Windows 8 Falls Behind Even the Maligned Vista


Recommended Posts

Age isn't a factor in how one decides to organize. I know people who have 10 IE toolbars and a desktop full of shortcuts and files and ones who don't This cuts across age barriers. Probably a lot like people and how clean their car is on the inside. Age isn't a definitive predictor of how clean one will have the inside of their car.

well then, if they didn't care to begin with, the mess they create on the start screen wouldn't bother them either. to those of us who like it clean, will make it clean.

How is it not easy? Just start typing, and Search automatically opens.

Great stuff, I didn't know that - Why didn't the Store have a message saying that!!!

The annoying thing is that it only works on the front screen of the store.

I'm undecided on the Search myself. I really, really like the idea of a unified location for search, that's in one consistent place, no matter the app, but like you said, sometimes a contextual search should be more obvious.

The best I can offer is that you press Win+Q when in an app. That should activate the search for the app that you're in, rather than search for the system. For example, if you are in the Windows Store, then pressing Win+Q should open a search in the Windows Store, and not elsewhere.

Cool, thanks. I have also now found that the search via the charms menu, keeps you locked into Windows store search. Its now left me questioning everything, and also having to memorise the paths I need to get things done, none of them are intuitive.

I just do not know why some people here are SO against choices. Choices are good.

You have the choice to install ANY 3rd party product to do pretty much absolutely anything with Windows. Is that not enough choice for you?

Ok, well here is my start screen. I haven't done anything to it.

testsa.jpg

Now you will say "Well just unpin all that stuff" True I could, though I don't use the start screen I use start8, but I never had to clean any of that stuff up on windows 7

No in windows 7 instead you either had to pin it in a long list of disorganized pinned apps, or find them in a huge list of nested folders. as opposed to a start screen where you can pin as many of your favorite apps you want, and organize them properly so you can actually find them, in far less time than searching nested folders in the start menu.

There's a lot I find awful about Windows 8.

- Multiple places for settings. You have to mess around looking in the metro settings AND control panel - why not have it all in once place as it was before?

- The UI is a horrible, patchy mess. If they're going to go for metro, then commit to it everywhere. Don't give us a crippled Windows 7 desktop which matches nothing in the rest of the metro OS. Granted it sounds like Windows 'Blue' will fix some of this apparently but it should have been that way to begin with.

- No way to load a program full screen on bootup. For example, trying to put a machine together to load Steam Big Picture fullscreen on bootup for a gaming PC. In windows 8 there isn't a reasonable way to do it. You can get it to load to tray on bootup but you can't load anything full screen automatically before going to desktop as it forces you to load the start screen first. WHAT.

- No Xbox controller support for nagivating start screen. Again, for a gaming/media PC. It would have been easy to introduce and would be an ideal way to navigate the start screen with a wireless xbox pad, to load games etc. I know you can't navigate windows 7 with a pad but it seems like a real wasted opportunity, and would certainly have alleviated the fact you can't load steam big picture on bootup with it.

I could go on and on and on. I tried, really tried to get on with Windows 8. Immersing myself in it only caused great frustration, so it has been wiped in favour of Windows 7 until such time they overhaul significant parts of it.

Cool, thanks. I have also now found that the search via the charms menu, keeps you locked into Windows store search. Its now left me questioning everything, and also having to memorise the paths I need to get things done, none of them are intuitive.

Everyone got used to "Start > Shutdown". We should be fine. I think.

There's a lot I find awful about Windows 8.

- Multiple places for settings. You have to mess around looking in the metro settings AND control panel - why not have it all in once place as it was before?

- The UI is a horrible, patchy mess. If they're going to go for metro, then commit. Don't give us a crippled desktop which matches nothing in the rest of the metro OS. Granted it sounds like Windows 'Blue' will fix some of this apparently but it should have been that way to begin with.

- No way to load a program full screen on bootup. For example, trying to put a machine together to load Steam Big Picture fullscreen on bootup for a gaming PC. In windows 8 there isn't a reasonable way to do it. You can get it to load to tray on bootup but you can't load anything full screen automatically before going to desktop as it forces you to load the start screen first. WHAT.

