Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jjkusaf said:

Thanks. Didn't even think about that. 

Nothing to it, bud. :) It's an ugly spud without it, though, I agree. I have to say, though, it's interesting looking at those impact folds. They're designed to absorb MMOD impacts -- not deflect them. They're made for Tanking, for those versed in Gaming vernacular. And they stow away for compactness. Incredible design went behind them. :yes: 

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

High-Res Photos of Expanded BEAM Module & Historic Ingress

 

Quote

The first high-resolution photos of the Bigelow Expandable Activity Module in its fully-expanded configuration were released on Tuesday, showing a view of the module partially obstructed by Russian solar arrays. Residing on the aft port of the Node 3 module, BEAM is hard to photograph from the Station’s windows, though its two-year stay at the Station will provide numerous photo opportunities for spacewalking crew members.

http://spaceflight101.com/high-res-photos-of-expanded-beam-module-historic-ingress/

 

27454633561_a8c0fc66d6_o-1024x682.jpg

NASA/ESA/Bigelow Aerospace

 

 

27526829315_0f4bc2ae10_o-1024x682.jpg

NASA/ESA/Bigelow Aerospace

 

 

CkXFpxbUoAAuyOF.jpg-orig-1024x682.jpg

NASA/ESA/Bigelow Aerospace

 

 

CkXFp9kUUAADHsG.jpg-orig-1024x682.jpg

NASA/ESA/Bigelow Aerospace

 

 

CkVzpvxWsAADbTH.jpg-orig-1024x682.jpg

NASA/ESA/Bigelow Aerospace

 

  • Like 3
  • 2 months later...

NASA Selects Six Companies to Develop Prototypes, Concepts for Deep Space Habitats

 

Quote

WASHINGTON, Aug. 9, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- NASA has selected six U.S. companies to help advance the Journey to Mars by developing ground prototypes and concepts for deep space habitats.

 

Through the public-private partnerships enabled by the Next Space Technologies for Exploration Partnerships-2 (NextSTEP-2) Broad Agency Announcement, Appendix A, NASA and industry partners will expand commercial development of space in low-Earth orbit while also improving deep space exploration capabilities to support more extensive human spaceflight missions.

 

The selected companies are:

Bigelow Aerospace of Las Vegas
Boeing of Pasadena, Texas
Lockheed Martin of Denver
Orbital ATK of Dulles, Virginia
Sierra Nevada Corporation's Space Systems of Louisville, Colorado
NanoRacks of Webster, Texas


Habitation systems provide a safe place for humans to live as we move beyond Earth on our Journey to Mars. 

 

"NASA is on an ambitious expansion of human spaceflight, including the Journey to Mars, and we're utilizing the innovation, skill and knowledge of the both the government and private sectors," said Jason Crusan, director of NASA's Advanced Exploration Systems. "The next human exploration capabilities needed beyond the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and Orion capsule are deep space, long duration habitation and in-space propulsion. We are now adding focus and specifics on the deep space habitats where humans will live and work independently for months or years at a time, without cargo supply deliveries from Earth."

 

The six partners will have up to approximately 24 months to develop ground prototypes and/or conduct concept studies for deep space habitats. The contract award amounts are dependent on contract negotiations, and NASA has estimated the combined total of all the awards, covering work in 2016 and 2017, will be approximately $65 million, with additional efforts and funding continuing into 2018. Selected partners are required to contribute at least 30 percent of the cost of the overall proposed effort.

 

The ground prototypes will be used for three primary purposes: supporting integrated systems testing, human factors and operations testing, and to help define overall system functionality. These are important activities as they help define the design standards, common interfaces, and requirements while reducing risks for the final flight systems that will come after this phase.

more at the link...

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/prnewswire-space-news.html?rkey=20160809DC65909&filter=1639

 

My notes based on their recent projects

 

Bigelow Aerospace of Las Vegas (large expandable habitats)

 

Boeing of Pasadena, Texas (Bigelow partner)

 

Lockheed Martin of Denver (medium metal habitats)

 

Orbital ATK of Dulles, Virginia (general systems, Cygnus-based small habitats)

 

Sierra Nevada Corporation's Space Systems of Louisville, Colorado (general systems, ORBITEC ECLSS systems, thrusters and Vortex engines)

 

NanoRacks of Webster, Texas (Shuttle mid-deck experiment racks)

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...

