Man of Steel sequel to feature Batman (and others) (2016)


Recommended Posts

I'm betting they haven't mentioned it because it's "obvious" at this point.

The general-not-into-comics public may not see it coming, but they'll understand

once the commercials start hitting TV saying all the heroes will be in one movie.

For those of us that do know our comics/cartoons, it's pointless to say since we

already see it coming.

 

Anyhow, I could very well see this movie ending with the heroes discussing a

team. Like Iron Man showing up in the Hulk movie end-credit scene hinting at

the Avengers.

I think that we're going to get cameos or very minor roles compared to superman and batman. I'm thinking 50-60% for superman with 30-35% for batman. The rest to be split by WW and anyone else. This doesn't make it quite a JL movie yet but the one after this yeah.

Well yeah, you're both right. Plus it's an original way for DC to introduce them like this. But it's still too mane well known JL characters in a Man of Steel film if you ask me.

Anyhow, I could very well see this movie ending with the heroes discussing a

team. Like Iron Man showing up in the Hulk movie end-credit scene hinting at

the Avengers.

I hope this won't happen though. The Justice League all met each other by change and not by a firm like S.H.I.E.L.D. wanting to setup a team. I hope they'll stick to that idea and that they'll stay an autonomous group. They have a very good reason to why they're operating from the Watchtower. So yeah, I don't really see that talk happening like that :p

Or it could be that Superman's surprise entrance, combined with an existential threat, causes closeted meta-humans, aliens, and cowls to come out. Perhaps near the climax.

That's basically how the Justice League got formed; because of a common enemy. But don't you think they'd all have been on the news already. For instance, Batman is pretty far into his career so I'm sure he's been on the news several times. I just think they're going to have a common enemy and Batman is just curious to who this Man of Steel is. Then again, maybe that's just too easy.

In which book was that? Because the first Justice League formed in The Brave and the Bold #28 and it wasn't a story that revolved around Superman and Batman.

In which book was that? Because the first Justice League formed in The Brave and the Bold #28 and it wasn't a story that revolved around Superman and Batman.

Man of Steel #3 (1986), "One Night in Gotham City." Their first post-Crisis interaction, written by John Byrne.

Bats keeps Superman at bay with the threat of a hidden bomb that would kill someone in Gotham if Superman penetrates a defensive field surrounding his uniform. After the case is solved he reveals the bomb would have blown up Bats himself (Bruce.) Superman ends up perplexed, wondering about their relationship.

All I'm here to say is that Jaimie Alexander would have been a much better choice for Wonder Woman. In terms of acting ability, experience and having the right look.

 

Gal Gadot has done Fast and Furious, and absolutely nothing else of significance. She can not lead solo movie on her own. Zack Snyder dun goofed off. And on top of that she is skinny as heck. That's not Wonder Woman.
 

I am not convinced by this casting or about this sequel. If Snyder pulls it off given all I've read so far, he's a far better director than I give him credit for.

Man of Steel #3 (1986), "One Night in Gotham City." Their first post-Crisis interaction, written by John Byrne.

Bats keeps Superman at bay with the threat of a hidden bomb that would kill someone in Gotham if Superman penetrates a defensive field surrounding his uniform. After the case is solved he reveals the bomb would have blown up Bats himself (Bruce.) Superman ends up perplexed, wondering about their relationship.

That's probably just about their first encounter then. The Brave and the Bold #28 is from the 60's and that's when the first Justice League was formed. It would be interesting if they took parts from Man of Steel #3 though.

I think it'll be a blend of elements from MoS #3, the first episodes of the Justice League animated series and New 52. The first MoS film already had elements from the MoS #1 comic (birthing chambers etc.) and New 52 (no shorts uniform, Clark's wandering etc.)

MMPS site: http://mmpicturestudios.com/

http://www.freep.com/article/20131212/ENT07/312120028/

Work begins in Pontiac on Superman-Batman movie

Preproduction has begun in metro Detroit on the eagerly awaited ?Man of Steel? sequel with Superman and Batman.

Michigan Motion Picture Studios in Pontiac will play a key role in what?s considered the biggest movie shoot ever to land in the state. The studio complex is serving as home to production offices for the Warner Bros./DC Entertainment project. When filming starts next year, all seven of the soundstages will be used. The still-untitled Superman-Batman movie is expected to occupy the complex through August.

The superhero epic?s economic impact is expected to extend across the region. It plans to shoot at the Pontiac studio as well as at locations throughout the state.

?This project will employ more Michigan residents than any other film project has ever employed in the state of Michigan,? says Michigan Motion Picture Studios COO Anthony Wenson.

>

banner3-home.jpg

The article says "the main antagonist, who's likely to be none other than Lex Luthor". I don't see a Lex Luthor in Joaquin Phoenix at all!

The article says "the main antagonist, who's likely to be none other than Lex Luthor". I don't see a Lex Luthor in Joaquin Phoenix at all!

Yeah but apparently the talk was Idris Elba for Luthor originally and that's a cool choice

Just in case they use the New 52 looks (Sups uniform in MoS is close)

New 52 supporting characters who have reason to be in MoS2 whatevertheycallit....

Luthor (still driven)

a-10.jpg

Supergirl (more brash & defiant)

2629535-supergirl_v6_01012.jpg

J'onn J'onzz (Martian Manhunter)

tumblr_m5za1tkjhF1qiqvl2.jpg

I'd J'onn J'onzz in one of the Man of Steel films! But no one said he'd be in this one ;)

Yeah but apparently the talk was Idris Elba for Luthor originally and that's a cool choice

Not too keen on that. I didn't like the fact that they opted for a black Kingpin in Daredevil either. I'm not a racist by any means, but changing characters in that way seems odd to me. I'd much rather see Brian Cranston as Lex Luthor than Idris Elba.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!