5 hurt in accidental shootings at 3 U.S. gun shows


Recommended Posts

Accidental gunfire at three gun shows around the United States on Saturday left five injured, authorities said.

Three people were injured in Raleigh, North Carolina, at the Dixie Gun and Knife Show at the state fairgrounds, a quarterly event that usually draws thousands of people. State agriculture department spokesman Brian Long said a 12-gauge shotgun discharged as its owner unzipped its case for a law enforcement officer to check at a security entrance.

Two bystanders were hit by shotgun pellets and taken to a hospital. A retired deputy sheriff suffered a slight hand injury.

Long said the shotgun's owner, 36-year-old Gary Lynn Wilson, brought the weapon to the show to find a private buyer. Sheriff Donnie Harrison said it was too early to know whether Wilson might be charged.

In Indiana, police said a 54-year-old Indianapolis man was injured when he accidentally shot himself while leaving a gun show.

State Police said Emory L. Cozee was loading his .45 caliber semi-automatic when he shot himself in the hand as he was leaving the Indy 1500 Gun and Knife show at the state fairgrounds. Loaded personal weapons are not allowed inside the show.

Cozee was hospitalized for treatment. Police say the shooting was accidental and no charges will be filed.

Meanwhile, authorities in Ohio said a gun dealer in Medina was checking out a semi-automatic handgun he had bought when he accidentally pulled the trigger, injuring his friend. The gun's magazine had been removed from the firearm but one round remained in the chamber, police said.

Police Chief Pat Berarducci said it appears the bullet struck the floor and the man was wounded in the arm and leg. Berarducci said the man was taken by helicopter to a Cleveland hospital. His condition was not immediately known.

This doesn't help the pro gun crowd at all.

These are your law abiding citizens that are supposed to know how to handle a gun.

Seems like more educations about handling guns safely is necessary when you allow people to buy a gun

  • Like 2

It doesn't matter to the pro-gun crowd how many people are injured or killed - all that matters is that they're ready to bear arms against an oppressive government. Obviously. :rolleyes:

This doesn't help the pro gun crowd at all.

These are your law abiding citizens that are supposed to know how to handle a gun.

Seems like more educations about handling guns safely is necessary when you allow people to buy a gun

You need to pass a test to get your driving license but not for an ar15

It doesn't matter to the pro-gun crowd how many people are injured or killed - all that matters is that they're ready to bear arms against an oppressive government. Obviously. :rolleyes:

And they are only too happy to throw money at that oppressive government as long as its spent on the military no contradiction at all :rofl:

  • Like 2

Let's get a little perspective here people. Accidents happen all the time. How many thousands upon thousands of people got into accidents in their cars during the time the show took place? How many people cut themselves with knives during the same amount of time and had to go to the hospital? How many thousands of people got hurt just doing their job at their place of work?

Why do we not make a big deal about those accidents when they happen far more often and hurt far more people than guns? Yeah crusading against guns might be a worthy cause for some but at the end of the day they are far down from the top of the list of things that are likely to hurt you in your day to day lives.

  • Like 3

This is why before owning a gun you should have to get a license, that includes a full course on Basic Gun Safety.. And maybe a little common sense. Walking around with a loaded Shotgun, and not knowing that there's a round in the chamber.. this is fairly basic stuff..

Idiots. People hurt themselves with chainsaws, too, but no-one is crying about Home Depot selling them.

Right, because people run around killing mass quantities of people with chainsaws....and they're specifically designed for killing. Oh wait....

Idiots. People hurt themselves with chainsaws, too, but no-one is crying about Home Depot selling them.

Right, because people run around killing mass quantities of people with chainsaws....and they're specifically designed for killing. Oh wait....

Uhoh, be careful, McCordRm. nekkidtruth, is using the "oh wait" reply tactic.

Chainsaws are specifically designed to kill trees. I've used one myself, very effective at slaughtering those pesky trees!

