Recommended Posts

Still can't close metro apps without going back to said god awful start screen, scrolling to the left and then closing

 

The easiest way to close apps is to move your mouse into either left corner (top or bottom) and the list of recently used apps appears. You then middle click to close them. If you don't have a middle mouse button you click and hold and drag down. And this works from wherever you are. No need to go to the start screen to close apps.

Yay the start button is back but wait.... clicking it takes us back to the god awful start screen instead of the apps menu. Fail 

 

Still can't close metro apps without going back to said god awful start screen, scrolling to the left and then closing

 

It was rumoured that shutting down the PC was going to be simplified.... did I miss something?

 

I see the visuals have improved slightly, but after been treated to Areo Glass in Win7, This is still ****.

The startbutton does what it did since Windows 95: bring you back to start. That's 18 years of fail.

 

Scrolling to the left? Anyway, where is it supposed to bring you? The Settings-app?

 

Start > Right click > Shut down

 

I don't get whay you mean with the last one: however, the only difference between Aero Glass and Aero Metro are the transparant and corners. And it has been like that for over 12 years and optional for over 18 years.

The easiest way to close Metro apps is to not close them at all, since they suspend on their own (which no previous version of Windows had the setup for.)  I don't get why people still get hung up on that.

 

Still can't close metro apps without going back to said god awful start screen, scrolling to the left and then closing

The issue I'm having is that the thumbnail switcher only hosts up to 9 apps on my screen, regardless of whether I have more open. This means that if I just leave apps open, it becomes harder (or impossible from that list) to switch to the one I want.

The issue I'm having is that the thumbnail switcher only hosts up to 9 apps on my screen, regardless of whether I have more open. This means that if I just leave apps open, it becomes harder (or impossible from that list) to switch to the one I want.

Use Alt-Tab in that case.

The issue I'm having is that the thumbnail switcher only hosts up to 9 apps on my screen, regardless of whether I have more open. This means that if I just leave apps open, it becomes harder (or impossible from that list) to switch to the one I want.

 

 

Yeah, I think they need to allow it to scroll like they did with the new tabs window in metro IE11 compared to the fixed tabs bar in IE10.  It shouldn't be limited in any way.

In Windows 8.1, you can close apps COMPLETLY by draging them to the bottom side of your screen, then wat 1 second, the thumbnail of the app will change into the apps logo, as soon as that happens, you can release the mouse and the app will be closed.

I agree that we could see the classic control panel get the axe in time but I don't think it'll be soon.  There are lots of advanced option they still haven't even changed from their original Win9x days, old dialog windows etc.  Look at IE's internet options for example, that things been the same since IE5 I bet. 

 

It's going to take quite some time to redo all that and work it into the new PC Settings area, though I think if they do it then fine.  In the end it's best to have one area for things and not 2 or 3.  As for the desktop, nah, not going away but I expect more changes to it.  I think the systray will be replaced once they add a notification center/area as part of metro which I fully expect is going to happen.

 

Right now though I'm much more interested in the 4,000+ new APIs they've added to 8.1 and what developers can do with those as far as metro apps go.

GP007 - that is largely due to our (as users) insistence on backward-compatibility with how we have historically done things; why else did it take until Windows 8 for the Start menu to have its chop called?  The same applies to Enhanced Protected Mode - it can easily turn into a UAC gripefest.  (It is on by default in Windows Server - and has been since 2003 - due to folks expecting SERVER operating systems to be locked down that way; do that to a desktop or even workstation OS and users will kvetch.)

However, I'm neither griping OR kvetching - I'm simply enjoying.

GP007 - that is largely due to our (as users) insistence on backward-compatibility with how we have historically done things; why else did it take until Windows 8 for the Start menu to have its chop called?  The same applies to Enhanced Protected Mode - it can easily turn into a UAC gripefest.  (It is on by default in Windows Server - and has been since 2003 - due to folks expecting SERVER operating systems to be locked down that way; do that to a desktop or even workstation OS and users will kvetch.)

However, I'm neither griping OR kvetching - I'm simply enjoying.

 

I get that, but at the same time, those old settings dialog boxes don't have much to do with backwards compatibility.   Nothing stops them from changing desktop IEs options into something new for example.    I just think it's going to take longer than some expect before they have everything in the new PC Settings section that they can drop Control Panel.  And I think that by the time we reach that point the desktop itself could just be a Win32 VM to run our old apps and nothing more.  If they keep adding more and more APIs to WinRT with each update then it shouldn't take long for it to be able to drive the same level of apps we're used to with Win32.

