Recommended Posts

I have a desktop themepack (the RM Studios London themepack) that I use for both desktop and Start background - they will now rotate in tandem.

They're not bringing the Start Menu back.

 

They should.  Or at least they should add in a reasonably useful, and business-oriented replacement for it.  the Windows 8 Start Screen will simply never be useful in a business or non-entertainment setting.  Hell, given the direction they are going, I'd love to see a Windows Home and Windows Work type differentiation between OS offerings.

 

Good gawd... i shudder at the thought of teaching our mostly completely non-technical staff user base of around 1800 how to use Windows 8.  Which is why we will never deploy it.  Doesn't make any sense in a domain-based, productivity-driven, educational industry work environment.

  • Like 1

They should.  Or at least they should add in a reasonably useful, and business-oriented replacement for it.  the Windows 8 Start Screen will simply never be useful in a business or non-entertainment setting.  Hell, given the direction they are going, I'd love to see a Windows Home and Windows Work type differentiation between OS offerings.

 

Good gawd... i shudder at the thought of teaching our mostly completely non-technical staff user base of around 1800 how to use Windows 8.  Which is why we will never deploy it.  Doesn't make any sense in a domain-based, productivity-driven, educational industry work environment.

 

They won't. Ignoring the fact that it had issues working with Windows 8 features, Microsoft has built a branding image with live tiles. Windows Phone has them, XBox has them, SkyDrive has them, Windows NOT having them would be damaging to that brand. Remember, three screens and a cloud? That's this. That's why it's not coming back.

 

"I don't, however, believe that Microsoft is going to relent on the Start screen. The new app launcher does the job well enough, and live tiles are a genuinely useful capability. The tile design is taking on an important branding role across the company (being more or less shared across phone, tablet, PC, and console), and that unification makes any backtracking very unlikely. There are plenty of third-party Start menu implementations. If the issue is truly a deal-breaker, I would suggest that you investigate one of those."

 

- http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/06/what-does-windows-8-1-offer-to-desktop-die-hards/

^^ I'm not disagreeing with any of that...  you're right!  I'm just saying that the direction that they are taking is going to alienate the working world.  I realize that MS wants it to be this new paradigm for both home and office, but it ain't gonna happen anytime soon.  Unless you can get the working world away from the traditional keyboard / mouse desktop, Win8 is always going to be a step backwards, not forwards.

 

To be clear, I despise using Win 8 on a desktop.  Love it on a phone, tablet or small, touch-sensitive laptop.

^^ I'm not disagreeing with any of that...  you're right!  I'm just saying that the direction that they are taking is going to alienate the working world.  I realize that MS wants it to be this new paradigm for both home and office, but it ain't gonna happen anytime soon.  Unless you can get the working world away from the traditional keyboard / mouse desktop, Win8 is always going to be a step backwards, not forwards.

 

To be clear, I despise using Win 8 on a desktop.  Love it on a phone, tablet or small, touch-sensitive laptop.

 

The "working world" has adjusted just fine to bringing iPads and iPhones - the users don't seem to have any problems using those devices.  The truth is, after a period of time, most users will be so used to dealing with Windows 8 or a similar interface, that it won't be a big deal to move to it at their office.

 

FTR, I use Windows 8 on my non-touch-screen dual 24" monitor setup and love it (don't use many Metro apps, although that may change with 8.1), and I run it on my Surface.  I work for a large, multi-national corporation, and they're moving their tens of thousands of employees to Windows 8 over the course of the coming year or so.  According to their metrics, most employees, after adjusting, like Windows 8 and are just as productive, if not more.

  • Like 4

@GreyWolf - In Windows 8.1, the limit is 9, 6 was in Windows 8.

 

 

That's good to know, they've planned ahead to support larger screens now.  I think 6 is fine for up to 24" screens but with a 30" 9 makes more sense.

Can someone confirm if dragging down to close Metro apps will keep them running in the background/Task Manager?

 

If so, this is a bit silly decision.

Closing an app doesn't mean keep it running soewhat hidden... ;-)

 

cheers.

Can someone confirm if dragging down to close Metro apps will keep them running in the background/Task Manager?

 

If so, this is a bit silly decision.

Closing an app doesn't mean keep it running soewhat hidden... ;-)

 

cheers.

 

Yes, apps continue to run in the background so you need to use Task Manager to close them. Maybe they'll be closed fully in the final build of windows 8.1.

My only problem is that scrolling seems to be slower throughout the whole OS. 

 

Anyone else experienced this?

 

 

Graphics drivers need to be updated, I know AMD has beta drivers out for it's cards but NVidia hasn't yet, nor Intel for it's IGP.  That's probably why it's not smooth yet.

Graphics drivers need to be updated, I know AMD has beta drivers out for it's cards but NVidia hasn't yet, nor Intel for it's IGP.  That's probably why it's not smooth yet.

 

Thanks for the reply. My problem is that I have a card from the mobility radeon 4000 series and those cards are not supported by the official amd drivers anymore. In windows 8 the stock one was working perfectly.

Decor8 stopped working. ModernNix stopped working, UXThemePatcher causes a BlueScreen so I can't re-apply my theme. Lovely.

Well yeah O.o

Clearly things ######ing with Windows files are going to break when those Windows files change >.<

Perhaps if you actually list the problems you faced, we could better understand this post...

 

 

Just another hater rant with an over long pre excuse

 

Dude, get on the modern OIS bandwagon or switch, Win 8 and 8.1 are the Future and no amount of internet hissy fits are changing that, so evolve and embrace change or Linux and OS X are waiting for you

Installed on my Surface RT.  Noticed considerable improvement in app performance (IM+ and All About Money feel a lot snappier).  Internet Explorer looks and feels the same at the moment, but haven't used it much - still has problems with plus.google.com :( The new Reading List app looks promising.  I need to spend some more time with this until I get a good feel of it and express my judgement later, but overall looks good. 

 

One gripe I have is related to textboxes and selection.  Before, I could select text with one tap, the popup menu would appear with a second tap.  Now I have to press and hold for the popup menu to appear.  Anyone else noticed this?  

 

Also, anyone knows if it's possible to hide the start button - don't really need it considering I have a hardware button on the screen a couple of centimeters away.

Apps should see a boost in performance from the start but once they get recompiled and updated to support 8.1 and not just 8.0 we'll see a even bigger boost in performance. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!