Teen Planned to Attack Walmart After Killing Family


Recommended Posts

Only an idiot can think that more guns is the best way to fight against guns. If guns were banned back in the day her family would probably still be alive.

If they were banned back in the day, more guns would not help. However the reality in the US is that the threshold has been crossed where guns are so prevalent, that it is relatively easy for a criminal to get a gun on the black market that more guns (in the right hands) and making it easy to get more guns is the only thing that can fight the guns in the wrong hands, barring any magical new technology that can remove all the illegal guns, back to being a pre-gun prevalence state.

Problem is it's still too easy on the legal side. It has to be easy - up to a point. Once you cross that point and people who are unfit to own guns responsibly can get guns legally, then it is aiding the side that you are trying to protect against.

I agree that there should be in-home inspections, I would go as far as mental health assessments, yearly inspections of the gun safe and random inspections as a condition of firearm ownership. Make sure that they are really locked up properly and is not a drug den - nothing more (nothing too intrusive). It would create a lot of jobs too.

But bottom line is that guns need to stay, they are the only effective solution to stop the country from being over run by criminals.

Compare it to a more obvious scenario. If Israel stopped all of the citizens from carrying guns within the country, what do you think would happen? They would be quickly over-run by their enemies because there is no deterrent and nothing to stop them. Some people here hate Israel and would see this as a good thing, but that is not the point. The point is that a country under threat from enemy guns (criminal or combatant) needs to have guns to keep their enemy in check.

  • Like 1

Location: England :rolleyes:

Soooo....should I respond this to Americans commenting other countries' news?

If they were banned back in the day, more guns would not help. However the reality in the US is that the threshold has been crossed where guns are so prevalent, that it is relatively easy for a criminal to get a gun on the black market that more guns (in the right hands) and making it easy to get more guns is the only thing that can fight the guns in the wrong hands, barring any magical new technology that can remove all the illegal guns, back to being a pre-gun prevalence state.

Problem is it's still too easy on the legal side. It has to be easy - up to a point. Once you cross that point and people who are unfit to own guns responsibly can get guns legally, then it is aiding the side that you are trying to protect against.

I agree that there should be in-home inspections, I would go as far as mental health assessments, yearly inspections of the gun safe and random inspections as a condition of firearm ownership. Make sure that they are really locked up properly and is not a drug den - nothing more (nothing too intrusive). It would create a lot of jobs too.

But bottom line is that guns need to stay, they are the only effective solution to stop the country from being over run by criminals.

Compare it to a more obvious scenario. If Israel stopped all of the citizens from carrying guns within the country, what do you think would happen? They would be quickly over-run by their enemies because there is no deterrent and nothing to stop them. Some people here hate Israel and would see this as a good thing, but that is not the point. The point is that a country under threat from enemy guns (criminal or combatant) needs to have guns to keep their enemy in check.

Do you wear 5 tin foil hats?

I have another one if you want.

If they were banned back in the day, more guns would not help. However the reality in the US is that the threshold has been crossed where guns are so prevalent, that it is relatively easy for a criminal to get a gun on the black market that more guns (in the right hands) and making it easy to get more guns is the only thing that can fight the guns in the wrong hands, barring any magical new technology that can remove all the illegal guns, back to being a pre-gun prevalence state.

There are other solutions. For instance, you could stop the supply of ammunition for existing calibres?or impose a supertax to get around the libertarians?and make legal weapons use a new calibre - guns aren't all that much use without ammunition. Will that solve it? Of course not, though it's easier tracking down people making ammunition illegally than it is tracking down illegal guns when ammunition is freely purchasable.

If you have a high murder rate you don't simply give up and say "there's nothing we can do about it now" - the gun situation is no different. Rather than complaining about what won't work people need to look for what will work. Limiting magazine sizes is a start; banning the most dangerous types of ammo can only help; closing loopholes for background checks is a win-win; requiring inspections to ensure weapons are safely stored in a locked gun cabinet is a must, etc. If you start by banning the most dangerous calibres and working your way down then you don't leave citizens unarmed and vulnerable but you can reduce the number of firearms fatalities. The United States has a completely different gun culture to other countries so obviously it needs a different approach but there has to be an approach - simply flooding the country with even more firearms can only end badly.

