Windows 8: A


Recommended Posts

To call me oblivious however is an insult. I've worked IT, I've worked engineering, I've worked support, I've worked dev, I've worked QA, I've worked BI.

hahaha, not oblivious in general, or I wouldn't be conversing with you online or otherwise. Oblivious as to why XP remained in enterprise environments for so long. Definitely not laziness as you suggested ...

Edit: BTW, Microsoft, rightly, eats its own dog food, whether they like it or not so ... :) But having said that, while we go back and forth about the Desktop OS, there is not doubt, Server 2k12 is a fine product that WILL have a dramatic positive change on productivity and bottom lines.

On Windows 8 what is the fastest way to get to the users profile directory the one that has contact, favorites documents and pictures?

Win+E. In the address bar, click the first tab on the cookie crumb, and select the user folder.

Win+E. In the address bar, click the first tab on the cookie crumb, and select the user folder.

ya, that's just one example where Windows 8 take more clicks than windows 7.

Windows 7 / Click start (or windows key) then click the profile name at the top right.

No, it was that whole global recession thing going on.

and we shouldn't forget about Vista ...

ya, that's just one example where Windows 8 take more clicks than windows 7.

Windows 7 / Click start (or windows key) then click the profile name at the top right.

Hehehe, I'm gonna call that one a draw. But I do agree there are several areas where Windows 8 takes more clicks or drags or is just more cumbersome than windows 7. I don't think that in and of itself is a reason to avoid it, unless you work heavily with Search and those results using context menus.

My preference would be faster fixes and updates to 8, not to stay with 7. I do think for this hybrid period and GPO setting to avoid the Start Page would have been great! My biggest complaint is the incompleteness of the apps and interoperability of Surface, Phone, and Desktop or lack thereof. I also question whether the Modern UI can every duplicate the full functionality of the Explorer UI. The pitiful media management situation is also a reason I would advise consumers avoid it until that is fixed. The bugs and such which will be fixed over time just make it inadvisable to deploy enterprise-wide IMO. Just the monitor sleep bug, that may very well be drivers and only affects a small percentage of users, is too expensive to risk. Some legacy apps do something to the registry that can prevent hyperlinks from working in all Modern apps and this one has no response from Microsoft as of yet. In a VDI environment, maybe. Physical desktops, nah, not a chance.

There's a reason in many organization there has been a de facto policy not to deploy and OS enterprise-wide until a Service Pack has been released. Well, there are no more service packs ... lol.

The stakes are very high for Microsoft, they can't actually admit to any major shortcomings right now. That would go a loooong way toward building confidence ... but even I would not advise that type of admission right now and that's unfortunate. The stakes are so high I just can't understand the lack of polish across the Windows 8/RT/WP8 spectrum. I would however, be working round the clock to release patches, fixes, and app updates with a sense of urgency. But that's just me.

ya, that's just one example where Windows 8 take more clicks than windows 7.

Windows 7 / Click start (or windows key) then click the profile name at the top right.

If that's a task you perform often why don't you just pin the folder to the start screen? Then it'll be the same, Windows Key + Click folder icon. Alternatively add the folder to your explorer favourites sidebar and again it will be two clicks (Win + E, Click favourite item). Both as simple as Windows 7, it'll just take a few times to adjust to the new way.

and we shouldn't forget about Vista ...

No, we probably should. :laugh:

XP was the point at which a lot of corporations started pushing back against MSs "upgrade Windows upgrade Office upgrade your servers" every release idea, with good reason. That said, I think 7 would have been picked up faster were it not for the recession. Heck, I'm sitting at an XP box at work right now.

"Suppose that you are an expert user of Windows NT/XP/Vista/7, an expert user of an iPad, and an expert user of an Android phone? you will have no idea how to use Windows"

How ****ing clueless are people? Good god. :s

I don't think the issues he raises means he's clueless. I consider myself quite capable and it took me a day and a half to accidentally figure out how to make the app switch bar stick on my Surface. Swipe from the left just switched to the previous app. It also took a minute to figure out how to close an app from the app bar, drag down. As well as how to drag and move live tiles easily [drag down slightly and hold for a sec, then drag is smooth].

