Windows 8 SP1: What We Hope To See


Recommended Posts

I agree completely with the article, my biggest problem with windows 8 is that it's a solid evidence for how "modern UI" and computing is going in the direction of dumbing down everything for the sake of making it simple. A good UI, IMO, is the one that achieves the balance between having too much options (like most of linux DEs) and providing too basic options and restricting customization. (like Metro/Modern UI).

Compared to mobile interfaces Windows 8 has pretty good amount of options (on the "Modern UI" side) but on a desktop it's absolutely pathetic; you can't use custom titles backgrounds without hacks for example. Imagine having to use an external application and various hacks to edit a shortcut icon. That's how limiting windows 8 interface is, and if this is the future, then the future of computing is quite bleak.

Wait what?

You can do everything on 8 that you can do in 7, and even more.

Have you even used 8?

Wait what?

You can do everything on 8 that you can do in 7, and even more.

Have you even used 8?

Yes, I have used it. I meant Modern UI of windows 8. Which, obviously, is going to be the UI that Microsoft continues developing in the future much more than the legacy desktop. Windows 8 Modern UI indicates the direction microsoft is taking for UI, the fact that desktop is still there doesn't change anything about it.

I like Windows 8, Modern Apps, and Surface. But I won't insult the intelligence of experienced users who have long, well organized, efficient Start menus in Windows 7.

For that type of usage, Windows 8 is clumsy and inefficient. It's no secret Metro does not handle long lists well at all and there are no nested folders whatsoever. I myself, don't pin much to the start menu because after 1 screen, it becomes clumsy and cumbersome to use.

I believe the reason MS de-unified the search is to try to hide the major flaw in the Metro UI. Cannot handle long lists, period.

Compromises had to be made. I think it is an acceptable compromise but won't pretend the issue doesn't exist.

Yes, I have used it. I meant Modern UI of windows 8. Which, obviously, is going to be the UI that Microsoft continues developing in the future much more than the legacy desktop. Windows 8 Modern UI indicates the direction microsoft is taking for UI, the fact that desktop is still there doesn't change anything about it.

That entire statement makes no sense.

You basically are saying, 'Ignore everything that I want you to ignore and then my point makes sense.'

I'm sorry but things don't work that way. Metro is there for the purpose of giving you fast access to the personal side of things. The desktop is there to give you access to legacy and power user scenarios.

If I weren't so tired I would pop out an apt analogy for why this is ridiculous.

the future of computing is quite bleak.

It isn't. Computing will continue in new ways, more profitable than ever, too. And that's all there is to computing (or anything, for that matter) - profit. Mobile systems have opened eyes and opened wallets. As for people - now it is what it was meant to be all along - simple and so that it just works (or dumbed-down, if you prefer - I do). It is why OS X has kept itself at least a little bit relevant and why desktop Linux has failed so many times - it's not simple and it doesn't just work. It's trying to now, but the train has left the station now that Windows has finally become simple, too.

Bleak for a certain kind, including me and, it looks like, you, indeed. We will be an irrelevant minority. But the computing will live on.

This post reflect the opinions of many, I'm very sure... problem is that MS is even intending to go away with the so called Service Packs, entering to an era of apple-esque os selling: pay little for our os but with more os releases.

That entire statement makes no sense.

You basically are saying, 'Ignore everything that I want you to ignore and then my point makes sense.'

I'm sorry but things don't work that way. Metro is there for the purpose of giving you fast access to the personal side of things. The desktop is there to give you access to legacy and power user scenarios.

If I weren't so tired I would pop out an apt analogy for why this is ridiculous.

Metro is not created to complement desktop, desktop is there for backward compatibility, nothing more, nothing less. If it did complement it we wouldn't have that much duplicate and overlapping features (two IEs, two different ways to switch opened applications, desktop applications being in taskbar and metro apps being in the "hot corner" gesture) and seriously, how faster would accessing a website would be for me If I used metro IE than the normal desktop IE? Nothing. I thought it was obvious that windows 8 is the transition between old and new. A way to make users familiar with the Modern UI so it becomes the default UI completely one day with no awkward transition to desktop on doing some tasks, that what always happens with windows development.

