Man of Steel sequel to feature Batman (and others) (2016)


Recommended Posts

:blink:

 

do you know anything about comics? at all?

 

To be fair...the guy has a point.  One character's story has gone to great lengths to humanise and make him fallable to the point of becoming an anti-hero, whereas one has been made morally superior and a judge to humanity itself, and is, in fact, an Alien, superior in strength and speed to all before him.

 

Regardless of whether the guy has read the comics or not...they are two VERY different worlds in which they live.....Comics is one thing, but porting thast to the big screen and getting bums on seats to actually invest in the characters would be another.  This is why you see people like Nolan being coveted so much due to the character driven worlds he creates for Comic book heroes (Batman being the his)

FYI Bats and Sups have butted heads many times before, dating back to comics published in the 1940's. It took fighting a common enemy, and a bit of trickery on Bats part, to get them to stop and eventually work together. Trust took longer. I believe MoS2 will tell that story as a prelude to Justice League as it IS necessary for that film to work.

What Simon Pegg and Nick Frost said about Batflect

SIMON - "I couldn't totally see why people are so upset that the tall, handsome, lantern-jawed, talented, dark haired, actor, Ben Affleck is playing Bruce Wayne, I mean WOW, what a 'weird' choice."

NICK - "Is it any weirder than when they casted Michael Keaton?"

Ugh! Dumbest thing I've heard. Not only do these two characters not belong in the same universe, they definitely shouldn't be fighting each other. So many strikes against this film, I'm definitely leaning towards the never watching it column.

Who says they don't belong in the same universe? They have been in the same universe along with many other super-heroes for such a long time now :/ At this point, it's ignorance to say they don't belong in the same universe. Even in the latest "Batman/Superman" comic books you can see that it makes perfect sense to have them in the same universe. They've done a terrific job with putting them both against each other in that book. It even makes sense in Frank Miller's "The Dark Knight Returns". I think you just don't know both characters well enough, at least not as good as the reader of the comics. Batman has many ways to put Superman down.

And Superman is an alien remember? Superman's enemies are often aliens as well. Why can't it be possible that Superman dropped to earth in Batman's world?

concept art revealed by the guy who worked with nolan

kf2o.jpg

I said on Twitter that the mouth part still looked weird. But I must say that it looks better than in The Dark Knight trilogy.

Clark has Lois, makes sense that Bruce should have...someone! Apparently Ben Affleck's Batman will also have a love interest in Zack Snyder's follow up to Man Of Steel, as Latino Review have revealed the following details that have been sent around to various talent agencies. According to the site, "they?re looking for someone in their late 20s and are open to all ethnicities... and are looking for an actress who is both tall and possesses physicality."


http://latino-review.com/2013/09/batman-gets-a-girlfiend-in-man-of-steel-2/

Who says they don't belong in the same universe? They have been in the same universe along with many other super-heroes for such a long time now :/ At this point, it's ignorance to say they don't belong in the same universe. Even in the latest "Batman/Superman" comic books you can see that it makes perfect sense to have them in the same universe. They've done a terrific job with putting them both against each other in that book. It even makes sense in Frank Miller's "The Dark Knight Returns". I think you just don't know both characters well enough, at least not as good as the reader of the comics. Batman has many ways to put Superman down.

And Superman is an alien remember? Superman's enemies are often aliens as well. Why can't it be possible that Superman dropped to earth in Batman's world?

You do understand that I am expressing my opinion of a MADE UP character, a fictional character. I'm not arguing whether the sky is blue or grass is green :rolleyes:

 

These movies may have elements of the comic books, but they are not the comic books. Nolan worked very hard to make his vision of Batman as grounded as possible in reality. Superman may have fit in the same universe that Tim Burton created, and extended to Mr. Freeze, but not the universe Nolan created, which is why I bet is one reason why he left the project.

 

So, I have to ask, because apparently entitled comicbook fans have to give permission to have an opinion: may I perdyplease believe that these characters don't belong in the same universe.