Uhoh, be careful, McCordRm. nekkidtruth, is using the "oh wait" reply tactic.

Chainsaws are specifically designed to kill trees. I've used one myself, very effective at slaughtering those pesky trees!

Comparing trees to humans/sentient beings. Sounds logical! I'm sure you can come up with better than that. Perhaps if you weren't trying so hard to compare things that have pretty much zero to do with each other, you might have actually come up with a feasible argument.

Comparing trees to humans/sentient beings. Sounds logical! I'm sure you can come up with better than that. Perhaps if you weren't trying so hard to compare things that have pretty much zero to do with each other, you might have actually come up with a feasible argument.

But I wasn't comparing trees to humans, way to take my remarks completely out of context and use your own to try and put me in my place, maybe you could try something more original...oh wait..........

Comparing trees to humans/sentient beings. Sounds logical!

You mean like this idiot? (Whom people like you have a hard-on for):

http://motorcitytimes.com/mct/2010/07/obama-science-czar-john-p-holdren-%e2%80%9ctrees-have-legal-rights%e2%80%9d/

But I wasn't comparing trees to humans, way to take my remarks completely out of context and use your own to try and put me in my place, maybe you could try something more original...oh wait..........

Perhaps you should speak to whoever it was that made your post prior to this one. They did in fact insinuate that chainsaws were designed for killing trees, comparing them by proxy to guns which are specifically designed for killing living beings. It's become a bit ridiculous that you can't even follow your own conversation. Have we really reached a point where you don't really have anything to add that substantiates the points you try to make, that you feel the need to lie and says you didn't say what you said?

You mean like this idiot? (Whom people like you have a hard-on for):

http://motorcitytime...ights%e2%80%9d/

I'm not entirely sure what your point is. I've never, at any point in time, given an opinion on how I feel about the environment or any of the issues trees face.

Perhaps you should speak to whoever it was that made your post prior to this one. They did in fact insinuate that chainsaws were designed for killing trees, comparing them by proxy to guns which are specifically designed for killing living beings. It's become a bit ridiculous that you can't even follow your own conversation. Have we really reached a point where you don't really have anything to add that substantiates the points you try to make, that you feel the need to lie and says you didn't say what you said?

I'm not entirely sure what your point is. I've never, at any point in time, given an opinion on how I feel about the environment or any of the issues trees face.

I clearly did not lie and I did not compare trees to humans, why is it so difficult for you to understand? You want to make up things and attack people for their remarks. You're deluded in believing your own BS. So typical of an armchair activist.

I clearly did not lie and I did not compare trees to humans, why is it so difficult for you to understand? You want to make up things and attack people for their remarks. You deluded in believing your own BS. So typical of an armchair activist.

If you say so. As they say however, the proof is in the pudding. You very clearly stated that chainsaws were specifically designed for killing trees, immediately after I mocked someone else for attempting the same thing. Even the most basic deductive reasoning would lead one to believe you too were comparing said items. Perhaps another attempt at an English class might help alleviate these types of misunderstandings.

If you say so. As they say however, the proof is in the pudding. You very clearly stated that chainsaws were specifically designed for killing trees, immediately after I mocked someone else for attempting the same thing. Even the most basic deductive reasoning would lead one to believe you too were comparing said items. Perhaps another attempt at an English class might help alleviate these types of misunderstandings.

I did say chainsaws were designed for killing trees and how effective they are at slaughtering "those pesky trees". You refuse to admit that it is you who is taking my remarks out of context and adding your own. And I wholeheartedly agree, an English class would help you immensely, particularly regarding mockery and sarcasm. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink!

I did say chainsaws were designed for killing trees and how effective they are at slaughtering "those pesky trees". You refuse to admit that it is you who is taking my remarks out of context and adding your own. And I wholeheartedly agree, an English class would help you immensely, particularly regarding mockery and sarcasm. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink!

My averages of 95% in English through each year I was in school would beg to differ.

