Windows 8: A


Recommended Posts

Microsoft (MSFT) is no stranger to criticism these days, and the company?s new Windows 8 platform is once again the target of a scathing review from a high-profile user. Well-known Internet entrepreneur and MIT professor Philip Greenspun handed Windows 8 one of its most damning reviews yet earlier this week, calling the new operating system a ?Christmas gift for someone you hate.? Greenspun panned almost every aspect of Microsoft?s new software, noting that Microsoft had four years to study Android and more than five to examine iOS, but still couldn?t build a usable tablet experience.

?The only device that I can remember being as confused by is the BlackBerry PlayBook,? Greenspun wrote on his blog after using Windows 8 on a Dell (DELL) XPS One All-in-One desktop PC. The acclaimed computer scientist noted that Microsoft omitted all of the best features from the most popular touch-focused platforms and instead created a user interface he describes as a ?dog?s breakfast.?

?Suppose that you are an expert user of Windows NT/XP/Vista/7, an expert user of an iPad, and an expert user of an Android phone? you will have no idea how to use Windows 8,? Greenspun wrote.

He continued, ?Some functions, such as ?start an application? or ?restart the computer? are available only from the tablet interface. Conversely, when one is comfortably ensconced in a touch/tablet application, an additional click will fire up a Web browser, thereby causing the tablet to disappear in favor of the desktop. Many of the ?apps? that show up on the ?all apps? menu at the bottom of the screen (accessible only if you swipe down from the top of the screen) dump you right into the desktop on the first click.?

SOURCE: http://bgr.com/2012/12/06/windows-8-criticism-android-ios/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/
Share on other sites

If this guy reviewed Windows 95, I bet he'd say the same thing about launching DOS apps from an icon on the desktop. "It dumps you into a command-line interface, the screen changes, and mouse support is gone! To turn off the computer, you have to go to the 'Start' menu, which is non-intuitive for users. Microsoft had all this time to learn from System 6/7, and yet they came up with this?"

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373008
Share on other sites

"Suppose that you are an expert user of Windows NT/XP/Vista/7, an expert user of an iPad, and an expert user of an Android phone? you will have no idea how to use Windows"

How ****ing clueless are people? Good god. :s

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373020
Share on other sites

no a Christmas gift for someone you hate is a el cheapo Chinese junk android tablet with minimal processing power and minimal RAM... watch them get frustrated to heck with the laggy response, non-working UI and crappy screen touch quality (im talking the sub $100 tablets, not the higher end ones)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373026
Share on other sites

Some functions, such as ?start an application? or ?restart the computer? are available only from the tablet interface.

What? I recall pinning icons to my desktop... And two, it's like that in any other Windows OS, how is launching an app from Start any different than launching an app for the Start Menu?

These guys sound like bigger idiots than the Inc.com guy who thought Windows RT can get Win32 malware...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373034
Share on other sites

I personally very much dislike 8, however over the past few months, I have started to get tired of these reports. I feel 8 sucks, other people think it sucks, but there's way to much of the exact same thing said. For all the people that dislike it, do as I do.. stay with Windows 7.

However, the only thing I disagree with in the article is that of the playbook. I feel it is very user friendly, very easy to use and gets the job done. Not sure why he was having such difficulty.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373036
Share on other sites

What? I recall pinning icons to my desktop... And two, it's like that in any other Windows OS, how is launching an app from Start any different than launching an app for the Start Menu?

These guys sound like bigger idiots than the Inc.com guy who thought Windows RT can get Win32 malware...

well there is one difference, you do have to have a full screen menu to launch an app from the start screen from the desktop, as opposed to from a non-intrusive (not full screen take over) list... talking about launching from the start menu/screen here not pinning to something else

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373064
Share on other sites

Windows 8 has some great stuff under the hood, we must not forget that.

MS lost me with the tablet UI, IM a desktop user, Ive only upgrades one PC instead of the usual houehold.

I honestly dont think MS cares. I dont think I do anymore.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373086
Share on other sites

no a Christmas gift for someone you hate is a el cheapo Chinese junk android tablet with minimal processing power and minimal RAM... watch them get frustrated to heck with the laggy response, non-working UI and crappy screen touch quality (im talking the sub $100 tablets, not the higher end ones)

So who gift you this item and when did you receive it?
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373118
Share on other sites

If this guy reviewed Windows 95, I bet he'd say the same thing about launching DOS apps from an icon on the desktop. "It dumps you into a command-line interface, the screen changes, and mouse support is gone!

