Windows 8 Sales are actually Amazing - 40 million sold


Recommended Posts

DotMatrix

I seen your reply and i tried to really understand where your coming from.

And i see what you mean.. what you said does make a lot of sense.

But i want to give you this reply.

If we both agree change is needed and eventually gonna happen etc etc..

Then the real question and debate here is how and what..

most of us that have issues with Windows 8 are saying exactly that

and once again your responding that we're wrong and change is needed

fine but what does that have to do with anything i've ever said on neowin about it ?

So really when you keep saying that your dodging the question basiclly.

And even further than that i don't think you answered my question (i'm not saying on purpose)

I honestly am interested in knowing where your coming from and seeing your point of view

not so i can try and use it against you or anything I'm just curious why you seem so heavily

invested in battling almost everyone that says anything in slightest negative about windows 8.

And i'm not trrying to single you out because many people have made this what seems a personal battle for them.

I doubt we're ever gonna get anywhere but i honestly wanna see where many of you are coming from.

so if you wanna share your thoughts and motives etc then please enlighten us all :)

and please don't ignore the first part of my reply / response to your earlier comment ;)

(the part where i pointed out change and how its implemented are 2 different things)

Which is why I believe you're going to see the Metro-ification of more elements in Windows 9. Hell maybe even in "Blue".

More than likely what we will see in Windows 9 is the return to options. They will expand Metro in some way, but there will be options to disable portions or all of it.

Realistically, Windows 8 was a safe bet by Microsoft. Businesses are largely just getting to Windows 7 so they were already aware that many will skip Windows 8. It happens with every mid-term Windows release and Microsoft knew this. They jumped out there to see how far they could push this and what the backlash would be (or not be). The one thing I can see clearly is that the backlash for them has been pretty stern and brutal.

The business world would be ready to move to Windows 9 sometime after it is released as long as they feel it is a valuable choice for them. I'd be amazed if Microsoft didn't add options to scale back Metro in very deep ways by then. I also wouldn't be surprised if they returned the Start Menu or some variation as well, but at the least many Metro options will magically become optional.

MS has to do something in the mobile space, but they can't lose the Desktop either. If their "unification" strategy is going to pay off at all they need existing Desktop users to buy in. Like it or not the main customer for Windows desktop is the business community not the consumer. If Microsoft slams the door on them hardcore they'll lose the war. Windows 9 will most likely adjust its UI more to fit whatever device you're using, PC or Tablet.

So Windows 9 will look different than Windows 8, and Windows 7. It is too early to know what it will be, but I'm confident that if it is what you suggest, severe pushing of more Touch and less of everything else, then we're witnessing the end of Microsoft's reign over computing (not death, but they won't be the monopoly force they were for the bulk of our lives).

  • Like 1

More than likely what we will see in Windows 9 is the return to options. They will expand Metro in some way, but there will be options to disable portions or all of it.

Realistically, Windows 8 was a safe bet by Microsoft. Businesses are largely just getting to Windows 7 so they were already aware that many will skip Windows 8. It happens with every mid-term Windows release and Microsoft knew this. They jumped out there to see how far they could push this and what the backlash would be (or not be). The one thing I can see clearly is that the backlash for them has been pretty stern and brutal.

The business world would be ready to move to Windows 9 sometime after it is released as long as they feel it is a valuable choice for them. I'd be amazed if Microsoft didn't add options to scale back Metro in very deep ways by then. I also wouldn't be surprised if they returned the Start Menu or some variation as well, but at the least many Metro options will magically become optional.

MS has to do something in the mobile space, but they can't lose the Desktop either. If their "unification" strategy is going to pay off at all they need existing Desktop users to buy in. Like it or not the main customer for Windows desktop is the business community not the consumer. If Microsoft slams the door on them hardcore they'll lose the war. Windows 9 will most likely adjust its UI more to fit whatever device you're using, PC or Tablet.

So Windows 9 will look different than Windows 8, and Windows 7. It is too early to know what it will be, but I'm confident that if it is what you suggest, severe pushing of more Touch and less of everything else, then we're witnessing the end of Microsoft's reign over computing (not death, but they won't be the monopoly force they were for the bulk of our lives).

