Microsoft's Penello: No way is Xbox One giving up 30% power advantage t


Recommended Posts

It's not a separate processor and GPU, it can run as hot as it needs to.

 

I don't expect the stupid arguments will be calmed down til mid 2014 at the earliest heh.

 

 

There have been times when these ridiculous arguments depress me a bit as a gamer.  There are just too many on the internet that have to fight about this stuff, have to attack these companies for whatever reason, even in the face of a good product. 

 

In an era where it seems like everybody has a youtube channel making videos about all the things they have to speak about about or rage about, etc, it can seem like there are more jerks in the gaming community then ever before.  There are numerous gaming outlets on youtube that regularly post half of the info regarding a story, poke fun at a company they have a personal bias against, etc, fueling the 'raging' that occurs in comments and forums all over.   It reaches beyond gaming, but your point was about the console wars.

 

When I was younger, there was never this kind of hostility towards brands among my friends, etc.  Yeah, there was marketing from various console makers that would stir the pot with the 'bit wars', etc, but there was not this sort of community army that would decide to trash one company or another.  Now there is and it can get rough.

It's not a separate processor and GPU, it can run as hot as it needs to.

 

I don't expect the stupid arguments will be calmed down til mid 2014 at the earliest heh.

I don't get what you're saying? I even mentioned APU in the post you quoted.

 

To be honest, it shocks me that everyone is so childish to be throwing around these percentage figures in a box which hasn't even got its clock speeds announced. With the size of the box, Sony could of opted for more CU's with a slower clock speed to counteract the heat production in the box. Which would be a very logical thing to do considering the size of it. With Sony only announcing the tech details of the cores and leaving the clock speed out of it, they could simply just be pulling off what they've done in previous generations, like Albert has said.

I don't get what you're saying? I even mentioned APU in the post you quoted.

I was just saying as one part they put out less heat than seperate parts.  Heat is becoming much less of a problem, otherwise tablets wouldn't be as powerful as they are.

I was just saying as one part they put out less heat than seperate parts.  Heat is becoming much less of a problem, otherwise tablets wouldn't be as powerful as they are.

Actually the opposite, because the chips are together, they produce more heat.

I don't get what you're saying? I even mentioned APU in the post you quoted.

 

To be honest, it shocks me that everyone is so childish to be throwing around these percentage figures in a box which hasn't even got its clock speeds announced. With the size of the box, Sony could of opted for more CU's with a slower clock speed to counteract the heat production in the box. Which would be a very logical thing to do considering the size of it. With Sony only announcing the tech details of the cores and leaving the clock speed out of it, they could simply just be pulling off what they've done in previous generations, like Albert has said.

That doesn't make any sense. The easy way out is to increase the size of the box instead of adding cost (larger, costlier silicon) to it. They have indirectly committed to a 800MHz GPU when they quoted a 1.8something TFlops number at reveal.

The most they will do is underclock the CPU but given the specs, I don't think heat will be a problem for them, but it may run louder compared to XBO.

That doesn't make any sense. The easy way out is to increase the size of the box instead of adding cost (larger, costlier silicon) to it. They have indirectly committed to a 800MHz GPU when they quoted a 1.8something TFlops number at reveal.

The most they will do is underclock the CPU but given the specs, I don't think heat will be a problem for them, but it may run louder compared to XBO.

You're forgetting that this is a business and the engineers aren't usually the ones who have the last say. I'm just saying, all that kit in the box which is that small is either very loud or under clocked.

You're forgetting that this is a business and the engineers aren't usually the ones who have the last say. I'm just saying, all that kit in the box which is that small is either very loud or under clocked.

 

i mean,its possible, but they can easily fit it in that size box with those specs without a doubt. will it be quiet? with the power supply in there and that size? doubtful.

 

the reason xbox one is bigger is because they are positioning this thing to be an entertainment box, therefore it is imperative that its very silent. they've been actively promoting how silent it is. look at the size of the heatsink and fan

 

aOMVZbV.jpg

i mean,its possible, but they can easily fit it in that size box with those specs without a doubt. will it be quiet? with the power supply in there and that size? doubtful.

 

the reason xbox one is bigger is because they are positioning this thing to be an entertainment box, therefore it is imperative that its very silent. they've been actively promoting how silent it is. look at the size of the heatsink and fan

 

aOMVZbV.jpg

Exactly my point, dat heatsink & fan. That's how much heat extraction an APU with 5 billion transistors needs to run cool, considering the top is one great vent also.

Exactly my point, dat heatsink & fan. That's how much heat extraction an APU with 5 billion transistors needs to run cool, considering the top is one great vent also.

PS4's die size is some 25% smaller (don't quote me on the exact number)

PS4's die size is some 25% smaller (don't quote me on the exact number)

Ah, that'll be due to the lack of ESRAM. RAM doesn't produce much heat though as it requires minimal voltage. So the main culprits of the heat generation still remain in the same die.

 

EDIT: Have they even officially announced the die size and SoC specifics? I'd really like to know some more details.

i mean,its possible, but they can easily fit it in that size box with those specs without a doubt. will it be quiet? with the power supply in there and that size? doubtful.

 

the reason xbox one is bigger is because they are positioning this thing to be an entertainment box, therefore it is imperative that its very silent. they've been actively promoting how silent it is. look at the size of the heatsink and fan

wher'ed the pic come from?

isn't that pic an x360?  It looks pretty darn close to this http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Xbox+360+E+Teardown/15062/2 (step 11, pic with the cover coming off)

They are very similar, that is actually the X1. I've taken apart and saved my 360 numerous times from imminent death by removing the x-clamps and screwing the CPU/GPU to the board. It looks like they share the same case structure and heat extraction design just on a larger scale. For example, my 4 year old 360 S has a vent on the top directly above the SoC with a smaller heatsink and fan straight above it. Its just a good way to directly extract heat since the warm air isn't channelled through the box like it was in the original.

