Explosion at Boston Marathon *NSFW IMAGES*


Recommended Posts

Did they already id the child publicly? I know who it is due to some friends in the area that know the family.

Yes. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/martin-richard-dead-boston-marathon-explosions_n_3090386.html

has anyone noticed the guy on the roof

OMG someone on a roof deck :rolleyes:

XtQoLNW.jpg

http://www.nydailyne...ticle-1.1317947

something interesting, that's blown up.

roof17n-1-web.jpg

Again these buildings have roof top decks, second look at the image, the person is walking towards the blast area not away from it and is still no where near the edge of the building. It's sad how such nonsense has taken off.

OMG someone on a roof deck :rolleyes:

XtQoLNW.jpg

Again these buildings have roof top decks, second look at the image, the person is walking towards the blast area not away from it and is still no where near the edge of the building. It's sad how such nonsense has taken off.

AGAIN, all it was was mentioned. No one said 'OMG THERES A GUY THERE!!!!". just an observation that that image had been posted and brought up speculation.

Reward for perp. http://boston.cbslocal.com/2013/04/16/boston-police-firefighter-unions-offer-50000-reward-after-marathon-bombings/

$50,000 Boston Police and Firefighters Unions

So, I tried finding out some new info this morning on the radio while taking my son to pre-school. I always listen to sports talk on XM/Sirius and one of the shows claimed there was a photo of the 8 year old boy at the finish line holding a sign that read "Peace". Immediately I thought that is too convenient and, of course, the show host then claims he saw the photo on twitter :/ When I got home I went on Facebook and my Feed was filled with "We love Boston" with candles and whatever else sentimental stuff (which is fine) but then I see a photo of the 8 year old holding a sign that said "Martin", which is apparently his dad's name (his dad ran in the race). And to top it off, a friend shared a picture of a little girl running with the caption "This 8 year old girl died in the Boston Marathon bombing, like to show support."

I mean, people want to criticize MSM for shoddy reporting but dammit, we don't help ourselves with all of this rampant, blind sharing of "info". I have no idea what is real and what isn't. Then I see the picture of the "no legs man" and how he is a veteran and was a stage piece, I see a Fox News head throwing out comments about killing an entire group of people? I guess I'm the only one but I feel like I'm at the end of my rope here.

seriously... you don't understand the difference between terrorbombings at a sporting event where there's hundreds of cameras set up and filming. and a school shooting where the police are first to set up and control the situation, and where all the victims are school kids.

one's also technically a tragedy while the other is an act of terror.

  • Like 2

seriously... you don't understand the difference between terrorbombings at a sporting event where there's hundreds of cameras set up and filming. and a school shooting where the police are first to set up and control the situation, and where all the victims are school kids.

one's also technically a tragedy while the other is an act of terror.

Who are you directing that comment to?

^ You guys aren't seriously giving 4chan images credence, are you?

Not any more than people concerning themselves with a man on the roof. Or the bomb sniffing dogs which apparently is news to people that this is a common thing at events. Or the idea that a middle eastern man running in the opposite direction is evidence of anything.

Also, to answer HawkMan's quesiton, I believe the red outline was to highlight the bench in the before/after shot.

all i see are close up videos of the first bomb with the second in the background. wheres videos of the second? Its kinda pathetic that officials are so desperate for video and pictures, looking at peoples cell phones at the airport...? they probably are clueless.

you fail. key words from Obama are "target civilians". the US isn't targeting civilians. if you believe they are, then put your tin foil hat on.

Obama's latest statement:

I'm quite surprised to see such a statement being made, as by that definition the US drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia would also be acts of terror.

No. I stated that securing such a large area would be very difficult due to the amount of foot traffic. Even so, improved security does not have to mean an invasion of civil liberties.

you don't have to be smart to do this. NK is advertising their weapons to the world right now to make some money, thats smarter than whoever did this. NK knows if they did this, US would eventually find out and NK would be no more.