  • Like 2

People have been killing people long before video games. If anything video games relieve my urge to kill others in real life :p

Crazy people are maybe just attracted to violent games, so it could be the other way around.

they tried this crap back in the 90's and all we got was the rating system . I know all us older gamers remember the crap that

mortal kombat and night trap started , maybe Obama will bring in the nut jack Thompson to help bs the house into getting it passed

and talk about how bad the games were back then

it should be up to the parents ( not government ) to decide what there kids can handle and to step up more on what there kids do and watch

some parents just don't give a darn and let there kids play what ever they want. I sell used games and I seen parents buy games like gta for kinds under 9 even after you warn them about language and content.we don't need our games getting stripped and removed of content like what Germany does to some if its games if it doesn't just ban everything first

Why can't people realize that when guns get limited or banned, it won't be a instant fix, and instead, will be a long term issue to keep on top of. Sure, many people will still have guns at the beginning. But give it a few years, and as the law gets more of those guns taken away, the amount of them available will drop. Soon, there will be so little guns, that if someone did want one, it would be too expensive for anyone but those with a ton of money. It wouldn't be available to basically 80% of the population.

Sure, it wont be instant, but people don't or can't seem to think about long term. Long term, gun bans would gradually eliminate most guns around. And as those with the guns get caught or taken away, the supply will just keep dwindling. It's called thinking ahead.

I have one NRA family member and he is absolutely nuts about guns. He's a die hard creationist republican who buys gins like groceries. He has a 5 by 5 foot pile of ammo all loaded into high cap mags for any from from his glock to his 408 Chey tak. He has survival kits in his house and has one for all his kids because he's convinced the government is going to declare martial law to take away his guns. This is your average fringe gun owner and their scary as can be. The worst part is he holds a FFL and can buy guns normally restricted to civilians and he doesn't keep them in a gun safe. Guns and ammo litter his house and his kids have access. He also never locks his door.

I have one NRA family member and he is absolutely nuts about guns. He's a die hard creationist republican who buys gins like groceries. He has a 5 by 5 foot pile of ammo all loaded into high cap mags for any from from his glock to his 408 Chey tak. He has survival kits in his house and has one for all his kids because he's convinced the government is going to declare martial law to take away his guns. This is your average fringe gun owner and their scary as can be.

I have over 10,000 rounds of ammo and i'd buy guns like groceries if I had the money but don't confuse a hobby with someone that wants to shoot up a school. I mean really, does it make a difference how many guns someone has? So because I have more than one gun that makes me suspicious? I am no different than a computer nerd the only difference is a computer nerd uses computers, fiddles with them and buys the latest tech, same with me except I fiddle with guns (in a safe manner) and buy guns.

Oh yeah I remember you think people are crazy for having a hobby that involves guns now. Never mind, continue to be paranoid, over and out.

  • Like 1

I have over 10,000 rounds of ammo and i'd buy guns like groceries if I had the money but don't confuse a hobby with someone that wants to shoot up a school. I mean really, does it make a difference how many guns someone has? So because I have more than one gun that makes me suspicious? I am no different than a computer nerd the only difference is a computer nerd uses computers, fiddles with them and buys the latest tech, same with me except I fiddle with guns (in a safe manner) and buy guns.

Oh yeah I remember you think people are crazy for having a hobby that involves guns now. Never mind, continue to be paranoid, over and out.

And you are just as insane as my family member. I have had to explain to his kids in private many times the government isn't going to come take them in the night from him and that Obama getting another term doesn't mean they wont live long enough to get to highschool.

So everyone knows, I am a conceal carry holder and practice regularly. I have even had to pull my concealed weapon before. I carry everywhere and own enough ammo when not out practicing for 2 mags. I support practical gun control and find myself a sane gun owner.

And you are just as insane as my family member. I have had to explain to his kids in private many times the government isn't going to come take them in the night from him and that Obama getting another term doesn't mean they wont live long enough to get to highschool.

Sid i'm probably more sane than a lot of people on this forum. Just because I own guns doesn't mean squat. I promise you that you wont hear about me shooting up any schools or any other public places. I'm not insane as you think I am. I think you are a scared little man, I even doubt you'd use your gun if you had to. You are probably one of those gun owners that say I have a gun, that's enough, I'll just throw it in the back of the closet and be done with it.

Sid i'm probably more sane than a lot of people on this forum. Just because I own guns doesn't mean squat. I promise you that you wont hear about me shooting up any schools or any other public places. I'm not insane as you think I am. I think you are a scared little man, I even doubt you'd use your gun if you had to.

No but if a federal officer showed up with questions about your unusual stockpile i can see you flipping and shooting him. Remember the ocklohoma city bombing was a conservative terrorist.

