Recommended Posts

Hum

To date I have spent almost four years reverse engineering the technology, analyzing the biological theory of interaction, understanding the requirements and evaluating the goals of this human experimentation program.  Its been very clear that the intention has always been focused on control.  That is, by exploiting the interaction between electromagnetic waves and the charged particles surrounding the neuron, highly controlled radio signals should, in theory, be able to induce firing patterns in complex manners.

Indeed, this is a very well studied area and some significant breakthroughs have been made.  That said, is the notion of complex remote control of the physical body, enough to replicate the daily actions of a human, a work of science fiction and some clever obfuscation of fundamental errors by those involved?

My analysis suggests that this is true.

 The AI behind this technology is able to extract and decode speech, visual, auditory, evoked potentials, sensory information (feelings, emotion, pain, etc), spatial reasoning, etc.  The AI is also able to successfully write to each of these areas creating a wide variety of complex hallucinations that would be on par with a Hollywood production.

The common factor in all of this, is that each of these systems are subjective inputs.  If you know anything about neural networks, their function is filter noise and classify input.  The ability to write information to these areas and have it perceived correctly subjectively comes as no great surprise.  Even if the signals resulted in highly distorted input, the neural networks of the brain would clean up the input, suppress noise and fill in blanks through the activation of particular circuits.  This process is akin to looking at a pattern for too long without blinking and seeing it begin to fill your field of view.  It is based on a continuous saturation of the inputs.

Coming to aspects such as motor control, we observe that in every case a complete breakdown of the ability to demonstrate complex control.  It is true that twitches can be made, muscles will compress, facial expression can be triggered, eyes will blink, eyes can be moved. eye focus can be altered, the tongue can be moved, etc.  But none of this demonstrates complex coordinated control that in anyway functions as it would in everyday life.  That is, objectively, all the events look abnormal and can serve no functional role.

The excuse I suspect that is often provided is that the neural networks require training.  That, in time, a generalizable solution will emerge that will allow the complex control of any human by exploiting the major nerve pathways of the human body.

Is this true though?

It is very easy to kick such a question into the long grass, especially when those the answer is being supplied to those that have no real knowledge of the field of neural networks, or the biological underpinnings of motor control in the human body.

Firstly, the neural networks that control the motor functions are not the opposite of an input.  That is, they don't take an input and convert it to a noise.  Rather, they can be better thought of as a type of amplifier.  An input is supplied which cascades down through the body, branching off into different nerve endings but resulting in a complex coordination that is accurate every time.

Let's look at this process in terms of information in idealized terms.  We go from a single input which, as it transverses down the body, is captured at different points.  At each of these different points, this same message means different things.  Not only does it mean a different thing, but that different thing is related to what happened further up and further down the body.  Think of moving your arms for example.  Let's say you raise your shoulder, bend your elbow, then bend your wrist.  All the muscle tissue along this area is interconnected and you cannot induce one muscle to move in a fashion that would compromise the integrity of another.  There must be a coordination that takes into account the motion of each individual muscle area.  Thus, the muscles need to be aware of each other.

In robotics, we make use of servos for this.  The servo provides feedback that can be relayed to other servos to keep the motions aligned and within specification.  There are three competing assumptions in how the body achieves this.  The first is that the information is contained in the primary signal, the second is that the motions are augmented in real-time via biofeedback and final assumption is that it is a combination of both.  No doubt it is felt that additional chemical messengers play a significant role also.

The key point to note in this is that the output has a high degree of accuracy.  That is, given the physical differences between individuals a generalizable pattern is not physically realizable.  Even a general solution adopted from one individual, could not be adapted to another individual in a realistic time frame.  It must be remembered that it is not just a matter of adjusting weights in the neural networks, the activity of the human body is a product of chemical exchanges and these will be unique given the differences in physical layout.

This level of complexity increases when we consider that the chemical reactions within the neuron that the electromagnetic waves augment, may not produce the same output when presented by the same stimulus.  Remember it is suspected that the mode of interaction effects the thermal regulation of a chemical reaction.  Given the physical differences between neurons, different thermal properties would exist and thus, the alteration of this regulation may not produce the same neurotransmitter output at the synapses.

Neurons can have upwards of 7000 outputs and whilst this may be reduced in motor neurons, we cannot be sure that each motor neuron provides a standard output at the synapses.  Each of these, given the nature of genetics, should be completely unique.