You do understand that I am expressing my opinion of a MADE UP character, a fictional character. I'm not arguing whether the sky is blue or grass is green :rolleyes:

 

These movies may have elements of the comic books, but they are not the comic books. Nolan worked very hard to make his vision of Batman as grounded as possible in reality. Superman may have fit in the same universe that Tim Burton created, and extended to Mr. Freeze, but not the universe Nolan created, which is why I bet is one reason why he left the project.

 

So, I have to ask, because apparently entitled comicbook fans have to give permission to have an opinion: may I perdyplease believe that these characters don't belong in the same universe.

This movie isn't set in Nolan's universe though and the Batman that they're going to have in this film won't be a continuation of Nolan's Batman. I'm sure he didn't left the project because they're not using his version of Batman.

We're discussing things here. If you're going to post something that contradicts the topic, be ready for people to actually disagree with you and that they're actually going to explain WHY they disagree with you.

Of course you can have the opinion you have, I never meant to imply that you didn't. I was just giving my opinion about what you were saying and why it does make sense to have both characters in the same universe.

 

Clark has Lois, makes sense that Bruce should have...someone! Apparently Ben Affleck's Batman will also have a love interest in Zack Snyder's follow up to Man Of Steel, as Latino Review have revealed the following details that have been sent around to various talent agencies. According to the site, "they?re looking for someone in their late 20s and are open to all ethnicities... and are looking for an actress who is both tall and possesses physicality."

 

I guess next they'll make the Bats more compassionate? Maybe even a sense of humor? OMG!

This movie isn't set in Nolan's universe though and the Batman that they're going to have in this film won't be a continuation of Nolan's Batman. I'm sure he didn't left the project because they're not using his version of Batman.

We're discussing things here. If you're going to post something that contradicts the topic, be ready for people to actually disagree with you and that they're actually going to explain WHY they disagree with you.

Of course you can have the opinion you have, I never meant to imply that you didn't. I was just giving my opinion about what you were saying and why it does make sense to have both characters in the same universe.

I never said Nolan's Batman & Snyder's Superman were set in the same universe. I don't want them in the same universe.

 

Nolan didn't want them in the same universe:

 

"A lot of people have approached Superman in a lot of different ways. I only know the way that has worked for us that?s what I know how to do," Nolan said, emphasizing the idea that Batman exists in a world where he is the only superhero and a similar approach to the Man of Steel would assure the integrity needed for the film. "Each serves to the internal logic of the story. They have nothing to do with each other." Source: http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/christopher-nolan-takes-flight-with-superman-we-have-a-fantastic-story-1/

 

That's why Nolan left the project.

I never said Nolan's Batman & Snyder's Superman were set in the same universe. I don't want them in the same universe.

 

Nolan didn't want them in the same universe:

 

"A lot of people have approached Superman in a lot of different ways. I only know the way that has worked for us that?s what I know how to do," Nolan said, emphasizing the idea that Batman exists in a world where he is the only superhero and a similar approach to the Man of Steel would assure the integrity needed for the film. "Each serves to the internal logic of the story. They have nothing to do with each other." Source: http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/christopher-nolan-takes-flight-with-superman-we-have-a-fantastic-story-1/

 

That's why Nolan left the project.

My mistake. To me it seemed like you thought they were continuing Nolan's Batman.

While I agree to some extend with Nolan, I also agree that they both can be in each other's universe. Nolan's Batman wouldn't fit in with Snyder's Superman, nor would that Batman fit in with the Justice League. That's one reason why I'm glad that Bale doesn't play the new Batman as well. But I also feel that it is possible for both of them to be in the same universe. It just depends on how both characters are written and setup in that world, imo.

I think until the plot is released all this is futile.

 

The fact remains however, despite what some are saying here, what happens in a comic is far from acceptable on the big screen, from a revenue and franchise perspective.