I could go on and on and on. I tried, really tried to get on with Windows 8. Immersing myself in it only caused great frustration, so it has been wiped in favour of Windows 7 until such time they overhaul significant parts of it.

When you say the desktop was "crippled", what do you mean?

As for the control panel, I don't know if that will ever really improve. It's always been kind of scattered, and I'm not sure any future version of Windows will change this.

yes and no. at least in the start menu things stayed alphabetized and not just in the order that you installed things

I do not dislike the start screen by any means but I think it could still use a little work (looks forward to windows blue update :))

go to all apps in the start screen and it's also listed alphabetized and grouped by folders/apps. the start screen is not a replacement for all programs, it's a replacement for the pinned apps, your favorite apps, the apps you actually use, except that with the start menu, you could only pin so many, and even then they where in a tiny nasty list where you had to search up and down to find the right icon. on the strat screen you can pin as many as you want, and organize them as you want in named groups.

When you say the desktop was "crippled", what do you mean?

As for the control panel, I'm not sure that will ever get better. It's always been kind of scattered, and I'm not sure any future version of Windows will change this.

As in the start menu. All they've done is given us a Windows 7 desktop and crippled it without the start menu, that interface matched that desktop, period.

I can see why they've done the metro interface, it suits touch devices really well. But shoehorning it onto the desktop has simply made things more convoluted.

The desktop needs to be metro-ised to make a coherent experience. There needs to be a single place to configure your machine, not go digging around what may or may not be in the metro config tool and also the control panel.

Everything is too patchy, the start screen feels like it was shoehorned in and parts of the OS were crippled to force you to use it.

There are things I like, like the searching, enhanced task manager/performance monitor etc, but the whole UI experience needs an overhaul. I also like the idea of having information simply displayed to you like that and it not using those silly Widgets. Metro everything though and make it coherent just simply have one interface style.

I'm not saying Windows didn't need an overhaul, I think it was stuck in a design rut and did need something drastic. I simply think they've done it wrong. They've spent far too long focussing on doing something for touch devices and not made it work properly and coherently on PCs. By the sounds of it MS have realised this themselves and might address it with Windows Blue (if it is even real).

A lot of us felt that Windows 8 might start slowly. It's a huge change and your normal user hates change. If Microsoft stays the course they might begin to win people over eventually. Or maybe not.

normal users love the change. it seems to be the so called techies that whine the most about windows 8. Every "noob" I know that got windows 8 loves it and learned to use it in less then a day. My parents suck at computers and they absolutely love windows 8. My grandma even uses windows 8.

  • Like 2

normal users love the change. it seems to be the so called techies that whine the most about windows 8. Every "noob" I know that got windows 8 loves it and learned to use it in less then a day. My parents suck at computers and they absolutely love windows 8. My grandma even uses windows 8.

Quite agree.

It appears to be the crowd that should know better who are fuming because they really couldn't do it any better themselves (which we know any way).

As in the start menu. All they've done is given us a Windows 7 desktop and crippled it without the start menu, that interface matched that desktop, period.

I can see why they've done the metro interface, it suits touch devices really well. But shoehorning it onto the desktop has simply made things more convoluted.

The desktop needs to be metro-ised to make a coherent experience. There needs to be a single place to configure your machine, not go digging around what may or may not be in the metro config tool and also the control panel.

Everything is too patchy, the start screen feels like it was shoehorned in and parts of the OS were crippled to force you to use it.

There are things I like, like the searching, enhanced task manager/performance monitor etc, but the whole UI experience needs an overhaul. I also like the idea of having information simply displayed to you like that and it not using those silly Widgets. Metro everything though and make it coherent just simply have one interface style.

I'm not saying Windows didn't need an overhaul, I think it was stuck in a design rut and did need something drastic. I simply think they've done it wrong. They've spent far too long focussing on doing something for touch devices and not made it work properly and coherently on PCs. By the sounds of it MS have realised this themselves and might address it with Windows Blue (if it is even real).

