Recommended Posts

First test flight is next summer from Vandenberg AFB. They just finished the F9/F9-R/FH pad there, and there will be a landing site for returning reusable stages.

All 3 stages fire at launch, with the core stage throttled back, and the side boosters separate at about Mach 6-10 (6 if the side boosters fly back and land like F9-R). Before they separate extra fuel enters the core stage to fill it up, allowing it to continue with a full load. This is known as "CrossFeed", something proposed years ago but not fully implemented. Not to this degree.

After the core runs dry it falls away and the restartsble MVacD upper stage fires, perhaps several times to drop sats in diffrrent orbits or loft a 53 mT payload (>2x Delta IV Heavy or Shuttle - more than the mass of a fully loaded 737-200) to ofbit. MVacD is a MUCH larger upper stage than on the now retired Falcon 9 v1.0.

Until SLS flies (if it flies) FH will be the heaviest launcher in the world. By far. It'll have about 3.9-4.0 million lbf of thrust.

After FH is operational they start on the core stage of their next monster - a methane-fueled super-heavy that'll lift 150-200 mT.

This early promo video from the announcement is all they've published so far, but more should be coming soon.

Sounds like they need a pad for a really-big-rocket if they're bidding on a former Saturn V / Shuttle pad

http://www.spacenews.com/article/civil-space/36230no-contest-for-pad-39a-spacex-appears-to-be-only-bidder#.UeBov7-9LTp

No Contest for Pad 39A? SpaceX Appears To Be Only Bidder

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) appears to be the only company that put in a proposal to NASA to take over one of the space shuttle?s mothballed launch pads at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida.

NASA declined to comment on how many bids it received in response to a solicitation that closed on July 5, but a survey of U.S. launch companies by SpaceNews shows only SpaceX saying it put in a proposal to take over Launch Complex 39A.

United Launch Alliance, which flies the Delta and Atlas rockets, and ATK, which has been developing a shuttle-derived launcher called Liberty, said they passed on the Pad 39A solicitation.

Orbital Sciences Corp., which this year completed the first test flight of its new Antares rocket to fly cargo to the international space station, launches from Wallops Island, Va. Company spokesman Barry Beneski said he did not know of any plans to expand to Florida.

Likewise passing is Space Florida, the state-backed economic development agency that has been selected to take over operations and develop the shuttle?s runway for commercial operations.

NASA is looking for a commercial partner to lease Pad 39A, and intends to keep the second shuttle launch pad, 39B, for its heavy-lift Space Launch System. The design for 39B also would accommodate commercial users.

California-based SpaceX already flies its Falcon 9 rockets from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, located just south of Kennedy Space Center, and is preparing for launch of its first rocket from a newly developed site at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

The company has been on the hunt for a third site, preferably one that would be overseen by the Federal Aviation Administration, not NASA or the military. An environmental assessment of a potential site in Texas is under way.

Documents posted on NASA?s solicitation website shows the agency wants to have a commercial operator for Pad 39A in place by Oct. 1, 2013, when funding for maintenance is slated for termination.

Another Very Loud Noise acceptance test from Falcon 9 v1.1 -

Waco Tribune....

Rain and SpaceX thunder

I'd thought the weather would preclude testing at SpaceX's McGregor site today ? but on the other hand, they've now confirmed they can fire the first stage during a gap in the rain.

I haven't heard back from SpaceX yet, but the rumble that matched the usual SpaceX-test noise started at around 7:41 pm Sunday and lasted around three minutes ? which is the duration a Falcon 9 first stage usually fires during an ascent. The previous test ? which lasted at least two minutes, but how much longer than that is unknown ? was on July 4.

(There had been some Twitter discussion the last few days on whether the first stage would burn for a shorter time on missions where SpaceX wanted to reuse it ? that's what the R in "Falcon 9-R" stands for, after all ? and I don't honestly know whether this settles that question.)

Lotsa good tidbits today!

Elon Musk ‏@elonmusk

Just completed full mission duration firing of next gen Falcon 9 booster. V proud of the boost stage team for overcoming many tough issues.

And on the F9-R front -

QuoteBernard ?@_Balefire_

@elonmusk How do you guys plan grasshopper re-entry and landing from space? Nose first then swivel closer to ground :? How do you slow down?

