Apple maps now better than Google maps


Recommended Posts

Not even close. Google Maps are still far superior in locating addresses and businesses. Apple maps still continually is so wrong that it puts me on the other side where I need to be. I would not trust their services on moments that are critical. 

 

What is surprising is that Google Maps and Apple Maps could not locate UUC Motorsports in Alpharetta, GA but HERE maps with Nokia was able to locate it. That was surprising to find out. In fact it can locate more businesses in my little test than both Google Maps and Apple Maps. I prefer Google Maps for often than not. Although I have the 2013 Maps in my cars it's still far easier to use my phone or tablet to locate the business and navigate me there. I guess I got used to it and with my Windshield Mount it's just so easy to read and it connects to my bluetooth and is like my other navigation system. 

 

I won't trust Apple Maps for some time to come. I wish I could but it has put me in a church parking lot instead of across the street where the Pizza place has been for almost 10 years. It has put in 2 miles out of the way and thought it was in the right place according to its GPS data. 

 

I wish Nokia's HERE maps were better looking. It works for the most part but its not as aesthetically pleasing as Google or Apple Maps.

I like accuracy in my maps, not shiny graphics. Oh the 3d effect in cities looks cool? Great. I look at Google Maps to search for businesses etc and for directions. Almost no businesses list themselves with the service that Apple Maps relies on, so around me it lists practically no stores or businesses. It has horrendous errors in my area, I reported them all to Apple repeatedly when I had my iPhone 5 but looking at my friends iPad he still has, none of them are fixed, Google fixed most of the errors I pointed out within a month.

Apple had more business listings before it when launched.

Apple?s Maps app won?t debut for several months, but it already has some 20 million more business listings than Google, according to data disclosed by the companies.

Apple had more business listings before it when launched.

 

 

Which is great, IF you're in an area where these businesses list themselves with the service Apple uses. In practice though where I live almost none of them have, but have listed with Google.

Which is great, IF you're in an area where these businesses list themselves with the service Apple uses. In practice though where I live almost none of them have, but have listed with Google.

I agree with you. Google maps is faster at updating new streets and businesses in my area. So I use it as well on my phone. I was just pointing which service technically has more listings.

It is true. in fact Apple maps are more up-to-date than the one of google.

Guess it depends where you live...

Apple Maps:

 

do51zs.jpg

Google Maps:

 

2hmzt6h.jpg

Apple Maps uses data that is at least 6 years old here, in comparison Google Maps has been updated every summer for the last three years, the current data is just a few months old on Google. We also have street view data is from August 2012 too which Apple can not offer at all.

  • Like 2

What!........that statement doesnt even make sense to me please clarify?

Apple users use Internet more than other platforms. They spend more on apps, they spend more time on maps service a month and etc...

This has been a known fact for a while.

  • Like 1

They spend more possibly due to higher prices on the Apple platofrm the rest is pure guff

IBM just reported that iOS was used for 80% of all mobile online transactions for Black Friday. Just do some simple searches on Google and you will see just how much Apple users spend online vs their Android counterparts. It's basically the main reason developers prefer iOS, they see more profit from it.

We are talking one day out of 365 and not traffic use but transactions which is entirely different to the statement you made.

Any how we are wandering way off topic

want to talk about the other 364 days too? yes off topic but he is correct.

wow,apple really screwed google didn't they.i guess you could say they got scroogled. users probably still think the maps app is google maps,based on the usage figures posted above. very clever, stealing a big chunk of the mobile maps base just like that. I wonder if google still thinks apple is their best friend in the world.

One of the core strengths of Apple maps since day 1 was their larger business archive. Apple always had a larger business database.

 

Even if they are in the wrong spots.

No, that Apple already took a huge chunk out of google maps service without it being on other platforms

Duh. Apple device owners will ALWAYS be predisposed towards using Apple software over any others. You're just telling us water is wet.

In the US it's all probably more close, but in Europe there's no contest. Google Maps has really rich maps, every single business, park, ... is on there and there's a very active community on Map Maker making corrections all the time. Apple Maps looks very bland in comparison.

 

Stevan, if you have a Mac, could you go to Sint-Truiden (Belgium) in Apple Maps and in Google Maps and take screenshots of both? I have Mavericks in VMWare but Maps requires OpenGL... I'd love to see the difference. There are a few parks, schools and hospitals that are only marked correctly on Google Maps afaik.

Duh. Apple device owners will ALWAYS be predisposed towards using Apple software over any others. You're just telling us water is wet.

 

I think it depends on how hard core you are. My wife has an iPhone but she uses Google Maps because she likes it better.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I agree, especially if it is cloud sourced, like this one is.. but I wouldn't say no to a local AI assistant similar to the Zettlab one which would be really helpful with my large Photos library, but also to perform tasks like installing Docker apps rather than me having to do it via Docker Compose, but I don't think we're quite there yet. Synology Photos is somewhat AI, you can ask it to search for certain people (if you have tagged them and it will attempt to match similar photos to the person) and if you put a search term in for "cars" for example, it will show you all photos with a car.
    • I doubt that Google will keep the same price... it may go up from that list published.
    • Sennheiser's audiophile grade HD 600 hits lowest ever price on Amazon Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen If you are in the market for high-quality audiophile-grade over-ear headphones then Sennheiser's HD 600 are a great choice for sure, especially today on Prime Day 2026 as the product has hit its lowest ever price (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Sennheiser HD 600 has long been regarded as a reference headphone for listeners seeking a detailed and natural listening experience. It is an open-back design that is built around the idea of acoustic transparency which is essentially said to allow sound waves to move freely for a more spacious and accurate presentation by reducing turbulence and the type of distortion that can result from it. At the heart of the product is Sennheiser’s proprietary driver system featuring a 42 mm driver paired with a lightweight diaphragm and aluminum voice coils. The company says this design helps deliver fast response times and better articulate sound across the audible frequency range. Comfort and durability are also key aspects of the HD 600 as the headphones feature soft velour ear pads designed for extended listening sessions. The HD 600 comes with a detachable 3-meter cable, a 6.3 mm stereo connector, and a 3.5 mm adapter for compatibility with a wide range of audio equipment. The technical specs of the Sennheiser HD 600 are given in the table below: Specification Value Transducer Principle Dynamic, Open-Back Ear Coupling Circumaural (Over-Ear) Frequency Response 12 Hz – 40,500 Hz Sound Pressure Level (SPL) 97 dB (1 V) Impedance 300 Ω Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) < 0.1% (1 kHz, 1 V) Cable Length 3 m (9.8 ft) Connector 3.5 mm Stereo Jack Plug Included Adapter 6.3 mm (1/4") Stereo Jack Adapter Weight 260 g Magnetic Field Strength 1.8 mT Driver Size 42 mm Dynamic Driver Diaphragm Size 38 mm Get it at the link below: Sennheiser HD 600: $237.00 (Sold by Electronics Expo, Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $449.95) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • So the card is targeted at headphone users - so the review should be from someone that uses this - maybe I can review a card next time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!