Zoo Offers Chance to Swim With Tiger Cub


Recommended Posts

DADE CITY -- The most popular attraction at Dade City?s Wild Things weighs in at eight pounds and loves to make his voice heard. Tony the tiger is still a cub. He pounces around his enclosure playing with his toys and he loves his bottle.

Tony also likes to take a dip in his pool and anyone willing to pay a fee can swim with him.

"If you come and encounter little Tony now when he's a baby, you can come back in a few years when he is full grown and tell people, 'I swam with that guy,'? said Randy Stearns, an animal handler at Dade City?s Wild Things.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission says cubs like Tony can have full contact with visitors until they reach 25 pounds.

"It's about 30 minutes and what you get to do is come out and play with the tiger cub," Stearns said. "You get to spend some time on the land playing with them and running around. Sometimes, he'll take his bottle so, you get to feed him. And, you actually get to get in the water with him."


Tony is not the only one who cools off in the pool. There is also Ally the alligator who hosts her own pool parties. Guests get to swim with Ally while her mouth is taped shut. :huh:

The experience is similar to the pool parties offered by Alligator Attraction in Johns Pass. In both instances, a handler is present.

"We make sure all of the things are in line, plus a keeper is always present within reach at all times,? said Kathy Stearns, who owns Dade City?s Wild Things. "So, it's perfectly safe and perfectly legal."

The FWC says it is investigating the gator swim at Dade City?s Wild Things just like it did at Alligator Attraction.

As for Tony the tiger, when he reaches 25 pounds he will have to be restrained when interacting with visitors according to FWC guidelines.

Dade City?s Wild Things charges $200 for a 30 minute tiger cub swim. Gator swims are a $100 for 20 minutes.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will this make the cub less likely to turn on humans since they've grown up around them?

Sadly enough, probably not. If they start to feed him red meat, or due to his size he inadvertantly hurts someone and gets a taste for blood, thats pretty much it. I love tigers, and lions, but that would be the only reason I wouldn't ever want to be around one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will this make the cub less likely to turn on humans since they've grown up around them?

I would hope -- but humans have a way of beating the innocence out of children -- human or otherwise. :ermm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will this make the cub less likely to turn on humans since they've grown up around them?

actually this could make it more likely with so much attention from humans he can develop "angry man syndrome" which is basically an identity conflict he may become confused with who and what he is? is he human? how can he be human? we stand on two? he walks on four? and it will drive him mad and hostel ... happened to an emu I once knew...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Fiza Ali
      Argo AI will now provide free rides in California in its autonomous vehicles
      by Fiza Ali

      Argo AI, the autonomous vehicle technology start-up backed by VW and Ford, has received a permit in California that will enable it to offer free rides in its self-driving vehicles on public roads of the state.

      According to the approved application, the Drivered AV pilot permit was issued by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) at the start of July. The news was posted on the start-up's website over a week after Ford and Argo announced plans to launch at least 1000 self-driving vehicles on the ride-hailing network of Lyft in several cities over the course of coming five years, beginning the initiative in Austin and Miami.

      Since 2019, Argo has been putting its autonomous vehicle technology in Ford vehicles to test around Palo Alto. For now, the test fleet of the company in California consists of almost a dozen self-driving test vehicles, along with autonomous test vehicles in Detroit, Pittsburg, Washington D.C., Austin, and Miami.

      Waymo, Zoox, Voyage, Pony.ai, Deeproute, Cruise, AutoX, and Aurora have also landed permits to take part in the Drivered Autonomous Vehicle Passenger Service Pilot program of the California Public Utilities Commission which still requires a human safety operator to be behind the wheel. All those companies which have this permit cannot charge for rides.

      The state necessitates that companies navigate a series of regulatory hurdles from the California Department of Motor Vehicles and the CPUC before they can be allowed to charge for rides in driverless robotaxis.

      Source: TechCrunch | Image via Ford

    • By Ather Fawaz
      Nuro approved to become the first driverless delivery service in California
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via Nuro Nuro, the autonomous delivery startup, has obtained the first-ever approval from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to launch driverless services in the state. The milestone achievement makes Nuro the first company to receive approval of this kind, ahead of companies like GM and Amazon who have only received testing approvals for their bids in the same technology thus far.

      Following the approval, Nuro can now start autonomous routine deliveries of food, beverages, medicine, and other products in California. The firm states that it will soon begin operating commercially on California roads in two counties—Santa Clara and San Mateo— near its headquarters in the Bay Area with an established partner. The company stated in a blog post:

      Service will start off with a fleet of Toyota Prius vehicles in fully autonomous mode before the company eventually deploys its custom-built electric R2 vehicles. Nuro accentuated that safety is the primary concern for its vehicles, stating that the "R2 was purposefully engineered for safety, with a design that prioritizes what’s outside — the people with whom we share the roads — over what’s inside." As such, deliveries can only occur during good weather conditions, and the vehicles will be limited to a maximum of 25mph (~40km/h).

    • By zikalify
      Voters in California say gig economy drivers are contractors
      by Paul Hill

      While most people’s attention has been on the Presidential election, voters in California got to vote on something called Proposition 22 too. It asked voters whether app-based drivers should continue to be classified as contractors or whether they should be considered employees and gain extra rights; 58.42% said they should continue to be classified as contractors while 41.58% were in favour of changing their status.

      Unsurprisingly, the big tech firms with a stake in the measure such as Uber, Lyft, Instacart and DoorDash backed the bid to classify workers as contractors. The firms were so invested in keeping their costs low, in fact, that they invested more than $200 million, which is a record, trying to convince people to vote in their favour.

      Drivers and unions were hoping the public would vote the other way. Nicole Moore, a driver and organiser at Rideshare Drivers United, said that tech firms outspent the competition by 20:1 but ultimately, the decision will not stop workers and unions from demanding better working conditions. Had drivers been classified as employees, they would have been eligible for the minimum wage, unemployment benefits, and health insurance.

      While the result is not what a lot of drivers wanted, Proposition 22 still requires some concessions from the likes of Uber and Lyft. They will have to provide some benefits such as vouchers to access subsidised health insurance and guarantee hourly earnings. The companies will also bolster safety by performing more background checks on drivers.

      Source: The Guardian

    • By zikalify
      Global Privacy Control is a new initiative to help people enforce their rights
      by Paul Hill

      Several companies and individuals have today launched the Global Privacy Control (GPC), an initiative that seeks to help users enforce their rights under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The backers say that the new rights mean nothing if it's too difficult for people to benefit from them.

      Those backing the Global Privacy Control include Ashkan Soltani from Georgetown Law, Sebastian Zimmeck from Wesleyan University, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Financial Times, Automattic (WordPress.com and Tumblr), Glitch, DuckDuckGo, Brave, Mozilla, Disconnect, Abine, Digital Content Next (DCN), Consumer Reports, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

      The GPC’s backers said that the CCPA gives Californians a legal right to opt-out of the sale of their data, they can do this by having their browser signal to businesses that they’ve opted out. Unfortunately, there’s no defined or accepted technical standard for these signals so users don’t have an easy way to inform businesses of their preferences.

      The group has launched an experimental phase where people can download browsers and extensions from Abine, Brave, Disconnect, DuckDuckGo, and EFF in order to tell participating publishers that they do not want their data to be shared. Going forward, those behind GPC want to develop an open standard that many organisations can finally support; they’re now in the process of finding the best venue to make this proposal.

      The GPC’s backers said they look forward to working with California’s Attorney General to make the GPC legally binding under CCPA. In addition, they’re looking to make the GPC applicable under other laws around the world such as the GDPR.