I don't consider myself clueless, but exposing the app bar was not something many will figure out easily. So in that respect I agree with him, though once I figured out how to use it, it's quite nice. These things are subjective, I don't have a problem with the power settings on the charm bar on the Surface or desktop. I think it's kind of cool though actually making the selection isn't really touch friendly, you're not always sure you've touched the right selection because it's just a line of text with no visual clue.

Definitely not as intuitive as say an iPad. Can he figure it out, I'm sure. But he's evaluating it from the perspective of millions of non-technical consumers and on much of it he's right.

Microsoft is no shrinking violet, they can handle the constructive criticism and being an 800lb Gorilla, could use it here and there.

On Windows 8 what is the fastest way to get to the users profile directory the one that has contact, favorites documents and pictures?

Win+E. In the address bar, click the first tab on the cookie crumb, and select the user folder.

ya, that's just one example where Windows 8 take more clicks than windows 7.

Windows 7 / Click start (or windows key) then click the profile name at the top right.

Hehehe, I'm gonna call that one a draw. But I do agree there are several areas where Windows 8 takes more clicks or drags or is just more cumbersome than windows 7. I don't think that in and of itself is a reason to avoid it, unless you work heavily with Search and those results using context menus.

My preference would be faster fixes and updates to 8, not to stay with 7. I do think for this hybrid period and GPO setting to avoid the Start Page would have been great! My biggest complaint is the incompleteness of the apps and interoperability of Surface, Phone, and Desktop or lack thereof. I also question whether the Modern UI can every duplicate the full functionality of the Explorer UI. The pitiful media management situation is also a reason I would advise consumers avoid it until that is fixed. The bugs and such which will be fixed over time just make it inadvisable to deploy enterprise-wide IMO. Just the monitor sleep bug, that may very well be drivers and only affects a small percentage of users, is too expensive to risk. Some legacy apps do something to the registry that can prevent hyperlinks from working in all Modern apps and this one has no response from Microsoft as of yet. In a VDI environment, maybe. Physical desktops, nah, not a chance.

There's a reason in many organization there has been a de facto policy not to deploy and OS enterprise-wide until a Service Pack has been released. Well, there are no more service packs ... lol.

The stakes are very high for Microsoft, they can't actually admit to any major shortcomings right now. That would go a loooong way toward building confidence ... but even I would not advise that type of admission right now and that's unfortunate. The stakes are so high I just can't understand the lack of polish across the Windows 8/RT/WP8 spectrum. I would however, be working round the clock to release patches, fixes, and app updates with a sense of urgency. But that's just me.

Wouldn't the right click "power" menu in Win8 balance that out a bit? There's 2 click access to things there that used to take more clicks in Win7 right?

I think the MIT prof is an idiot. Windows 8 pro is way better than windows 7. The claims he makes seem like he had not used it much then wrote a review. With wintutu you get to use either start menu or start screen.

Sigh...Why is it that you are comparing the changes to Windows 8 with the changes of moving on from command line?

Could it be....possibly....somehow.....that he uses the computer in a different way than you? My god all of this "I can use Windows 8 just fine so you must suck at computers or are just too lazy". As I have mentioned, when I use Windows 8 in a productive way, the Charms bar and App switcher keep getting in my way. My clients keep activating them as well, which makes it very embarrassing when you then ask them for money for your work. You look unprofessional when there are these hidden menus appear constantly.

Do you expect me to teach my photoshop/after effects clients how Windows 8 works before I work on their projects? No. It is my responsibility as the person that is hired to do the work, to appear professional at all times.

So without Start8, I HATE Windows 8 as a productive environment. Everything else is fine, but that is the truth you guys seem to not realize. People use computers differently.

