Recommended Posts

The problem: Yellow 5 and Yellow 6, two artificial food dyes that give the dish it's day-glo hue but also contain known carcinogens. In Europe, foods that contain Yellow 5 are required to carry a warning label, and the chemical has been banned outright in some countries, including Norway and Austria. In 2008, the Center for Science in the Public Interest petitioned the FDA to ban eight different food dyes found in nearly everything kids like to eat today (even plain white marshmallows have blue dye in them).

"A lot of American companies use ingredients in the products they sell in the US that are no longer used, and are in some cases banned in other countries," Leake told Yahoo! Shine in an interview on Wednesday. "We were just appalled."

In the United Kingdom, Kraft's "Cheesey Pasta" comes in a red-and-yellow box?and doesn't contain artificial food dyes. Instead, the company uses natural colors from paprika extract and beta-carotene to create the dish's iconic color for British consumers.

Leake and Vani Hari, who writes the blog Food Babe and guest posts once a month on Leake's blog, 100 Days of Real Food, decided to launch a petition at Change.org, calling on Kraft to give U.S. consumers the same chemical-free formulation that they currently sell in the U.K. They racked up more than 18,000 signatures in less than 24 hours.

"McDonald's french fries has basic ingredients in the U.K.: potatoes, salt, and oil," Hari told Yahoo! Shine in an interview. "But here in the United States they use an ingredient that's an anti-foaming agent that's used in Silly Putty."

Betty Crocker cake mixes, Pringles potato chips, Rice Krispies, Starburst candies, and Diet Coke were among those that use artificial flavorings, colorings, and preservatives in the U.S. but leave them out of their European versions. Kellogg's strawberry Nutri-Grain cereal bars, for example, are colored with Red 40, Yellow 6, and Blue 1 in the United States but use beetroot, annatto, and paprika in their "soft bake bars" sold in the United Kingdom.

"These companies already have better, safer versions of their products formulated and for sale in other countries overseas," Leake pointed out. "In some cases, that's because their consumers demanded it. But nobody has done anything over here yet."

more

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1140426-war-on-unhealthy-food-additives/
Share on other sites

"These companies already have better, safer versions of their products formulated and for sale in other countries overseas," Leake pointed out. "In some cases, that's because their consumers demanded it. But nobody has done anything over here yet."

In the US I have found that when you try to bring this up with people, nobody seems to care at all, and certainly not enough to demand change. It's very frustrating.

  • Like 1

If I didn't know better I would say all these companies are trying their damndest to kill us Americans off.

And it would seem American consumer are making it rather easy for them to do it.

Going to be a disaster for M&M's :p

th?id=H.4845991025049619&pid=15.1&H=107&W=160

There's no reason it should be, as Smarties don't have any artificial additives (colours, flavours or preservatives).

In the United Kingdom, Kraft's "Cheesey Pasta" comes in a red-and-yellow box?and doesn't contain artificial food dyes. Instead, the company uses natural colors from paprika extract and beta-carotene to create the dish's iconic color for British consumers.

This is what I find most interesting - that natural additives are used in the UK but not in the US. We saw the same thing with the Pink Slime scandal, where it was being used by McDonald's in the US but not in the UK; same with High Fructose Corn Syrup, which is used in the US but rarely in the UK. Then there's the dangerous use of growth hormones and antibiotics in US cattle, a practice illegal in the EU and other countries. Consumers need to be more vigilant and regulatory bodies need to be more effective. Companies basically do what they can get away with and apparently they can get away with more in the US.

This isn't restricted to the US, though. Regulators need to be responding to the latest medical information, like the recent research that links processed meats to cardiovascular disease, cancer and early deaths. Unhealthy products should be banned, taxed or include health warnings. If graphic health warnings are considered appropriate for smoking then maybe something similar should be considered for processed meats. There also needs to be more done to address lifestyle issues, as the EU?the UK especially?has failed to address the obesity crisis. The UK obesity rate is one of the highest in the world, yet it is still being tackled reactively rather than pro-actively.

Let's not forget the neurotoxin sweetner Aspartame. a powder substance derived from the fecal matter of bateria

http://youtu.be/lSnbMue3Da0

The only fecal matter is that of the bull, This is a urban myth.

Lo at people saying ban HFCS natueralistic fallicy ahoy

Consumers need to be more vigilant and regulatory bodies need to be more effective. Companies basically do what they can get away with and apparently they can get away with more in the US.

Actually there's a another reason, lobbying.

The reason why HFCS and ethanol in gasoline is so prevalent in America is because of lobbying by corn farmers. Essentially the government uses our tax money to subsidize corn in order to keep them in business. The net result? The consumers suffer.

The reason why things that are illegal worldwide are legal in the US? Same thing, companies pay millions to get their way.

Hell look at taxes. Things like TurboTax, H&R block are non-existent worldwide but here in America tens of millions of people buy their products year after year in order to fill in their tax returns. H&R Block and Intuit spend millions to stop the Government from simplifying the tax code so that people keep having to buy their products.

Things won't change until lobbying is made illegal and people stop voting in politicians who care more about their pockets than the people who voted them in.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A gatekeeper is basically a company that is used by so many other (businesses) that sudden changes could impact the other business might fail. Like for example, say a car show room uses AWS to it's database, as gatekeepers amazon wouldn't really be expected to just change it's terms of conditions that would rug pull the database from the car show's business leaving them in the dark.
    • As someone who isn't in the EU what is all this gatekeeper stuff about anyways?
    • The data center gold rush has tossed all forms of sensibility and reasoning right out of the window. The craziest part being that AI infrastructure isn't driven by consumer demand. It's being driven by manufacturers to force AI onto the market, consumers be damned.
    • Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary ..... LOL.... These are the new prices peeps, because they will still sell them. Everybody will get used to the price hike = more Profit!
    • EU says AWS and Microsoft Azure should be treated as DMA gatekeepers by Pradeep Viswanathan Under the European Commission's Digital Markets Act (DMA), a company is presumed to be a gatekeeper if it meets certain quantitative thresholds. However, the Commission can still investigate and designate a company even if it does not meet the numeric thresholds, provided the service has a major market impact. The European Commission launched its investigations into AWS and Azure on November 18, 2025, to address unfair or anti-competitive practices in the cloud sector. Today, the European Commission has informed Amazon and Microsoft of its preliminary view that their cloud computing services, AWS and Azure, should be designated as gatekeepers under the DMA. The EC highlighted that Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure are the largest and second-largest cloud computing services in the European Union. Both of these platforms act as important gateways between businesses and their customers in the EU. The EC further mentioned that AWS and Azure have reached significant turnover, built large and entrenched user bases, and benefit from high switching costs and customer lock-in. Furthermore, their operational capacity and investments appear to have outpaced those of competitors. Teresa Ribera, Executive Vice-President for Clean, Just and Competitive Transition, said the following: It is important to note that the findings are preliminary and do not decide the final outcome. Amazon and Microsoft can now review the findings and respond to the Commission. However, if the Commission confirms its preliminary findings, it will formally designate Amazon and Microsoft as gatekeepers for AWS and Azure. Once designated, Microsoft and Amazon will have six months to bring their cloud services into full compliance with the DMA’s rules and regulations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      424
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Xenon
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!