Elon Musk ?@elonmusk

@_Balefire_ Hard to properly answer in 140 chars, but I can say that it stays engines down thru whole descent profile

Bernard ?@_Balefire_

@elonmusk Very interesting, will you need a disposable cone protecting against re entry (aero) on base or can the nozzles take it? Dankie!!!

Elon Musk ?@elonmusk

@_Balefire_ nozzles are designed to handle extreme loads. Should be able to handle max Q on reentry without protection.

Tobias Vandenbempt ?@TobiasVdb

@elonmusk How much % extra fuel would you need to make a landing like grasshopper? Is the entire braking procedure by firing trusters?

Elon Musk ?@elonmusk

@TobiasVdb Yes, it is a purely propulsive landing, but using the huge landing gear A frames as air brakes. Landing prop < 5% of vehicle mass

SpaceX chief of propulsion Tom Mueller said during a presentation at the Joint Propulsion Conference in San Jose that the F9 v1.1 / CASSIOPE first stage will be shipped to Vandenberg next week, and the second stage will be shipped a week later. Targeted launch date is September 5.

Also, talk about Very Loud Tests!!

http:/wacotrib.com/news/business/spacex-gets-mcgregor-approval-to-test-falcon-heavy/article_d3b00845-1c78-55f2-9533-fde5282475c6.html

SpaceX gets McGregor approval to test Falcon Heavy

The city of McGregor has amended its lease with SpaceX to allow the company to test ?future technologies? at McGregor?s industrial park ? including possibly the Falcon Heavy, which reportedly will become the world?s most powerful private rocket ? city and SpaceX officials confirmed.

?The basic change is that more thrust will be allowed than under the original lease,? McGregor City Manager Kevin Evans said.

SpaceX and McGregor also reached on agreement on how late crews can perform rocket tests, some of which can be heard for miles.

Tests on the Falcon Heavy would have to end by sunset, while those of the Falcon 9 could continue until 10 p.m., two hours earlier than the previous deadline of midnight.

With 3.8 million pounds of thrust at liftoff, the Falcon Heavy will have the ability to carry satellites or interplanetary spacecraft weighing more than 53 metric tons to low Earth orbit.

That is nearly twice the payload of NASA?s space shuttle, whose use has drawn to a close.

SpaceX communications director Christina Ra would not say when testing of the Falcon Heavy would begin, calling it a ?proprietary matter.?

But the California-based company already has landed its first customer ? Intelsat, a Washington, D.C.-based provider of satellite services worldwide ? for the new rocket.

Ra, in a phone interview, said SpaceX wanted more options at its McGregor-based Rocket Motor Testing Zone ?because it is our main rocket facility with an ever-growing footprint. There are a lot of projects, future technologies, that we will be working on there.?

Evans said SpaceX employs more than 200 people at its complex in McGregor, a figure that Ra confirmed.

SpaceX in recent weeks has been testing the Falcon 9-R ? a next-generation version of the company?s Falcon 9 rocket, with the ?R? standing for reusable ? in a series of louder-than-normal firings that began in May. The company also has been testing individual engines for the Dragon orbiter and Falcon rockets.

The Falcon 9 has nine Merlin engines in its first stage, while the Heavy will have three nine-engine cores, Ra said.

Like the Falcon 9 ? which made it to orbit in an October 2012 despite losing an engine ? the Heavy is designed to tolerate the failure of several engines and still complete its mission, according to the SpaceX website. A disabled engine is shut down and the remaining engines compensate for it.

?Anticipating potential astronaut transport needs, the Heavy also is designed to meet NASA human (safety) rating standards,? SpaceX reports.

The Falcon Heavy will have commercial, civil and national security applications, Ra said, adding that customers will pay $81 million to $135 million per launch, depending on the weight of the payload and the rocket?s destination.

That is about twice the price of a Falcon 9 launch, Ra said.

On Sunday, SpaceX test fired the core stage of the next-generation Falcon 9-R rocket that will be used to launch Canada?s CASSIOPE space weather satellite in September from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., Ra confirmed in an email.

She said the Falcon 9 will have the same updated design on all flights moving forward, including continued supply trips to the International Space Station by the company?s Dragon cargo ship under a contract with NASA.

