Staples becomes first major US retailer to sell 3D printers


Recommended Posts

The day you'll be able to walk into a national retail chain and leave with a 3D printer is almost here. Staples today announced that it's begun selling 3D Systems' Cube 3D Printer for $1,299. The device won't be in stores until the end of June, and even then it will only be available from a "limited number" of locations. But online orders kick off immediately, so you can order one from the Staples website and have it shipped to your door starting today.

3D Systems started shipping the Cube 3D Printer to consumers just over a year ago. It's not quite as feature-rich or capable as some competing printers, though you'll be able to create items up to 5.5 inches square. Designs are also limited to one of 16 different colors (Staples says it plans to stock replacement cartridges and other accessories). Once owners print out all 25 included templates, they'll need to hunt down additional designs online ? thankfully Cubify doesn't make it a hard process.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/3/4297612/staples-first-major-us-retailer-sell-3d-printers-cube-3d-printer

I think that 3d printing will have a pretty serious effect on many manufacturing industries - so it's pretty baffling that many don't know about it's existance

Let's just hope that no companies that make, and will make, 3d printers will have this guy as their quality manager :laugh:

3q5psh.jpg

I think that 3d printing will have a pretty serious effect on many manufacturing industries - so it's pretty baffling that many don't know about it's existance

Let's just hope that no companies that make, and will make, 3d printers will have this guy as their quality manager :laugh:

3q5psh.jpg

3D printing is rarely ever used for mass-production. Casting, extruding, etc. will probably always be cheaper and produced faster. However, I agree about businesses that have low volume or don't need to produce items that fast.

3D printing is rarely ever used for mass-production. Casting, extruding, etc. will probably always be cheaper and produced faster. However, I agree about businesses that have low volume or don't need to produce items that fast.

yea, i feel the same way... i bet places like the disney parks will get a bunch of them tho, to print out little toys and stuff, kind of like those plastic mold things that they used to have in the rest areas and theme parks here in south florida. I know i had a few of the little things, stick 50 cents in and watch the mold close, see the plastic go into it, it was pretty cool back in the day

3D printing is rarely ever used for mass-production. Casting, extruding, etc. will probably always be cheaper and produced faster. However, I agree about businesses that have low volume or don't need to produce items that fast.

I was mainly thinking this from a consumer perspective; there was an article (on Neowin if I remember correctly) about how 3d printers were being used for printing cases, like on the good ol' Nokia phones, which brought 3d printing to my attention.

It's amazing that printing medicine could "could be used by the public in around two decades" (source: http://www.techspins...s-and-medicine/) and that a house could be constructed by 3d printing in 2014 (source: http://blog.icoreglo...to-real-estate/)

Granted - neither which are general consumer products; but I think many companies will go out of business, if the consumer can print the stuff cheaper than they can manufacture it.

If anyone has an article about the future of 3d printing on manufacturing industries, I would love to know about it

I don't see 3D printers becoming mainstream for a looooooooooooooooooooooong time. 2D printers have very practical applications (printing for school or work, pictures, directions, recipes, to-do lists, etc.). 3D printers simply don't have that same practicality. I'm not saying that 3D printers are useless, far from it. But I don't see the majority of the public taking much interest in the technology. What I find more likely is that it will become commonplace for shops to provide specialty services using these devices, including some major retailers (the ones with photo labs).

I'm not sure what I'd do with one.

Wait till they make one that can assembly nearly any food product e.g. cakes :D Or maybe if you had an xbox 360 and wanted a new customized case you could print that... or picture frames, coat hangers, storage containers, puzzles, parts for toys e.g. create a propeller blade for a toy then polish it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm hoping with the Surface Pro 12, I can use either USB-C for my Xreal One Pro glasses. With my Surface Pro 11 OLED X Elite, I have to plug them into the top port. The bottom port will power it, but nothing shows on the screen. Maybe it's my setting. When I plug in the glasses, I have it output only to the glasses. So maybe I need to turn on both displays with it in the top port, then switch the glasses to the bottom port and set it to output only to the glasses. And then hopefully Windows remembers the settings for either the top port and bottom port (one of the awesome features of Windows where it remembers the exact configuration when plugging in external monitors.
    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
    • wow. that color finally comes to Surface Pro. was always a little jelly when a friend had the sandstone Surface Laptop. I wonder how different this dune is from the sandstone. I'll be getting the dune version. always thought black and platinum were a little boring. I'll still have access to my blue Surface Pro 11 as it'll be a hand-me-down.
    • Looks a very subjective aren't they!? I like its simple design. I love the way Apple designs their products with function over form, minimalization, and simplicity over cluttered complex designs. Many, not all, of their products follow this trend, and the device becomes a tool rather than dominating the space. I do not however like their OS. I have never bought a Apple product, and while I'd consider the Neo for my wife, I am hoping there are better alternatives out there when her failing MacBook Pro 2017 finally stops. Fischer-Price is famously plastic, garish, and poorly made. Basically you're describing the Window Laptops the Neo competes against! This is how product design should be, and what Apple have often followed in recent years: https://tenprinciples.design/
    • Isn't that true for every codec? I remember having to buy a PCI MPEG-2 decoder card just so I could play DVDs on my computer back in the late 90s. AV1 support is still fairly new.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!