North Korea isn't smart enough to do something like this regardless.

We knew the Boston Marathon would pose a threat, but we didn't know to what extent. I am sure they will figure it out after all this is over.

Its very sad that this **** has to happen in a modern society. Why cant people just get along??? I hate having to look over my shoulder when i go to the city but you have no choice. There are animals out there trying to hurt everyone. :cry:

you fail. key words from Obama are "target civilians". the US isn't targeting civilians. if you believe they are, then put your tin foil hat on.

NYTimes: "British and Pakistani journalists said Sunday that the C.I.A.?s drone strikes on suspected militants in Pakistan have repeatedly targeted rescuers who responded to the scene of a strike, as well as mourners at subsequent funerals."

There's no tin foil hat involved. It is well documented that the US is targeting civilians in drone strikes. The horrific injuries and fatalities inflicted by the Boston Marathon Bombing are no different to the drone strikes targeting innocent civilians in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. When you think about how much people in the US despite those responsible for the bombing, that's how much people in those countries hate the US.

It's so depressing. :(

I read the rest of the story. its not really credible:

"The bureau?s findings are based on interviews with witnesses to strikes in Pakistan?s rugged tribal area, where reporting is often dangerous and difficult. American officials have questioned the accuracy of such claims, asserting that accounts might be concocted by militants or falsely confirmed by residents who fear retaliation."

thats still too many civilians dead. you could look at it a couple different ways. terrorists need to die, if civilians have to die then so be it. they hide near civilians cause they are cowards or if theres civilians arounds then call the strike off, but you won't be killing any terrorists.

the statement in your signature is still questionable since the source about attacking rescuers and funerals isn't credible.

NYTimes: "British and Pakistani journalists said Sunday that the C.I.A.?s drone strikes on suspected militants in Pakistan have repeatedly targeted rescuers who responded to the scene of a strike, as well as mourners at subsequent funerals."

There's no tin foil hat involved. It is well documented that the US is targeting civilians in drone strikes. The horrific injuries and fatalities inflicted by the Boston Marathon Bombing are no different to the drone strikes targeting innocent civilians in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. When you think about how much people in the US despite those responsible for the bombing, that's how much people in those countries hate the US.

It's so depressing. :(

thats still too many civilians dead. you could look at it a couple different ways. terrorists need to die, if civilians have to die then so be it. they hide near civilians cause they are cowards or if theres civilians arounds then call the strike off, but you won't be killing any terrorists.

the statement in your signature is still questionable since the source about attacking rescuers and funerals isn't credible.

That's far from the only source - it was simply the first one to hand. There was a documentary covering it, where drone operators admitted they target vehicles with unknown people inside and monitor the strike site for hours afterwards to determine whether to conduct a secondary strike. The evidence is out there, though I really wish I knew what the documentary I watched was called - it might have been Attack Of The Drones (though it's worth watching regardless). Any way you look at it, the US has killed hundreds of innocent civilians in drone strikes and that dwarves the THREE people killed in the Boston Marathon Bombing.

terrorists need to die, if civilians have to die then so be it. they hide near civilians cause they are cowards or if theres civilians arounds then call the strike off, but you won't be killing any terrorists.

