Recommended Posts

Thomas, the oldest tortoise in Britain, had to be put down after being attacked by the rodent in the garden of his owner?s home in Guernsey.

Born when Gladstone was Prime Minister, at first it looked as though the lettuce-loving tortoise would recover from his injury. He spent five days on a course of strong antibiotics, being fed through a tube.

But the wound became so infected that his owner, June Le Gallez, had no choice but to have him put to sleep.

?We are very upset, ?distraught actually,? she said last night. ?Thomas was like a member of the family. He was bitten on the leg by a rogue rat in the garden and the wound became so inflamed that it started pushing into his shell.

?He wasn?t eating or appearing to get any better, so a week later, as a family, we made the decision to put him to sleep.?

Mrs Le Gallez, 54, inherited Thomas 35 years ago from her late cousin Grace Hilditch. She had been given the tortoise in 1922 as a present from her father Harry, who was friends with a London Zoo reptile keeper. Thomas lived through the Blitz with Grace at her home in Ilford, Essex, but it was bombed by the Nazis in 1945. He was rescued from the rubble by an air raid warden.

For most of his incredibly long life, the tortoise hid a dark secret under his shell ? he was actually a female. :o It was only when Mrs Le Gallez became his owner in 1978 that a vet discovered the staggering truth, nearly a century after Thomas was born.

By then he was already a national institution, so the name stuck, and he continued living happily with fellow tortoises Gorky and Carstaias, mere striplings at 50. Gorky was bitten on the nose in the same rat attack.

Mrs Le Gallez said: ?People suggested I rename him ?Thomasina, but I thought it would be cruel. For more than 30 years the tortoises have roamed free in the garden and nothing has happened. It?s such a shame for him to go this way. Thomas has been through so much.?

source

post-37120-0-48986900-1368721920.jpg

For most of his incredibly long life, the tortoise hid a dark secret under his shell ? he was actually a female. :o

This is why I love you, Hum. Most people would be content with just copying the article, but you always add your little anecdotal smiley to give it the hum personalized flair. Never stop posting.

Tortoises are incredible creatures. Seems as though, without outside interference (like a rat), they'd live forever.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      561
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!