Recommended Posts

I so hate Opera for using chrome engine for their browser. Goddamn do i hate the new password management system, the bookmark system and everything about it. Nice way to ruin something so original and imitate crappiness. No offense to chrome users but i was never fan of it and never will. Presto engine had me since the day i first used it.

 

The only reason i am using it now is because i am so used to Opera, have like hundreds of bookmarks and so much data stored in it and for nostalgia of it. I am gonna write my own browser based on internet explorer and call it stnowser, at least i won't claim originality which opera so proudly claim now. It is basically chrome remodeled.

 

PS: You won't understand my frustration if you haven't been a fan of opera, i used it since version 8 and that was eternity ago and it truly was unique back then.

 

PS2: If anyone know of another awesome browser that isn't chrome/firefox, fire away.

 
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1206189-why-did-opera-become-chrome/
Share on other sites

I so hate Opera for using chrome engine for their browser. Goddamn do i hate the new password management system, the bookmark system and everything about it. Nice way to ruin something so original and imitate crappiness. No offense to chrome users but i was never fan of it and never will. Presto engine had me since the day i first used it.

 

The only reason i am using it now is because i am so used to Opera, have like hundreds of bookmarks and so much data stored in it and for nostalgia of it. I am gonna write my own browser based on internet explorer and call it stnowser, at least i won't claim originality which opera so proudly claim now. It is basically chrome remodeled.

 

PS: You won't understand my frustration if you haven't been a fan of opera, i used it since version 8 and that was eternity ago and it truly was unique back then.

 

PS2: If anyone know of another awesome browser that isn't chrome/firefox, fire away.

Ha well there's always IE :P

I think I've read that they felt it more valuable getting their people to contribute to the open-source Blink platform than for them to keep on developing Presto.

 

I always found pages never looked quite right with Presto so I'm happy about the switch. 

i tried to get myself to like opera, but never could. some webpages wouldnt load/display correctly, had to trick gmail into not loading the not showing the HTML view, annoying mouse scrolling. It was a mess

That changed when they switch to chromium

Ha well there's always IE :p

 

I am seriously considering that, the new IE is not that bad...at least it is original  :D

 

Opera wasn't that famous with its presto engine but there was still a very loyal following, they ###### everyone of their fans by becoming something those fans despised, their forums are full of complaints and they mass deleted and banned a lot of people, not very good thing to do.

 

They should open source the presto engine and let someone else develop a browser based on it, i am sure it will be success.

Don't forget that Opera now contribute to the whole Chromium/Blink code, so anything they've done in Presto previously that worked great technically could be implemented by them into this new engine.

  • Like 3

While I liked the old presto engine and it was a great engine. 

 

remember NONE of the great opera features where part of the engine, but the browser built around the engine. most of the good old features are coming back but it takes time to recode it all.

Maxthon, but it's based on Webkit (not Blink... currently) but it can use IE's Trident too (dual engine browser). Other than that, nope.

 

Does look nice, i'll give it a try. I am liking K-Meleon it is similar to Firefox but i don't hate firefox as much, it just doesn't have the features i am used to in (old) opera e.g notes, email manager/irc but it does have amazing add-ons so maybe i will end up with firefox after all or k meleon.

 

I only switched to opera 20 today because v12 is pretty much useless now and very buggy, i would probably have used it for eternity if it worked half as much as it was a year ago lol. 

(Disclaimer: My opinion, I don't need bashing if don't agree, don't start fight with quoting).

Opera Presto engine might not be up to expectations for users but other bundled features of Opera were really out of the box things. Presto engine needed real push from web developers side so that Opera developers become more and more focused on it. Now they really should Open Source it and their JS engine and Test suite as well.

Opera did good move to switch to Blink with Chromium wrapper but I really hate one thing about Chromium that you can't go away with using Blink separately from Chromium. I think Google should try to add so that people can build more focused browser using Blink. In this regard Webkit is way ahead while Gecko is struggling, even Jolla OS developer offered patches for Gecko embedding but still no further progress.

I personally wish that Safari would have been around in the corner, so we can use it but sad to say Apple sometime do stupid decision makings.

Opera Presto developer really made some good workups in Blink engine (text selection, unprefixing and removing old stuff, scrolling improvement and they continue to do more so).

 

Currently if anyone wants pure Webkit experience although some half assed then this browser worth a try: http://www.midori-browser.org/

Its based on WebkitGTK+ and quite infancy right now but I have high hopes that they manage to consider Windows as second place after being default in Elementary Luna OS Linux (I'm not Linux guy).

 

Internet Explorer is not too shabby these days and in some points light years ahead of even Chrome and Firefox. I have high hopes for IE12, I hope that MS does not disappoint us. I have huge wishlist for them if they like to hear us out to bring to table.

Safari for Windows does need to make return seriously.

