Sexual Orientation (2003 to 2006)


I AM A / WHO LIKES  

1956 members have voted

  1. 1. I AM A / WHO LIKES

    • Male / Male
      131
    • Male / Female
      1392
    • Male / Male & Female
      103
    • Female / Male
      31
    • Female / Female
      15
    • Female / Male & Female
      13
    • Other (Asexual/Autosexual)
      21


Recommended Posts

I must be straight cos I only go for Ewe's

and if you do it near a cliff they push back more!

And sport a Kilt cos they can hear the sound of a zip from 20 paces, and can outrun a human without trying

It is not possible for two men or two women to have sex.

sex ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sks)

n.

1. Sexual intercourse.

sexual intercourse

n.

Coitus between humans.

co?i?tus ( P ) Pronunciation Key (k-ts, k--)

n.

Sexual union between a male and a female involving insertion of the penis into the vagina.

There you have it. Proof that two men (or two women) cannot possibly have sex with each other. What it is the so-called "gay" and "lesbians" are doing -- I don't know. Just keep it to yourself.

Can we please grow up a bit. Like who cares if someone is homosexual or heterosexual?

I could not careless.

I am heterosexual not straight I find that offensive.

I am a Man that likes Women if you don't understand what heterosexual means, or off the opposite sex.

:ninja:

Thanks, don't clap just throw quaters! :woot:

585128645[/snapback]

if you think this is childish, or incorrect, don't post. It's people like you, that bring along the FCC. people that can't make choices for themselfs. People need to be told what to do, and how to do things these days. Howard Stern would be allowed to do thousands of things funnier then what he does now, because of the FCC.

IF YOU DONT LIKE IT, DONT LISTEN TO IT OR WALK AWAY!

I am as bent as a ruler.

585129578[/snapback]

ROFL!!! thats funny

I am straight, or so I hope. How can you tell!?

585129771[/snapback]

look on google, and look at a naked man, and then a naked women. you will know if IT moves looking at the guy, or the women ;)

It is not possible for two men or two women to have sex.

sex    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (sks)

n.

1. Sexual intercourse.

sexual intercourse

n.

Coitus between humans.

co?i?tus    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (k-ts, k--)

n.

Sexual union between a male and a female involving insertion of the penis into the vagina.

There you have it. Proof that two men (or two women) cannot possibly have sex with each other. What it is the so-called "gay" and "lesbians" are doing -- I don't know. Just keep it to yourself.

585129810[/snapback]

ABSOLUTELY CORRECT!

but men and men can "make love" and same with women and women

Edited by lylesback2
It is not possible for two men or two women to have sex.

sex? ? ( P )? Pronunciation Key? (sks)

n.

1. Sexual intercourse.

sexual intercourse

n.

Coitus between humans.

co?i?tus? ? ( P )? Pronunciation Key? (k-ts, k--)

n.

Sexual union between a male and a female involving insertion of the penis into the vagina.

There you have it. Proof that two men (or two women) cannot possibly have sex with each other. What it is the so-called "gay" and "lesbians" are doing -- I don't know. Just keep it to yourself.

585129810[/snapback]

Oh, lets have a further look at that:

sexual intercourse

n.

1. Coitus between humans.

2. Sexual union between humans involving genital contact other than vaginal penetration by the penis.

Main Entry: sexual intercourse

Function: noun

1 : heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : COITUS

2 : intercourse involving genital contact between individuals other than penetration of the vagina by the penis

Perhaps you didn't read further than the first line or perhaps you just want to look correct.

Edited by Xeron
I'm all out of love.

Will a Hallmark card do?

585127546[/snapback]

for wut?

that's weird 。

"I'm all out of love". that's wut I was supposed to say.

I'd love someone(actually everthing around me) for a moment ( maybe 1 or 2 or several days), but never longer than that.

Even dislike myself sometimes.

So I'd chosen to like ( not love) all people. that's much easier.

Maybe it's good to be single for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      580
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!