The old start menu doesn't match the desktop at all, it's just an old simple method of providing a launcher menu, the only reason you say it matched is because you're used to it. but there was nothign about it that matched the desktop. the start screen matches the desktop more than the menu with the other changes that's been done.

Meanwhile I've shown it to a lot of people at the store and common to them all, they buy windows 8 over the windows 7 computer most of them where planning on.

I hope they bring them all back and get FULL refunds when they realise you lied to them about what it was and how it was going to make their use of a PC much easier.

  • Like 1

As in the start menu. All they've done is given us a Windows 7 desktop and crippled it without the start menu, that interface matched that desktop, period.

I can see why they've done the metro interface, it suits touch devices really well. But shoehorning it onto the desktop has simply made things more convoluted.

The desktop needs to be metro-ised to make a coherent experience. There needs to be a single place to configure your machine, not go digging around what may or may not be in the metro config tool and also the control panel.

Everything is too patchy, the start screen feels like it was shoehorned in and parts of the OS were crippled to force you to use it.

There are things I like, like the searching, enhanced task manager/performance monitor etc, but the whole UI experience needs an overhaul. I also like the idea of having information simply displayed to you like that and it not using those silly Widgets. Metro everything though and make it coherent just simply have one interface style.

I'm not saying Windows didn't need an overhaul, I think it was stuck in a design rut and did need something drastic. I simply think they've done it wrong. They've spent far too long focussing on doing something for touch devices and not made it work properly and coherently on PCs. By the sounds of it MS have realised this themselves and might address it with Windows Blue (if it is even real).

I agree with you on consistency. Parts like the control panel need to be unified. I think I get what you mean by "parts of the OS were crippled to force you to use it" (Like the addition of Charms?) I disagree that the Start menu "matched" the desktop because functionally I think the Start Screen works better, regardless of the environment.

But I'm still a little lost about what you mean with the desktop. When you say metro-ised, do you mean things should be forced to run full screen, legacy applets like "Right-click Taskbar > Properties > Taskbar Properties" should be removed? Because doing such things seems like it would only "cripple" the desktop even more.

Or am I misunderstanding you?

6952934817_7f70ffbbbc_z.jpg

reminds me of an OVER cluttered desktop with no space to put anything new. You can see the existing icons have already overflowed WAY to the right, and WAY to the left and would need to be scrolled over to find.

What a nightmare!!!

  • Like 1

But I'm still a little lost about what you mean with the desktop. When you say metro-ised, do you mean things should be forced to run full screen, legacy applets like "Right-click Taskbar > Properties > Taskbar Properties" should be removed? Because doing such things seems like it would only "cripple" the desktop even more.

Or am I misunderstanding you?

I just mean in style and design. We have Metro, and then we have desktop. There's no effort put in to making the desktop look like a part of the rest of the OS (start screen, or vice versa). The start screen feels tagged on. The desktop needs a whole overhaul (even just a theme or something).

Ideally, they would move as much OUT of the desktop as possible. Ie, remove the control panel, have a CP tile which brings up a Metro CP app. It would also be nice to have an embedded Metro explorer browser.

In fact, doing a quick search, I found this posted by a fellow Neowiner. https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1097383-concept-for-window-8-metro-file-explorer/

That would be PERFECT. Could be baked right into a start screen/metro app so there was no need to go to desktop to browse the filesystem.

I'm fully in support of moving further to a start screen type interface if they just committed and went further with it. I don't want to have to keep switching between the two for tasks which could simply be moved to the metro interface. My issue isn't with metro, just that they haven't gone metro enough.

Windows 8 is a HUGE mistake on Microsoft's part.

Obviously their over-riding plan was to homogenise everything (but that's impossible). Where they may have planned to make every platform look and work the same, all they have actually done is splintered users.

Bottom line is that Windows will end up like linux (and then become irrelevant in the market), where everyone thought "linux is the same" but actually everyone's implementation is different, and ofter programs are designed for specific make or versions of linux and don't work on different brands/releases.

I hope they bring them all back and get FULL refunds when they realise you lied to them about what it was and how it was going to make their use of a PC much easier.

how did I lie to them, especially in a live demo.