A simple option to disable these menus would have made the OS better for most. It is not because we are scared/lazy/stuck in the past/whatever, it is when things start interfering with your workflow. Why can't you guys see that?

1) If 'charms' and 'app switcher' keep getting in the way then I have to ask what the hell are you doing - the only way either one of those will appear is if you put the cursor right in the corner of the screen - why the hell are you putting the cursor all the way up there?

2) Put the cursor on the bottom left hand corner, click and then click on a pinned application that is present on the start screen. It is Microsoft's fault that you can't be bothered teaching employees about pinning applications? heck, why not ignore the start page altogether and just pin the most common applications to the taskbar?

3) It has nothing to do with using computers differently and everything to do with people using computers inefficiently. Don't try to pull a fast one by claiming that your inefficient way of doing things translates into you being a precious and unique snow flake thus your individuality must be respected.

4) Nothing interferes with the work flow - if you can't keep your cursor from the corners of the screen then it is clear that you're the with the problem and not Microsoft, Windows 8 or the Windows 8 development team.

1) If 'charms' and 'app switcher' keep getting in the way then I have to ask what the hell are you doing - the only way either one of those will appear is if you put the cursor right in the corner of the screen - why the hell are you putting the cursor all the way up there?

2) Put the cursor on the bottom left hand corner, click and then click on a pinned application that is present on the start screen. It is Microsoft's fault that you can't be bothered teaching employees about pinning applications? heck, why not ignore the start page altogether and just pin the most common applications to the taskbar?

3) It has nothing to do with using computers differently and everything to do with people using computers inefficiently. Don't try to pull a fast one by claiming that your inefficient way of doing things translates into you being a precious and unique snow flake thus your individuality must be respected.

4) Nothing interferes with the work flow - if you can't keep your cursor from the corners of the screen then it is clear that you're the with the problem and not Microsoft, Windows 8 or the Windows 8 development team.

Really? Where are the close buttons? Where is the Chrome Back button?

Geez, I am so sick of the "activating these bars? You are horrible at using computers. Microsoft is so AWESOME that they cannot do ANYTHING wrong. You obviously cannot use computers so it is your fault, not microsofts".

I have said it before. I detach dialogs from Photoshop and other adobe programs, so yes my mouse goes where the hot corners are. THAT is my workflow.

Really? Where are the close buttons? Where is the Chrome Back button?

Are you using a Metro application or a win32 one? either talk about one or the other - don't interpolate the two issues. As for closing a Metro application you go to the left with your cursor, swipe down, switch off the application you're using and then close off the application you no longer wish to use. As for Chrome - how is it Microsoft's fault that Google hacked together Chrome in such a way?

Geez, I am so sick of the "activating these bars? You are horrible at using computers. Microsoft is so AWESOME that they cannot do ANYTHING wrong. You obviously cannot use computers so it is your fault, not microsofts".

You're the one who can't seem to use a computer without constantly putting your cursor on a hot corner.

I have said it before. I detach dialogs from Photoshop and other adobe programs, so yes my mouse goes where the hot corners are. THAT is my workflow.

Then don't maximise the window to cover the whole screen and for Christ sake don't put the floating boxes in the corner of the bloody screen. I mean, come on - I swear you're just deliberately doing things so then you feel cheesed off and then it justifies why you hate Windows 8.

Windows 8 defiantly feels like the mouse and keyboard was an after thought.

How? All the classic keyboard shortcuts still work, and the mouse works just as it did in Windows 7...

Are you using a Metro application or a win32 one? either talk about one or the other - don't interpolate the two issues. As for closing a Metro application you go to the left with your cursor, swipe down, switch off the application you're using and then close off the application you no longer wish to use. As for Chrome - how is it Microsoft's fault that Google hacked together Chrome in such a way?

You're the one who can't seem to use a computer without constantly putting your cursor on a hot corner.

Then don't maximise the window to cover the whole screen and for Christ sake don't put the floating boxes in the corner of the bloody screen. I mean, come on - I swear you're just deliberately doing things so then you feel cheesed off and then it justifies why you hate Windows 8.

