Gamma Ray burst could wipe out quarter of earth's atmoshphere


Recommended Posts

Scientists are claiming a gamma ray burst could wipe out a quarter of the earth's atmospheric ozone layer from Wolf-a Rayet star called WR 104, around 8,000 light years away in the time frame anywhere from tomorrow to 500,000 years.

http://timesofindia....ow/20341971.cms

Alternate Link

http://www.forbes.com/sites/brucedorminey/2013/05/27/earth-may-still-lie-in-path-of-potential-gamma-ray-burst-grb-say-astronomers/

We've known that Gamma Ray bursts could wipe out earth for ages now, from known and unknown sources, due to their directionality we generally don't know about them until the hit or near miss us.

As for wiping out a quarter of the atmosphere, yeah that's bad, but most direct hits would kill everyone on that side of earth instantly and everyone else would soon follow from nature going ballistic and all that crap. the mother of all nuclear winters.

no man-made planetary gamma ray shield in theory?

It's just electromagnetic radiation, but it's very powerful so you'd need an underground bunker. I don't know if it has to be 1, 2, or 3 metres deep.

Alright guys, we're gonna need Bruce Willis, Morgan Freeman, a scientist and a hot chick, if we can get those I feel we can come up with a plan to prevent this if, nay when its gonna go down.

It's just electromagnetic radiation, but it's very powerful so you'd need an underground bunker. I don't know if it has to be 1, 2, or 3 metres deep.

Someones never played or watched anything space related in their life, everyone knows planetary shields are on the list... just like regular shields and warp drives, photon torpedos,

If it's 8000 ly away, it could have gone boom 8000 years ago. Quick, send someone to check if it's still there! Stupid space with its enermous distances...

but if it is space... is it really a distance, how can there be a distance ... if there is nothing ... or just time you have to wait to get from planet to planet O.o this is me tired... i need to come back stonned and compare my notes

It's just electromagnetic radiation, but it's very powerful so you'd need an underground bunker. I don't know if it has to be 1, 2, or 3 metres deep.

Well, in a deep enough bunker you could survive the actual blast. Few problems with that though. There would be no early warning at all, and even then you could practically never come out, well you could, but there would be nothing.

but if it is space... is it really a distance, how can there be a distance ... if there is nothing ... or just time you have to wait to get from planet to planet O.o this is me tired... i need to come back stonned and compare my notes

Distance is relative, the faster you travel, the smaller the distance between your start and endpoint is. For you of course, not for an observer on earth.So yeah, you could travel to a star 8000 lightyears away, see if it is still there, come back to earth to tell people about it all in a few years, no problem. But on earth 16000 years would have passed, making your trip probably pointless.

And you guys expect the human race to be there to witness it? Thanks to us, planet will be an asteroid belt long before the gamma ray wave hit the solar system

Well it could happen anytime, in the next hour even. you never know when a GRB will decide to strike, we don't know where they are as we can only discover them if we look in the right spot at the perfect time. and even then we only see the ones who flash/spin in our direction at that time. Luckily space is so massive and the further away from them we are the less the chance is they will manage to hit the perfect angle to swipe us. But you never know.

As for witnessing it. No, that won't happen as anyone in a position to view it will be dust before there's anything to witness, everyone else will only witness the after effects.... for a time... then they to are done witnessing anything :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My comment was intended to be humorous. Since I believe scientists already knew it since, as scientists, they understand relatively.
    • Surprise Execs are dumb. I hope the rehired engineers said were not coming back until we get 2x our salary.
    • Ford execs say they made a mistake when they replaced human engineers with AI by David Uzondu Ford recently announced that over the last three years, it's had to rehire about 350 "gray beard" engineers to mentor younger staff and reprogram diagnostic systems and AI tools that were failing to meet up to quality expectations. The company's VP of vehicle hardware engineering, Charles **** said that leaders overlooked the deep experience of veterans who survived many product cycles. **** admitted that simply replacing them with AI was a huge mistake, and that while AI is "a fantastic tool," it remains "only as good as the information you use to train it." The rehired engineers now run mandatory meetings to troubleshoot vehicles and reprogram automated engineering software and AI tools to prevent glitches before production. These technical specialists hunt for failure points before parts ever reach the plant floor, helping prevent the massive recalls and defects that previously cost the company billions as it aims to cut one billion dollars in expenses this year. In last year's JD Power Quality Survey, an annual study that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership, Ford finished 10th among mainstream brands and scored below the industry average. But this year, JD Power ranked the automaker as the top mainstream brand, placing it above the likes of Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ford attributed this massive improvement directly to the expertise of these returned engineers. Ford's realization that AI cannot magically design and test quality vehicles without senior human oversight is just the tip of the iceberg. When Careerminds looked at companies that conducted AI-driven layoffs, researchers found out that 35.6% of those companies had to rehire more than half of the employees they previously fired. Another 32.7% had to rehire between 25% and 50% of them. In 2024, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of Klarna, proudly announced that its new chatbot was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. As a result, the fintech company froze hiring and cut hundreds of positions. But by mid 2025, and into 2026, Klarna was scrambling to recruit human agents again because customer satisfaction had plummeted. It turns out, while AI is very good at answering basic questions like how to check an account balance, when faced with complex customer issues that require nuance, the thing usually resorts to the unhelpful, robotic corporate jargon we all know and love.
    • Free AI in IDEs is shifting to paid models Or you know, you could just learn to actually design and code apps, use frameworks to handle the repetitive parts and not use AI at all - and voila... free for life!
    • In a sane world US antitrust laws wouldn't even allow these companies to be in the position to be subjected to EU directives. As you say, better than oligarch nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      405
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!