Good analysis. I think what Windows 9 looks like depends on what type of consumer Christmas and following acceptance Windows 8 receives over the next 90 days and how well touch computing supplants desktop computing in the enterprise (not much over the next 3 years IMO). Kiosks have been around a long time and they are consumption devices. The opposite of what most enterprise desktops do. Let's not overlook the fact that thus far Surface's largest selling point is it's click keyboard :)

The threat to their unification initiative is the lack of unification of their devices, which can be fixed via iTunes, I mean software.

Lots of good points LogicalApex. One thing I would like to highlight though, it seems many here are under the false impression that a 'power user' is one that works in a specific way. While that may be true to certain extents, the article Apex linked tells the real story. The one consistent is that Power Users primarily are those that tweak their environment to their personal preferences and are generally opposed to being forced to do things 'one way'.

"It seems programmers and designers (and most Professional IT folk - my edit) like to customize their environment. Who would?ve guessed? Could that be why they chose their profession?"

More than likely what we will see in Windows 9 is the return to options. They will expand Metro in some way, but there will be options to disable portions or all of it.

This.

I'll bet my life on it as well. Contrary to belief, Microsoft DO learn from their mistakes, they may not admit them, but there will be some 'back-peddling' while moving forward in Windows 9.

Options maybe, in the same way that WP8 opened up from WP7. But there won't be a return of the start menu or other deprecated options.

There will be more modern ui, and there will be more options FOR the modern ui.

Options maybe, in the same way that WP8 opened up from WP7. But there won't be a return of the start menu or other deprecated options.

There will be more modern ui, and there will be more options FOR the modern ui.

Good call mentioning Windows Phone 8 as it supports my point fairly well actually... Look at some of the big ticket features on Windows Phone 8 compared to Windows Phone 7.

1. Native Code Support.

2. SD Card Support

3. Side Loading Support

All of these MS said weren't important when they launched Windows Phone 7. They argued Native Code was a bad idea because developers were given direct access to hardware and it would harm battery life. They argued that SD cards weren't a good idea as they were slow and no one used them. Additionally, they argued side loading wasn't used by anyone and caused piracy issues.

Microsoft made constant arguments about why these things weren't important in mobile and why they weren't needed in Windows Phone. Except, you fast forward to today and you're seeing them in Windows Phone.

The only thing you'll get from the way Microsoft reacts is they do it like every other major company. They'll keep telling you that the product they are selling you today is awesome and there isn't anything wrong with it. When you complain that is isn't right in x way then they'll tell you why x is wrong. All the while they know they'll never convince you that x is wrong and they are working frantically to get x added into the next version. They can't publicly say "hey we agree that x should have been there" without risking killing sales. So they wont do that.

Windows Phone 8 is just a solid example that they do listen to vocal complaints from the community and no matter how many times they tell you they won't do something, if enough people want it, they will.

More than likely what we will see in Windows 9 is the return to options. They will expand Metro in some way, but there will be options to disable portions or all of it.

Realistically, Windows 8 was a safe bet by Microsoft. Businesses are largely just getting to Windows 7 so they were already aware that many will skip Windows 8. It happens with every mid-term Windows release and Microsoft knew this. They jumped out there to see how far they could push this and what the backlash would be (or not be). The one thing I can see clearly is that the backlash for them has been pretty stern and brutal.

You can bet that they will expand metro but the options you want (disable start screen and/or metro etc.) are not coming back unless Windows 8 is a spectacular flop which is unlikely given the apparent good start.

About enterprise: IT at my workplace is planning for a Windows 8 pilot with intention to actually use it. I was surprised to find about that actually because they haven't yet completely finished on 7 and there are many XPs still around (we skipped Vista).

Let's not generalize enterprise, shall we?

Good call mentioning Windows Phone 8 as it supports my point fairly well actually... Look at some of the big ticket features on Windows Phone 8 compared to Windows Phone 7.

1. Native Code Support.

2. SD Card Support

3. Side Loading Support

Windows Phone 7.x has SD card support. I know because I use a 32GB card in mine. One of the first HTCs actually uses an SD card for internal storage (not exposed to user).

There is no special side loading support in WP8 compared to WP7. I think you are confusing install from sd card to side loading?

Windows Phone 7.x also had native code support just that it was restricted to select few. They did listen to vocal complaints but they still haven't addressed most vocal complaints about WP8 (lack of carrier free updates being one).

Good call mentioning Windows Phone 8 as it supports my point fairly well actually... Look at some of the big ticket features on Windows Phone 8 compared to Windows Phone 7.

