Recommended Posts

JUSTIN BIEBER earned $55 million in 2012, according to Forbes, but in new videos for the SpendSmart Payments Company, which offers a prepaid debit card for teenagers, the singer talks about his modest upbringing.

?You know when I was a kid, we didn?t have a lot of money, so me and my family had to watch the money that we spent,? Mr. Bieber says in a video directed at his young fans. ?I learned if you have $100 or $100 million ? if you spend more than you have, you?re going to go broke.?

Mr. Bieber urges viewers to ?have a talk with your family about money? in the video. ?Managing your money is important,? he says, ?and there?s a great company that can help you do that called SpendSmart.?

The video, by BrandFire in Manhattan, will be shared by Mr. Bieber beginning Thursday on his YouTube channel (more than two million subscribers), Facebook page (more than 52.4 million followers), and on Twitter (more than 37.3 million followers).

Subsequent videos, called ?Real Talk,? also will feature Mr. Bieber discussing financial literacy and encouraging teenagers to share their videos.

Mr. Bieber is being paid $3.75 million for a 14-month contract, along with potential monthly royalties tied to the growth of active SpendSmart cards, according to documents the company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The deal also, according to the filing, includes a stock option to buy two million shares of SpendSmart stock, which was trading at 38.8 cents a share Wednesday.

more

What's wrong with prepaid credit cards?

Prepaid debit cards are simply debit cards that you have to manually add money to - they're pretty pointless. They're not credit cards as you can only spend your own money.

  • Like 2

Prepaid credit cards are simply debit cards that you have to manually add money to - they're pretty pointless.

but they're not linked to your bank account which makes them good for younger people and you have the added benefit of the security and ability to use them online.

  • Like 3
but they're not linked to your bank account which makes them good for younger people and you have the added benefit of the security and ability to use them online.

Regular debit cards can be used online and younger people should be taught to be responsible with their money.

Regular debit cards can be used online and younger people should be taught to be responsible with their money.

Yeah but mistakes will be made(and learned from) and it's better not to have those mistakes linked to a bank account and as i said it's more secure than old fashioned pocket money.

being from Canada, the system could be slightly different then in the states, but we have had debit cards for teens since the Debit card came out.... all teens have them... they don't have this in the States? i am very shocked to hear this, would have never believed it had just one person told me. It works the way he says too, you can only spend what money you have, once its empty, it then it doesn't let you spend anymore.

being from Canada, the system could be slightly different then in the states, but we have had debit cards for teens since the Debit card came out.... all teens have them... they don't have this in the States? i am very shocked to hear this, would have never believed it had just one person told me. It works the way he says too, you can only spend what money you have, once its empty, it then it doesn't let you spend anymore.

No the states does have them just that until like two years or so ago you weren't given the option for overdrafts.

The bank would allow you to overdraft whenever they wanted it. Now that option rests on you. Want it? You can. Don't want any overdrafts? You can do that too.

Normally I think of Bieber as an absolute moron who shouldn't be around but I do think this is a good thing. Tons of teens follow his every word and if he can get them to better manage their money, everyone will benefit.

Prepaid debit cards are simply debit cards that you have to manually add money to - they're pretty pointless. They're not credit cards as you can only spend your own money.

They make it easy and peace of mind for those who shop online. I wouldn't want to use my main bank account (the account that i pay my bills with) to buy steam games. Too risky even though my bank allows fraud protection. Using prepaid card also forces me (who have a tendency to overspend) to budget. Near my work is a post office that I visit to load cash onto the card so it can be used effortlessly on steam which it is linked to. If I don't want to spend money, then I don't go and therefore have no money to buy online thus saving me money and blocking my tendency to buy at first sight, thus preserving my main bank account for important payments like bills, food, clothes and stuff like that.

Mr. Bieber is being paid $3.75 million for a 14-month contract, along with potential monthly royalties tied to the growth of active SpendSmart cards, according to documents the company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

So he's not doing this out of the goodness of his heart.

  • Like 2

Credit vs debit cards (In the UK);

If you buy something, turns out it's crap and you want your money back, or heck, maybe you don't get your money back at all.

Debit card: Go to the company and hope they send you your money, otherwise, you've lost it.

Credit card: Refuse to pay for the item you haven't recieved or aren't happy with and tell the credit card company, they will get the money back from the company and you won't lose out.

As much as I hate credit cards, they have that very good point about them.

I use a pre paid Credit card

I dont have any normal credit cards because i dont want the temptation of spending money i dont have

but i use prepaid credit card to buy things online that you cant use paypal or a normal debit card to pay

I use a pre paid Credit card

I dont have any normal credit cards because i dont want the temptation of spending money i dont have

but i use prepaid credit card to buy things online that you cant use paypal or a normal debit card to pay

doesn't sound like a credit card to me, lol.

What's wrong with prepaid credit cards?