The bottom line here is that to achieve realistic, or even functional, voluntary control would be like trying to brute force a key with trillions and trillions and trillions of digits.  Not only that, but trying to do it when the entire process is I/O bound.  Then there is also the key issue of whether or not, given completely accurate signals, the chemicals required would be present.

If you didn't full grasp this last point, let me sum it up like this.  The approach is absurd, on par with trying to lift Jupiter using a sausage over dial-up.

This issue is completely obvious.  If you can interact with spatial reasoning, yet have issues moving a finger which is a by far more well studied system, then something is clearly wrong.

It would appear that this program is attempting to achieve the impossible by masking the facts from those that are paying the bills.  No doubt there are a range of reasons behind this, from risk of exposure right through job and investment losses.

The world can rest easy tonight in the knowledge that this technology is a white elephant and that no foreign nation will be hijacking people any time soon.

That said, it is still a fearsome weapons platform designed with soft targets in mind and measures must be put in place to defend civilians from it.  It won't be long until we have multiple competitors and the inability to project influence.

source

Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne

 

No.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou

 

 

No.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Atomic Wanderer Chicken

How about when you are face to face with Obama, can he read your mind? Is Obama an actual human or was he swapped with an Android that looks, talks, thinks and acts like him?

Link to post
Share on other sites
remixedcat
theyarecomingforyou, on 24 Sept 2013 - 18:39, said:

 

adrynalyne, on 24 Sept 2013 - 18:30, said:

 

trag3dy, on 24 Sept 2013 - 18:29, said:

 

astropheed, on 24 Sept 2013 - 18:28, said:

No.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled

 

My analysis suggests that this is true.

 

You need to go back to school. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
TAZMINATOR

Quoteception

 

A new movie, 'Quoteception'.... starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Ellen 'remixedcat' Page

 

:laugh:

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled

A new movie, 'Quoteception'.... starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Ellen 'remixedcat' Page

 

:laugh:

 

I'd go see it. :D

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
compl3x

You're all wrong, of course. Satellites can read minds. Major League Baseball has been spying on us for years:

 

gBAhUp8.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
spenser.d

You're all wrong, of course. Satellites can read minds. Major League Baseball has been spying on us for years:

gBAhUp8.png

Ha, that brings back memories.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+virtorio

Not a big deal; people seem to be having less and less of them.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
FloatingFatMan

Didn't we do this thread once already with that... odd guy, Nullie?

Link to post
Share on other sites
astropheed

Didn't we do this thread once already with that... odd guy, Nullie?

 

Yeah, but it was a pretty fun thread, wasn't it? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Decebalvs Rex

If a satellite can read my thoughts , I will crash it / BSOD it . I have so many things going on in my mind...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
KingCracker

It can't if you are wearing tin foil. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Mirumir

A satellite can't read our thoughts...yet. It doesn't need to. It fulfils another mission.

 

Why read someone's brain if you can brainwash everyone? Why read someone's thoughts if you can manage what people think, dream, and fear of by resorting to propaganda? And satellites are a major component in its distribution.

 

p.s. "they" already know what we think, because we, the humans, have already discussed all the possible and the impossible human-related topics on Facebook.

Link to post
Share on other sites
kronckew

my nsa thought-controller says i must say no.

Link to post
Share on other sites
remixedcat

The observers already do that crap without satellites.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By anmol112
      TikTok plans to sue Trump administration over executive order
      by Anmol Mehrotra



      The year 2020 has been rough for TikTok as the company is battling for existence in the USA. President Donald Trump has made it clear to ByteDance, TikTok's parent company that it should sell its business to a US-based company or it will be banned.

      Earlier this month, Donald Trump signed an executive order giving Chinese companies like WeChat and TikTok 45 days before they have to cease operations in the USA. Now, Reuters reports that TikTok has decided to file a lawsuit to fight Trump's executive order. According to the report, TikTok plans to argue its classification as a threat to National Security. This should not come as a surprise since TikTok said it was formulating a legal strategy to fight the executive order.

      In an email, TikTok said the following (via CNet):

      The White House has declined to comment on the matter at the moment. However, US President Donald Trump has made it clear that he wants ByteDance to sell TikTok to an American company. Currently, Microsoft, Twitter and Oracle are interested in acquiring TikTok.

