Recommended Posts

loaded it last night on a test machine and ran into a few very strange things.

 

  • It asked for a product key, which i could not give it because windows 8 systems do not come with a sticker with the key on it, ended up looking on microsofts sight and got a preview key to use.
  • Once the computer rebooted and told it it was ready for use (and ran through the small setup) it went to the desktop for a few minutes and signed me off, once i signed back in, i got a black screen with a curser, and the CPU is tacked out to 98%

They should.  Or at least they should add in a reasonably useful, and business-oriented replacement for it.  the Windows 8 Start Screen will simply never be useful in a business or non-entertainment setting.  Hell, given the direction they are going, I'd love to see a Windows Home and Windows Work type differentiation between OS offerings.

 

Good gawd... i shudder at the thought of teaching our mostly completely non-technical staff user base of around 1800 how to use Windows 8.  Which is why we will never deploy it.  Doesn't make any sense in a domain-based, productivity-driven, educational industry work environment.

While people complain about the OS lacking unification, the same people also complain that they want more fragmentation built into it by including the start menu.

 

Why is the start screen any different to the start menu if you're just loading programs from it? Also, as a guy who's installed Windows 8 for many non-tech users, its very easy to pick up. I just show users how to get to the desktop and back to the start screen, which takes the whole of 4 seconds. After that, and when they release they have a central app store where they can download games for their kids, you soon realize how much it actually benefits the normal user. True story!

 

I can't wait to try out Windows 8.1.

  • Like 1

Well yeah O.o

Clearly things ****ing with Windows files are going to break when those Windows files change >.<

 

Not everything changes. There was a strong possibility the theme patching stuff would work. 

They should.  Or at least they should add in a reasonably useful, and business-oriented replacement for it.  the Windows 8 Start Screen will simply never be useful in a business or non-entertainment setting.  Hell, given the direction they are going, I'd love to see a Windows Home and Windows Work type differentiation between OS offerings.

 

Good gawd... i shudder at the thought of teaching our mostly completely non-technical staff user base of around 1800 how to use Windows 8.  Which is why we will never deploy it.  Doesn't make any sense in a domain-based, productivity-driven, educational industry work environment.

You know it's kinda funny really.

 

Here I am looking at my start screen thinking:

 

Hmm.  Mail.  Yeah I use that at work (though it is no Outlook.)  Oh a calendar!  I use that for work too.  A weather app.  Oh my boss won't be cross seeing that over my shoulder.  A map app!  I could use that to get some maps for my next off-site visit!  Photos!  Wow - there's all my photos of whiteboards and system architecture sketches.  Even more neat - there's all my work colleagues cycling through the people app.  I can click on them to get maps, phone numbers and stuff.

 

This stuff will NEVER catch on in the workplace! WHAT WERE MICROSOFT THINKING??????!!!!!!!  /s

  • Like 2

You know it's kinda funny really.

 

Here I am looking at my start screen thinking:

 

Hmm.  Mail.  Yeah I use that at work (though it is no Outlook.)  Oh a calendar!  I use that for work too.  A weather app.  Oh my boss won't be cross seeing that over my shoulder.  A map app!  I could use that to get some maps for my next off-site visit!  Photos!  Wow - there's all my photos of whiteboards and system architecture sketches.  Even more neat - there's all my work colleagues cycling through the people app.  I can click on them to get maps, phone numbers and stuff.

 

This stuff will NEVER catch on in the workplace! WHAT WERE MICROSOFT THINKING??????!!!!!!!

What about all those highly useful desktop apps which you pin to the start screen to make it a fully fledged application launcher like its meant to be, do you not use those either?

Stop being a jackass, it has the same purpose of the start menu.

  • Like 1

As mentioned before (I think) I dislike background colours on desktop applications for the start screen. Differentiating app types isn't as easy. Firefox also seems to have an awful bright blue, not sure why.

I can't wait til Neowin supports IE11....that'll be like next year right ;)

 

I have had more trouble just getting this thing installed and working right than anyone should ever have to, but now that it's working I do love it.

 

Damn.

 

 

Surprisingly, Neowin works better with IE11 on my Surface tablet, than it did with IE10. Go figure. :P

What about all those highly useful desktop apps which you pin to the start screen to make it a fully fledged application launcher like its meant to be, do you not use those either?

Stop being a jackass, it has the same purpose of the start menu.

Sorry - I should've put a /s on the end of the last line.  I just edited it now.

