Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

i suppose if he bragged at least they will not have issues getting him put in prison, and from what i gather most prisoners do not have fond feelings for child rapists.

i suppose if he bragged at least they will not have issues getting him put in prison, and from what i gather most prisoners do not have fond feelings for child rapists.

Indeed. He's likely to have a short meeting with a sharp object.

The hell with putting them in jail, a bullet to the head is what they deserve.  Quick and easy, and if you use a large enough caliber they won't even know what hit them :D

However,  put them in a particular correctional facility known for gang raping inmates...might be a fitting sentence.

 

Nobody likes rapists, not even inmates.

I say we give the victim a metal strap on and let her go to town.

 

This and probably wrap sandpaper around the shaft.

this is just sick, the amount of violence she suffered most likely changed her forever into a different person. Also they went into a extra leap for calling her parent explaining what they were doing to her, this is beyond anything i ever heard.

 

how someone should deal with this? as a parent i would probably go berserk on them; as a citizen the notions of justice and human rights are important ones and should be respected for a healthy society; the victim should see justice applied to the culprits and they should receive the properly penalty for a crime as cruel as this one; the problem is, if proven they are guilty, how to deal with this without becoming a monster as they are? kill them? how? slowly, faster? put them into prison for life, having the state paying for them to live and the victim knowing they are alive?

 

we, as a society, should not let this things go unpunished and just the notion that they could get away because of a technical detail or some legal crap, it disgusts me.

However,  put them in a particular correctional facility known for gang raping inmates...might be a fitting sentence.

 

Nobody likes rapists, not even inmates.

 

 

Which is a bit hypocritical of prisoners when you consider how much rape occurs in prison.

That is almost always same sex rape, and usually an establishment of power & pecking order. Violent as they are most all hardcore prisoners have either mothers, younger brothers or sisters they feel defensive about, and this kind of opportunistic rapist represents what would set them off to defend them. This is what makes rapists, pederasts, and pedophiles targets.

Lot of "UMADBRO" types posting here.

 

I've always been in favour of a humane, efficient death penalty for crimes such as this. A quick shot to the head or injection does it. It's not about revenge or retribution but about practicality and creating a closure to the events.

 

All these "PUT THEM IN JAIL TO GET RAPED BY BUBBA!!" and "PUT THEM THROUGH A MEAT GRINDER!!" type comments are pure sickness and irrational.

Sentiments shared

 

I know EXACTLY what I would do to those sick f**ks if I ever got my hands on them.

 

 

To any of you who share these sentiments and statements.

 

How does this make you any better than them ?

Unfortunately, this will never happen an people like this still have rights.

 

And plea bargains shouldnt even be considered in a situation like this.

In my opinion it's completely jacked up that people like this still have rights. As soon as they are proven guilty they should be given the same rights they gave this girl (ie. none).

 

To any of you who share these sentiments and statements.

 

How does this make you any better than them ?

Personally I think they should be treated how they treated the victim. In this particular case they completely controlled her and stripped her of all her rights as a human being, so they should therefore be stripped of all their rights as a human being. It may sound harsh but honestly it is the least they deserve. As for how it makes me any better than them, I wouldn't want this type of thing done to an innocent person, let alone a child....only those who have done it to an innocent person. If you have ever watched the tv show Dexter (anyone on Neowin who hasn't?) I honestly view justice similarly to how Dexter does. If a person does something heinous to another human being, they should receive similar treatment.

 

I wouldn't go as far to be a vigilante who brings this sort of justice to others, but I would support a government sanctioned law with proper safeguards in place pertaining to it.

  • Like 1

I honestly view justice similarly to how Dexter does. If a person does something heinous to another human being, they should receive similar treatment.

 

That basically makes you a psychopath. but it's not a big deal a good percentage of the human population are...

That basically makes you a psychopath. but it's not a big deal a good percentage of the human population are...

Not really.

 

 

Psychopathy is a disorder, defined by Hare's Psychopathy Checklist ? Revised (PCL?R) and characterised in part by a diminished capacity for remorse and poor behavioural controls ( Hare, 1991).

I do not have poor behavioral controls and I am remorseful, but not to somebody I feel deserves it....in my eye if somebody murdered an innocent person, they deserve to be killed....I am not religious, but I do believe in an eye for an eye.

 

As an addendum to what I said earlier, I only feel that way about something done intentionally, I do not feel someone who killed someone else accidentally (or through self-defense or something) should be treated in the same manner, only those who knew what they were doing, in control of their actions, and continued to do so.

To any of you who share these sentiments and statements.

 

How does this make you any better than them ?

It doesn't, I'm no better than any other law abiding and moral man/woman or child I never said I was.

But as a father of 3, 2 of whom are little girls, I know what I would want to do to someone who would do what this sick little motherf****r did.

Most of my r/t friends would agree, (though actually carrying out said threat would be something we'd reconsider)

And like any father, if enraged to the point of not thinking clearly anymore, a man isn't going to care about the consequences of his actions at the time.

I'm with the eye for an eye notion. If they torture their end dhould be administrred in the harshest manner. This isn't psychopathy, iust institutionalized Karma. What comes around, goes around. Etc.

Must be why the American "correction" facilities are such wonders at turning out reformed criminals, and are not a revolving door that turns out repeat criminals worse than when they came in, huh ?

In what society at ANY time has punishment/revenge/eye for an eye, EVER caused reduced crime and less violence in society. Answer is never and nowhere. You americans are way to focused on revenge punishment over reform. You're to interested in punishing criminals to even talk about reforming them, even though reforming leads to much lower crime rates, cheaper prisons, less people and time in prisons and productive members of society.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!