    • By Namerah S
      Google to lay a new subsea cable connecting the US, UK and Spain
      by Namerah Saud Fatmi

      Alphabet-owned company Google has announced that it will be laying a new subsea cable christened Grace Hopper. The path of the new cable from Google Cloud is set to connect the U.S., UK and Spain. It is to be used mainly for the purpose of carrying traffic for the company's enterprise and consumer products.

      The new undersea cable is set to use some of the latest technology in the industry. It will incorporate novel optical fiber switching, making it the first submarine cable in the world to have such features. Google hopes that this will result in making Grace Hopper faster and more reliable than the rest.

      Speaking about the upcoming transatlantic cable, VP of Google's global network Bikash Koley delved into the details of the project:

      It is expected that Grace Hopper will be ready by 2022. Google has selected SubCom, an experienced company in the undersea cable industry, for the project. A contract for the cable has already been signed by the two parties.

      This, of course, isn't Google's first such venture. The first privately-owned undersea cable laid down by the company was named Curie. It was announced in early 2018 and subsequently commissioned in 2019. Apart from Curie, the tech giant owns two other private cables named Dunant and Equiano.

    • By Namerah S
      Facebook pledges $1 billion to the California housing industry
      by Namerah Saud Fatmi

      In a blog post written by CFO David Wehner, Facebook announced an investment worth $1 billion to address the current housing crisis in California. The tech giant plans on pouring in the amount in the California housing industry over the course of the next ten years.

      The Menlo Park-based company plans to boost the affordability of houses is not limited to California - the state where its headquarters are located. Facebook intends to help out all other communities in which it operates to solve housing issues.

      To seal the deal and set the promise in stone, Facebook has officially partnered up with Gavin Newsom, governor of the State of California, to tackle the housing situation. Governor Newsom highlighted the significance of the tech giant's commitment for the people:

      Facebook's $1 billion investment will be split into several projects and funds in the decade to come. A brief outline of this plan was provided by the social media giant, a summary of which is provided below:

      $250 million to a public-private partnership with the State of California for mixed-income housing on excess state-owned land in areas with highest housing scarcity. $150 million for the production of affordable housing in the San Francisco Bay Area including contributions to the Bay’s Future Fund. $225 million in Facebook-owned land in Menlo Park which is now zoned for housing and will produce upwards of 1,500 mixed-income housing units. $25 million to build residences for school districts on public land in partnership with San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties. $350 million in other communities with affordable housing issues where Facebook operates. It is a point of interest that although Facebook has announced detailed plans to address the housing crisis, no exact time frames or ETAs have been disclosed concerning these individual projects as to when exactly they launch or hope to successfully complete.

      Facebook isn't the first tech firm to claim responsibility in the areas it operates and gives back to the community, especially concerning housing issues. Earlier this year, Microsoft made a similar move by committing $500 million in order to increase affordable housing in and around Seattle. In June, Google also announced an investment of $1 billion in housing across the Bay Area.

    • By Namerah S
      Sony Interactive Entertainment launches online store in the US
      by Namerah Saud Fatmi

      Japanese conglomerate Sony Interactive Entertainment launched its very own online shop to cater to its American consumer market. The digital store went live today and is available directly from PlayStation.com. It carries a wide range of PlayStation 4 consoles, accessories, video games and other miscellaneous products such as PlayStation Plus membership vouchers.

      Although the current selection of products and game titles is limited, Sony plans on expanding the store's portfolio in the future. For now, the only titles available on the store are:

      Astro Bot: Rescue Mission Blood & Truth Bloodborne Days Gone God of War 3 Remastered Horizon Zero Dawn Marvel’s Spider-Man: Game of the Year Edition MLB The Show 19 Quantic Dream Collection Ratchet & Clank The Last of Us Remastered Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End It is worth noting that these games will ship out as physical discs.

      To celebrate the launch, the online shop is currently having a launch promo which ends on October 31, 2019. It includes two bundles, the first is a PlayStation 4 with a one year PS Plus subscription selling for $339.99 while the second offer includes a PlayStation 4 Pro with a one year PS Plus membership for $429.99 - making it $19.99 off each package.

      Additionally, PS Plus members who are logged in get to claim 1-Day Express Shipping free of charge. As previously mentioned, Sony's brand new online store is only available to U.S. customers and can be accessed from the official PlayStation website.