Except win95 was designed as a replacement and consensus so far is that RT is not a replacement for the desktop environment. Thats what fuels the majority of this debate as few took issue with the temporary pains to realize the gains. The two headed nature of 8 simply doesn't sit well with many, which is unfortunate, because that marketing decision overshadows some of the great work they have done on both sides of the fence.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373124
Share on other sites

Last night I bought and installed Start8 on my Windows 8 desktop computer (4 monitor setup). It really does feel like a breath of fresh air. This is after using windows 8 on 2 computer since it went on sale.

On the Windows 8 UI I find myself doing what feels like more to get to the same place as Windows 7.

Sure windows 8 has keyboard shortcuts coming out it's ass, but taking keyboard shortcuts out of the equation (Most users don't even know control + c copies), navigating the UI feels like more work than (it's predecessors) it should be.

I've still never understood hiding important menu's from the user. Even if they are going to remove the start menu, why did they have to remove the start button? It's almost like they were in a meeting they one day constructing a list of "the top 5 ways they could confuse the average user" then proceeded to implement all of them.

Unless you are on a tablet, the charms bar gives you this "What the hell are you doing here" feeling, almost every-time you activate on purpose or otherwise. It's also a pain in the ass to activate if you have dual monitors (Once again taking keyboard shortcuts out of the equation).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373126
Share on other sites

Except win95 was designed as a replacement and consensus so far is that RT is not a replacement for the desktop environment. Thats what fuels the majority of this debate as few took issue with the temporary pains to realize the gains. The two headed nature of 8 simply doesn't sit well with many, which is unfortunate, because that marketing decision overshadows some of the great work they have done on both sides of the fence.

I have no doubt the Modern interface will mature to the point that it will completely replace the desktop. It took several iterations of the desktop GUI to replace the command prompt, and it will most likely be the same with Modern. There might be some niche applications that absolutely need the desktop, but it's going to be a fairly rare occurrence.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373170
Share on other sites

And I still don't see how, considering the limitations imposed by the design, they will get there without another radical change/reboot. Anything that radical will no longer be the 'Modern' interface though.

Only a revolutionary change to Modern could do what you suggest, not evolutionary ones as have defined the Desktop environment.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373268
Share on other sites

With Windows 8, I haven't had this much fun using a computer since I first got one to be honest. It feels so reinvigorating to actually be learning something new as opposed to using the same GUI with "cool" Aero effects or redundant menus. If there's anything this backlash has taught me, it's that people can't learn something new.

The only negative remark I'll make about it is that Microsoft continued the trend they started with Vista of either moving, layering, or straight up removing vital functions. While the Charms Bar is great on a WinRT tablet, it's worth ****-all on even a Win32 tablet, let alone a desktop/laptop. Devices is practically useless, Start is redundant, Search is dismal, and Settings leads you to what Charms should have been. Share is more tablet-oriented but I'm willing to ignore it for the greater good of having an OS that can work across multiple platforms.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373442
Share on other sites

"Suppose that you are an expert user of Windows NT/XP/Vista/7, an expert user of an iPad, and an expert user of an Android phone? you will have no idea how to use Windows"

How ****ing clueless are people? Good god. :s

look on this forum. its full of clueless people that think windows 8 is hard or confusing lol then in a later post these same people pretend to work in the IT sector.

Last night I bought and installed Start8 on my Windows 8 desktop computer (4 monitor setup). It really does feel like a breath of fresh air. This is after using windows 8 on 2 computer since it went on sale.

On the Windows 8 UI I find myself doing what feels like more to get to the same place as Windows 7.

Sure windows 8 has keyboard shortcuts coming out it's ass, but taking keyboard shortcuts out of the equation (Most users don't even know control + c copies), navigating the UI feels like more work than (it's predecessors) it should be.

I've still never understood hiding important menu's from the user. Even if they are going to remove the start menu, why did they have to remove the start button? It's almost like they were in a meeting they one day constructing a list of "the top 5 ways they could confuse the average user" then proceeded to implement all of them.

Unless you are on a tablet, the charms bar gives you this "What the hell are you doing here" feeling, almost every-time you activate on purpose or otherwise. It's also a pain in the ass to activate if you have dual monitors (Once again taking keyboard shortcuts out of the equation).

my above point proven

  • Like 3
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124118-windows-8-a/#findComment-595373464
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!