Hackulous, the pirated iOS app community, abruptly closes


Recommended Posts

Easy to own an iPhone when they are free with a 2 year contract now.

They are not free with a contract, they are free with a down payment contract. Buy a regular pone and you get a cheaper contract.

I will miss Installous dearly :(

Pirated software and iOS, two things I have absolutely nothing to do with.

Then why are you posting in this topic?

You are just to gullible then as with just about ANY app/program, there is just about ALWAYS an equally as good free one. I can't remember the last time/year I actually paid for any app or program. Personally, there is nothing out really worth paying for!! This too!! :)

Spot on, well said Cork! I agree. Whether it's operating systems or programs, there's always a good free one that is equal to or better than a paid one. Windows and Linux Mint come to mind. I've been a Windows guy for years, but my Linux consultant girlfriend has me using Mint and OpenSUSE, and I can't thank her enough as Mint is just as good as Windows if not better. Programming on it for cross platform is actually easier which helps me a lot as I'm a .NET/Mono & GTK/Glade dev.

Admittedly, in my job of IT and electronics repairs there ARE paid programs such as HDD Regenerator & GetDataBack that free doesn't come anywhere near for functionality or ease of use. I love opensource for the simple fact that if there's a problem with the program and I'm skilled enough I can fix it, no waiting for Patch Tuesdays (Yeah, MS!) or for someone else to do it. Anyone who calls programmers Open Source Extremists are just jealous because we're good at what we do :)

  • Like 2

It's definitely a lot easier to pirate hard work on Android.

LOL @ These iOS fanboys. The jailbreak mods were so universal that i cant imagine how anyone considered Android a more piracy friendly platform compared to iOS(unless they were doing based on counts rather than percentage rates, then ofc, android is FAR more popular). Every single person thats jailbroken their phone was a pirate pretty much because it was tons easier than on android.

As for ppl saying Paid apps are a ripoff, thats true on iOS, because almost everything costs money and the whole platform is designed to gouge you, straight from the overpriced yet underpowered device, to the apps.

On android, there are clear differences between most paid apps and their free counterparts.

As for this hackulous thing, pirates will always be pirates, so Apple just lost a little market share.

  • Like 3

LOL @ These iOS fanboys. The jailbreak mods were so universal that i cant imagine how anyone considered Android a more piracy friendly platform compared to iOS(unless they were doing based on counts rather than percentage rates, then ofc, android is FAR more popular). Every single person thats jailbroken their phone was a pirate pretty much because it was tons easier than on android.

:rolleyes: Yes, because jailbreaking is synonymous with pirating. Pretty much no-one jailbroke their iOS device in order to use unofficial customisations/tweaks.

As for ppl saying Paid apps are a ripoff, thats true on iOS, because almost everything costs money and the whole platform is designed to gouge you, straight from the overpriced yet underpowered device, to the apps.

Android apps cost 2.5X more than iPhone apps

Canalys attributes the price discrepancy to two factors:

  • Apple's more mature, controlled retail environment, which allows in-app purchases and drives app price competitiveness
  • With fewer people willing to pay for apps on the Android Market, developers have to charge that much more to break even

Source: http://tech.fortune....an-iphone-apps/

In regards to the iPhone being an "underpowered device", I'd post benchmarks of the iPhone 5 outperforming Android devices out at the time, but there's no point bothering with someone that has a closed mind or is just ignorant.

It doesn't matter if the app cost a single penny, piracy is a fact of life and people will always pirate, no matter what the cost of the app is. I think a lot of the time, it's more psychological, the "thrill" of getting away with piracy, then one not having the money to pay for an app.

In regards to the iPhone being an "underpowered device", I'd post benchmarks of the iPhone 5 outperforming Android devices out at the time, but there's no point bothering with someone that has a closed mind or is just ignorant.

Benchmark scores are completely synthetic and, largely theoretical. They?re also heavily influenced by optimizations in the software and the way the OS runs the benchmarking app. In other words, they?re not really all that important. Who cares if the X Android device scored less than the iPhone 5? At the end of the day, the only thing that matters is how your phone performs in real world use. If you don?t perceive any lag or slowdown in your daily usage of the phone, that?s all that matters. Nobody cares how the benchmarks compare to the competition as long as the phone handles thrown at it. Benchmark scores only give us a baseline for the maximum performance output of a phone under a very specific set of circumstances, nothing more.

At the end of the day, the only thing that matters is how your phone performs in real world use. Benchmark scores only give us a baseline for the maximum performance output of a phone under a very specific set of circumstances, nothing more.