This post reflect the opinions of many, I'm very sure... problem is that MS is even intending to go away with the so called Service Packs, entering to an era of apple-esque os selling: pay little for our os but with more os releases.

I believe MS has indicated constant incremental updates would replace Service Packs, not new OS releases. With persistent Internet connections, this is quite viable and preferable IMO. Why wait for a SP?

User Interface

Let?s face it. The Windows 8 user interface is a complete disaster. I realize that some of you ? my tech-savvy colleagues, included ? are perfectly willing to write off Microsoft? inclusion of Metro/the ?Modern UI?/the ?new Windows user interface?/whatever the heck Microsoft?s calling it nowadays. I respect that opinion as a tech-savvy individual myself. But even though Metro is just a big, out of control search tool that you can theoretically ignore if you just want that classic Windows 7 look and feel, it?s just not good enough.

It?s not good enough because average people ? and don?t take my word for it, consider the surveys ? are being overly confused by Microsoft?s decision to slap a tablet (or smartphone) OS onto Windows 8 for desktops and laptops. So much so, that they

on their desktops.

The solution? Microsoft needs to refine the user interface, period. And this can take a number of forms. The most obvious solution is treating Metro the way it was meant to be designed: as a supplement to the ?core? Windows 7 operating system rather than a botched attempt at a primary UI. Let users boot into the desktop if they want. Give them their Start button back. Give them the option of restricting Metro?s interface to Metro apps only, which also solves the irritating issue of installed apps filling Windows 8?s new user interface full of crappy tiles.

I don?t really have any good suggestions for dealing with the ?bars? found in Windows 8, nor do I think Microsoft would be all that willing to abandon its Charms. It?s unfortunate that Windows 8 comes with two disparate settings menus ? at the very least, a link from PC Settings to the Control Panel, and vice versa, would be a pleasant touch. As for Share, well, that?s still fussy depending on the kind of content you?re actually trying to show off to others. Caveat emptor.

A complete disaster? According to who? I honestly cannot understand this point of view. Not liking the look of something is one thing (that is pure opinion) but claiming the usability is worse is just stupid - IT ISN'T. Also...yet again some idiot (the article writer, not you) posts that ridiculous video of the old man using Windows 8. But of course they COMPLETELY IGNORE the fact that the video is edited to make a point. What the entire video ACTUALLY shows is that after a short time using Windows 8 that guy's dad learns how to use it quite easily. As for the settings - they do need improvement. All settings should be duplicated across both Metro and desktop environments (well...no reason really for desktop only settings need to be exposed through the Metro settings but most things should live in both places).

Mr. Gorbachev, Tear Down This (App) Wall

Why Metro doesn?t talk to Windows 8?s Desktop Mode, and why Windows 8?s Desktop Mode doesn?t talk to Metro, we?ll never know. Or, rather, we?ll never know the reason why Microsoft didn?t do everything in its power to break down the wall between the two halves of Windows 8 ? for apps, that is.

Windows 8 currently makes you run two browsers (one for the normal desktop and the other for Metro).

Here?s the confusing bit. If you go to load Internet Explorer, the Metro app, it doesn?t match up with the desktop-based version of Internet Explorer in the slightest. The same holds true for Google?s Chrome, or just about any other app that happens to have both Metro and Desktop versions on Windows 8. What you end up getting are two completely different experiences within ? arguably ? identical applications: Your tabs in one don?t match your tabs in the other, among other synchronization problems.

Whether this is a Windows issue or a development issue, Microsoft needs to make it easier for apps found on the two parts of its operating system to get along. And while we?re at it, let?s get a fix for the ?Can?t load Metro-based browser unless it?s set to be your default browser? issue. I?m not a huge Internet Explorer fan, but there?s absolutely no way I?m going to even be able to use Internet Explorer in Metro the minute I set another browser as my default. In some cases, maybe I?d like to ? or need to ? use IE. Why send me off to the desktop if you don?t need to, Microsoft?

