Recommended Posts

So all HDD drives come with SSD caches now? Seriously?

 

No hard drive comes with SSD caches, SSD Cache is when you use a standard HDD with a SSD and link them as one drive.

 

I don't think you understand what SSD cache is about so here is an explanation:

 

http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/How-it-Works-Intel-SSD-Caching-148/

 

or here:

 

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4329/intel-z68-chipset-smart-response-technology-ssd-caching-review/2

 

SSD Caching or Intel's SRT (Smart Response Technology) allows a SSD to boost a HDD's performance, but you still need both and having just SSD's (Solid State Drives) is faster.

There would be no performance hit by installing a larger hard drive.

You guys are really starting to struggle to justify what amounts to simply a bad decision.

See people said it was bad last time around, but it made almost no difference in the end. Its funny that anyone would expect anything more. Such a small amount of the market wants this that its no benefit to MS to implement it.

No hard drive comes with SSD caches, SSD Cache is when you use a standard HDD with a SSD and link them as one drive.

 

I don't think you understand what SSD cache is about so here is an explanation:

 

http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/How-it-Works-Intel-SSD-Caching-148/

 

or here:

 

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4329/intel-z68-chipset-smart-response-technology-ssd-caching-review/2

 

SSD Caching or Intel's SRT (Smart Response Technology) allows a SSD to boost a HDD's performance, but you still need both and having just SSD's (Solid State Drives) is faster.

Hyrid Hard Drives do come with solid state caches. There's a slight price premium and they do perform better. Just hasn't taken off much with the performance of 64MB cache ram and the relatively low price of 128-256GB SSDs.

There would be no performance hit by installing a larger hard drive.

 

You guys are really starting to struggle to justify what amounts to simply a bad decision.

 

:yes:

 

Especially now the X1 will be using BR. Those game installs are going to eat up 500 GB very fast on both consoles (N)

Hyrid Hard Drives do come with solid state caches. There's a slight price premium and they do perform better. Just hasn't taken off much with the performance of 64MB cache ram and the relatively low price of 128-256GB SSDs.

 

SSD and HDD are physically two separate things, HDD reads off a disc, SSD (Solid State) has no disc of any kind or motors to drive the discs.

 

An hybrid drive is both in one module, its a HDD with a NAND Flash memory. So yes it is SSD caching but its the same thing I mentioned earlier.

 

Key word 'Hybrid'

SSD and HDD are physically two separate things, HDD reads off a disc, SSD (Solid State) has no disc of any kind or motors to drive the discs.

 

An hybrid drive is both in one module, its a HDD with a NAND Flash memory. So yes it is SSD caching but its the same thing I mentioned earlier.

 

Key word 'Hybrid'

You are correct above but you did say no HDD comes with SSD caching. Technically, not correct. Intel SRT is fairly new. Microsoft a few years ago was actually pushing for SSD cache in HDDs but with OS optimizations and the emergence of low cost SSDs it kind of faded away. Also, SRT is not really worth it, though I don't believe you have to use the entire SSD. I have it but have no need to install it. I File History to an older 2TB SATA2 drive at 110MBs R/W. It's actually a silent green drive 5900 RPM so I'm good. Of course, for backup, speed really isn't an issue at this point. Storage capacity and speed really just aren't big issues anymore for PCs or Consoles. Enthusiasts always want to push the specs though, it's a hobby, it's fun, but it's rarely necessary.

If the hdd fails you'd likely have to send it in to Sony anyways as you wouldn't be able to get the OS off of it and onto your new hdd.

 

No. You install a new HDD and it formats it ready for use.

 

See people said it was bad last time around, but it made almost no difference in the end. Its funny that anyone would expect anything more. Such a small amount of the market wants this that its no benefit to MS to implement it.

 

Based on what? Is there any research or figures in this area? Or is this just more of "If MS doesn't do it they must have a very good reason why" kind of stuff?

 

Frankly, when it comes to giving consumers what they want MS isn't exactly winning any awards.

No. You install a new HDD and it formats it ready for use.

Formatting a new HD and installing firmware/OS from thumbdrive is one of the PS3's neater features.

PS3/PS4 Replacable Hard Drive:
+You can use a larger/faster drive than the stock drive for more room and/or better performance.
+Doesn't void the warranty.
+You don't have to send the console in to Sony if your HD fails. You can buy a new HD and install the OS on it, then restore your files from a backup.
+Internal is faster than external, esp. with hybrid or SSD drives.
+Third party drives are much cheaper than MS's proprietary ones.
+PS4 also supports external storage devices.