Yes while I don't want to overplay the role of benchmarks, read my comment in the context of what I replied to; the intention wasn't to bash Android devices. In regards to the iPhone being potentially underpowered, I can only reference benchmarks as I cannot measure real world use. I could state my own experience of it not being laggy but that's hardly comparative or anything more than anecdotal.

It doesn't matter if the app cost a single penny, piracy is a fact of life and people will always pirate, no matter what the cost of the app is. I think a lot of the time, it's more psychological, the "thrill" of getting away with piracy, then one not having the money to pay for an app.

I agree 100%.

There's is no thrill about getting away with piracy, it's just the generation of kids today that expects to get everything they want, and to get it right now and not pay for it. they don't see consequences and they don't car about it. they simply don't want to pay for stuff if they don't have to.

Yes while I don't want to overplay the role of benchmarks, read my comment in the context of what I replied to; the intention wasn't to bash Android devices. In regards to the iPhone being potentially underpowered, I can only reference benchmarks as I cannot measure real world use. I could state my own experience of it not being laggy but that's hardly comparative or anything more than anecdotal.

Yes, Anadtech says that the iphone/ipad cpu and gpu are somewhat the best at the moment. Ofcourse, android phones release like every week and there's bound to be a faster model. But the iphone 5 can stand on its own because it's highly optimized and there's very little lag if not at all.

You are just to gullible then as with just about ANY app/program, there is just about ALWAYS an equally as good free one.

I can't remember the last time/year I actually paid for any app or program. Personally, there is nothing out really worth paying for!!

This too!! :)

Sometimes, but usually NO. not at all. and even when there is it's usually ad supported which is plain horrible.

and since you're using program and not just apps, what's an equally good free alternative to 3DS MAX and Photoshop ?

as for apps on mobile, what's an equally good free app to the iOS Day One journal app, for Android ?what's an equally good camera app to CameraFX or ProHDR Camera ? I tried a ton of free podCast apps before I finally caved in and bought Double Twist on my android phone.

Still waiting for corks reply. it's not like he ran away because he didn't have an answer or anything...

I did use Installous a few times for apps that I wasn't sure had the features I needed and I wanted to confirm first,

Always uninstalled then purchased the app if this was the case.

Not all apps are '99 cents'

Android does it right by letting you get a refund within 15minutes of purchase if you delete the app

I did use Installous a few times for apps that I wasn't sure had the features I needed and I wanted to confirm first,

Always uninstalled then purchased the app if this was the case.

Not all apps are '99 cents'

Android does it right by letting you get a refund within 15minutes of purchase if you delete the app

Apple lets you have a refun within reasonable time if you contact them, that's better than 15 minutes which in some situations is long before you can even use the app.

they used to do it right when it was 24 hours, they should have dropped it to 12 or at most 6 hours, the 15 minute thing is ridiculous and they might as well have just removed it altogether.

They are not free with a contract, they are free with a down payment contract. Buy a regular pone and you get a cheaper contract.

That isn't necessarily so. Verizon and AT&T in the US just have their plans and that is it. Bring your own phone, get one of their subsidized phones under a 2 year contract...makes no difference in your monthly bill except that they require all smartphones to have a data plan (feature phones can be voice only).

I admit, I used Installeous once to install Sparrow to check it out. I found out that it wasn't worth the hype and uninstalled it. Then I uninstalled installeous. That whole thing reeked of malware vectors.

Yeah, but the you're still,on one of the overpriced plans, with the ridiculous 2 years contracts. Good thing 12 months is the max contract time for consumers over here.

That is why you see the stories about Verizon, Sprint, and AT&T sales staff pushing consumers to Android instead of iPhone. iPhone 16GB is $650 and the big 3 sell subsidized for $200. Meanwhile, a new 16GB Android or WP phone costs $500 and the big 3 subsidized for $200. They make more money off a customer if they go with Android than iPhone because Apple requires a LOT of subsidization to be on a network.

You get the same plan either way, so IMO the iPhone is better if you are going with a 2-year subsidized contract. With an AT&T subsidized iPhone for $200, you can use for 2 years and then have AT&T unlock the phone and actually re-sell it for about $350. Try and sell a 2 year old Android phone for more than $50.

It is what it is and has nothing to do with being an iSheep or a Fandroid. Used Apple **** has amazingly high resell value, especially old unlocked iPhones.

I'm starting to prefer going straight to unlocked and using pay-as-you-go networks here because they are a LOT cheaper month-to-month (although lack LTE). The unlocked 16GB Nexus 4 was a steal at $350, so I went with that one for this round.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!