Google changes how it measures Android version adoption, sees uptick in Jel

By +Frank B.
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

+Frank B. Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

Google changes how it measures Android version adoption, sees uptick in Jelly Bean devices

Google routinely gives monthly numbers breaking out the adoption of various versions of Android, but the company has now changed the way it calculates those numbers ? providing a distinctly different portrait of the Android ecosystem in the process. As outlined on the Android Developers site, Google now uses the data collected when users visit the Google Play Store; under the previous system, any check-in to the store by the device would have been incorporated into the results, user-generated or not. The new system went into effect starting with this month's results.

The change essentially skews the results towards those users who are actively visiting the Play Store. Google says as much on the page itself, noting that the new system "more accurately reflects those users who are most engaged in the Android and Google Play ecosystem." To be fair, however, it is those same users that Android developers should arguably be focusing on in the first place, since they're more likely to discover or purchase an app.

Unsurprisingly, the new data collection tactic results in a landscape of Android users that are more current than what was described just one month ago. Jelly Bean accounts for 25 percent of the devices out there ? up from 16.5 percent in March's results. The other numbers saw less dramatic shifts; Ice Cream Sandwich was on 29.3 percent of devices in the new figures (up less than a percentage point from the prior month), while Gingerbread users dropped from 44.2 percent to 39.8 percent.

While adoption of new versions of Android has been on the rise ? last month Android 4 variants overtook Gingerbread for the first time? it's not clear whether the change in the Jelly Bean numbers here is sheer adoption, the change in the way the data is calculated, or a combination of both. Future numbers should provide additional insight, but one thing is certain: the days when the Android ecosystem was reliant on version 2.3 appear to finally be fading away.

post-1302-0-22599300-1364973177.png

Source: The Verge

Rising Star

AlexMagik

Posted
Posted

The sad part is actually the manufacturers that don't send much updates. the whole point of using android, except the sharing of an App store, was to be upgradeable by google as it's standard code. instead end up the same as a closed source OS that got stuck on that device until you trash and get a new one.

We could talk about rooting it, but the majority of the people don't even know what's that, nor they would even bother doing it, so it's not a real option.

  • fusi0n and +Zlip792
  • Like 2
Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

It's great that Android is open source but its only hurting the OS in the long run, there are brand new phones being released today with low resolution, slow cpu and gpu, hardly any memory still running Gingerbread, I don't like closed platforms but there is something to be said about how Microsoft and Apple run things, their phones have a guaranteed level of performance and quality.

Grand Master

+Audioboxer Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

It's great that Android is open source but its only hurting the OS in the long run, there are brand new phones being released today with low resolution, slow cpu and gpu, hardly any memory still running Gingerbread, I don't like closed platforms but there is something to be said about how Microsoft and Apple run things, their phones have a guaranteed level of performance and quality.

And a nice price tag to boot (Apple anyway).

Grand Master

dead.cell

Posted
Posted

The sad part is actually the manufacturers that don't send much updates. the whole point of using android, except the sharing of an App store, was to be upgradeable by google as it's standard code. instead end up the same as a closed source OS that got stuck on that device until you trash and get a new one.

We could talk about rooting it, but the majority of the people don't even know what's that, nor they would even bother doing it, so it's not a real option.

Still stuck with 4.0.4 thanks to Sprint on my GSII. Planning to root my phone but I barely have time for anything as it is. They promised an updated at the end of December, then pushed to February, then March... then LATE March. Now it's April lol...

I love Android and probably wouldn't switch to anything else, but this is friggin stupid.

Grand Master

techbeck

Posted
Posted

Still stuck with 4.0.4 thanks to Sprint on my GSII. Planning to root my phone but I barely have time for anything as it is. They promised an updated at the end of December, then pushed to February, then March... then LATE March. Now it's April lol...

I love Android and probably wouldn't switch to anything else, but this is friggin stupid.

Nexus devices. Always updated first.

Grand Master

Growled Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

Still stuck with 4.0.4 thanks to Sprint on my GSII. Planning to root my phone but I barely have time for anything as it is. They promised an updated at the end of December, then pushed to February, then March... then LATE March. Now it's April lol...

You get a few more features and such with 4.1 but for me it's wasn't that big of an upgrade. Got a Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 running 4.1.2

Grand Master

Sandor

Posted
Posted

Still stuck with 4.0.4 thanks to Sprint on my GSII. Planning to root my phone but I barely have time for anything as it is. They promised an updated at the end of December, then pushed to February, then March... then LATE March. Now it's April lol...

I love Android and probably wouldn't switch to anything else, but this is friggin stupid.

HTC/Bell Canada have left my device on 4.0.3

Probably going to cut both the phone (and Bell) in the summer and buy a WP8 device outright.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • You pay just $100 per TB with this rare 4TB PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD deal

      By goretsky · Posted

      Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • You pay just $100 per TB with this rare 4TB PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD deal

      By vjlex · Posted

      "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely

      By qbrick · Posted

      The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand

      By pradeepviswav · Posted

      Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • Mozilla highlights Firefox Nova 2026 redesign and more upcoming features with new roadmap

      By +Eternal Tempest · Posted

      It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!