Desktop doesn't "Talk" to the Metro environment because Metro apps live in a sandbox. They can only communicate through the Windows 8 contracts. This is for security reasons and like it or not will never change. HOWEVER. What he is explaining about Google Chrome has NOTHING to do with desktop apps not talking to Metro apps. It sounds like what he is expecting is the metro and desktop instance to be the same process? Once again, this cannot and will never happen. Perhaps though he is only arguing that it should sync tabs between both instances. Maybe it should, but I would ask what the hell he is doing running the desktop and Metro browsers at the same time? If you are on a desktop/laptop use the desktop version, if you are on a tablet use the Metro version.

Improved Metro Apps

I realize that Microsoft has the capacity to upgrade Windows Store apps as it sees fit, so there?s really no compelling reason to wait until the release of Windows 8 SP1 to do so. Even though we did point out the best Windows 8 apps out there, it sure does feel as if users are beta testing the most basic functionally Microsoft can see fit to release right about now.

Let's get more and better apps on there!

Let?s run through the quick laundry list. Mail app? A joke. Calendar? Doesn?t even integrate with the Mail app ? a peanut butter and jelly combination here one tastes a little bit awkward on its own but, together, make for a compelling meal. People? A complete nightmare of a contact list for anyone realistically looking to make edits on a semi-mass scale to the imported personas. Store? Make this app a live tile! Have it tell users when they need to jump in and upgrade their apps! SkyDrive? Kind of a pain in the butt to operate, at least compared to the ease that is the conventional Windows File Explorer. Messaging? Where are all the other supported services, let alone any of the other features one could find in a simple messaging app like, say, Trillian?

The list goes on. Microsoft needs to kick some spice into its Metro apps which, right now, make Web apps even look preferable to what Windows 8 has to offer. Take the apps off newbie mode, Microsoft: Give us some advanced functionality in SP1.

The apps will come. This has nothing to do with a service pack request. As time goes on there will be more and better apps, that is all there is to say about that. I do have an issue with hiss complaints about the stock mail, etc. apps. They are just like any other mobile app. WTF is he expecting? If he wants fully functional programs use the desktop version. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

As for the Store - it is a live tile that does tell you when updates are available. It could be updated to tell you which apps specifically have updates ready but my god that is really nitpicking for complaints at this point.

Increased Customization

Metro, by default, restricts your ability to add, change, or modify just about anything within the UI ? save the pretty background picture and the colors (see our Windows 8 tips guide). Why not open that up? Microsoft could be doing users a great service by giving them additional options to configure Metro?s column-and-row UI as they see fit.

This could include, but isn?t limited to: Changing the raw shape of Metro?s tiles themselves (maybe you?re a circle kind of a person); building in an easy means for developers to create live tiles or beautiful icons to use as their tiles and reducing the disparity between Windows Store Apps? prettier tiles and the uglier tiles of Desktop apps you install outside of the Store; giving users the ability to define the size and shape of columns as they see fit; giving users scrollable columns (Stardock's Fences, anyone?).

And, the biggie: Giving users some kind of method for selecting which of an installed app?s shortcuts they actually want Windows to make into tiles instead of defaulting to ?everything.? Even better, it would be great to have some kind of automated means for dumping certain tiles into previously established Metro columns instead of just some huge, default chunk. Perhaps Windows there could be some way to flag a program as a ?game? as a part of its installation routine, which would then allow Windows 8 to dump the program?s official tile into a ?Games? column that a user has already set up ? something like that.

There?s really no reason why Windows 8 users should have to turn to registry hacks or the freeware world just to be able to increase their control over their Metro experience. Let users experience Metro how they prefer to do so, not how Microsoft prefers them to do so.

They aren't going to let you make the tiles circle, this is perhaps the most absurd this I read in this article. I agree customization is always better - I have disabled the transparent charms bar hint that pops up when you hover your mouse in one corner. His complaints about the icons that get created on the start screen are a valid one - Visual Studio is among the worst offenders (even then it took about 10 seconds to remove them). However, while his wish to let the user choose which group an item's tile is placed is a good idea, it could only be done if: 1. Microsoft provided a mechanism for doing so. and 2. App developers updated their install routines to utilize it. No old application (we are talking every application currently in existence) could perform it, and Microsoft couldn't do it automatically because application and installer development on Windows is the furthest thing from standardized.