1. Native Code Support.

2. SD Card Support

3. Side Loading Support

All of these MS said weren't important when they launched Windows Phone 7. They argued Native Code was a bad idea because developers were given direct access to hardware and it would harm battery life. They argued that SD cards weren't a good idea as they were slow and no one used them. Additionally, they argued side loading wasn't used by anyone and caused piracy issues.

Microsoft made constant arguments about why these things weren't important in mobile and why they weren't needed in Windows Phone. Except, you fast forward to today and you're seeing them in Windows Phone.

The only thing you'll get from the way Microsoft reacts is they do it like every other major company. They'll keep telling you that the product they are selling you today is awesome and there isn't anything wrong with it. When you complain that is isn't right in x way then they'll tell you why x is wrong. All the while they know they'll never convince you that x is wrong and they are working frantically to get x added into the next version. They can't publicly say "hey we agree that x should have been there" without risking killing sales. So they wont do that.

Windows Phone 8 is just a solid example that they do listen to vocal complaints from the community and no matter how many times they tell you they won't do something, if enough people want it, they will.

They never said SD cards where slow, in fact most of the phones used SD cards for all intents an purposes. it was more about the user experience and the fact that the majority of the users don't understand the difference why some of their music is on /sdcard and some on /localstorage. it doesn't make sense, and Android is doing the same thing in the next version by virtual storage and such. it was also about the "secure" part of SD.

As for native code, that also wasn't quite the argument they used, and native code apps are being monitored through the app store anyway to keep battery eaters and such away, it's not like they have full access to the whole phone and all api's.

I think you'll also notice that, the start menu from Windows Mobile, has not made a re-appearance in Windows Phone 8 :p

As I said, they'll add more Modern, and they'll add more flexibility and options to modern, like they did with WP8. but they won't bring back the start menu.

They never said SD cards where slow

They just said they weren't supported. And with good reason. Every Focus we put them in eventually corrupted and had to be reformatted. I think MS shunned SD cards because WP7 simply didn't do them well (the whole unified memory thing). MS lies of course like all business' when needed. All fixed in WP8 so they're good now.

Lots of good points LogicalApex. One thing I would like to highlight though, it seems many here are under the false impression that a 'power user' is one that works in a specific way. While that may be true to certain extents, the article Apex linked tells the real story. The one consistent is that Power Users primarily are those that tweak their environment to their personal preferences and are generally opposed to being forced to do things 'one way'.

"It seems programmers and designers (and most Professional IT folk - my edit) like to customize their environment. Who would?ve guessed? Could that be why they chose their profession?"

Interesting Dashel. I actually think a lot of the professional backlash is because most "chose" the Windows platform for various reasons. With the nature of the changes made, loss of productivity for many (yes, it's a fact), and just pure annoyance of having to work around the hybrids shortcomings, user are frustrated because they feel they were not given options and are forced to accept something they view as inferior.

The notion that nerds, gadget freaks, IT pros, don't want to change, is somewhat ridiculous.

But what I think is causing the most frustration, is that many are just now realizing, while in the past they "chose" Windows, now it is apparent, they actually have no choice. There is no viable alternative to Windows for these people. And they are realizing how little choice they actually have given the desktop monopoly/dominance Microsoft has.

Don't get me wrong, it's not necessarily Microsoft's fault. Google is the devil, Linux is alphabet soup, and Apple, just no. For the first time I think people who have always been pro-Windows are realizing the negatives of lack of meaningful competition.

DotMatrix

I seen your reply and i tried to really understand where your coming from.

And i see what you mean.. what you said does make a lot of sense.

But i want to give you this reply.

If we both agree change is needed and eventually gonna happen etc etc..

Then the real question and debate here is how and what..

most of us that have issues with Windows 8 are saying exactly that

and once again your responding that we're wrong and change is needed

fine but what does that have to do with anything i've ever said on neowin about it ?

So really when you keep saying that your dodging the question basiclly.

And even further than that i don't think you answered my question (i'm not saying on purpose)

I honestly am interested in knowing where your coming from and seeing your point of view

not so i can try and use it against you or anything I'm just curious why you seem so heavily

invested in battling almost everyone that says anything in slightest negative about windows 8.

And i'm not trrying to single you out because many people have made this what seems a personal battle for them.