No but if a federal officer showed up with questions about your unusual stockpile i can see you flipping and shooting him. Remember the ocklohoma city bombing was a conservative terrorist.

No, I wouldn't be shooting them i'd be getting ready to call my lawyer because last time I checked I wasn't doing anything usual or illegal. But apparently to you l'm an extremist now because I enjoy the shooting sports?

Sid i'm probably more sane than a lot of people on this forum. Just because I own guns doesn't mean squat. I promise you that you wont hear about me shooting up any schools or any other public places. I'm not insane as you think I am. I think you are a scared little man, I even doubt you'd use your gun if you had to. You are probably one of those gun owners that say I have a gun, that's enough, I'll just throw it in the back of the closet and be done with it.

technically you are scared, you are the one not sure of your ability and subsidize that ability that with a gun.

Even the manufactures know it:

2rhah78.jpg

  • Like 3

No, I wouldn't be shooting them i'd be getting ready to call my lawyer. And unusual, so l'm an extremist now because I enjoy the shooting sports?

I bet you that their also all not locked securely in safes with ammo in desperate safes. You might fire back i need them accessible for self defense. I say the only one that should be outside a safe when not in use is your primary carry weapon.

Its not like I can go to a super market and purchase an Assault Rifle.. This is exactly why we shouldnt ban guns. People still have access to them no matter where!. It wouldnt solve any of these killings of those using Assault Rifles.

i see people speed all day long on the highway too, this is why we shouldn't have speed limits.

I bet you that their also all not locked securely in safes with ammo in desperate safes. You might fire back i need them accessible for self defense. I say the only one that should be outside a safe when not in use is your primary carry weapon.

I do keep them locked up except for the one I use for self defense and I keep that on me at all times. So yeah next..

Don't buy it my family member claims the same in public then if you ever happen to go in his house....

There is nothing I can say to convince you that that i'm not a conspiracy theorist with a tin foil hat on so I might as well not even waste my time with you. After all to you someone that collects and shoots guns has a hobby is an extremist and the feds should be knocking down the doors of people like me for having an "unusual stockpile". Between the two of us, I think you need to get a grip.

Why can't people realize that when guns get limited or banned, it won't be a instant fix, and instead, will be a long term issue to keep on top of. Sure, many people will still have guns at the beginning. But give it a few years, and as the law gets more of those guns taken away, the amount of them available will drop. Soon, there will be so little guns, that if someone did want one, it would be too expensive for anyone but those with a ton of money. It wouldn't be available to basically 80% of the population.

Sure, it wont be instant, but people don't or can't seem to think about long term. Long term, gun bans would gradually eliminate most guns around. And as those with the guns get caught or taken away, the supply will just keep dwindling. It's called thinking ahead.

some progunners don't have the ability to understand complex cause-and-effect. although its not always accurate, but it is a standard rule of thumb that progunners have a lower intelligence, in the sense of IQ

some progunners don't have the ability to understand complex cause-and-effect. although its not always accurate, but it is a standard rule of thumb that progunners have a lower intelligence, in the sense of IQ

Hey now as a gun owner owner i find myself sane! But i agree with the sentiment.

DDv.jpg

Yeah, he's the scared paranoid one, while you're stockpiling guns and ammunition, and one of your excuses is to protect yourself from a government take over, and criminals, hmm..

But you're very sane.

and before you try to act like you do it just for a hobby like you're currently attempting to do, remember all your previous posts are archived on this forum.

Do you know why I have ammo? Because I shoot guns as a hobby, I target shoot pretty much every weekend.. I need the ammo to continue to shoot. :rolleyes:

DDv.jpg

Yeah, he's the scared paranoid one, while you're stockpiling guns and ammunition, and one of your excuses is to protect yourself from a government take over, and criminals, hmm..

But you're very sane.

and before you try to act like you do it just for a hobby like you're currently attempting to do, remember all your previous posts are archived on this forum.

Lmao. That picture is awesome.

Let's not forget he also "discusses" without "insults". As clearly shown in this thread. Oh wait, I shouldn't even be conversing with you...psycho ;)

some progunners don't have the ability to understand complex cause-and-effect. although its not always accurate, but it is a standard rule of thumb that progunners have a lower intelligence, in the sense of IQ

Insulting us does not help your cause at all.

Lmao. That picture is awesome.

Let's not forget he also "discusses" without "insults". As clearly shown in this thread. Oh wait, I shouldn't even be conversing with you...psycho ;)

He is one. If it wasn't for video games he would kill others. How is telling the truth an insult.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!