Recommended Posts

on the topic of safety at the ATM am I the only one who looks for a bank that has them inside before using an ATM?

Looks like it. I always check the ATMs outside and inside to see where the line is shorter to get things done quickly. And most of the times, the lines are shorter inside. Sometimes you only have people standing in line at the ATM outside and no one inside, as people are too lazy to get inside the bank to use the ATM there.

Two tricks they use alongside a skimmer is for a man to stand behind you with a mobile in his hand as you enter the pin and just note it onto the device,hence the introduction in the UK of the [useless] yellow box near the ATM.The other more subtle is the placing of a downward facing camera on the housing above the keypad which films your keystrokes as you make them.

Which is why you should cover your hand as you enter your pin.

This guy obviously doesn't have a clue how smart cards (bank cards) work then, they're pretty similiar to SIM cards in that you have 3 attempts to input the correct pin, the bank machine transmits the PIN to the card, if it is wrong, it is not the bank machine that logs it but the smart card, after 3 wrong attempts, the smart card refuses to accept any more pin numbers and locks itself out (there is no PUK code for bank cards as there are SIM cards) and so the machine keeps it. Older cards would just refuse to accept any more PIN attempts but keep all the data in the smart card, newer cards destroy all data on the card when 3 attempts have been failed, because you can in theory reset the count or read off the data using a very powerful microscope though you'd have to know exactly where to look.

Depends on the country. In the US ATM cards don't use smart cards and as such don't have this layer of "protection".

I wrapped protection in quotes because the smart card may be duplicated rendering this security moot.

Only old ATMS eat the cards, the new ones are swipe only. However most block the card after 3 attempts.

You sure about that? My bank just upgraded their machines within the past year and they are not swipe only. The only places I've seen that are swipe only are ATM machines in shopping centers and such. Usually these are 3rd party ATMs.

You sure about that? My bank just upgraded their machines within the past year and they are not swipe only. The only places I've seen that are swipe only are ATM machines in shopping centers and such. Usually these are 3rd party ATMs.

Read my previous posts! that was my first post.

Most people if they get their cookies cleared can't remember their passwords to log back into sites. Most people first chance they get use a dictionary word as their password. When ever i'm helping someone set something up I ask them for a password they would want to use. First thing they said a word out of the dictionary. I tell them...uh no ..lets add something to that. People are HORRIBLE at security.

This one highschool kid got his facebook account hacked into. I walked them through resetting his password. I asked him ... "So what was your password"... he said "Football"

Most of the places I see the "swipe" machines rather than the "swallow" machines are in malls, supermarkets, public places. Meaning where the likelihood of the engineer being available is low. Places you don't want your card swallowed.

Hah, so weird, swipe cards?

I haven't seen a card being swept for at least 10 years now. Over here in Belgium everything is done with the chip and a PIN. I don't even think transactions with the magnetic strip are still possible, at least not national.

Although I have always used the same pin, it has absolutely no significance to anything in my life, and would be pretty hard for anyone to guess, even if they knew me. Like everything else it's a simple matter of common sense.

Berry says a whopping 26.83% of all passwords could be guessed by attempting just 20 combinations of four-digit numbers (see first table). "It's amazing how predictable people are," he says.

Not at all.

What is really amazing is that multi billionaire banking companies use a 4 numerical digits system as security.

Well, my bank doesn't allow double digits for one. Meaning pins like 0112 or 3699 wouldn't work. I guess it's all a matter of what each bank enforces?

People will just create password using the 4 corners or things like that.

Why not an alphanumerical keyboard and variable length passwords including caps and symbols ? Then even if someone has 123456789 as password you still have to guess how many digits were used. And you have 3 tries to guess it or the account is frozen and the owner of the card has to show in his bank to unfreeze it.

Probably makes just too much sense ... and is probably too much expensive for multi billionaire companies.

Dont blame the users. Blame the security ... or lack of.

Not at all.

What is really amazing is that multi billionaire banking companies use a 4 numerical digits system as security.

Yes ... my father still has a 4 digit pin with CIBC.

I'm with Desjardins for over 10 years, always had a 5 digit pin.

If you give out 8 digit pin, too many people will forget.

Yes ... my father still has a 4 digit pin with CIBC.

I'm with Desjardins for over 10 years, always had a 5 digit pin.

If you give out 8 digit pin, too many people will forget.

Problem with more digits on a pin is you need compatibility.

For example in the UK, you'd need ALL banks and building societies to switch to using longer pins which would require new bank machines or at least a firmware upgrade, plus all the database infastructure would need upgrading.

That would cost BILLIONS. As they say, 'if it ain`t broke, don`t fix it'.

Not really anything to be worried about unless the PIN actually is 1234, 1111, or 0000. You only get a couple tries before the ATM eats the card, so chances are the code won't be cracked in any timely manner.

Not all ATM's consume the card until the transaction is completed. Several models are swipe style.

Is this USA based only, or are there crazy banks in other countries that don't have a security feature on the ATMs that just "eats" the card if you input the wrong pin three times and the only way to get the card back is to go to the bank?

My bank does this. It doesn't physically take your card but it does disable the card if the wrong pin is entered too many times. Happened to me once when I forgot my pin :/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!