Recommended Posts

I knew he'd get off. The whole thing was nothing more than a PR stunt.  Like Smiley Virus, he's trying to go for a bad girl image.

ROFL

I don't know if you meant that as a funny post but Bieber as a bad girl was hilarious.

(Explains a lot about him too) :d

I was searching for something much more serious, and the link was on the page that I found here,

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/probe-to-compare-uk-safety-record-in-north-sea-with-other-countries.22027761

 

 

I knew he'd get off. The whole thing was nothing more than a PR stunt.  Like Smiley Virus, he's trying to go for a bad girl image.

 Yes, some kind of put up to make him look bad but gooder than bad... and me like a klutz copy pasted it,

ugghhh, I've been news promo hoed... :(

god what a pathetic state over there, i love this line "Other contradictory claims include police records that Bieber "stunk of alcohol", despite the alcohol levels in his bloodstream only measuring at .014" i didnt know that ANY alcohol was OK for a 19 year old, whats the drinking age again? I dont understand how that is just swept under the rug, UNDER AGE DRINKING AND DRIVING but hey its only .014 so well just drop it.

  • Like 2

TMZ reported it on todays live show.

he only blew a 0.014 blood alcohol

the GPS/black box in his rental car only shows a speed of 27 mph in the stretch were the cops say he was "racing." Video seems to confirm this.

they also reported that the cops in this area have a rep for being somewhat enthusiastic about traffic stops.

he only blew a 0.014 blood alcohol

I like how people are saying he "only" blew xyz as a way to justify it, that is still illegal no matter which way you look at it, he is 19 which is under the legal drinking age of 21, and driving. The minimum he should get is a Wet and Reckless but in all honestly he deserves a DUI and should have the book thrown at him for all his antics.

  • Like 2

I like how people are saying he "only" blew xyz as a way to justify it, that is still illegal no matter which way you look at it, he is 19 which is under the legal drinking age of 21, and driving. The minimum he should get is a Wet and Reckless but in all honestly he deserves a DUI and should have the book thrown at him for all his antics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_law#United_States_3

 

It is not illegal to have drunk alcohol in most states. The laws generally cover possession and purchasing.

I was reading the article and this stood out at me...

 

 

 

Others have called into question who should be held responsible for the teen, who, at 19, is still considered a minor in need of adult supervision in the United States

 

uh, what? at 18 you are considered an adult in the USA

I like how people are saying he "only" blew xyz as a way to justify it, that is still illegal no matter which way you look at it, he is 19 which is under the legal drinking age of 21, and driving. The minimum he should get is a Wet and Reckless but in all honestly he deserves a DUI and should have the book thrown at him for all his antics.

My "only" was in comparison to how it was originally portrayed.

I'd like for him to get hammeted too, however the problem is that in Florida the limit for those under 21 years old is 0.02 and he blew a 0.014.

Also and fpr reference, a healthy person metabolizes alcohol at a rate of about 0.015 per hour.

My "only" was in comparison to how it was originally portrayed.

I'd like for him to get hammeted too, however the problem is that in Florida the limit for those under 21 years old is 0.02 and he blew a 0.014.

Also and fpr reference, a healthy person metabolizes alcohol at a rate of about 0.015 per hour.

There are reports he was smoking marijuana too.  That can be used against him in a DUI.  Surprised they didn't test him for it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_law#United_States_3

 

It is not illegal to have drunk alcohol in most states. The laws generally cover possession and purchasing.

but he was driving, most places under 21 and any alcohol while driving is illegal.

 

I apologize to all who I made a fuss with, apparently you can slap me and call me sally

 

"Zero Tolerance for Drivers under 21

Florida has a Zero Tolerance law for drivers under 21. This means that any driver under 21 that is stopped by law enforcement and has a blood alcohol level of .02 or higher will automatically have their Florida drivers license suspended for 6 months. The .02 limit really means that you cannot have a single drink and drive. And that's the idea."

He was below 0.02 BAC. Most states have the same law.


I was reading the article and this stood out at me...

 

 

Others have called into question who should be held responsible for the teen, who, at 19, is still considered a minor in need of adult supervision in the United States

 

uh, what? at 18 you are considered an adult in the USA

 

 

Good catch. Who writes this crap?

If I had to guess the whole thing probably got thrown out because the initial pull over was unjustified.  Or perhaps the reasons the officer used to qualify that there was reasonable suspicion to conduct a field sobriety test were not good.  That is typically how these things get thrown out.

 

Once a lawyer has established that the pull over was unjustifiable and/or the field sobriety test was unjustifiable, then it really doesn't matter what evidence they collect after that fact: It is all thrown out.

If I had to guess the whole thing probably got thrown out because the initial pull over was unjustified. Or perhaps the reasons the officer used to qualify that there was reasonable suspicion to conduct a field sobriety test were not good. That is typically how these things get thrown out.

Once a lawyer has established that the pull over was unjustifiable and/or the field sobriety test was unjustifiable, then it really doesn't matter what evidence they collect after that fact: It is all thrown out.

Or the fact that he's a celebrity

(I remember Donny Osmond bragging about being immune to some traffic offences, purely because he is Donny Osmond)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
    • If you have an account with any of Meta's services, you technically have an account with all of their services. You may not use it, but it exists.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      93
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!