Firefox scenario is more like they are axing their own feet without any particular reason, the efforts they done on Australis UI and Modern Metro based, if done to cleanup old crufty code and getting more streamline codeline for new hackers (Open source hackers - students I mean here in positive sense). It could help them making it really great browser.

Opera for Windows, its just Chromium based browser on steroids, I will consider it if they really manage to do some amazing work with it.

Chrome - I really avoid and only use Chromium because of being Open Source and also Chrome sync feature is way better than Firefox one, they really need to make it less confusing. Not to mention I also use it as thread starter mentioned because of having too many bookmarks etc (over reliance in Australis after landing days) in it which again Firefox can't import.

(Disclaimer: My opinion, I don't need bashing if don't agree, don't start fight with quoting).

Opera Presto engine might not be up to expectations for users but other bundled features of Opera were really out of the box things. Presto engine needed real push from web developers side so that Opera developers become more and more focused on it. Now they really should Open Source it and their JS engine and Test suite as well.

Opera did good move to switch to Blink with Chromium wrapper but I really hate one thing about Chromium that you can't go away with using Blink separately from Chromium. I think Google should try to add so that people can build more focused browser using Blink. In this regard Webkit is way ahead while Gecko is struggling, even Jolla OS developer offered patches for Gecko embedding but still no further progress.

I personally wish that Safari would have been around in the corner, so we can use it but sad to say Apple sometime do stupid decision makings.

Opera Presto developer really made some good workups in Blink engine (text selection, unprefixing and removing old stuff, scrolling improvement and they continue to do more so).

 

Currently if anyone wants pure Webkit experience although some half assed then this browser worth a try: http://www.midori-browser.org/

Its based on WebkitGTK+ and quite infancy right now but I have high hopes that they manage to consider Windows as second place after being default in Elementary Luna OS Linux (I'm not Linux guy).

 

Internet Explorer is not too shabby these days and in some points light years ahead of even Chrome and Firefox. I have high hopes for IE12, I hope that MS does not disappoint us. I have huge wishlist for them if they like to hear us out to bring to table.

Safari for Windows does need to make return seriously.

Firefox scenario is more like they are axing their own feet without any particular reason, the efforts they done on Australis UI and Modern Metro based, if done to cleanup old crufty code and getting more streamline codeline for new hackers (Open source hackers - students I mean here in positive sense). It could help them making it really great browser.

Opera for Windows, its just Chromium based browser on steroids, I will consider it if they really manage to do some amazing work with it.

Chrome - I really avoid and only use Chromium because of being Open Source and also Chrome sync feature is way better than Firefox one, they really need to make it less confusing. Not to mention I also use it as thread starter mentioned because of having too many bookmarks etc (over reliance in Australis after landing days) in it which again Firefox can't import.

They've already fixed the sync function in firefox 29 beta. It works almost exactly like chrome's now, you just sign in with a 'firefox account'. no more pairing, sync keys etc...

They've already fixed the sync function in firefox 29 beta. It works almost exactly like chrome's now, you just sign in with a 'firefox account'. no more pairing, sync keys etc...

 

I know but I still don't feel the way its integrated in Firefox... They are only good at making UX mockup but not really good at improving User Experience at all.

I know but I still don't feel the way its integrated in Firefox... They are only good at making UX mockup but not really good at improving User Experience at all.

The new sync seemed pretty user friendly to me, significantly more so then it was previously. Most of the criticisms of the redesigned sync I've seen are really grasping at straws.

For me their Speed Dial implementation is still the best and smoothest, and I've come to treat the Stash as a reading list. Besides that, I like its UI better than stock Chrome/ium given Chrome has moved away from using native UI widgets on Windows.

 

And the days of dealing with pages that didn't look right on Presto are long gone.

 

To answer the OP: the upside of borrowing the bookmarks API from Chrome is that the existing bookmarks extensions from Chrome will work in Opera, such as Xmarks - Xmarks was supposed to provide an extension for Presto-based Opera but eventually gave up somewhere along the line. Now it works just fine. As for password management, recently I've switched out all password managers on my browsers to Lastpass (plus I've never liked how say a friend could go on my browser and with a few clicks view all passwords saved for my frequented sites).

I have used Opera since back in the 90's. I loved the features and speed it had. Sometime back Firefox had great features and I started using it, but was not sold entirely on it. I don't care for IE at all. Now that Jon Von Tetzchner got some money and no longer is with Opera, Opera is Chrome incognito so to speak. Different people own the company. I like the looks of Opera 20 and it runs quicker on my machines than any of the other browsers. There are a few things still yet wanted and I will give them some time to come thru with them. I don't care for a zillion bookmarks on the Speed Dial, maybe 10-12 is plenty.

The new sync seemed pretty user friendly to me, significantly more so then it was previously. Most of the criticisms of the redesigned sync I've seen are really grasping at straws.

 

Its matter of opinion and we should not hijack this thread from OP.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!