Microsoft's Penello: No way is Xbox One giving up 30% power advantage t


Recommended Posts

It's not a separate processor and GPU, it can run as hot as it needs to.

 

I don't expect the stupid arguments will be calmed down til mid 2014 at the earliest heh.

 

 

There have been times when these ridiculous arguments depress me a bit as a gamer.  There are just too many on the internet that have to fight about this stuff, have to attack these companies for whatever reason, even in the face of a good product. 

 

In an era where it seems like everybody has a youtube channel making videos about all the things they have to speak about about or rage about, etc, it can seem like there are more jerks in the gaming community then ever before.  There are numerous gaming outlets on youtube that regularly post half of the info regarding a story, poke fun at a company they have a personal bias against, etc, fueling the 'raging' that occurs in comments and forums all over.   It reaches beyond gaming, but your point was about the console wars.

 

When I was younger, there was never this kind of hostility towards brands among my friends, etc.  Yeah, there was marketing from various console makers that would stir the pot with the 'bit wars', etc, but there was not this sort of community army that would decide to trash one company or another.  Now there is and it can get rough.

It's not a separate processor and GPU, it can run as hot as it needs to.

 

I don't expect the stupid arguments will be calmed down til mid 2014 at the earliest heh.

I don't get what you're saying? I even mentioned APU in the post you quoted.

 

To be honest, it shocks me that everyone is so childish to be throwing around these percentage figures in a box which hasn't even got its clock speeds announced. With the size of the box, Sony could of opted for more CU's with a slower clock speed to counteract the heat production in the box. Which would be a very logical thing to do considering the size of it. With Sony only announcing the tech details of the cores and leaving the clock speed out of it, they could simply just be pulling off what they've done in previous generations, like Albert has said.

I don't get what you're saying? I even mentioned APU in the post you quoted.

I was just saying as one part they put out less heat than seperate parts.  Heat is becoming much less of a problem, otherwise tablets wouldn't be as powerful as they are.

I was just saying as one part they put out less heat than seperate parts.  Heat is becoming much less of a problem, otherwise tablets wouldn't be as powerful as they are.

Actually the opposite, because the chips are together, they produce more heat.

I don't get what you're saying? I even mentioned APU in the post you quoted.

 

To be honest, it shocks me that everyone is so childish to be throwing around these percentage figures in a box which hasn't even got its clock speeds announced. With the size of the box, Sony could of opted for more CU's with a slower clock speed to counteract the heat production in the box. Which would be a very logical thing to do considering the size of it. With Sony only announcing the tech details of the cores and leaving the clock speed out of it, they could simply just be pulling off what they've done in previous generations, like Albert has said.

That doesn't make any sense. The easy way out is to increase the size of the box instead of adding cost (larger, costlier silicon) to it. They have indirectly committed to a 800MHz GPU when they quoted a 1.8something TFlops number at reveal.

The most they will do is underclock the CPU but given the specs, I don't think heat will be a problem for them, but it may run louder compared to XBO.

That doesn't make any sense. The easy way out is to increase the size of the box instead of adding cost (larger, costlier silicon) to it. They have indirectly committed to a 800MHz GPU when they quoted a 1.8something TFlops number at reveal.

The most they will do is underclock the CPU but given the specs, I don't think heat will be a problem for them, but it may run louder compared to XBO.

You're forgetting that this is a business and the engineers aren't usually the ones who have the last say. I'm just saying, all that kit in the box which is that small is either very loud or under clocked.

You're forgetting that this is a business and the engineers aren't usually the ones who have the last say. I'm just saying, all that kit in the box which is that small is either very loud or under clocked.

 

i mean,its possible, but they can easily fit it in that size box with those specs without a doubt. will it be quiet? with the power supply in there and that size? doubtful.

 

the reason xbox one is bigger is because they are positioning this thing to be an entertainment box, therefore it is imperative that its very silent. they've been actively promoting how silent it is. look at the size of the heatsink and fan

 

aOMVZbV.jpg

i mean,its possible, but they can easily fit it in that size box with those specs without a doubt. will it be quiet? with the power supply in there and that size? doubtful.

 

the reason xbox one is bigger is because they are positioning this thing to be an entertainment box, therefore it is imperative that its very silent. they've been actively promoting how silent it is. look at the size of the heatsink and fan

 

aOMVZbV.jpg

Exactly my point, dat heatsink & fan. That's how much heat extraction an APU with 5 billion transistors needs to run cool, considering the top is one great vent also.

Exactly my point, dat heatsink & fan. That's how much heat extraction an APU with 5 billion transistors needs to run cool, considering the top is one great vent also.

PS4's die size is some 25% smaller (don't quote me on the exact number)

PS4's die size is some 25% smaller (don't quote me on the exact number)

Ah, that'll be due to the lack of ESRAM. RAM doesn't produce much heat though as it requires minimal voltage. So the main culprits of the heat generation still remain in the same die.

 

EDIT: Have they even officially announced the die size and SoC specifics? I'd really like to know some more details.

i mean,its possible, but they can easily fit it in that size box with those specs without a doubt. will it be quiet? with the power supply in there and that size? doubtful.

 

the reason xbox one is bigger is because they are positioning this thing to be an entertainment box, therefore it is imperative that its very silent. they've been actively promoting how silent it is. look at the size of the heatsink and fan

wher'ed the pic come from?

isn't that pic an x360?  It looks pretty darn close to this http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Xbox+360+E+Teardown/15062/2 (step 11, pic with the cover coming off)

They are very similar, that is actually the X1. I've taken apart and saved my 360 numerous times from imminent death by removing the x-clamps and screwing the CPU/GPU to the board. It looks like they share the same case structure and heat extraction design just on a larger scale. For example, my 4 year old 360 S has a vent on the top directly above the SoC with a smaller heatsink and fan straight above it. Its just a good way to directly extract heat since the warm air isn't channelled through the box like it was in the original.