 

I was trying to point out that the start screen stuff is just as useful in the context of the workplace as they are at home.

  • Like 1

Sorry - I should've put a /s on the end of the last line.  I just edited it now.

 

I was trying to point out that the start screen stuff is just as useful in the context of the workplace as they are at home.

Thought so, I read it expecting the /s  :)

 

Exactly, the start screen has perfect relevance. If the company has and works heavily on MS services then stuff like modern app deployment makes its even more beneficial. The start screen makes your PC feel more like yours. Like I actually take pride in re-arranging my start screen on my phone and computer. You can tell the difference so much when using someone else's computer or WP8 phone.

I am now doing a full re-install of Windows 8.1 from scratch rather than just running the update on my test machine, apparently others have had the same issue i did (with the computer booting to a blank screen) and no one has yet to resolve the issue. so a fresh install it is.

I like it a lot, actually. There are small refinements here and there and I'm not even going to install a start screen replacement I think.

 

Sorry if this is common knowledge, but has anyone noticed the introduction of animated wallpapers in the start screen?

And you can use your desktop wallpaper (even the themepacks) there, too (that's what I've done).

 

If only you could use them in the LOCK screen as well...(however, that is, admittedly, Quibble Territory).

What about all those highly useful desktop apps which you pin to the start screen to make it a fully fledged application launcher like its meant to be, do you not use those either?

Stop being a jackass, it has the same purpose of the start menu.

JonnyLH - You missed the "sarcasm" tag at the end - and also the whole point of that post.

The live tiles can certainly link to *desktop apps* (which pin to the StartScreen by default, or, at the very least, to the AppsScreen, which is one screen down) - however, live tiles for any application, desktop OR Modern, that supports them, can function as a tripwire/alarm, as you can tell, at a glance, whether there is anything you need to do immediately, without having to actually open the app or application to which they are attached.

 

Point of data - the Mail live tile is linked, naturally, to the Mail app (included with Windows 8.x); by default, of course, it's linked to your Microsoft account.  On my testbed, that same account (an Outlook.com mail account) is in Outlook 2013 - hence the Mail live tile lets me know if my Outlook.com account has anything important I need to deal with ASAP.  Therefore, I need only open Outlook if I have to.

 

That is above and beyond the Start menu.  It does everything the Start menu does - and then some.  And it takes up ZERO desktop real estate except for the Start button, which anchors the Taskbar.

It also fulfills a promise that started with ActiveDesktop and push gadgets and widgets (which go back to not only Windows 95, but NT 4.0 - specifically ActiveDesktop and push-based technologies for it).  It is, at most, a screen away - if you have multiple displays, you can, in fact, dedicate a display to it.  (Note that you don't have to do it - the choice is yours.)

 

Chance of my going back to Windows prior to 8.1 for any length of time on any of my computers?  Exactly none.

Not everything changes. There was a strong possibility the theme patching stuff would work. 

The problem is that the theme patchers use binary offsets in order to patch the files.

 

If a single bit is added or subtracted in front of where the change needs to be made, it breaks them >.<

If you don't want the tiles you can set it to go right to the all apps menu, then it's a full screen app list "menu".   This is no different than how it is in GNOME 3.x as well, also a full screen overlay "menu".    So if you don't want the tiles then you don't need to even see them or use them with 8.1.   You also see more items in the all apps list for the start screen then you ever did with the old start menu, something you'd think power users would like. 

 

But this argument is old, use a start menu replacement or stick with Win7.  I personally see a good number of improvements and additions in 8.1, plus it being free is great.  I can't wait to upgrade my main desktop PC to the final RTM version later.

Ok I have sorted my Office 2013 install issues. 

 

But still has anyone ever found how to remove those nagging folders in This PC? I think we need to dig deeper in to registry settings.

You mean the ones for Documents, Videos, etc.?

 

Those are the replacements for the default Libraries in Windows 8.0, and are pretty much the same default folders/sub-directories Windows has had since 3.x (with additions from 9x/NT).  All are linked to SkyDrive 8.1 (another by-default inclusion - referred to directly by the OOBE).  While it's a quibble, it's a USEful quibble; in fact, it matches - heads-up - a feature of iCloud (both OS X and iOS).

Update through win store.. that was a joke. no indication of download speed, no approximate time for installation. No solid indication whether the installation is still working. Disabled permanently the store download and downloaded ISO. Don't see anything new and exciting on desktop front and have no plan to be in metro land. so reverted to 8.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!