Metro is not created to complement desktop, desktop is there for backward compatibility, nothing more, nothing less. If it did complement it we wouldn't have that much duplicate and overlapping features (two IEs, two different ways to switch opened applications, desktop applications being in taskbar and metro apps being in the "hot corner" gesture) and seriously, how faster would accessing a website would be for me If I used metro IE than the normal desktop IE? Nothing. I thought it was obvious that windows 8 is the transition between old and new. A way to make users familiar with the Modern UI so it becomes the default UI completely one day with no awkward transition to desktop on doing some tasks, that what always happens with windows development.

I didn't say Metro was there to complement desktop. I said that both exist. I said that there's nothing that in 7 that you can't do on 8.

Both exist, and both work and accomplish the purpose that they were created to accomplish. Desktop is there for the power users and legacy (see I said legacy which refers to backwards compatibility) and Metro is there for the personal side of things.

The Metro Start Screen is an app launcher, notification center, and basic command center on steroids. It's there to let you start anything you want to start, see all of the notifications for things that are important to you, and allow you to take care of the basic maintenance tasks for the PC.

The desktop is there to provide users with back-compat for existing apps, power user tools, and a familiar interface for those who are going to take a while to get acclimated to the newer Start Screen experience.

So yes in a way they do complement each other...but I never claimed that the Start Screen was created to compliment the desktop.

How about mini tiles like WP8?

You can already make them smaller, but I suppose even smaller ones would be nice. There is a fair amount of wasted space. I would prefer nested tiles which would be a major upgrade.

I didn't say Metro was there to complement desktop. I said that both exist. I said that there's nothing that in 7 that you can't do on 8.

Both exist, and both work and accomplish the purpose that they were created to accomplish. Desktop is there for the power users and legacy (see I said legacy which refers to backwards compatibility) and Metro is there for the personal side of things.

The Metro Start Screen is an app launcher, notification center, and basic command center on steroids. It's there to let you start anything you want to start, see all of the notifications for things that are important to you, and allow you to take care of the basic maintenance tasks for the PC.

The desktop is there to provide users with back-compat for existing apps, power user tools, and a familiar interface for those who are going to take a while to get acclimated to the newer Start Screen experience.

So yes in a way they do complement each other...but I never claimed that the Start Screen was created to compliment the desktop.

The question is: Do you think Microsoft will continue developing "desktop" as it was during the releases before windows 8? don't you think it will be considered legacy one day and to be replaced by non other than a Metro-ified UI? Not now, not soon, but in the future?

Metro is not created to complement desktop, desktop is there for backward compatibility, nothing more, nothing less. If it did complement it we wouldn't have that much duplicate and overlapping features (two IEs, two different ways to switch opened applications, desktop applications being in taskbar and metro apps being in the "hot corner" gesture) and seriously, how faster would accessing a website would be for me If I used metro IE than the normal desktop IE? Nothing. I thought it was obvious that windows 8 is the transition between old and new. A way to make users familiar with the Modern UI so it becomes the default UI completely one day with no awkward transition to desktop on doing some tasks, that what always happens with windows development.

As much as it 'looks like' Microsoft will go in that direction, as much as you think it's 'obvious'. No, it isn't. There's still plenty of people of people (businesses) that rely on backwards compatibility. And on the day that nobody needs backwards compatibility anymore... how relevant will your complaint be that the desktop doesn't exist?

The question is: Do you think Microsoft will continue developing "desktop" as it was during the releases before windows 8? don't you think it will be considered legacy one day and to be replaced by non other than a Metro-ified UI? Not now, not soon, but in the future?

I think Microsoft will continue developing the OS in whatever direction makes the most sense from a business and usability perspective.

I think they will continue developing the desktop side of things for the foreseeable future, but not from the releases before 8, but from what they've done in 8.