They are very similar, that is actually the X1. I've taken apart and saved my 360 numerous times from imminent death by removing the x-clamps and screwing the CPU/GPU to the board. It looks like they share the same case structure and heat extraction design just on a larger scale. For example, my 4 year old 360 S has a vent on the top directly above the SoC with a smaller heatsink and fan straight above it. Its just a good way to directly extract heat since the warm air isn't channelled through the box like it was in the original.

I edited, just hadn't seen it before I guess.

More about the RAM

 

PlayStation 4 is currently around 50 per cent faster than its rival Xbox One. Multiple high-level game development sources have described the difference in performance between the consoles as ?significant? and ?obvious.?

 

Our contacts have told us that memory reads on PS4 are 40-50 per cent quicker than Xbox One, and its ALU (Arithmetic Logic Unit) is around 50 per cent faster. One basic example we were given suggested that without optimisation for either console, a platform-agnostic development build can run at around 30FPS in 1920?1080 on PS4, but it?ll run at ?20-something? FPS in 1600?900 on Xbox One. ?Xbox One is weaker and it?s a pain to use its ESRAM,? concluded one developer.

 

Microsoft is aware of the problem and, having recently upped the clock speed of Xbox One, is working hard to close the gap on PS4, though one developer we spoke to downplayed the move. ?The clock speed update is not significant, it does not change things that much,? he said. ?Of course, something is better than nothing.?

 

Even this close to launch, ?the hardware isn?t locked,? said another source. Sony and Microsoft are each still working on the graphics drivers for each console, and Xbox One is lagging behind in this regard ? Microsoft ?has been late on their drivers and that has been hurting them,? said one source. Another described Xbox One?s graphics drivers less charitably as ?horrible?. Both consoles? graphics drivers will continue to improve right up to ? and beyond ? launch, which will even up the difference in performance a little.

 

 

More @ http://www.edge-online.com/news/power-struggle-the-real-differences-between-ps4-and-xbox-one-performance/

The only part I call BS is this

Xbox One is weaker and it?s a pain to use its ESRAM

The layout is pretty much exactly same as Xbox 360. MS' dev. tools take care of it automatically and then devs can optimize further if they want.

Rest, we know specs, time to show games.

So they ran tests without any optimization and the results came out how they look on paper? We don't need a developer who sounds like he clearly doesn't care for MS anyways to come to that conclusion for us.

Proof is in the gaming and we've already seen games looking better on Xbox than on PS4. Whether that is a trend or not I don't know but we don't have long to wait to find out.

Already made a thread:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1176543-power-struggle-the-real-differences-between-ps4-and-xbox-one-performance/

 

That article has so many wrongs in it its untrue, it specifically mentions that both the hardware platforms aren't locked even though both have gone into mass production. The X1 DirectX driver has been final since E3. Do you honestly hold any weight to anything Edge say? They're known for siding unbelievable biased to get purchases and page hits.

ALU is 50% faster? :laugh:

 

destroyed any credibility of actually being a rumor. it doesn't work that way. move along.

Its hilarious isn't it. PS4 knows its times tables better so it's ALU is 50% faster. I wish they'd approve my account on GAF.

 

 

Hmm, interesting article. 

 

Well if this is all true, than it looks bad for the X1. Although its interesting that this article is basically at odds with some other recent articles that don't paint the X1 in a bad light.

 

I guess we will have to wait and see if someone refutes this info.  One thing I've noticed over the course of these console generations is that you will see articles like this that go back and forth.

 

Id love to see a definitive source, but what are the odds of that happening?

 

But hey, its a big win for the Sony fans though, if the article holds to be true.

When a number of developers, big names in the business, come out officially and not hiding behind anonymity to tell us that the two are very close what more do people want?    Kojima said they're very close back at E3 iirc, Carmack said they're very similar in front of loads of people.   The MS guys come out officially and state that they two are close, not even knocking the PS4 but just to debunk this overblown 30%, 40%, 50% (every week it seems to change) on paper theoretical performance difference.

 

You know who's keeping quite in all of this?  Sony.   Why aren't they coming out to defend their supposed massive performance difference?   I mean they jumped all over the chance to take shots at the XB1 over game sharing and used games and even jump ahead on the developer story before MS officially posted details about it's own indie program.   Now they're quiet about it?  Sony?  HA!   Sorry but I think we all know them better than that, any advantage they have they'd trumpet up and down the media till no end.  And yet, what do we see?   We get silence.   So I'm sure the fans will say they're being the better sport or w/e new excuse one can come up with for this lack of a response but no way, not those smug and arrogant SCE guys.  

Hmm, interesting article.

with outdated / wrong info

- PS4's APU is not 50% faster, its GPU has 50% more specs. PS4's on chip bus is slower compared to XBO.

- XBO's graphics driver was updated recently, is this article before or after the update?

and look - they say "the cloud" will make XBO faster than PS4 - what do PS4 fanboys think of it now? :laugh:

with outdated / wrong info

- PS4's APU is not 50% faster, its GPU has 50% more specs. PS4's on chip bus is slower compared to XBO.

- XBO's graphics driver was updated recently, is this article before or after the update?

and look - they say "the cloud" will make XBO faster than PS4 - what do PS4 fanboys think of it now? :laugh:

 

 

See this is why its a tad frustrating.  Everyone seems to be contradicting everyone else.  I hope that there is something to sort this stuff out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!