 

Let's take the Walking Dead for example....TV has made slightly more of the characters in order to engage the audience across the type of medium consumption within which they are working.  Comic books work significantly different, and hence, compromises sometimes need to be made.

 

Nobody wants to see Batman "out fight" Superman surely.  There has to be lore adhered to in order for any sense of story-realism to be, well, realised.

 

Therefore I still maintain that a few tricks and gadgets aside, the common consensus is surely that the plot will feature major disagreements, and if a fight ensues, it is not as gratuitous as in Comic, so as to adhere to the aforementioned realism.

I think until the plot is released all this is futile.

 

The fact remains however, despite what some are saying here, what happens in a comic is far from acceptable on the big screen, from a revenue and franchise perspective.

 

Let's take the Walking Dead for example....TV has made slightly more of the characters in order to engage the audience across the type of medium consumption within which they are working.  Comic books work significantly different, and hence, compromises sometimes need to be made.

 

Nobody wants to see Batman "out fight" Superman surely.  There has to be lore adhered to in order for any sense of story-realism to be, well, realised.

 

Therefore I still maintain that a few tricks and gadgets aside, the common consensus is surely that the plot will feature major disagreements, and if a fight ensues, it is not as gratuitous as in Comic, so as to adhere to the aforementioned realism.

A few pages ago I played with the idea that they might start with fighting against each other because they don't agree with each other. And then during the movie they're gonna have to fight the same villain to be able to save a city (?). That could be the start of the Justice League right there as well. But all of these ideas just sound way too easy :p

So, I have to ask, because apparently entitled comicbook fans have to give permission to have an opinion: may I perdyplease believe that these characters don't belong in the same universe.

You can, but you really have to better explain such opposition since they are in the same universe and they have met many times over the years.  Even Nolan's claim is weak, probably due more to the 'story impasse on the third Batman film' that did beg, where is Superman?'

 

Your claim seems more fundamental though, that they simply can't ever meet or even know of each other. 

 

I'm still hoping for the Enemies and Allies approach myself, just them crossing paths here and there.  Which is why I can see Affleck (as Wayne) being onscreen more than the Batman.

So is this definitely superman vs batman?  i mean i love both characters but come on.. superman would destroy batman :p

Batman usually keeps a little kryptonite around with him, just in case. You never know when it might come in useful.

I agree, but this Superman is a lot more human and a lot less indestructible than those who preceded him.  Maybe they thought because he wasn't practically a god anymore that they didn't need kryptonite?  I don't know.  I do agree, obviously, that if they are going to use kryptonite they're going to have to introduce it in the new film.  There were a lot of departures in the last one, though, so I guess we will just have to wait and see how much they have changed things.

I agree, but this Superman is a lot more human and a lot less indestructible than those who preceded him.  Maybe they thought because he wasn't practically a god anymore that they didn't need kryptonite?  I don't know.  I do agree, obviously, that if they are going to use kryptonite they're going to have to introduce it in the new film.  There were a lot of departures in the last one, though, so I guess we will just have to wait and see how much they have changed things.

 

He is no more or no less indestructible in this last movie then any other incarnation of Superman. The only difference in this last movie is that his powers are shown as a little more raw and slightly less controlled. In general nothing about his overall power was changed. He still gets his power from the yellow sun and I think it's safe to say the radiation of Kryptonite will still harm him. Superman wouldn't be Superman without it.

Yes, they kept the basics the same, but he got the crap kicked out of him.  A lot.  They also demonstrated that he might possibly be vulnerable from non-kryptonian sources if they can hit him hard enough, and it seemed like he needed to "recharge" his solar energy very frequently to retain his full powers.  Yes, if Kryptonite exists in this new Superman's universe he will obviously be vulnerable to it, but there wasn't so much as a hint of it when Krypton exploded.  They also seem to have removed the "traditional" Kryptonian crystal technology.  I'm not saying there is no Kryptonite.  We just don't know if it will be in there or not, and because they have changed so much we can't simply expect that it will exist because it has in the past.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!