It's exactly that sort of attitude that's responsible for hatred directed at the US. As I've said many times in various topics, the US wouldn't tolerate Mexico sending drones into the US to take out wanted criminals but that also take out innocent civilians. It's the hypocrisy of the situation that irritates me most.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • How can it beat a Steam machine without a serious GPU? The two CU iGPU only provides about 5fps in gaming. That's not going to make any gamer happy.
    • Anthropic introduces Claude Tag, a new AI teammate for Slack by Fiza Ali Anthropic has announced Claude Tag, a new feature that lets teams work with Claude directly inside Slack. The idea is simple: once Claude is added to a Slack workspace and given access to selected channels, users can tag @Claude in conversations and assign tasks. Claude can then work through those requests using connected tools and data sources before posting its results back into a Slack thread. What makes Claude Tag different from a typical chatbot is that it's designed to operate as a shared assistant for an entire team rather than a single user. Everyone in a channel interacts with the same Claude instance. This allows the team members to see ongoing work and continue tasks started by others. Furthermore, Anthropic says the AI can build context over time by following conversations in channels where it has permission to operate. This means users don't have to repeatedly provide the same background information for every request. The system is also designed for asynchronous work. Instead of waiting for responses in a chat window, users can assign a task to Claude and return later once the work is complete. Anthropic says Claude can break larger requests into multiple steps and use connected tools to complete them. Moreover, the system can also schedule follow-up tasks and continue working on projects over extended periods. Another feature allows Claude to keep the users updated and follow up on unresolved tasks when its optional "ambient" mode is enabled. The company says the tool is already being used internally for software development, data analysis, support workflows, and debugging. According to Anthropic, around 65% of its product team's code is now generated through its internal version of Claude Tag. For organisations concerned about security, administrators can control which channels, tools, and data sources Claude can access. Separate Claude instances can also be configured for different departments, helping keep information isolated between teams. Administrators can also monitor activity logs, review completed tasks, and set spending limits at both the organisation and channel level. Claude Tag is now available in beta for Claude Enterprise and Claude Team customers and runs on Claude Opus 4.8 that was announced this May. The feature will also replace Anthropic's existing Claude in Slack application, with current users able to migrate within a 30-day migration window. Lastly, eligible customers will receive introductory credits to help teams evaluate the new experience.
    • Beats Studio Pro wireless over-ear ANC headphones drop to their lowest price yet by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Beats Studio Pro headphones at their all-time low price. The Studio Pro use 40mm active drivers which are designed to improve clarity and reduce distortion compared to previous models, with up to an 80% improvement over the Beats Studio3 Wireless. A built-in digital processor adjusts frequency response to keep the sound balanced rather than overly boosted in any one area. They also include Active Noise Cancelling that adapts to your surroundings to reduce background noise along with a Transparency mode that lets outside sound in when you need awareness of what’s going on around you. Furthermore, the headphones support personalised Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking as well as Dolby Atmos playback on supported content. Moreover, built-in voice-targeting microphones improve call quality. You can also switch between three sound profiles including Beats Signature for balanced music playback, Entertainment for films and gaming, and Conversation for clearer voice in calls and podcasts. Physically, they are designed to be worn for long periods without feeling heavy or awkward. The ear cushions use UltraPlush engineered leather while metal sliders allow you to adjust the fit. On the connectivity side, the Studio Pro use Class 1 Bluetooth for a stable, long-range wireless connection. There is also a 3.5mm input if you want to plug in directly, including use with in-flight entertainment systems. Controls are located on the headphones and include a "b" button for music and call control, a volume rocker, and a multifunction button used for switching listening modes, EQ settings, power, and pairing. In addition, the headphones offer integration with both Apple and Android devices. On Apple devices, they support one-touch pairing with iCloud-linked devices, hands-free Siri access, Find My tracking based on last connected location, and automatic software updates. On Android devices, they support Google Fast Pair, Audio Switch between compatible devices, and Google Find My Device tracking, with additional features available through the Beats app. When it comes to the battery performance, it is rated at up to 40 hours of listening time with ANC turned off, and up to 24 hours with ANC or Transparency mode enabled. A 10-minute Fast Fuel charge should provide up to 4 hours of playback. Finally, the headphones use a rechargeable lithium-ion battery and charge via USB-C. Beats Studio Pro Wireless Over-Ear ANC Headphones: $149.95 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • "lets you pause updates by choosing an end date, for up to 35 days" Wasn't it "indefinitely"?
    • Those extra reboots are related to the UEFI Secure Boot certificate update thing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!