Right so NOTHING AT ALL is Microsoft's fault? Where am I talking about the metro applications, I did not say anything about metro applications? They do not have a close button, as Chrome still has a desktop application, or I must be using something weird right not. The Chrome desktop version has the back button where the app switcher hot corner is close to ON THE DESKTOP. The close button ON DESKTOP APPLICATIONS is right by the hot corner for the charms bar. Geez I do not know how I accidentally activate these hot corners when the tools and buttons are right next to them. Hmmmm.

Right I am sorry for wanting to disable hot corners when I am in the desktop environment. I guess we all need to be zombies and accept whatever Microsoft does.

So you are saying programmers need to now not allow you to maximize applications or it is the programmers fault?

You're the one who can't seem to use a computer without constantly putting your cursor on a hot corner.

There it is again. "Do not like Windows 8 or have ANY ISSUES with it? You cannot use computers then". What is with the attitude on this board? I have been using computers longer than some on this board (there are some that are older than me), but the point is, I have been using computers since Windows 3.1.

I like Windows 8 just fine, but I cannot voice my opinion about something that irritates me without comments like "You can't use computers"? It is not that damn hard to accidentally activate the hot corners. Everybody I know that has tried Windows 8 says the same thing. Oh...."They can't use computers too" right? Yeah their degree and years of experience in the work place when they can;t use computers must be awesome.

Then don't maximise the window to cover the whole screen and for Christ sake don't put the floating boxes in the corner of the bloody screen. I mean, come on - I swear you're just deliberately doing things so then you feel cheesed off and then it justifies why you hate Windows 8.

So you want me to sacrifice my screen estate instead of wishing there was an option to disable it? What is the damn point of the ability to maximize windows if we obviously am not allowed to anymore? Hmm....I have use Photoshop maximized and floating boxes the way I wanted to since Windows XP and I believe Photoshop CS 1 which had that feature. I built my own workflow.

NOT ONCE did I say I hated Windows 8....geez. I said I loved it but the hot corners are the only thing that irritates me.

It is official folks, even if we like a product, we can NEVER.....NEVER say anything that irritates us again. Let's just get rid of movie, game, and product reviews since we cannot say anything about a product. If a company want to make a defective video card, it is their product and can do whatever they want with it.

How? All the classic keyboard shortcuts still work, and the mouse works just as it did in Windows 7...

I never said they weren't. I guess what I should have said was "Windows 8 Modern UI / Charms, feels like the mouse and keyboard was an after thought"

I regret spending $15 for the Win8 upgrade.

There are some stuff I like about it but Metro really pushes me back to re-evaluate my multi-tasking.

So what you are saying is you don't want to be bothered with learning. Well you can down grade for free. Then pass me your Win8 key thank-you very much.

How? All the classic keyboard shortcuts still work, and the mouse works just as it did in Windows 7...

one example...... the start screen... with a touch screen you tap and drag... moves left and right... easy... I'd expect this same exact behavior with a mouse...

alright, click the screen and drag... hummmm nothing... oh wait a scroll bar popped up let me use that..... uh why? why do we have a scroll bar? we can easily emulate the touch response with a mouse, why did we make it two separate things? Pretty much all touch UI's I've used that also have a mouse, the mouse emulates touch if you don't have touch... sure you can't do multi point touch but it can at least emulate single point touch with a click and hold

it gets stupid when you can still emulate most other tap and drag things like the grab the top drag of the screen, drag to move, etc stuff in the "metro" apps yet something as simple as scrolling on the start screen uses a freaking scroll bar?

one example...... the start screen... with a touch screen you tap and drag... moves left and right... easy... I'd expect this same exact behavior with a mouse...

alright, click the screen and drag... hummmm nothing... oh wait a scroll bar popped up let me use that..... uh why? why do we have a scroll bar? we can easily emulate the touch response with a mouse, why did we make it two separate things? Pretty much all touch UI's I've used that also have a mouse, the mouse emulates touch if you don't have touch... sure you can't do multi point touch but it can at least emulate single point touch with a click and hold

The mouse is not emulating touch. Nor was it ever designed to, and Windows 8 IS NOT replacing natural mouse movements with touch emulations.