I doubt we're ever gonna get anywhere but i honestly wanna see where many of you are coming from.

so if you wanna share your thoughts and motives etc then please enlighten us all :)

I'm not trying to dodge any questions. I'm just simply trying to say, computing is on the verge of becoming something more than static desktops. It's ready to go to the next level, but many here aren't. There are many exciting up and coming technologies that require fresh thinking, but many don't want to leave the comfort zone of static icons, and static start menus. There's an entire world of dynamics waiting to be explored, but we're never going to get there by clinging on to old computing styles. Tablets are a great step towards that, but that doesn't mean the desktop can't be included. Generally speaking the desktop UI is a fairly boring environment, and it simply doesn't have to be that. I'd rather a world where people had fun while sitting at their machines. Not the "same old, same old" thing we have going on now.

Windows 8 is a great step in that direction. I sit down at my machine and my START screen instantly lights up and comes to life. It's full of the things that matter to me - my calendar, the area's weather, news, etc. The START screen is never the same twice. I know this sounds cheesy - but it's full of energy. I don't feel as bored as I once did sitting in front of my machine, because there's always something new to look at. Metro just has a "fresh" feel to it. It's like having a brand new car, after years of having the old one fixed and patched up.

Does that help to explain?

More than likely what we will see in Windows 9 is the return to options. They will expand Metro in some way, but there will be options to disable portions or all of it.

Realistically, Windows 8 was a safe bet by Microsoft. Businesses are largely just getting to Windows 7 so they were already aware that many will skip Windows 8. It happens with every mid-term Windows release and Microsoft knew this. They jumped out there to see how far they could push this and what the backlash would be (or not be). The one thing I can see clearly is that the backlash for them has been pretty stern and brutal.

The business world would be ready to move to Windows 9 sometime after it is released as long as they feel it is a valuable choice for them. I'd be amazed if Microsoft didn't add options to scale back Metro in very deep ways by then. I also wouldn't be surprised if they returned the Start Menu or some variation as well, but at the least many Metro options will magically become optional.

MS has to do something in the mobile space, but they can't lose the Desktop either. If their "unification" strategy is going to pay off at all they need existing Desktop users to buy in. Like it or not the main customer for Windows desktop is the business community not the consumer. If Microsoft slams the door on them hardcore they'll lose the war. Windows 9 will most likely adjust its UI more to fit whatever device you're using, PC or Tablet.

So Windows 9 will look different than Windows 8, and Windows 7. It is too early to know what it will be, but I'm confident that if it is what you suggest, severe pushing of more Touch and less of everything else, then we're witnessing the end of Microsoft's reign over computing (not death, but they won't be the monopoly force they were for the bulk of our lives).

Windows 8 was far from a safe bet. And the only backlash is coming from those so-called power users who want a Linux OS, and not a consumer OS. Windows was never Linux, nor shall it ever be. It's tough, but try for a moment to think like a consumer. You think they want to launch programs using the Run command? Or lunch apps from Start? Do you really think they want to stare at line after line of code? Hell no. Not even I do. Microsoft isn't bringing back the Start Menu, or any other depreciated option. That's just the way computing works. You move forward - not back. If anything the only options you'll get, would be for the Metro side of the OS, and nothing else, like HawkMan pointed out. Microsoft isn't going to invest time and money to bring something back that they invested in killing, just to make a few IT folks happy. Unification begins with Metro and the RT api, you know for a fact that RT and Windows Phone cannot interact with Win32, so to unify the two, you need common ground, and Metro is just that.

Options maybe, in the same way that WP8 opened up from WP7. But there won't be a return of the start menu or other deprecated options.

There will be more modern ui, and there will be more options FOR the modern ui.

QFT.

The Start Menu:

Only on Windows does it make sense to click Start to shut down.

They seriously think that this mess of cascading menus is better than the Program Manager?

UAC:

I always turn it off - it is completely useless for Power Users.

They'll get rid of it in the next version - no one likes it.

Search:

Search is only useful for people too stupid to organize their Start Menu.

Turn off the search indexer - it will free up system resources.

It's not that Microsoft hasn't thrown wrenches into established workflows in the past. Every time they do it, it's the end of the world.

  • Like 2

Windows 8 was far from a safe bet. And the only backlash is coming from those so-called power users who want a Linux OS, and not a consumer OS. Windows was never Linux, nor shall it ever be. It's tough, but try for a moment to think like a consumer. You think they want to launch programs using the Run command? Or lunch apps from Start? Do you really think they want to stare at line after line of code? Hell no. Not even I do. Microsoft isn't bringing back the Start Menu, or any other depreciated option. That's just the way computing works. You move forward - not back. If anything the only options you'll get, would be for the Metro side of the OS, and nothing else, like HawkMan pointed out. Microsoft isn't going to invest time and money to bring something back that they invested in killing, just to make a few IT folks happy. Unification begins with Metro and the RT api, you know for a fact that RT and Windows Phone cannot interact with Win32, so to unify the two, you need common ground, and Metro is just that.

