Recommended Posts

How are people even questioning this? i'd much prefer that a doctor refer me to see a counsellor or offer medication which i can still refuse than have a priest analyse me or even perform an exorcism. One may yield results, the other will most likely cause confusion and panic.

An example.

A woman at a church i used to attend was frequently in tears and very emotional. She was struggling with depression. People felt this was a spiritual matter and encouraged prayer and other approaches, even actively encouraging her to avoid doctors who won't understand!

I'm not advocating shunning conventional treatments, if you need them...

And who should decide whether or not you need them? Medical professionals? You know, the folks who have dedicated their lives to diagnosing illnesses and disorders?

Keep in mind you earlier stated:

I'd rather someone with depression or anxiety issues first go talk to a priest or a yogi or whomever as a counselor just for advice about life, rather than first go to a doctor whose just going to pressure him to go on medication

Hell. People may as well go to their local psychic.

And who should decide whether or not you need them? Medical professionals? You know, the folks who have dedicated their lives to diagnosing illnesses and disorders?

Ultimately, the individuals with problems themselves. There isn't some scientific test for if a depressed patient needs a doctor, it depends on how well they can recover without one.

How can they tell the difference between mental disturbed and having a demon?

In most cases they are found to have some mental illness and referred to a doctor. There are some specific signs of demonic presence, I'm not very well versed in that but things like fear of sacraments and sacramentals, superhuman strength, flying through the air or speaking of things they could not possibly be aware of or understand would count.

"The devil exists. That's a fact," she told The Associated Press.

Yeah, and so does Poseidon, Zeus, Thor, Odin, and His Noodliness, the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

A "demonic possession" is nothing more than a mental disorder. Instead of exorcists, they need more psychiatrists and psychologists.

A "demonic possession" is nothing more than a mental disorder. Instead of exorcists, they need more psychiatrists and psychologists.
Psychiatrists and psychologists are helpless with the cases that they deal with. Have you ever looked into the topic before dismissing it as nonsense?
Have you ever looked into the topic before dismissing it as nonsense?

ask yourself why are there still skeptics? science and medicine isn't about dismissing anything but it is about practice, research and establishing fact. scientists are have tested for example the theory that our universe is a hologram, a simulation. science has put forward the Randi Paranormal Challenge and yet nobody has successfully claimed the prize money despite best efforts. The hologram test would mean accepting that we exist as a simulation and are the product of a higher source! - an interesting article on this was in the BBC Focus Magazine

I'm actually borderline agnostic and i've only recently drifted from being a theist but my opinion remains the same. I've 'witnessed' people speaking tongues, healing, the "power of the holy spirit" even people claiming to have the gift of prophecy and my response to their claims was not immediate dismissal but rather basing my opinion on what i see before me and what i hear, not just what i felt or believed to be real.

The bible itself actually says in 1John 4:1 - Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.

A responsible believer, somebody who intends to dedicate their life to christianity for example and all that entails has the right to test the spirit (to see if it is indeed the 'holy spirit'). Therefore why hasn't a priest conducted an exorcism in a scientifically controlled environment? it hasn't happened yet or the ritual of exorcism hasn't been proven to be necessary otherwise right now i'd be sat here agreeing with you. The same can be said for the existence of demons or paranormal apparitions. No conclusive evidence has been produced.

As Anaron below me says

I don't believe in the supernatural but if evidence is found that supports the existence of angels and demons, then I will have no choice but to believe in their existence.

Evidence is crucial. I wouldn't for example trust anybody to care for my children unless i had evidence or proof that they were safe and trustworthy. Your life is also precious and i would urge you to examine your beliefs. Science is not the enemy of religion or the Bible. For example the name of a King/Ruler found in the Bible was thought to be entirely made up, however a tablet surfaced that had this persons name on it and Historians accepted it's account! Evidence and Supporting Evidence. Nothing less is worth your time and dedication.

Expanding further on the Child analogy. If my child for arguments sake manifested what appeared to be stigmata wounds, and apparently spoke in tongues i'd firstly consider that a real person physically laid hands on my child and that the distress of this (or perhaps head trauma) has caused them to speak unintelligible babble and i'd seek a doctor immediately. Not a priest. Finally on that point, where do we draw the line? at what point is a priest no longer qualified to assist? The "power of God" is not limited to that of exorcism - Like this Couple would you watch two children die before seeking a medical professional or is this scenario limited only to what you judge to be demonic?

And believe me as an ex-jehovah's witness and former follower of church of england i'd love to see that there is a creator, that there is hope but reality so far has proven that wrong.

My last point is this. This is the Catholic Church. They spear headed the Crusades against Muslims, killing many innocent people. They sanctioned this in the name of God himself yet later apologised through the Pope calling them "the sins of the church". If God was truly behind their actions, yet they were proven to have acted of their own accord in one or more instances, it is possible that there may one day be an apology for exorcisms? i believe yes.

Psychiatrists and psychologists are helpless with the cases that they deal with. Have you ever looked into the topic before dismissing it as nonsense?

Yes, I have. And from what I've read, the majority of cases are caused by a mental disorder. Other cases are caused by neurological disorders (e.g. epilepsy). As far as I'm aware, there's no scientific evidence to support demonic possession. I'd go as far as saying that it's all based on anecdotal evidence from the perspective of a religious individual. Stories that come to light are basically cherry-picked when in truth, they're likely the result of an undiagnosed and potentially treatable disorder instead of something supernatural.

I don't believe in the supernatural but if evidence is found that supports the existence of angels and demons, then I will have no choice but to believe in their existence.

@thechronic I agree with most of what you say and I welcome your nuanced opinion. I'm in a similar position as you as a long-time Catholic who's recently started leaning towards agnosticism. My comment was mainly for those who reject the validity of these stories on principle.

Yes, I have. And from what I've read, the majority of cases are caused by a mental disorder. Other cases are caused by neurological disorders (e.g. epilepsy). As far as I'm aware, there's no scientific evidence to support demonic possession. I'd go as far as saying that it's all based on anecdotal evidence from the perspective of a religious individual. Stories that come to light are basically cherry-picked when in truth, they're likely the result of an undiagnosed and potentially treatable disorder instead of something supernatural.

From what I've personally seen, and I've been in the Church for a long time, exorcists are well trained to recognize epilepsy and such natural disorders. When the case calls for medical care, which is usually the case, they'll refer the person to doctors. Only when there are clear signs of the supernatural is exorcism performed. Exorcists deal with hundreds of cases every year so evidence abounds, if you care to look. I don't personally know what to make of that as I don't really believe in anything supernatural anymore, but there's no denying that exorcists actually cure a lot of people from strange religion-related conditions that modern science is unable to deal with.

Hysteria and auto suggestion can account for many "manifestations" that you see portrayed such as in church meetings, which are miraculously lauded by famous telecasters as miracle cures.Whilst I agree as with many ailments that reach as Doctors ears they can be mentally based,there are as even in science unexplained anomalies which confound simple explanation.

From what I've personally seen, and I've been in the Church for a long time, exorcists are well trained to recognize epilepsy and such natural disorders.

Do they have magical powers to tell the difference between someone who is schizophrenic and someone whose soul has been invaded by the bogeyman?

I've yet to see a case of an Atheist being possessed, surely we must be a much easier target?

That's the thing with bull****, you have to believe in it to be deluded by it.

Although I am sure many faith heads think being an atheist is a form of possession.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!