Man of Steel sequel to feature Batman (and others) (2016)


Recommended Posts

So this is going to basically be a Justice League movie instead of an outright Superman sequel.

I don't think it's going to go that far.  I expect WW, will be a small part that will help lead into a future WW movie.  As far as batman goes I think even his parts will be smaller than superman.  I expect a 70/30 split between the two as far as the story goes.

I don't think it's going to go that far.  I expect WW, if it is WW, will be a small part that will help lead into a future WW movie.  As far as batman goes I think even his parts will be smaller than superman.  I expect a 70/30 split between the two as far as the story goes.

 

Snyder confirmed that she's WW. And I really hope they feature more of Supes. After I walked out of Man of Steel I was wanting to see more of his journey. With Batman and Wonder Women added in, I was starting to become worried that this might turn into a reaction to The Avengers.

She'll have to bulk up...

3yt6.jpg

I don't know, WW has her own superpowers going, she doesn't have to look buff to account for it like batman does for example.  I'm sure she will a bit but not much imo.

I don't know, WW has her own superpowers going, she doesn't have to look buff to account for it like batman does for example.  I'm sure she will a bit but not much imo.

She'll be tall so that's good for WW

Callan Mulvey Eyed For BATMAN VS. SUPERMAN Villain

f6ne.jpg

Src

I can see that happen tbh because I he has the right look to pull off a version of Barry Allen. Not sure about the Wonder Woman casting though. To the people saying she has superpowers and doesn't need to look buffed, you might be right but in the comics she looks buffed regardless. It's because of her culture.

All these added superheroes though, I'm not too sure about it at all. I mean, it's awesome and all, but I'd much rather have this one revolving around Superman and Batman without the added Justice League members. I was all excited about the idea when I first heard about it, but now that they'll be adding Flash as well, I think it's a bit too much.

I'd much rather see them in their own respective films. But then they'd be repeating what Marvel did has already done with the Avengers. They could've left Flash out, with Wonder Woman having a small role in this film. And then have Flash joining them in a Justice League film along with Green Lantern (hopefully John Stewart), Aquaman and Cyborg. I'd love to see Shazam in a Justice League film as well, possibly 2!

I can see that happen tbh because I he has the right look to pull off a version of Barry Allen. Not sure about the Wonder Woman casting though. To the people saying she has superpowers and doesn't need to look buffed, you might be right but in the comics she looks buffed regardless. It's because of her culture.

All these added superheroes though, I'm not too sure about it at all. I mean, it's awesome and all, but I'd much rather have this one revolving around Superman and Batman without the added Justice League members. I was all excited about the idea when I first heard about it, but now that they'll be adding Flash as well, I think it's a bit too much.

I'd much rather see them in their own respective film. But then they'd be repeating what Marvel did has already done with the Avengers. They could've left Flash out, with Wonder Woman having a small role in this film. And then have Flash joining them in a Justice League film along with Green Lantern (hopefully John Stewart), Aquaman and Cyborg. I'd love to see Shazam in a Justice League film as well, possibly 2!

It's the difference between being "buff" and in WW case as a amazon being fit/toned or whatever. She doesn't have to take it to any female bodybuilder levels for example like the male characters tend to try to. As far as adding more characters to the movie, I expect even WW part to be pretty minor let alone flash who could just get a cameo for a few seconds.

It's the difference between being "buff" and in WW case as a amazon being fit/toned or whatever. She doesn't have to take it to any female bodybuilder levels for example like the male characters tend to try to. As far as adding more characters to the movie, I expect even WW part to be pretty minor let alone flash who could just get a cameo for a few seconds.

Yeah, that's true actually. But Gal Gadot just looks fragile compared to what I expected of a movie version of Wonder Woman, you know what I mean? With buff I didn't mean bodybuilder level btw, because that doesn't look good on woman at all. A bit buffed is alright but bodybuilder? Hell no :p

I expected the movie version of Wonder Woman to look more like this:

its_a_me_wonder_woman.jpg

And yeah, I hope Flash's role will be minor, he deserves his own film imo.

Yeah, that's true actually. But Gal Gadot just looks fragile compared to what I expected of a movie version of Wonder Woman, you know what I mean? With buff I didn't mean bodybuilder level btw, because that doesn't look good on woman at all. A bit buffed is alright but bodybuilder? Hell no :p

I expected the movie version of Wonder Woman to look more like this:

[image]

And yeah, I hope Flash's role will be minor, he deserves his own film imo.

What about this? :hump:

 

owLhyJW.jpg

Yeah, she looks awesome! But not for the Wonder Woman part, she's too old for that now, haha :p

Also, thanks to Damien's signature I thought Callan Mulvey was being considered for the Flash role :pinch: What I do wan't to say about the article though is that it's too early for Doomsday if you ask me. Unless they're going to assemble the Justice League after this film and Doomsday is getting a small part at the end of the film as a cliffhanger.

Also, thanks to Damian's signature I thought Callan Mulvey was being considered for the Flash role :pinch: What I do wan't to say about the article though is that it's too early for Doomsday if you ask me. Unless they're going to assemble the Justice League after this film and Doomsday is getting a small part at the end of the film as a cliffhanger.

Spelling my name wrong is blashpemy! :p

Yeah I think he could be a minor villain, to unknown really to be a main one

Spelling my name wrong is blashpemy! :p

Yeah I think he could be a minor villain, to unknown really to be a main one

That's what you get when you read too many Batman comics, haha :p

She's a worse pick than Affleck for Batman; at least Affleck has the physic. Wonder Woman shouldn't be a body builder, but one would think they'd avoid casting a twig.

It's interesting... he doesn't look massive in the Suit, but when he steps out of the water after his first rescue... holy **** he looks buff.

With the right cloths you can hide a persons build. In most cases he's got on very loose fitting shirts and so on, probably a few sizes bigger than needed.

bxip.png

According to sources of The Hollywood Reporter, actor Jason Momoa has entered negotiations with Warner Bros. to join the cast of Zack Snyder's Man of Steel sequel.

It's unknown who the Game of Thrones actor will play in the (working title) Batman Vs. Superman flick, but THR speculates it's either the big bad Doomsday, or perhaps the Martian Manhunter, a charter member of Justice League. Whoever the character, it seems that Jason Momoa has replaced Captain America: The Winter Soldier actor Callan Mulvey on the studio's radar. Anyhow, besides the HBO series Game of Thrones, Momoa had a lead role in the 2011 flop Conan the Barbarian, and he reportedly turned down Marvel's "lowball" offer to play Drax the Destroyer in Guardians of the Galaxy.

Src

I agree with the fact that it's starting to look like a Justice League film. And I don't think they'll have cameo roles if they're casting such big actors for the roles already. Unless they're already working towards the Justice League film this way, without telling the public.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!