The key problem with your view of the future is expressed pretty clearly there with your "think like a consumer" perspective. Microsoft isn't at liberty to forget the professional user base as you seem to so casually allure to. Microsoft needs someone to pay the bills and the reality is they can't rely on the consumer market for that at this moment, if ever. Windows 8 was a safe bet because it was their attempt to reach out to the consumer market without severely killing their business customers long term.

If you honestly believe MS should, and are, ignoring business users for consumers without any qualms about their demands at all then you might as well move onto something else. Consumers by and large don't like Microsoft in the consumer space. Every single consumer product MS has made, except the XBOX, as been a massive failure. They wouldn't be silly enough to gamble that hard on the future of Windows, one of their major cash cows.

As I said earlier, like it or not their customer is business. They may want the consumer, but they will be hoping to win them over long-term, not with a single release as you're eluding to here.

The Start Menu:

Only on Windows does it make sense to click Start to shut down.

They seriously think that this mess of cascading menus is better than the Program Manager?

UAC:

I always turn it off - it is completely useless for Power Users.

They'll get rid of it in the next version - no one likes it.

Search:

Search is only useful for people too stupid to organize their Start Menu.

Turn off the search indexer - it will free up system resources.

It's not that Microsoft hasn't thrown wrenches into established workflows in the past. Every time they do it, it's the end of the world.

Keep in mind Microsoft is listening to the customers and changing the features to give people less reason to hate them. For instance, in Vista everyone got pinched by UAC. If you did "administrative" tasks like rename a folder or copy files you'd be getting 4 or 5 UAC prompts during the process. In Windows 7 MS toned it down enough that you will see them only when installing and removing programs, for the most part. The complaints of it died down because UAC was radically improved between Vista and 7.

They just said they weren't supported. And with good reason. Every Focus we put them in eventually corrupted and had to be reformatted. I think MS shunned SD cards because WP7 simply didn't do them well (the whole unified memory thing). MS lies of course like all business' when needed. All fixed in WP8 so they're good now.

eh, no.

eh, no.

Perhaps I should be more specific, removable SD cards (as users are accustomed to using an SD card; as fixed and now usable in WP8) and non-certified SD cards as they become a part of unified memory under WP7 and just don't work well. Even certified cards would corrupt and require reformatting of all memory in our experience, hence, we stopped allowing their use.

From Microsoft:

  • The SD card slot in your phone is intended to be used only by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) that built your phone and your Mobile Operator (MO). These partners can add an SD card to this slot to expand the amount of storage on your phone.
  • To help ensure a great user experience, Microsoft has performed exhaustive testing to determine which SD cards perform well with Windows Phone 7 devices. Microsoft has worked closely with OEMs and MOs to ensure that they only add these cards to Windows Phone 7 devices.
  • You should not remove the SD card in your phone or add a new one because your Windows Phone 7 device might not work properly. Existing data on the phone will be lost, and the SD card in your phone can't be used in other Windows Phones, PCs, or other devices.

Keep in mind Microsoft is listening to the customers and changing the features to give people less reason to hate them. For instance, in Vista everyone got pinched by UAC. If you did "administrative" tasks like rename a folder or copy files you'd be getting 4 or 5 UAC prompts during the process. In Windows 7 MS toned it down enough that you will see them only when installing and removing programs, for the most part. The complaints of it died down because UAC was radically improved between Vista and 7.

I never had UAC prompts from just renaming a folder.

I think you mean you had UAC prompts for renaming a folder within obviously "Dangerous" parts of the OS like system32 or Program files, right?

I never had UAC prompts from just renaming a folder.

I think you mean you had UAC prompts for renaming a folder within obviously "Dangerous" parts of the OS like system32 or Program files, right?

Probably. However, you probably could give the rights to a folder in a user space to Admin and get one. That's not likely to happen under normal circumstances, though.

BajiRav

you said

"unless Windows 8 is a spectacular flop which is unlikely given the apparent good start."

I disagree for example wikipedia states the result is mixed NOT good.