Xbox One has none of those advantages, and a whole bunch of negatives:
-External drive enclosures are an extra expense.
-You have to send your console in to MS if the non-replacable drive fails. And no, MS isn't going to recover the files off the dead drive for you, that kind of diagnostic data recovery service is expensive.
-You can't install or run games from "the cloud", that's not what the """unlimited storage""" is for.
-MS will probably take you for a ride to replace the internal HD, given how expensive 360 drives are. That's on top of the shipping costs.

As usual the PS4 comes out ahead by far in the all important storage category.

I remember reading a while ago that the drive is non-replacable because making it replacable would cause airflow/heating issues, and the X1 was ordered to be near silent. The X1 being quieter than the PS4 might be one of the few advantages it has, although we don't know the noise levels of PS4 yet.

By the way, we don't know if either drive is a hybrid w/ flash cache. Obviously if one of them was a hybrid and one wasn't, the hybrid would have a speed advantage.

Actually I put a spare 128GB SSD into my PS3 and save game load times were noticably faster. I expect a real benefit for putting an SSD in PS4 as well.

You are correct above but you did say no HDD comes with SSD caching. Technically, not correct. Intel SRT is fairly new. Microsoft a few years ago was actually pushing for SSD cache in HDDs but with OS optimizations and the emergence of low cost SSDs it kind of faded away. Also, SRT is not really worth it, though I don't believe you have to use the entire SSD. I have it but have no need to install it. I File History to an older 2TB SATA2 drive at 110MBs R/W. It's actually a silent green drive 5900 RPM so I'm good. Of course, for backup, speed really isn't an issue at this point. Storage capacity and speed really just aren't big issues anymore for PCs or Consoles. Enthusiasts always want to push the specs though, it's a hobby, it's fun, but it's rarely necessary.

 

Technically it is correct, the hybrid is not a HDD it is a hybrid HDD + SSD.

 

Also buying an SSD over a HDD isn't a hobby, its about performance and the SSD performs much better than the HDD.

Technically it is correct, the hybrid is not a HDD it is a hybrid HDD + SSD.

 

Also buying an SSD over a HDD isn't a hobby, its about performance and the SSD performs much better than the HDD.

It absolutely is an HDD with an SSD fro caching in the same enclosure. It is in effect the same as SRT. Separate SSD and HDD the only difference being SRT uses the PC case as the enclosure.

"Enthusiasts always want to push the specs though, it's a hobby, it's fun, but it's rarely necessary."

"Enthusiasts always want to push the specs though, it's a hobby, it's fun, but it's rarely necessary."

 

No need for performance increases..

 

So you think we should be playing Atari 2600 instead?

 

Atari2600.jpg

 

I cannot understand how you can justify hardware improvements as unnecessary, you know how every software (including games) have minimum requirements to run.. well its necessary for your system to meet or exceed these requirements for it to function.

Now... It's hdd swap out that's being nitpicked about...

 

I've been saying, I swap out the hdd on my 60gb PS3 and 80gb PS3...

 

And it has been 7 and 6 years respectfully....  And guess what... I still have a 60bg PS3 and a 80gb PS3...

 

Its funny how the it's the petty none issues that matter... lets be honest...

 

You can't swap the hdd out... time to cancel the pre-orders.... etc, etc, insert rant, etc...

 

Get over yourselves...

 

It's funny how people try to drown out Microsoft's awesome features with petty little things...

  • Like 2

No need for performance increases..

 

So you think we should be playing Atari 2600 instead?

 

 

 

I cannot understand how you can justify hardware improvements as unnecessary, you know how every software (including games) have minimum requirements to run.. well its necessary for your system to meet or exceed these requirements for it to function.

 

And that's fine, in a PC context.  Wanting to improve your console hardware specs defeats the purpose of a console and the cost-benefit is miniscule anyways.  You're not going to see significant gains with any hard drive you choose, and you can't really replace any other hardware and expect anything out of it.  If you want to get into hardware improvements, PC gaming will take you in with open arms.  The point of console gaming is that it's optimized for a particular set of hardware and won't take advantage of anything else.

As you all know, the future of storage is external. 

 

mac_pro_new.jpg

:D  :D  :D

 

I'm not following your post. You say the future of storage is external, but you post a picture of a wastebasket. Are you saying we would throw things away instead of upgrading them?

And that's fine, in a PC context.  Wanting to improve your console hardware specs defeats the purpose of a console and the cost-benefit is miniscule anyways.  You're not going to see significant gains with any hard drive you choose, and you can't really replace any other hardware and expect anything out of it.  If you want to get into hardware improvements, PC gaming will take you in with open arms.  The point of console gaming is that it's optimized for a particular set of hardware and won't take advantage of anything else.

