Auction House to be removed from Diablo 3


Recommended Posts

I think that this will really improve the game.  The AH kills the progression of difficulty in the game.  If the game at any point becomes challenging, a quick trip to the AH and 2-3 small upgrades and now the game is easy-cakes again.  This makes the various modes of difficulty and Monster Power levels completely arbitrary and there is no real sense of accomplishment by completing any challenges in the game at a higher difficulty if all that you had to do to beat it is spend a little gold on the AH.

 

In hardcore mode, the AH was a bit more fun because the challenge of not dying, ever, is there.  Also with everyone always leveling in HC mode, selling and buying low level items was funner.  Still, this needs to be done and I'm glad Blizzard finally came to their senses about it.

I think that this will really improve the game.  The AH kills the progression of difficulty in the game.  If the game at any point becomes challenging, a quick trip to the AH and 2-3 small upgrades and now the game is easy-cakes again.  This makes the various modes of difficulty and Monster Power levels completely arbitrary and there is no real sense of accomplishment by completing any challenges in the game at a higher difficulty if all that you had to do to beat it is spend a little gold on the AH.

 

In hardcore mode, the AH was a bit more fun because the challenge of not dying, ever, is there.  Also with everyone always leveling in HC mode, selling and buying low level items was funner.  Still, this needs to be done and I'm glad Blizzard finally came to their senses about it.

The problem is that the stuff you buy at the AH is stuff that should have dropped for you. As the game was at launch when I played through it the first week was just stupid. Items that dropped where much lower than me. To get a good item I would have had to redo each level 30 times, and even then the drops would be to low.

The problem is that the stuff you buy at the AH is stuff that should have dropped for you. As the game was at launch when I played through it the first week was just stupid. Items that dropped where much lower than me. To get a good item I would have had to redo each level 30 times, and even then the drops would be to low.

 

The drop rates were terrible on release.  They have since improved the drop rates to the point that at least making it to Inferno difficulty w/o ever using the AH is possible (but not really so much on HC mode).  It isn't uncommon (in my experience) to see 1-2 legendary drops that are actually decent for some class (most likely not yours) in the first play through on normal.

 

On launch it was pretty much impossible to farm your own gear once you beat Hell difficulty.  Act 1 didn't drop items with a high enough item level to ever complete Act 1.  It was ridiculous.  Even Hell was a real challenge without visiting the AH, but after many many deaths I pushed through it on my Barb despite the ridicule from friends because I wasn't using the AH.  Really bad decision making on Blizzards part and it was pretty obvious that the motivation for low drop rates were to force everyone to use the gold AH or worse the pay-to-win AH.  Sad to think how much further along the game would be if they had made this decision a year ago.

It was just stupid to try playing this game with any amount of seriousness. I would go through the game just fine on normal, and then getting to Hell was a nice challenge at first but soon it became impossible. At the time, I figured the game was designed to replay levels casually to farm gear. I'm okay with that but it didn't work that way. No matter how many times I replayed the same levels over and over I never got a drop that meant jack squat to me. It's all garbage that I ended up selling to vendors. It was so obvious to anyone who played the game where the problems lay. It really made me wonder if Blizzard was playing their own game to the end-game. Like I said, I can appreciate the replayability of the game, but the loot system has completely undermined this making it just a terrible experience. Auction house doesn't solve anything, it just makes up for a shi**y loot system and Blizzard should have known this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!