The desktop in 8 isn't the same as the desktop in 7. They are a good number of changes there. Statements are why I question if you've used 8 since it seems you don't know that the desktop itself has been changed from the 7 version in several ways. You don't take the time to really rework an interface that you're planning on killing in the near future. ;)

The question is: Do you think Microsoft will continue developing "desktop" as it was during the releases before windows 8? don't you think it will be considered legacy one day and to be replaced by non other than a Metro-ified UI? Not now, not soon, but in the future?

In the future, we probably won't have the desktop anymore because we won't need it.

We need the desktop now because there are still programs we want to run on it. That's why we're complaining. But complaining about the future using our current computing standards as a guideline is a broken argument. Nobody knows the future.

In the future, we probably won't have the desktop anymore because we won't need it.

We need the desktop now because there are still programs we want to run on it. That's why we're complaining. But complaining about the future using our current computing standards as a guideline is a broken argument. Nobody knows the future.

This is definitely true, but what I'm complaining about is the whole unified UI direction Microsoft is taking with windows, If I want to have a modern (as in recent, bleeding-edge) and functional UI for your desktop computer that makes use of the large screen and designed for the precise method of input of using a mouse there won't be any if Microsoft continued going this direction.

Legacy applications will be adapted to the same direction MS is taking when they are moved into the new platform. And desktop users will have to adjust to a UI that's not designed for their machines specific strengths. It's a like a console port of a game, would it work on your pc? yes. You wouldn't "need" mouse-friendly menus or controls, but you are going to have to adapt to something that is not efficient at all.

I think Microsoft will continue developing the OS in whatever direction makes the most sense from a business and usability perspective.

I think they will continue developing the desktop side of things for the foreseeable future, but not from the releases before 8, but from what they've done in 8.

The desktop in 8 isn't the same as the desktop in 7. They are a good number of changes there. Statements are why I question if you've used 8 since it seems you don't know that the desktop itself has been changed from the 7 version in several ways. You don't take the time to really rework an interface that you're planning on killing in the near future. ;)

I know there are plenty of new features added to desktop in 8, but I believe they are simply there because they have to provide something for the users so they wouldn't think that 8 is modern UI just thrown together with windows 7. Gradually, by time, I expect this attention to lower. I don't have a crystal ball. But it just makes sense to me (apparently only me :p)

Nobody knows the future.

Some do. Some make that future at this very moment. Different for each of us, but they do.

As for Microsoft planning to develop things in one way or the other - I say with complete confidence that Windows 8 (except the number) was not on any of their roadmaps as little as 3 years ago. It proved to be the right decision now, given the circumstances, but we'd never know that it was if Microsoft hadn't made it - instead we'd be fighting another Superbar vs Quick Launch war, or whatever new thing they'd think up.

Tech people are susceptible to suggestion from the overlords as much as everyone else. Sometimes even more, because we're closer to them.

You can already make them smaller, but I suppose even smaller ones would be nice. There is a fair amount of wasted space. I would prefer nested tiles which would be a major upgrade.

Yeah I'm talking about mini tiles like this: (The teal ones in the 1st pic.)

post-447111-0-54656300-1351975293.jpg

Yes, I have used it. I meant Modern UI of windows 8. Which, obviously, is going to be the UI that Microsoft continues developing in the future much more than the legacy desktop. Windows 8 Modern UI indicates the direction microsoft is taking for UI, the fact that desktop is still there doesn't change anything about it.

Point is, the UI doesn't change the compatability of apps

XBOX Movies with greater support for tagged files, The recent update lets it pull the release year form the files metadata doing the same for genre while allowing the files to be grouped by metadata properties instead of just a to z would be good and a right click > synopsis metadata viewer would be even better.

Oh and timed text subtitle support

53e21591.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
    • is that a personal preference? whether it is or isn't, i get where you're coming from. i try to get and use fully open sourced applications whenever i can but there are instances where i find a superior product that is closed sourced. in these cases i do my best to learn about the company, who operates it, their background, parent and sub structure etc. to some extent, depending on "the smell test". i really believe that Syncback is really and truly something great. even if you don't use it, it's always worth a recommendation to someone else, especially if that someone else is not very computer literate. for someone of your calibre you, you'll manage just fine with Syncthing, no doubt about it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!