Debit cards make far more sense - and not just for teens. They don't endanger your credit, and can be reloaded rather easily and painlessly - even BY a teenager.

Case in point - I personally have an AccountNow reloadable/prepaid VISA. I can use it anywhere VISA is accepted -- even online or at ATMs - and reloading funds is a snap, with half a dozen places within a half-mile WALK of my home, and I live in an unincorporated town of less than 1000 souls. The cost? None. (It's why I don't need OR want an ATM card, much to the chagrin of my bank; banks earn fee income from those - especially ATM cards that double as debit cards.)

Besides, Justin Bieber's not the only celebrity hawking debit or prepaid cards - among the OTHER celebrities hawking them are the Kardashians and Suze Orman; why them, and NOT Bieber?

Besides, Justin Bieber's not the only celebrity hawking debit or prepaid cards - among the OTHER celebrities hawking them are the Kardashians and Suze Orman; why them, and NOT Bieber?

Also worthless individuals. :p

Never understood all the stupid "hero worship" that goes on with people like this. I wouldn't even wipe my feet on 'em.

Do all US credit/debt cards have these types of charges?

$1.50 - ATM Withdrawal (Domestic)3

$2.50 - ATM Withdrawal (International)3

$0.50 - ATM Balance Inquiry

Not to mention the fees for the card:

$3.95 - Monthly Fee

$0.75 - Additional Load from Bank Account

$2.95 - From a Credit or Debit Card (up to $100)

$3.00 - 30 Days of Inactivity

https://www.spendsma...reement#pricing

I use a pre paid Credit card

I dont have any normal credit cards because i dont want the temptation of spending money i dont have

but i use prepaid credit card to buy things online that you cant use paypal or a normal debit card to pay

Those are actually prepaid DEBIT cards - not credit cards; they have to be loaded before they are usable.

I have one, which indeed comes in quite handy when carrying cash is not merely a BAD option, but impractical, and checks are not an option.

They have lower fees than PayPal (a lot of them, such as AccountNow, have no fees at all other than those charged by MoneyGram or Western Union when using them to load or reload your card - and that fee goes to WU or MoneyGram, not the card company) - which is why it replaced the option of a debit card from my bank (which earns fee income from THEIR debit cards) and, as you pointed out, can be used places PayPal can't.

Also worthless individuals. :p

Never understood all the stupid "hero worship" that goes on with people like this. I wouldn't even wipe my feet on 'em.

They are called *sponsorship fees* or *compensation fees* - and they are similar to name rights fees for buildings (from office buildings to sporting facilities). The Los Angeles Country Transit Authority has a deal like that for a debit card with the Authority logo that doubles as a "swipe card" for use in their system - and other mass-transit authorities are considering similar deals (examples - MTA in New York City, and WMATA in greater Washington, DC) - it keeps your taxes from going up.

Prepaid debit cards are simply debit cards that you have to manually add money to - they're pretty pointless. They're not credit cards as you can only spend your own money.

No they are not pointless.

Some online shops only accept credit/debit card. Plus, it's safer than carrying a bunch of cash.

  • Like 2
No they are not pointless.

Some online shops only accept credit/debit card. Plus, it's safer than carrying a bunch of cash.

They're pointless in comparison to a debit card. As for restricting the amount you can spend, the same can be achieved through online banking and transferring money between a savings and debit card linked account.

If teens can't be trusted with money then they shouldn't have it (i.e. it should be looked after by their parents); if they can they should be free to spend it as they please with a conventional debit card.

No they are not pointless.

Some online shops only accept credit/debit card. Plus, it's safer than carrying a bunch of cash.

that's not what he means. the statement "pre-paid debit cards are pretty pointless" is, at least in my mind.. fairly accurate statement, but not 100%

debit card - offer a direct link to your bank account. you spend some money, it is debit from your account directly. you can obviously also use it to withdraw from an ATM, and you can only spend the money you have.

The main benefit here is that you don't have to carry cash.. there are no additional benefits, or protections offered from the financial institution supplying the service.

credit card - allows you to purchase 'on tick', and pay off when you choose. perhaps at the end of the billing cycle.. perhaps to spread a bit cost.

The main benefit here, is not that you are taking out a short term loan.. but more in terms of the protection you are offered from the supplier (visa or mastercard). cancelled events, additional warranty on electrical goods, cash back etc.

pre-paid debit card - it's a card that you have to manually put money on. i.e. transfer it from another account (that most likely already has a spending mechanism) and put it on a card.

you don't get any of the protections of a credit card, with an additional con/overhead of needing to manually load it up

the ONLY benefit i can see with these cards is that if you are completely incompetent and irresponsibly with your money you could set a hard limit of spend per month, or, as i suspect is the target audience for mum and dad to give their kids an allowance that isn't cash. it's much easier to track how much you give your kids if it's audit-able and electronic rather than ?20 here, ?10 there.

once it's gone it's gone!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!