This article could have gone under various threads but I have a feeling Bigelow is going to be front and center, with SpaceX playing a larger role than initially thought.

 

Companies pitch plans for commercial space station modules

 

bigelow-20161012-879x485.jpg

Robert Bigelow discusses Bigelow Aerospace's plans to complete two B330 modules by 2020 at the ISPCS conference Oct. 12. Credit: SpaceNews/Jeff Foust

 

Quote

Bigelow Aerospace is moving ahead with plans announced earlier this year to have two of its B330 expandable modules ready for launch by 2020, with the option of installing one of them on the ISS. Robert Bigelow, chief executive of Bigelow Aerospace, said the company is currently working on a series of ground test articles that will allow the company to “leave our mistakes on the ground” prior to launching the B330 modules.

 

Bigelow has been working on expandable module technology for more than 15 years, but believes that the crew transportation systems needed to make commercial space stations viable are finally ready. “I have throttled my company back and fourth two or three times because of the transportation problem,” he said. “This is the first time that I have ever really decided that it looks like it’s close enough.”

 

A key issue for both companies, either for commercial ISS modules or standalone space stations, is getting the modules launched. Baine said that the large size of the their module limits their launch options, and that the company is “notionally” considering SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy to launch it.

 

Bigelow said it’s planning to use the most powerful version of the Atlas 5 to launch its B330 modules, under an agreement his company announced with United Launch Alliance earlier this year. Bigelow said, though, that the company’s funds currently only cover the development the B330 modules, and not their launch.

 

Bigelow said the company may pay for the launches through either revenue from customers for those modules, or by taking in new investors. “It could be countries, it could be large companies, it could be people who aren’t even affiliated with the space world,” he said of potential investors.

more at the link...

http://spacenews.com/companies-pitch-plans-for-commercial-space-station-modules/

 

:)

  • Like 2

Well, everything finally seems to be coming together for them. There is launching capability for the modules, launching capability for the passengers is finally coming through and meanwhile the BEAM is champing it like a rockstar up at the ISS. Yay.

  • Like 2
  • 3 months later...

Just in via Bigelow's FB page:

 

16143819_771171176367213_775794728620247

 

Quote

As BEAM continues to outperform expectations, NASA and Bigelow Aerospace are in agreement to evolve BEAM into becoming an everyday asset aboard the ISS — met International Space Station.

I haven't found the details of what this entails yet... but it seems to me like a pretty big victory for their inflatables after not even being halfway through the evaluation period!!!

  • Like 3
4 minutes ago, DocM said:

Never doubted it'd work....too many solid tests.

 

Bring on XBASE!!

Amen!

 

Only issue in this mission so far were some slightly over-performing velcro straps on inflation :D

  • Like 3

I've been thinking about the 330 some more. Could the upgrades to the Falcon-9 (the Block 5) allow it to tote a 330 uphill to the ISS for testing if it were in it's "base form", ie without the solar panels and without the crew accommodations (sleeping bags, etc) that could be installed on a subsequent mission later on?

 

Some other questions:

 

- If the 330 were to be a module on the ISS, would it really need the solar panels?

- could it be berthed where the IDA is currently located, and the IDA moved to the rear port of the 330 or is it not rigid enough to structurally support spacecraft on that end?

 

As I said, just thinking about it. :) 

No, it is just to heavy, not to mention to bulky for the current fairing.

 

But yeah, that configuration on the ISS could work, it is also exactly what Bigelow proposed NASA to do. That is mostly to get NASA to at least pay for a ride to space tho :p

Mass isn't the issue. Every time F9 pushes a Dragon uphill it's launching more mass than Atlas V ever has.

 

An 18 - 19 meter fairing is needed to launch B330.  Atlas V has one, needed for some military payloads, and for now F9/FH don't.  Eventually they'll need one.

Ahh. Well, they'll need one eventually as @DocM stated. Perhaps it's in the cards sooner or later eh? :yes: I was unaware Bigelow had already proposed it that way though ... cool. :D See, I'm getting there!

 

Maybe even a six-way hub at that section where it's berthed to add even more modules, and totally remove that oddball Shuttle-era PMA structure (the "slanted thing"). I think it's an eyesore, myself.

Edited by Unobscured Vision
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!