It doesn't matter to the pro-gun crowd how many people are injured or killed - all that matters is that they're ready to bear arms against an oppressive government. Obviously. :rolleyes:

Are you talking about the people here on neowin or what? Define this croud and bring to light this evidence you have uncovered here. I think if you have a problem come do something about it boy :)

Are you talking about the people here on neowin or what? Define this croud and bring to light this evidence you have uncovered here. I think if you have a problem come do something about it boy :)

And you'll what? Prove that you're clearly not mentally stable enough to own a gun?

My averages of 95% in English through each year I was in school would beg to differ.

And you can prove that, how? And it is relevant, how? The world is not about the grades, it is about how you use the skills. I think you did not did your supposed 95% in English credit when you misinterpreted what was supposed to be light humour with no intention of personal attack or agenda except to poke fun at the home depot statement. I guess I could give you the benefit of the doubt, as we all know if you study literature enough there is always something hidden between the lines, but you seem to taken the "oh wait" quip far too personally.

When i read Raze's statement, I chuckled. Chainsaws are very effective at cutting those pesky trees, more so than people and probably more so than anything else. Now it begs the question, what is guns most effective at these.... probably killing organic meatbags of some sort.

As for this, this is a non-issue personally. Accidents happen all the time, just as stupidity. People who were there all are probably pro-gun anyway and it shot what probably is a crowd of pro-gunners. Is not a good look, but at the same time it merely points to need of basic safety knowledge of how to handle a gun as opposed question its place in society. Bringing a loaded shotgun? Really? Maybe it was a pity it didn't unloaded into himself so he stop spreading his genes, unless he felt so unsafe he have his loaded shotgun at the ready. But won't a pistol be faster than unzipping the thing? Who knows, not when it spontaneously discharges.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Free eBook: A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (worth $126.95) by Steven Parker Claim your complimentary copy (worth $126.95) of "A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0" for free, before the offer ends on July 8. (link below) Description The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework, produced in response to a 2014 US Presidential directive, has proven essential in standardizing approaches to cybersecurity risk and producing an efficient, adaptable toolkit for meeting cyber threats. As these threats have multiplied and escalated in recent years, this framework has evolved to meet new needs and reflect new best practices, and now has an international footprint. There has never been a greater need for cybersecurity professionals to understand this framework, its applications, and its potential. A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 offers a vital introduction to this NIST framework and its implementation. Highlighting significant updates from the first version of the NIST framework, it works through each of the framework’s functions in turn, in language both beginners and experienced professionals can grasp. Replete with compliance and implementation strategies, it proves indispensable for the next generation of cybersecurity professionals. A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 readers will also find: Clear, jargon-free language for both beginning and advanced readers Detailed discussion of all NIST framework components, including Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover Hundreds of actionable recommendations for immediate implementation by cybersecurity professionals at all levels A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 is ideal for cybersecurity professionals, business leaders and executives, IT consultants and advisors, and students and academics focused on the study of cybersecurity, information technology, or related fields. How to download for free Please ensure you read the terms and conditions to claim this offer. Complete and verifiable information is required in order to receive this free offer. If you have previously made use of these offers, you will not need to re-register. A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Was $126.95, but is now FREE | Above link offer expires on July 8. The below offers are also available for free in exchange for your (work) email: View our recent time-limited free eBook offers The Complete Free AI Learning: Master ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & More ($21 Value) now FREE How to Build an AI Design Workflow with Gamma ($21 Value) now FREE The Ultimate Linux Newbie Guide – Featured free content Python Notes for Professionals – Featured free content Learn Linux in 5 Days – Featured free content Quick Reference Guide for Cybersecurity – Featured free content We post these because we earn commission on each lead so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin The above deal not doing it for you, but still want to help? Check out the links below. Check out our partner software in the Neowin Store Buy a T-shirt at Neowin's Threadsquad Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: An account at Neowin Deals is required to participate in any deals powered by our affiliate, StackCommerce. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through the branded deals site.
    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!