Maybe you should go and edit the wikipedia page lol

and DotMatrix

Your reply seems fair but i have 2 thoughts.

You never addressed your motivations.. why is this such a battle for you ?

Why are people not allowed to dislike things on Windows 8 ?

Also for the most part i heard you stating your opinions and i won't dare say they are wrong

but lets keep things in context.. I have an opinion too.. so what lol

What makes your right and mine wrong ? What you typed out didn't make a compelling argument for me personally

For others ya maybe ?? And Windows is not designed for a subset of the public tradionaly

and having M$ slash and burn all their products and services and merge them into one so called "unified"

platform means more than ever they should be trying to please a wider audience.

And you gave me your opinionon M$'s direction and here iis mine in response.

M$ shouldn't be killing good practices because some people are bored with windows.

That sounds an awful lot like change for changes sake to me.

Don't forget you can always go and install software after installing windows..

We don't need to get carried away with bundling things into the OS..

Not when they are doing stuff liek removing WMC lol

You should read the quote posted at wikipedia from this guy..

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes from ZDNet wrote: "The biggest problem with Windows 8 is that it wasn't born out of a need or demand. Its design failures, particularly with ?Metro UI? will likely be its downfall."[115]

edit:

I don't see the problem here if M$ can please everyone. What is wrong with adding some options to an OS

that will please both sides ? of Say the Metro interface for example. If both sides get what they want then why is only one side complaining ?

Perhaps I should be more specific, removable SD cards (as users are accustomed to using an SD card; as fixed and now usable in WP8) and non-certified SD cards as they become a part of unified memory under WP7 and just don't work well. Even certified cards would corrupt and require reformatting of all memory in our experience, hence, we stopped allowing their use.

From Microsoft:

  • The SD card slot in your phone is intended to be used only by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) that built your phone and your Mobile Operator (MO). These partners can add an SD card to this slot to expand the amount of storage on your phone.
  • To help ensure a great user experience, Microsoft has performed exhaustive testing to determine which SD cards perform well with Windows Phone 7 devices. Microsoft has worked closely with OEMs and MOs to ensure that they only add these cards to Windows Phone 7 devices.
  • You should not remove the SD card in your phone or add a new one because your Windows Phone 7 device might not work properly. Existing data on the phone will be lost, and the SD card in your phone can't be used in other Windows Phones, PCs, or other devices.

I think you're confusing software with hardware compatibility.

M$

M$'s

M$

M$

And that's where everything you said became meaningless ramble that there's no point reading or responding to. Actually that happened at the first one, the rest your cemented it.

though I was starting to feel it already when you mentioned Wikipedia.

Chief Marketing and Financial Officer for Windows opened up the Credit Suisse Annual Tech conference with the news that Windows 8 has sold 40 million licenses so far.

Can we stop the foolish debate of it being a flop now? thanks! would appreciate getting back to talking about fun stuff!

its cause people dont have a choice when buying a new laptop... I have "down graded" to windows 7 and linux for a few people lately

BajiRav

you said

I disagree for example wikipedia states the result is mixed NOT good.

Maybe you should go and edit the wikipedia page lol

and DotMatrix

Your reply seems fair but i have 2 thoughts.

You never addressed your motivations.. why is this such a battle for you ?

Why are people not allowed to dislike things on Windows 8 ?

Also for the most part i heard you stating your opinions and i won't dare say they are wrong

but lets keep things in context.. I have an opinion too.. so what lol

What makes your right and mine wrong ? What you typed out didn't make a compelling argument for me personally

For others ya maybe ?? And Windows is not designed for a subset of the public tradionaly

and having M$ slash and burn all their products and services and merge them into one so called "unified"

platform means more than ever they should be trying to please a wider audience.

And you gave me your opinionon M$'s direction and here iis mine in response.

M$ shouldn't be killing good practices because some people are bored with windows.

That sounds an awful lot like change for changes sake to me.

Don't forget you can always go and install software after installing windows..

We don't need to get carried away with bundling things into the OS..

Not when they are doing stuff liek removing WMC lol

You should read the quote posted at wikipedia from this guy..

[/sup]

edit:

I don't see the problem here if M$ can please everyone. What is wrong with adding some options to an OS

that will please both sides ? of Say the Metro interface for example. If both sides get what they want then why is only one side complaining ?

I want to reply to this, but the copious use of "M$" tells me you're trolling.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!