than 5 million sales). 5 million sales now is a smaller amount of the whole market than 4 million sales at the last iPhone launch.

Therefore in real terms there are more people buying iPhones, but less of the market are buying iPhones, and therefore you could anticipate good sales for Android and WP8 in the future, or otherwise people are simply holding onto their phones for longer.

I've not read the whole thread, but when reading other topics regarding this "news" most people (and news articles) seem to ignore the actual growth of the smartphone market (soemthing which the Analysts did include and why they were expecting more than 5 million sales). 5 million sales now is a smaller amount of the whole market than 4 million sales at the last iPhone launch.

Therefore in real terms there are more people buying iPhones, but less of the market are buying iPhones, and therefore you could anticipate good sales for Android and WP8 in the future, or otherwise people are simply holding onto their phones for longer.

this is a great point.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!