iOS 7 Beta   

315 members have voted

  1. 1. Have you installed the Beta yet?

    • Yes
    • No - Will never install it
    • No - Plan to install it soon enough
  2. 2. If you like it, what is that you like the most?

    • Icons
    • Control Center
    • Typography
    • Lockscreen
    • Notification Center
    • Interface Elements - Buttons
    • It's Fresh, New and Cool!
    • Difficult to say right now
  3. 3. If you don't like it, what is itching you the most?



Recommended Posts

Liking it much more now, however, still thing the animations need to be quicker. You can still open an app quicker on IOS 6.

 

For some reason I doubt that Apple is going to speed them up at all :(.  The one that really annoys me because it is too long is when you go from the lock screen to the home screen (no open app already).  It looks pretty and has a nice "wow" effect when you are first playing around with it, but that quickly wares off (on me anyway).

My phone does feel warmer compared to b5, but the battery life seems about the same.

 

I can't say definitively yet.  It could be that I associate warm phone with draining battery...At the end of the work day I'm usually at 65-70% and now I'm at 55%... could just be my statistical error.  I'll know more after a few days.

For some reason I doubt that Apple is going to speed them up at all :(.  The one that really annoys me because it is too long is when you go from the lock screen to the home screen (no open app already).  It looks pretty and has a nice "wow" effect when you are first playing around with it, but that quickly wares off (on me anyway).

 

Yeah. I think when it comes out and I jailbreak again, the first thing I'll do is install %hookslaw. I had this on iOS 6, so it's even worse for me going to iOS 7.

 

Since beta 5, the clicking sound when unlocking the phone is gone. When locking the phone the sound is still there, just unlock. Anyone else have this problem?

 

I've had this also.

iOS 7 beta 7 existence denied

 

Those of you waiting for an iOS 7 beta 7 download to go live might be disappointed if the latest claims are correct, which apparently come from inside sources stating the program is complete.

 

We have already touched on the chances of an iOS 7 beta 7 release one day this week and how there was a big gap until the expected Gold Master release date of September 10. We should note that some exclusive Apple partners would likely see the final build a few days before developers get hands-on.

 

Today, we stumbled across this article that went live shortly after beta 6 became available. This page might have been translated from German, but it clearly points to no iOS 7 beta 7 even though some of us hope for a release date somewhere between now and the start of September.

 

One of the reasons a few developers and analysts expected iOS 7 beta 7 was due to the tiny install size, and how Apple normally deliver a large number of bug fixes in a final beta.

 

So, there you have it Phones Review readers. One relatively known blog claiming there will be no more betas and telling us not to expect iOS 7 beta 7. Do you think that is it, or are there too many problems still within iOS 7 beta 6 to warrant beta 7 before the Gold Master launches next month?

 

Source

  • 2 weeks later...

Something wrong remains with the bluetooth playback. When I'm listening to Spotify (bluetooth connection) in my car and the phone starts ringen. Spotify stops playing, the iPod app starts playing and the person at the other side of the line can hear my music. :lol:

Something wrong remains with the bluetooth playback. When I'm listening to Spotify (bluetooth connection) in my car and the phone starts ringen. Spotify stops playing, the iPod app starts playing and the person at the other side of the line can hear my music. :lol:

 

The moment I posted this the issue was resolved. Nice! :lol:

About the only difference I've seen so far from Beta 6 -> GM on my iPhone 5:

 

* New ringtones

* Asking Siri to navigate me somewhere actually works right

* I can edit the "me" contact without the contacts app crashing

 

Also, there's a handful of dynamic and still wallpapers included by default now.

 

They've also changed the sound the phone makes when plug in your phone to charge it. The sound when starting Siri is altered as well.

 

Edit: The locking sound has changed as well, it has an echo to it now.

Well I installed this on my iPad 2 .. it's very nice, although I never had any doubt it wouldn't be. I do like the new UI. Has anyone noticed the 3D effect on the home screen when moving the ipad around?

It's parallax and was shown a lot during WWDC/iOS 7 promos. It's not enabled on the 4S, IIRC.

 

Not on the 4, but should be enabled for the 4S.

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I installed this on my iPad 2 .. it's very nice, although I never had any doubt it wouldn't be. I do like the new UI. Has anyone noticed the 3D effect on the home screen when moving the ipad around?

I did (friend's iPad got the update last night - she asked me to update it for her, since I'm her IT geek). I'm actually more impressed with iOS 7 on an iPad than I was on a same-vintage iPhone 4 - further, both BT and wireless-N performance are improved over iOS 5 or 6 (her third-party keyboard connected to the Pad via BT, and the router connection is N to either her router or mine - both of us have wireless-N routers).

Is it just me, or is changing the brightness on iPad using the control center kind of a pain?  The majority of the screen "dims" down when the control center is up.  It's bring up the control center, adjust brightness, close control center, see if that works for me, nope, return to control center, adjust brightness... kind of a fiasco. 

 

It isn't an issue on iPhone because of the auto brightness control and the fact that the control center takes up the majority of the screen (and it isn't "dimmed").

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!