The same can be said with webpages on a tablet, but we've known for a while now that the scroll wheel on the mouse makes our lives easier. The scroll wheel is the most efficient way to scroll. Duh.

So, why are you using the scrollbar? I've known since the betas that Start can be scrolled using the wheel...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Russia was able to invade Crimea because of those people. But my point is that I've personally heard how great it was to be "back in Russia" right afterwards - look how great it is now. I've asked you a question in another comment which you haven't answered, so I'll ask it again: is it better now without "Europrats"?
    • ZimaBoard 2 1664 Starter Kit review: it's a cool and affordable DIY NAS by Steven Parker IceWhale Technology reached out to me asking if I was interested in testing the ZimaBoard 2, and after convincing them to send me the Starter Kit, it arrived at my doorstep in May. A bit of background: it is a Shanghai-based Chinese company founded in 2020, which specializes in single-board servers and personal cloud solutions. From searching around online, user feedback on the company and ZimaOS is mostly positive, so we're off to a good start. In addition, I should probably point out that although they do not have a large portfolio of NAS devices, with just four of what they do offer, they seem to have covered everything from a relatively low-priced entry point with the ZimaBoard 2, right up to the high end, with the ZimaCube 2 Creator Pack that even includes an NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000. Anyway, as already mentioned, what we have today is the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit, and here are the full specifications: ZimaBoard 2 Model 832, 1664 CPU Intel Core N150 (4x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.6 GHz) TDP: 6W (Base) 10W (Max) Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (1.00 GHz) Memory 8 GB, 16 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (soldered) Disk Capacity 60 TB (30 TB x 2) Supported RAID Types TRAID, TRAID +, RAID0, RAID1, RAID5, RAID 6, RAID 10 Storage 2 x SATA 3.0 6Gb/s Ports with Power Bootloader 32 GB, 64 GB eMMC Network 2x RJ-45 2.5 GbE PCIe 1 x PCIe 3.0 (via LPC) USB Ports 2 x USB-A 3.1 (5 Gbps) Display Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@60Hz) Hardware Transcoding Engine H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 Virtualization Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Size (H/W/D) 140mm x 83mm x 31mm Weight 0.4 kg (only ZimaBoard 2 device) Power 12v 5A Power Supply Warranty 1 year (Global) 2 Years (EU) OS ZimaOS v1.6.1 MSRP $339, $399 ($548.60) As you can see above, there are two variants of the ZimaBoard 2. The lesser variant has half the eMMC storage and 8 GB less RAM, although it also costs $60 less than the top variant we are testing today. The above pricing is only for the ZimaBoard 2. I put the MSRP of the Starter Kit next to it in brackets, although as of publishing, it is discounted to $534.50. The ZimaBoard 2 started life on Kickstarter and shipped to backers in August last year. It became available via the official website in late 2025 and Q1 2026. This hobbyist NAS contains the still relatively new N150 Intel CPU released in the first quarter of 2025, with support for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, although in this case, the memory is integrated into the board itself, so it will not be possible to upgrade or expand the amount. It also supports AV1 decoding, as well as H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). The different capabilities in the Alder Lake-N (and Twin Lake) series are listed below. Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9 W Intel Core 3 N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 9 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Twin Lake series that sits near the bottom of the N-series, designed for low- powered systems and entry-level laptops, and as such has a base level TDP of just 6W. As I have noted before, we are seeing another NAS with a great amount of RAM. It's important to mention that the ZimaBoard 2's memory is integrated into the base board (which is why they have two variants of it). As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. First impressions The Starter Kit came in one outer box with several packages inside it (shown above). I forgot to take pics of it because when it arrived, it wasn't clear what was inside, and I had to confirm with my contact that I received the entire Starter Kit. In the box ZimaBoard 2 ZimaBoard 2 HDD