SpaceX also is flying its Grasshopper rocket as a testbed for technology in the Falcon 9-R, whose stages are eventually planned to return to the launch site for reuse instead of becoming space junk or breaking up as they re-enter the Earth?s atmosphere.

Company founder and CEO Elon Musk has said that early Falcon 9-R launches will test that return capability by trying to bring the first stage back to an ocean splashdown.

SpaceX has signed a three-year lease for land and facilities at Spaceport America near Las Cruces, N.M., for higher and farther Grasshopper flights, but also will continue Grasshopper tests in McGregor.

Payload fairing tests are done -

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=41201

SpaceX Testing Complete at NASA Glenn's Renovated Facility

CLEVELAND - How loud is 166 decibels? It's about as loud as the thrust of 20 jet engines or a rock concert with 36,000 speakers. It's also the level of noise some spacecraft experience when launched and is now the highest level of noise that can be produced in the Reverberant Acoustic Test Facility (RATF) located at NASA Glenn Research Center's Plum Brook Station in Sandusky, Ohio.

For the first time in the RATF, spaceflight components were subjected to these high noise levels to determine if they would withstand acoustic reverberations during launch or launch aborts. Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) completed testing on a 5.2-meter fairing for its Falcon 9 rocket in the RATF and Plum Brook's Space Power Facility (SPF) vacuum chamber this summer. The tests confirmed the fairing could withstand the harsh conditions associated with space travel.

According to Glenn's director, Jim Free, "The SpaceX fairing tests prove the Space Power Facility can enable strong commercial space transportation capabilities and other missions. The facility is now ready to provide vibroacoustic test capabilities and one-stop space environmental testing for space vehicles."

Glenn's Plum Brook Station is unrivaled in its space environment simulation test capabilities. The SPF combines the world's largest vacuum chamber and the world's most powerful low-frequency mechanical vibration test stand. With the recently-added acoustic test chamber, SPF has become the world's most powerful simulator of noise levels experienced during launch.

"While we're focused on rapid innovation, SpaceX's first priority is always to get our customers' payloads safely to orbit," said Elon Musk, SpaceX CEO and chief designer. "Testing at Plum Brook enabled simulation of some unique flight conditions, furthering what we are able to do on the ground to ensure flight success."