Meh. The Start Button disappears after you press it and Microsoft is still insistent on you using their Metro apps. The scroll bar at the bottom of the Start Screen page doesn't need to be there. It overlaps with the Start Button. Maybe a small scroll bar right underneath the Start Screen with a glow that moves from left to right as you scroll? There needs to be windowed Metro apps (with a menu bar) and they need to reside in the task bar and not the (recent apps) bar on the left. Is it possible for the Charms options to be located in the task bar too?

They won't. Ignoring the fact that it had issues working with Windows 8 features, Microsoft has built a branding image with live tiles. Windows Phone has them, XBox has them, SkyDrive has them, Windows NOT having them would be damaging to that brand. Remember, three screens and a cloud? That's this. That's why it's not coming back.

 

"I don't, however, believe that Microsoft is going to relent on the Start screen. The new app launcher does the job well enough, and live tiles are a genuinely useful capability. The tile design is taking on an important branding role across the company (being more or less shared across phone, tablet, PC, and console), and that unification makes any backtracking very unlikely. There are plenty of third-party Start menu implementations. If the issue is truly a deal-breaker, I would suggest that you investigate one of those."

 

- http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/06/what-does-windows-8-1-offer-to-desktop-die-hards/

 

It's hard to further damage a brand image that consumers already hate.

The only gripes I have is with the customisation of the Start Screen.

 

I have found that you can't easily place 4 "small" tiles in a line easily if you don't have a "wide" tile above them first even if you have a "large" tile it doesn't work. Also you can't have a line of "small" tiles and then a "wide" or "large" tile below without leaving a "small" tile high gap between them - Hope these gets fixed before release.

 

Other than that, loving 8.1

The easiest way to close apps is to move your mouse into either left corner (top or bottom) and the list of recently used apps appears. You then middle click to close them. If you don't have a middle mouse button you click and hold and drag down. And this works from wherever you are. No need to go to the start screen to close apps.

I noticed this no longer works on 8.1 via touch.

 

Meh. The Start Button disappears after you press it and Microsoft is still insistent on you using their Metro apps. The scroll bar at the bottom of the Start Screen page doesn't need to be there. It overlaps with the Start Button. Maybe a small scroll bar right underneath the Start Screen with a glow that moves from left to right as you scroll? There needs to be windowed Metro apps (with a menu bar) and they need to reside in the task bar and not the (recent apps) bar on the left. Is it possible for the Charms options to be located in the task bar too?

On one hand I quite agree with the idea of more polished scroll notification.  On the other, driver support in Win8 is still spotty enough on touchpads I'd hate to be without the landing area.

  • The start screen looks a mess with the tiles being colored based on their icon color, Id prefer an option to set them all to the accent color
  • Not a good idea using the accent color for anything other than labels in the new control panel.
  • At least they added some eye candy to the start button to justify its waste of screen space

All in all its the same as windows 8 lots of new features for SMB/Enterprise/PowerUsers

Anyone else unable to sign in with a local account? the only option it gives me during setup is make or sign in to a Microsoft account....

 

 

There's another thread about that as well, you can fail the account login and it should show the option to make a local account, or once you reach that part disconnect from the internet and you get the local account option as well.

There's another thread about that as well, you can fail the account login and it should show the option to make a local account, or once you reach that part disconnect from the internet and you get the local account option as well.

 

that's just ridiculous... makes testing in a domain annoying

The only gripes I have is with the customisation of the Start Screen.

 

I have found that you can't easily place 4 "small" tiles in a line easily if you don't have a "wide" tile above them first even if you have a "large" tile it doesn't work. Also you can't have a line of "small" tiles and then a "wide" or "large" tile below without leaving a "small" tile high gap between them - Hope these gets fixed before release.

 

Other than that, loving 8.1

This. The way we can customize the position of the tiles can still be improved. Right now, we are still restricted with the size of the "medium" tile. You have to fill that spot first or have a bigger tile before you can place a tile on the other column or below it. This also prevents us from having 4 small tiles in a line as you mentioned or as the screenshot below shows, placing the Movie Moments tile a slot higher to cover the blank area.

post-372806-0-50478300-1372780784.png

Hmm, today I decided to try the Metro version of IE11 so I set it to be the default browser. For some reason, it still keeps on opening the desktop version.  What else do I need to do?

 

Where do you open links from?  I think they made it so that if you open a link from a app on the desktop then desktop IE opens, if it's a link inside a metro app then metro IE opens.   I'll have to fire up my VM and check.

Where do you open links from?  I think they made it so that if you open a link from a app on the desktop then desktop IE opens, if it's a link inside a metro app then metro IE opens.   I'll have to fire up my VM and check.

No, I mean, opening a fresh session of IE and not just links.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!