Expansion Bracket + PCIe card frame Zimaboard Mini DisplayPort Male to HDMI Female Cable 4K 60Hz Zimaboard PCIe 3.0 x4 to Dual NVMe M.2 SSD Adapter Card Quick guide [full online guide] Limited warranty notice Screws Design Where to start? You'd be forgiven for mistaking it as an SSD enclosure if not for all the ports on it. It is completely made out of metal, and the top is an entire heatsink. It has a premium feel about it, but it definitely looks like a hobby device. As you will see, the completed build looks like it belongs in a server or meter closet rather than as a showpiece on someone's desk. On what I am calling the rear, there's a Mini DisplayPort (1.4), two 2.5 GbE ports, with Type A 3.1 USB ports, and then the barrel connector port. Around the front, there are two SATA6 ports with a power connector in the middle. Left side Right side One side is completely free of ports. On the other there's a slit that allows for the feed of a CPU fan cable, and a PCIe 3.0 X4 slot. Top Bottom The top is entirely made up of a heatsink except for the extended height for the I/O on the rear. Around the other side, you can find the ZIMA branding and some regulatory information stamped near the bottom. As you may see from the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, it scratches quite easily from just moving it around on my Ikea island. Teardown Before we get started, let's have a look at this thing on the inside. The steps to get to the board are as follows: Remove the four smaller Torx screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2; Remove the four larger Torx screws on the sides of the device; Carefully unstick the CMOS battery from the PCB; Remove two Phillips screws on the PCB; Lift out the PCB. Yes, as you can tell from the instructions, you need three different tools to remove Torx and Phillips screws (10 in total), and unhelpfully, one of the screws is located under the CMOS battery, which is stuck onto the PCB. Building Now comes the fun part. Because the ZimaSpace website does not provide any guidance on how to put the Starter Kit together. They only have guidance for connecting the CPU fan. However, they did upload a video to their YouTube channel that shows the entire process. To install the fan, first remove the four screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, then on the inside, there is a CPU FAN connector where you can attach the fan, reattach the ZimaBoard 2 frame, and feed the fan cable through the provided slit. Then remove the nearest screw on the side and attach the fan frame to the side of the device using the same screw. ZimaBard 2 screws Aligning the screws Bottom view Remember those four screws we removed to access the CPU FAN? Longer screws are provided in the box with the HDD Expansion Bracket, which is what you will now need to attach the ZimaBoard 2 to it. Helpfully, the orientation on how to attach it is made obvious when the frame can only be screwed on at the same overall length as the ZimaBoard 2. If you do it the wrong way around (which is what I did initially) one side hangs off the frame, and it becomes difficult to attach the PCIe Adapter Card cable. PCIe card frame Other side PCIe slot connector Next, it's time to attach the PCIe card frame, which is fastened with the help of 3.5-inch SATA HDD (3 screws). These are toolless screws that you can just use your fingers to fasten them with. Then it is time to connect the provided PCIe cable with the slot connector on one side of the ZimaBoard 2, feed it through the bottom of the HDD frame, and fasten it with two standoffs. Both bracket options 2280 standoffs with 2x 4TB MP44Q The PCIe 3.0 X4 card comes with a short bracket option, handy if you decide to place it inside a different NAS or rack server, but here we need the long bracket. Oddly enough, the M.2 standoffs were preinstalled into the 22110 position, but extra standoffs are included in the box, which I installed at the 2280 position for our use. I added a couple of MP44Q M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs (2 x 4TB) that can be availed on Amazon for $478.99 (the lowest price for 3 months) that TEAMGROUP supplied us with Then we have the almost completed build, you just need to push the card into the PCIe slot. Unfortunately, IceWhale Technologies did not provide a screw for the PCIe card frame (this is also apparent in their own video). Here it is at several different angles, with the last pic showing the SATA Y-Cable connected to the two WD Red Plus 4TB drives. Setup and Usage Next, you connect your cables to the I/O, and the ZimaBoard 2 powers on automatically, as there