Recommended Posts

U.S. Attorney Wendy Olson said Tuesday that Jason Lloyd Schaber, 40, of Boise, was sentenced in United States District Court to 30 years in prison, followed by lifetime supervised release -- after pleaded guilty in May to sexual exploitation of children by producing and distributing child pornography.

According to the plea agreement, the investigation of Schaber's activities began in April, 2012, after Boise Police were contacted by a person who saw a Craigslist advertisement offering a 3-year-old child for prostitution. Investigators worked with Craigslist and Google and traced the ad back to Schaber in mid-May, according to reports. Boise Police investigators obtained a warrant to search Schaber's home, which they executed on May 31, 2012.

Schaber has been in custody since his arrest.

The plea agreement states that Schaber produced 26 sexually-explicit images and videos of female minors who were less than six years of age -- and distributed child pornography that he had produced himself , or that he had obtained from the Internet. The images and videos depicted actual and simulated intercourse, oral sex and the lascivious exhibition of the genitals and pubic area of the minors, according to the plea agreement, reports said.

more

30 years for something that can be easily monitored and prevented from that individual. As sick as he may be, why are we wasting close to 1 million dollars on this guy when he can be monitored and restricted for a fraction of the cost. People really forgot the prison system is not suppose to be a punishment system, but rather a rehabilitation system.

30 years for something that can be easily monitored and prevented from that individual. As sick as he may be, why are we wasting close to 1 million dollars on this guy when he can be monitored and restricted for a fraction of the cost. People really forgot the prison system is not suppose to be a punishment system, but rather a rehabilitation system.

haven't you heard, the government would rather waste your money instead of look for cheaper alternative

30 years for something that can be easily monitored and prevented from that individual. As sick as he may be, why are we wasting close to 1 million dollars on this guy when he can be monitored and restricted for a fraction of the cost. People really forgot the prison system is not suppose to be a punishment system, but rather a rehabilitation system.

I agree. Let's put a bullet in him and be done with it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!