Bottom line is that Windows will end up like linux (and then become irrelevant in the market), where everyone thought "linux is the same" but actually everyone's implementation is different, and ofter programs are designed for specific make or versions of linux and don't work on different brands/releases.

hahhahaha, omg...

Windows 8 is rubbish and so are the drivers for it. I don't need any flaming it just my opinion.

The drivers are very good, better then in Windows 7 for my laptop.

With a Windows 8 installation I was ready to do everything I want, only a video card driver.

With Windows 7 did I need to get my USB drive, go to another computer and download network drivers. Else I won't have any connection. :p

Windows 8 is a HUGE mistake on Microsoft's part.

Obviously their over-riding plan was to homogenise everything (but that's impossible). Where they may have planned to make every platform look and work the same, all they have actually done is splintered users.

Bottom line is that Windows will end up like linux (and then become irrelevant in the market), where everyone thought "linux is the same" but actually everyone's implementation is different, and ofter programs are designed for specific make or versions of linux and don't work on different brands/releases.

Hahahaha. Oh, my...

I just mean in style and design. We have Metro, and then we have desktop. There's no effort put in to making the desktop look like a part of the rest of the OS (start screen, or vice versa). The start screen feels tagged on. The desktop needs a whole overhaul (even just a theme or something).

Ideally, they would move as much OUT of the desktop as possible. Ie, remove the control panel, have a CP tile which brings up a Metro CP app. It would also be nice to have an embedded Metro explorer browser.

In fact, doing a quick search, I found this posted by a fellow Neowiner. http://www.neowin.ne...-file-explorer/

That would be PERFECT. Could be baked right into a start screen/metro app so there was no need to go to desktop to browse the filesystem.

I'm fully in support of moving further to a start screen type interface if they just committed and went further with it. I don't want to have to keep switching between the two for tasks which could simply be moved to the metro interface. My issue isn't with metro, just that they haven't gone metro enough.

I get you, and I agree. That's clearly the direction MS has set, so I'm confident that what you're describing will arrive soon enough.

reminds me of an OVER cluttered desktop with no space to put anything new. You can see the existing icons have already overflowed WAY to the right, and WAY to the left and would need to be scrolled over to find.

What a nightmare!!!

Yea the default behavior should be for it not to be pinned to the Start Screen and for you to have to manually pin it by going to All apps. But the ability to organize it is much better than the ability to organize the Start Menu. (You have to scroll All programs on the start menu too)

I just mean in style and design. We have Metro, and then we have desktop. There's no effort put in to making the desktop look like a part of the rest of the OS (start screen, or vice versa). The start screen feels tagged on. The desktop needs a whole overhaul (even just a theme or something).

My intuition is Microsoft is eventually going to bring WinRT to the desktop, so you can have click-once installs and natively compiled .NET apps on the desktop. and they were postponing that for a later release.

What I'd eventually like to see is for Microsoft to skip the desktop/metro duality altogether and just have apps that either run in windowed or full screen versions, and switch environments, what Apple is doing with MacOS.

I think Windows 8 has a bit of a scrambled design. It seems to jump from a familiar Windows experience to an odd, oversized, full-screen mess, and then back again.

If they reeled things back a bit and stuck to just one type of interface design then Windows 9 should be a huge improvement..

Ok, well here is my start screen. I haven't done anything to it.

testsa.jpg

Now you will say "Well just unpin all that stuff" True I could, though I don't use the start screen I use start8, but I never had to clean any of that stuff up on windows 7

Messy-Desktop.jpg

Herp herp I can play this game too.

The desktop is so much less organized than the start screen, and needs far more babysitting. I keep mine completely empty, and it's nice.

Herp herp I can play this game too.

The desktop is so much less organized than the start screen, and needs far more babysitting. I keep mine completely empty, and it's nice.

How old is that screenshot? There's the previous IE, the older uTorrent, duplicate Safari icons, etc... Does that say 2009 on the taskbar?

Also, not that I disagree the desktop needs the same if not more managing, but I thought the desktop had Auto-arrange and Align-to-grid enabled by default. Or was it just Align-to-grid? Either way, that's really something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!