is no power button on the device. Power is controlled through the Settings in ZimaOS. BIOS The ZimaBoard 2 includes an Aptio BIOS from American Megatrends [1, 2, 3], and you can setup pretty much everything here including the boot order, which is locked to the UEFI OS, however above that choice you can enable or disable booting to a SATA/USB bootloader so this would still allow you to switch to an alternative bootloader and boot from it, or disable it to instead always start from the first disk with an OS installed on it. Initial Setup Upon connecting to the LAN and booting up, the ZimaBoard 2 can be reached by navigating to the IP address (shown if you have a monitor connected), or you can find it using the ZIMA Client desktop application, which is essentially a Zima device finder. Initializing the ZimaBoard 2 The ZimaOS setup process is pretty straightforward, through a wizard, and in full above, it basically consists of setting up an account and some handy tips, and that's that! Post Setup (ZimaOS update) Upon first boot, you are alerted that there is a ZimaOS update from 1.5.0 to 1.6.1, which I applied; the full process is shown above with the changelog. ZimaBoard 2 Storage Setup Next, it is time to set up the storage. ZimaOS actually throws everything onto the eMMC flash drive; it is also the default location of AppData, which is definitely something to be wary about, as the 45GB available storage could fill up quickly. HDDs I first attempted to create a Storage Pool using the two 4TB WD Red Plus NAS drives, and got an error message: After several attempts and then looking online, I discovered it was a bug with ZimaOS where the fix was simply to reboot ZimaOS and then try again, this time I was able to create a RAID mirror using the two drives. SSDs I did the same for the SSDs, as you will see in the above gallery, when I created the second Storage Pool, it only allowed me to select available drives. ZimaBoard 2 AppData ZimaOS comes with an App Store that includes a repository of almost 400 apps, so you will be able to find most of what you'll need for a NAS (although after a quick search, I wasn't able to find a Surveillance Manager), and now comes the important part: moving the default AppData location off the 45GB eMMC and onto a larger volume: Open Settings Then Apps Then, in the Select a new location field, click on the new Storage volume you want to move it to (in my case, the Apps Storage Pool), which is the SSD RAID mirror. Confirm the Migration warning Be praised! You can also do this for Docker (which by default installs onto the 45GB eMMC flash drive) and the User database. Plex Setup Next, I tested the configuration by installing the Plex Server app from the App Store. The library folders must already exist (which I placed into the Storage Pool). Plex Server setup is straightforward and requires very little configuration. In my case, all I had to do was add the media path I just created, which you can also browse to using the folder icon in the path field. In addition, you can now map the new Media library in Windows Explorer using the Zima Client. Oddly enough, it is not possible to access the ZimaBoard 2 over the Network Neighborhood; you must map drives using the client, which is shown in the last image in the above gallery. I watched one of my Blu-Ray rips, which is Dolby Vision with Dolby Atmos, and the content played fine with no stuttering or buffering, which is what anyone needs in this scenario. ZimaBoard 2 Zima Client mobile app There's also a client for mobile. It is pretty barebones, as shown in the above gallery, for example, the Apps screen launches the WebUI for that app, and the Backup must be done manually. On opening Backup, you can select internal storage folders on your phone to backup to the ZimaBoard 2's storage, and although this is constantly scanned, the backup action itself must be manually triggered. There is an option to allow foreground backup (last image in the above gallery), but this basically means the queued backup gets triggered when you manually open the app. Benchmarking SATA PCIe 3.0 X4 A CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 25H2 PC (image above) connected over a 2.5 GbE was well within acceptable ranges. Writes were generally better on the SSD RAID mirror. SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 I also ran the NAS Performance tester, which tests the link speed performance. As you can see, it pretty much maxes out the 2.5GbE connection. Of course, you can also opt to bond the two 2.5 GbE connections for a bit more umph, but I didn't do that. Thermals Top PCIe card SATA