With collaborations like Glenn's work with SpaceX to test its fairing, NASA is growing America's commercial space industry and, at the same time, taking steps to explore farther into our solar system and beyond.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • PDF-XChange Editor 11.0.1.0 by Razvan Serea PDF-XChange Editor is a comprehensive PDF editor that allows you to create, view, edit, annotate, and digitally sign PDF documents with ease. With advanced features like OCR, document security, and PDF optimization, PDF-XChange Editor is a powerful tool for both personal and professional use. Whether you need to edit text, images, or links, or add comments, stamps, or watermarks, PDF-XChange Editor provides all the necessary tools to make your PDFs look perfect. Additionally, it supports a wide range of file formats, including PDF, XPS, and DOCX, making it easy to convert and share your documents. PDF-XChange Editor key features: Edit text and images in PDF documents Add and remove pages from PDF files Annotate and markup PDFs with comments, highlights, and stamps Use OCR to convert scanned documents into searchable text Create and fill out PDF forms Sign and certify PDF documents digitally Add and edit hyperlinks within PDFs Extract text and images from PDF files Batch process multiple PDF files at once Customize the interface to your preferences Work with multiple documents in tabs Convert PDFs to other formats such as Word, Excel, and HTML Use advanced redaction tools to permanently remove sensitive information Add customizable headers and footers to PDFs Merge multiple PDF documents into a single file Split PDF documents into multiple files Add watermarks to PDF documents Use the measurement tools to calculate distances and areas in PDFs ....and much more PDF-XChange Editor 11.0.1.0 changelog: Fixed a crash in the new Open/Save dialog box when creating a new folder in an unavailable network path. (49552) Fixed a rare/infrequent crash on some dynamic XFA forms after changing their field values. [installer] Fixed an issue where shortcuts were lost during an upgrade from the previous version. [installer] Fixed an issue preventing migration of serial keys during updates from version 10. Fixed the issues with the shell context menu after installation of version 11. Fixed the issue with filtering comments. (49478) Fixed the issue that caused "Error [IO subsystem]: Invalid access mode." when converting PDFs to MS Office formats. Fixed an issue with the context menu position on some multi-monitor systems. (48467) Fixed an issue with handling complex custom file filters, displayed by JS, in the new Open/Save Files dialog box. (49486) Fixed several issues with the new 'Select Folder' dialog box. (49505) Fixed an issue with the new custom 'Open File' dialog box when using double-click to open it. (49498) Fixed an 'infinite' loop/proliferation in the 'Open Files' and 'Manage Places' dialog boxes. (49526) Fixed an issue with handling the mouse wheel inside the document "Find" box. (49539) Fixed an incorrect behaviour in the 'Go back (Alt+Left)' button in the new Open/Save Files dialog box. (49510) Fixed an issue with the shortcut keys (Alt+Left/Right) after navigating via breadcrumb paths in the new Open/Save Files dialog box. (49554) [installer] Fixed an issue with redrawing the progress text in the EXE installers. Fixed the issue where a mouse click outside of the polyline/polygon context menu during annotation creation would cancel the annotation. (49475) We switched back to using the system Open/Save/SelectFolder dialog box by default, instead of using the new one, because some popular features such as the QuickAccess/Recent items are missing in the new version. These will be added in a future release. Replaced the 'Extension' column in the new Open/Save File dialog box with a more user-friendly 'Type' column. Also fixed some issues when handling the 'Show file extension' option. (49497) Added the ability to authenticate local network shares in the new Open/Save Files dialog box. (49557) Improved the handling of dates after 01.01.2030 in XFA files - now such dates are stored properly when set via the dropdown widget. Flags NoZoom and NoRotate are now respected for only a limited subset of annotations. Download: PDF-XChange Editor (64-bit) | Portable ~300.0 MB (Shareware) Download: PDF-XChange Editor (32-bit) | Portable ~200.0 MB Download: PDF-XChange ARM64 | 276.0 MB Download: PDF-XChange Portable @PortableApps.com | 97.0 MB View: PDF-XChange Editor Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Still 3x what it should cost. So, it seems the trick is to increase price by 6x so that a reduction in price back to 4x looks like a steal. "You savvy shoppers win again!" I'm glad I'm not in a desperate spot to actually even need this overpriced crap. Hopefully, it comes back down by the time for when (or if) I ever do.
    • Although AI is great and has it's use cases they likely have massively overhyped it and it has not delivered as per their expectations. I fully expect them to start saying the same things again when it does get to a certain level of intelligence!
    • Microsoft wants to end printer driver headaches with Windows Ready Print by Usama Jawad A few days ago, Microsoft released Windows 11 Experimental build 26300.8553, bringing a ton of enhancements such as Start menu customization, search improvements, Taskbar polish, and other minor UI tweaks. Another relatively major enhancement snuck deep within the change log was related to upgrades to the Windows printing experience. Now, Microsoft has shared more details about these benefits. For starters, Microsoft has renamed its Modern Print Platform to Windows Ready Print. The company believes that this name highlights its shift in strategy, which now focuses on modernizing, securing, and streamlining the printing experience for Windows devices. Some of the upgrades present in Windows Ready Print have already been seeded to customers and partners. This includes ending support for third-party printer drivers via Windows Update and transitioning towards the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) and the native Windows IPP printer driver. In line with these changes, new printer installations will default to Windows Ready Print on eligible devices starting from July 2026. However, Microsoft recognizes that not all environments will be able to migrate to this platform immediately, so it will allow users to choose between installing the printer via Windows Ready Print or the traditional OEM process. Users will be able to toggle this configuration through Settings > Bluetooth & Devices > Printers & Scanners > Printer preferences. This control applies only to new printer installations, and its functionality can also be modified via Group Policy as follows: Launch Group Policy Editor Navigate to Local Computer Policy -> Administrative Templates -> Printers Find and select 'Configure Windows Ready Print driver ranking' -> double click to open it Select 'Enabled' (if you wish to enable Windows Ready Print driver selection) or 'Disabled' (if you wish to explicitly disable Windows Ready Print driver selection). Select Apply Select OK Similarly, if you set up Windows protected print mode through the same setting in Windows 11, it will also default to using Windows Ready Print exclusively. Microsoft hopes that these improvements will help eradicate dependency on OEM-specific driver installation processes and simplify printer installations. We'll likely find out more about other tangible benefits in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      johnjacobb40 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!