Valve releases linux betas of Half Life 1 and Counter Strike 1.6


Recommended Posts

True, but pair that with the first part of my response and it makes sense IMO. If you're making games for Linux, why not make them available to desktop users too? We don't know either way if the Steambox will be a hit. A venture into the console market is always a risk, but if the likes of Sony and Microsoft can pull it off, the cards aren't off the table for Valve either.

They are making their games available on desktop linux too, thats what this thread is about, you can play them on your pc or the upcoming steambox upgradable pc's. Steambox isn't going to be a single device, it will be small desktop pc's with multiple motherboard sections that can be upgraded, there will be multiple manufacturers making them.

They are making their games available on desktop linux too, thats what this thread is about, you can play them on your pc or the upcoming steambox upgradable pc's.

I think you misunderstood. That was my point, the question was rhetorical :p

And yet steam is still a 32-bit application without a metro interface.

For all intensive purpose steam is an advertising client, game launcher, gamer facebook, guides and FAQ, company and game update news source, console GUI, cloud storage for game settings, and probably something else I failed to mention.

And all I do is... launch games from it.

And yet steam is still a 32-bit application without a metro interface.

For all [intents and purposes] steam is an advertising client, game launcher, gamer facebook, guides and FAQ, company and game update news source, console GUI, cloud storage for game settings, and probably something else I failed to mention.

And all I do is... launch games from it.

If you're looking for a metro-styled Steam client, our member BoneyardBrew has created a Metro-esque skin that you can check out here: https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066270-metro-for-steam-271/.

I guess the point of dipping their toes in Linux is getting expertise on both porting old titles and going crossplatform on future ones so they can target all platforms with minimum effort. That is, even if the Linux or OSX markets were not actually worth it, they'd still be releasing for both Windows and the Steambox without pouring extra money to port games to the later.

Oh right, Steambox, forgot about that. I can't believe that's actually going to run Linux and be successful, considering there's essentially less than 0.001% of games that support Linux right now, and porting their own games to the platform won't skew that figure by much. It's... intriguing to say the least.

I may be wrong but I think the Steambox is going to be a big deal. I know a lot of people that's excited about it. What Valve is doing is not about desktop Linux, though I suspect desktop Linux may increase with all the good games coming for it. But the desktop will slowly die over the next few years.

Are these the Source version? If not, they have ran under Wine/WineX for a very long time.

Props to them for the effort though.

Yeah but it's nice to have a "native" port of these games instead of having to install some 3rd party compatibility layer. I had it working under wine a long time ago and it was kind of touchy. Sometimes I wasn't able to get out of full screen and other such nonsense, and the Windows steam client never ran quite right in Wine, and was really laggy for me. With what they've been doing we're actually able to have a good experience gaming with Steam on our Linux computers because they're actually porting their products over instead of doing what most game developers do and saying, "Try Wine, hope it works out for you, if it doesn't, too bad for you."

For those who may have experienced the "Frame Buffer" issue with Half Life or CS on the Linux version of Steam, I recorded a video on how to fix it.

  • Like 1

fixed for you. Don't want people getting the wrong idea. Gabe and Valve didn't give a rats ass about Linux or its users until gabe threw a tantrum about Windows 8 (hows that rage quit and no one using it going?). So don't try to pretend like he's seen the light and cares about us.

Please, don't try and pretend that the only reason you feel as such, is out of some misguided desire to defend a multi-billion dollar corporation and convicted monopolist that cares nothing for you.

It's funny that you actually think Valve exists solely to serve the whims of Gabe. Goes to show how much you know of Valve and their work structure.

I guess the point of dipping their toes in Linux is getting expertise on both porting old titles and going crossplatform on future ones so they can target all platforms with minimum effort. That is, even if the Linux or OSX markets were not actually worth it, they'd still be releasing for both Windows and the Steambox without pouring extra money to port games to the later.

They don't need the expertise, they already hired it. They brought in a bunch of Linux devs to bulk up their new Linux cabal, such as Forest "LordHavoc" Hale. I believe on recommendation from Michael Larabel of phoronix fame.

It's funny that you actually think Valve exists solely to serve the whims of Gabe. Goes to show how much you know of Valve and their work structure.

Ya its just coincidence that the beta shows up after gabe whines about Windows 8 and not long before when Linux users originally asked for it. Keep telling yourself whatever helps you go against these so called "multi-billion dollar corporation and convicted monopolist". Just remember to clean your tinfoil hat every few weeks to avoid infection.

Ya its just coincidence that the beta shows up after gabe whines about Windows 8 and not long before when Linux users originally asked for it. Keep telling yourself whatever helps you go against these so called "multi-billion dollar corporation and convicted monopolist". Just remember to clean your tinfoil hat every few weeks to avoid infection.

They won't have just started the Steambox project on a whim after the Win RTM, something like this has to have been planned for years. The comments Gaben made put a lot of attention on the relationship between Valve and Linux. It was basically viral marketing for the Steam console, and we all lapped it up :)

I've already played a few hours of HL1. It works great.

I'm loving how much Intel and Nvidia are improving their Linux drivers because of this influx of games. Also, love the improvements in the cruddy poor memory leak prone Compiz compositor.

^^ Great news indeed!

Ya its just coincidence that the beta shows up after gabe whines about Windows 8 and not long before when Linux users originally asked for it. Keep telling yourself whatever helps you go against these so called "multi-billion dollar corporation and convicted monopolist". Just remember to clean your tinfoil hat every few weeks to avoid infection.

Do you know what else is a coincidence? Sinofsky being booted out of Microsoft after Windows 8 is released. I guess using your logic that means Windows 8 is a confirmed failure, right?

But hey, keep telling yourself what you need to avoid that painful cognitive dissonance, aye?

Valve have probably been developing linux steam since the rumours of win8 having their own app store. It was certain that ms would do this after apple doing it successfully so they created linux steam in order to reduce this new threat.

I love that steam is coming to linux along with most likely all valve's own games. The linux drivers are seeing significant improvements as a result and will hopefully improve a lot more over the coming months.

Valve have probably been developing linux steam since the rumours of win8 having their own app store. It was certain that ms would do this after apple doing it successfully so they created linux steam in order to reduce this new threat.

They've been doing something with it before the release of Windows 7 - http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=steam_confirmation&num=1

There's been so many improvements in the Kernel, Mesa and graphics drives since 2008 that it could be argued that the Linux desktop just wasn't ready 4 years ago ?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!