They are very similar, that is actually the X1. I've taken apart and saved my 360 numerous times from imminent death by removing the x-clamps and screwing the CPU/GPU to the board. It looks like they share the same case structure and heat extraction design just on a larger scale. For example, my 4 year old 360 S has a vent on the top directly above the SoC with a smaller heatsink and fan straight above it. Its just a good way to directly extract heat since the warm air isn't channelled through the box like it was in the original.

I edited, just hadn't seen it before I guess.

More about the RAM

 

PlayStation 4 is currently around 50 per cent faster than its rival Xbox One. Multiple high-level game development sources have described the difference in performance between the consoles as ?significant? and ?obvious.?

 

Our contacts have told us that memory reads on PS4 are 40-50 per cent quicker than Xbox One, and its ALU (Arithmetic Logic Unit) is around 50 per cent faster. One basic example we were given suggested that without optimisation for either console, a platform-agnostic development build can run at around 30FPS in 1920?1080 on PS4, but it?ll run at ?20-something? FPS in 1600?900 on Xbox One. ?Xbox One is weaker and it?s a pain to use its ESRAM,? concluded one developer.

 

Microsoft is aware of the problem and, having recently upped the clock speed of Xbox One, is working hard to close the gap on PS4, though one developer we spoke to downplayed the move. ?The clock speed update is not significant, it does not change things that much,? he said. ?Of course, something is better than nothing.?

 

Even this close to launch, ?the hardware isn?t locked,? said another source. Sony and Microsoft are each still working on the graphics drivers for each console, and Xbox One is lagging behind in this regard ? Microsoft ?has been late on their drivers and that has been hurting them,? said one source. Another described Xbox One?s graphics drivers less charitably as ?horrible?. Both consoles? graphics drivers will continue to improve right up to ? and beyond ? launch, which will even up the difference in performance a little.

 

 

More @ http://www.edge-online.com/news/power-struggle-the-real-differences-between-ps4-and-xbox-one-performance/

The only part I call BS is this

Xbox One is weaker and it?s a pain to use its ESRAM

The layout is pretty much exactly same as Xbox 360. MS' dev. tools take care of it automatically and then devs can optimize further if they want.

Rest, we know specs, time to show games.

So they ran tests without any optimization and the results came out how they look on paper? We don't need a developer who sounds like he clearly doesn't care for MS anyways to come to that conclusion for us.

Proof is in the gaming and we've already seen games looking better on Xbox than on PS4. Whether that is a trend or not I don't know but we don't have long to wait to find out.

Already made a thread:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1176543-power-struggle-the-real-differences-between-ps4-and-xbox-one-performance/

 

That article has so many wrongs in it its untrue, it specifically mentions that both the hardware platforms aren't locked even though both have gone into mass production. The X1 DirectX driver has been final since E3. Do you honestly hold any weight to anything Edge say? They're known for siding unbelievable biased to get purchases and page hits.

ALU is 50% faster? :laugh:

 

destroyed any credibility of actually being a rumor. it doesn't work that way. move along.

Its hilarious isn't it. PS4 knows its times tables better so it's ALU is 50% faster. I wish they'd approve my account on GAF.

 

 

Hmm, interesting article. 

 

Well if this is all true, than it looks bad for the X1. Although its interesting that this article is basically at odds with some other recent articles that don't paint the X1 in a bad light.

 

I guess we will have to wait and see if someone refutes this info.  One thing I've noticed over the course of these console generations is that you will see articles like this that go back and forth.

 

Id love to see a definitive source, but what are the odds of that happening?

 

But hey, its a big win for the Sony fans though, if the article holds to be true.

When a number of developers, big names in the business, come out officially and not hiding behind anonymity to tell us that the two are very close what more do people want?    Kojima said they're very close back at E3 iirc, Carmack said they're very similar in front of loads of people.   The MS guys come out officially and state that they two are close, not even knocking the PS4 but just to debunk this overblown 30%, 40%, 50% (every week it seems to change) on paper theoretical performance difference.

 

You know who's keeping quite in all of this?  Sony.   Why aren't they coming out to defend their supposed massive performance difference?   I mean they jumped all over the chance to take shots at the XB1 over game sharing and used games and even jump ahead on the developer story before MS officially posted details about it's own indie program.   Now they're quiet about it?  Sony?  HA!   Sorry but I think we all know them better than that, any advantage they have they'd trumpet up and down the media till no end.  And yet, what do we see?   We get silence.   So I'm sure the fans will say they're being the better sport or w/e new excuse one can come up with for this lack of a response but no way, not those smug and arrogant SCE guys.  

Hmm, interesting article.

with outdated / wrong info

- PS4's APU is not 50% faster, its GPU has 50% more specs. PS4's on chip bus is slower compared to XBO.

- XBO's graphics driver was updated recently, is this article before or after the update?

and look - they say "the cloud" will make XBO faster than PS4 - what do PS4 fanboys think of it now? :laugh:

with outdated / wrong info

- PS4's APU is not 50% faster, its GPU has 50% more specs. PS4's on chip bus is slower compared to XBO.

- XBO's graphics driver was updated recently, is this article before or after the update?

and look - they say "the cloud" will make XBO faster than PS4 - what do PS4 fanboys think of it now? :laugh:

 

 

See this is why its a tad frustrating.  Everyone seems to be contradicting everyone else.  I hope that there is something to sort this stuff out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!