HDDs Next, I measured some hotspots while playing content on Plex. It's fair to say this will perform better than a NAS that is enclosed in a metal or plastic case, as almost everything storage-wise is exposed! Anyway, the ZimaBoard 2 did not break a sweat with Plex streaming or disk benchmarks. ZimaOS Factory Reset ZimaOS does not include a factory reset option. Instead, you have to download the ZimaOS image and flash it to the eMMC manually. The flashing process is shown in the above gallery. The steps to do so are listed below: Download the ZimaOS image here; Open BalenaEtcher (Run as Administrator) and select the image; Select your inserted USB drive (min 8 GB) Flash to it; Connect your USB drive, monitor, keyboard, USB hub (optional), mouse (optional), and network cable (recommended) to the ZimaBoard 2; Connect power and press F11 continuously; Select your USB drive starting with UEFI in the boot device menu; Press Enter on the Install ZimaOS option; Select /dev/mmcblk0 (MMC) flash drive as target; Confirm with (three times) to wipe the target disk; Wait a couple of minutes while ZimaOS installs; Remove the USB drive and confirm with a reboot; Your ZimaBoard 2 has been factory reset. However, you don't have to stick with ZimaOS, in fact the company also offers official CasaOS images, that are based on Debian; or as they say themselves, put anything you want on this "hackable single board server" it's up to you. Conclusion I had a lot of fun putting this together. I've custom-built all my own PCs and servers since the 90s, and this is the first time I have had to put a NAS together. Even if the actual base ZimaBoard 2 was already a completed build, it still feels pretty custom. I just wish that IceWhale Technology included a getting-started guide in the box for the Start Kit, which would have really completed this kit. Instead, I had to search for the official video on the YouTube channel to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong. So who is this for? Definitely the hobbyist who is comfortable building their own PC and servers. It also has a much smaller footprint than its nearest equivalent (in terms of specs), like the Beelink Me Pro, which is another NAS I will be testing soon. Although the Beelink does not come with the PCIe 3.0 X4 expansion, the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit suddenly looks to be a great bargain, even if it only offers the two 3.5-inch bays over the four in the other example. It makes a lot of sense to use Intel's N150 chip inside a NAS; it is more than capable of doing what the ZimaBoard 2 is intended for, media streaming and backup. It also looks like the IceWhale Technology staff are quite active in the official forums helping people with issues they come across with ZimaOS and the devices, peer support seems to be good as well, I was quickly able to find why I was not able to create a new Storage Pool in ZimaOS v1.6.1 even though that is quite a serious bug, hopefully it will be fixed in the next update. If you are comfortable with the command line and Docker, you'll be fine. You can do great things with this hardware. This was my first time with ZimaOS. It seems a bit barebones in comparison to the likes of Synology DSM, TOS, and UGOS, but it has a ton of apps to get you started with your home or small business NAS. Where to buy As of publishing, IceWhale Technology is running a discount of up to 5% for the Starter Kit. If you opt to get just the ZimaBoard 2 itself, it does come with a SATA Y-Cable, so you will be able to connect up to two 3.5-inch HDDs to it. ZimaBoard 2 1668 Starter Kit for $534.50 on Amazon US (was $548.60) ZimaBoard 2 832 Starter Kit for $372.88 on Amazon US (was $390.60) Zimaboard 2 1668 (16GB+64GB) for $419.90 on Amazon US Zimaboard 2 832 (8GB+32GB) for $359.90 on Amazon Disclosure: IceWhale Technology provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. Good to know The Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, when you purchase through links on our site, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • It's in the Insider's group so yes it's technically beta, though these days it's hard to see much of a difference unless you opt for the most extreme beta builds, which I don't. When I moved here from the Release Preview channel I did so primarily because I wanted to see how well the restored taskbar functionality (restored from Win10, and earlier) is working and whether it was time to finally abandon SAB--and it is--working fine, so far. Not as polished as SAB, but it'll do for me.
    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!