 

This makes zero sense.  Swapping the stock drive with something faster WILL show improvements.  Swapping an HDD with an SSD will have a massive improvement in load times.  It might not show AS much improvement if the software isn't designed to take advantage of SSD but there will be a noticeable difference.

This makes zero sense.  Swapping the stock drive with something faster WILL show improvements.  Swapping an HDD with an SSD will have a massive improvement in load times.  It might not show AS much improvement if the software isn't designed to take advantage of SSD but there will be a noticeable difference.

 

I haven't heard of any vast improvements from people swapping their PS3 HDDs.  I doubt most people would notice it, though I guess anyone who would actually care to replace the internal drive would be the ones to notice.  The biggest gains came from being able to install games to the drive, not from swapping drives.

You can't swap the hdd out... time to cancel the pre-orders.... etc, etc, insert rant, etc...

 

Get over yourselves...

 

It's funny how people try to drown out Microsoft's awesome features with petty little things...

Having to ship your console to MS because the drive died is a "petty little thing". Of course, you also have to insult everyone else who disagrees with you. I doubt anyone cancelled their preorder over removable storage, they likely never had a preorder to begin with.

 

MS had better hope kinect and HDMI input are "awesome features" worth the $100 price hike to consumers. I don't think they will be.

 

Replacing the PS3 drive with an SSD leads to noticably faster load times. Also see http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-can-ssd-upgrades-boost-ps3-performance

It's funny how people try to drown out Microsoft's awesome features with petty little things...

 

You do realize this is a thread about the PS4 in the Sony Console - Gaming Section.

 

Also the people who initially started the comparisons are pro-xbox clan and decided they needed to defend the Xbox One when no one was even comparing it.

So if your going to blame anyone about pointing out the Xbox One's shortcomings blame them.

And that's fine, in a PC context.  Wanting to improve your console hardware specs defeats the purpose of a console and the cost-benefit is miniscule anyways.  You're not going to see significant gains with any hard drive you choose, and you can't really replace any other hardware and expect anything out of it.  If you want to get into hardware improvements, PC gaming will take you in with open arms.  The point of console gaming is that it's optimized for a particular set of hardware and won't take advantage of anything else.

This might be the first time I've agreed with you in here. Obviously we must remain within the context of the thread.

With that in mind, with XBOne having a Windows 8-ish OS, there is a remote possibility it could take advantage of SSDs, but since it's not removable ... and not really necessary vs. the cost.

The increased performance re PS3 SSD seems to be disputed. Considering the price of SSDs it doesn't seem to be wise to drop that kind of cash upgrading your console in that way.

I just put an xtra HyperX 3K 128 in a slim I just bought refurb from Sony. Not much noticeable improvement. But, it was just laying around and the PS3 is absolutely silent with it. Long reads do well though and switching from PSN and XMB seems faster. Clearly, the HD is/was not a bottleneck for the PS3 in general.

The increased performance re PS3 SSD seems to be disputed. Considering the price of SSDs it doesn't seem to be wise to drop that kind of cash upgrading your console in that way.

 

A drive swap will make more of a difference with more modern hardware.  Isn't the PS3 just SATA1? 

I just put an xtra HyperX 3K 128 in a slim I just bought refurb from Sony. Not much noticeable improvement. But, it was just laying around and the PS3 is absolutely silent with it. Long reads do well though and switching from PSN and XMB seems faster. Clearly, the HD is/was not a bottleneck for the PS3 in general.

 

"A bottleneck is a phenomenon where the performance or capacity of an entire system is limited by a single or limited number of components or resources."

 

Like being limited to a certain read/write speed?

 

I'd say the HDD would be a bottleneck if load times or menu switching was noticeably improved as you mentioned.

"A bottleneck is a phenomenon where the performance or capacity of an entire system is limited by a single or limited number of components or resources."

 

Like being limited to a certain read/write speed?

 

I'd say the HDD would be a bottleneck if load times or menu switching was noticeably improved as you mentioned.

"Not much noticeable improvement."

We're talking about an SSD here. When you have to strain to find something that "seems" faster at times, it wasn't a bottleneck. But it's cooler than @##T to have one in there.

"Not much noticeable improvement."

We're talking about an SSD here. When you have to strain to find something that "seems" faster at times, it wasn't a bottleneck. But it's cooler than @##T to have one in there.

 

Do I really need to explain the definition of 'bottleneck' again?

 

The HDD was clearly a bottleneck if you noticed improvements, even if those improvements were 'Not much noticeable improvements" - or "Not very noticeable improvements" (Which would be the proper way to phrase it)

 

I really don't need to justify performance improvements, little performance improvements are made all the time and over time they equate to large improvements. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!