Missouri will fire 'sound cannons' at drivers to deter work zone speeding


Recommended Posts

Apparently the threat of a costly ticket isn't enough to slow down drivers passing through work zones on Missouri's highways, so the state is taking extreme measures to solve the dilemma. Missouri's Department of Transportation is preparing to deploy the LRAD sound cannon ? a tool (some might say "weapon") that's been used to break up mass gatherings like Occupy Wall Street ? to warn motorists that they're going too fast. The device emits a targeted, deafening siren that "easily penetrates the windshield and well-insulated cab of a car, even overriding the vehicle?s engine sounds and a radio turned up loud enough to jam to tunes at highway speeds."

 

 

The state has already conducted tests with LRAD (embedded below), loading it onto the back of a truck and sending out verbal "slow vehicles ahead" warnings to nearby vehicles. But now Missouri has committed to the technology by purchasing two of the pricey devices. Transportation officials claim that they provide an unmistakable alert about slower roadwork vehicles up ahead, and insist LRAD will only be directed at speeding drivers that haven't yet moved out of work lanes. Still, critics maintain that the ear-piercing nature of the alerts presents a clear danger in and of itself.

 

More...

http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/14/5613782/missouri-will-fire-lrad-sound-cannons-to-deter-work-zone-speeding

I would think blasting an oncoming car with extremely loud, out-of-nowhere noise would spook the driver to the point of causing an accident. That doesn't seem any safer to me. Also, won't this potentially cause hearing damage to the people in the car?

"Deafening siren"

Yeah I can see lawsuits a plenty. I certainly would if had my hearing damaged. And yes suddenly spooking drivers with a "deafening" noise is ludicrous. Whoever thought up this project, and whoever approved it need to have their heads examined.

  • Like 2
Missouri's DOT reportedly insists the tool will only being used at safe levels

How can it easily pierce the sound isulation of the car, override all noise including loud radio, and be at a "safe" level? How will it not accidentally catch other vehicles in the way of the sound beam?

 

Just plant a guy there with a radar, problem solved.

  • Like 3

don't let them tell you the budget is tight and the state is too broke to help the poor. theres always money to give to buy toys for law enforcement but never any to help the citizens 

  • Like 1

Funny they need a sound cannon when it was recently reported as mall town uses a mocked up crown vic and a dummy officer sitting on the side of the road to slow down speeders.  And this method works.

And it's probably a lot cheaper too.

The LRAD method will kill people...who on earth thought directing a loud noise to someone while they're driving would be a good idea?

How can it easily pierce the sound isulation of the car, override all noise including loud radio, and be at a "safe" level? How will it not accidentally catch other vehicles in the way of the sound beam?

 

Just plant a guy there with a radar, problem solved.

 

And different cars will be insulated than others, older ones will probably let noise through easily. There's too many variables. A modern car might be well insulated that you don't know if they're blasting music inside. I doubt they're going to guess the noise level and will blast the same volume at cars. There are going to be accidents.

I would think blasting an oncoming car with extremely loud, out-of-nowhere noise would spook the driver to the point of causing an accident. That doesn't seem any safer to me. Also, won't this potentially cause hearing damage to the people in the car?

 

Drive the speed limit and you won't need to worry.

 

What they really need is a device to send a signal to the car computer and cap the speed the car could go.

So deaf drivers are deterred how,again?

What they really need is a device to send a signal to the car computer and cap the speed the car could go. 

 

That would be great for trolling BMWs. I would build a transmitter to hack and cap them at school zone speeds.

That would be great for trolling BMWs. I would build a transmitter to hack and cap them at school zone speeds.

 

Modern cars are so easy. My friend used to work with the section of the Air Force that tries to break into networks to test our own security etc. Out of curiosity when one of the guys got a new car with a computer in it that monitored everything they tried to gain access to the Cars computer. After 30 minutes of trying it turned out the computer talked to the wheels via bluetooth to record the tyre pressure etc, and once that was discovered, access was gained to the Car computer within minutes, from there it was possible to remotely activate the brakes, overheat the engine by messing with core functions etc. 

 

Dangerous stuff. They claimed the brakes could be locked independently. 

How about they just fire a real cannon at them.. Bet they'll obey the speed limit when a Howitzer is aimed their way :p

 

Or just put a speed camera there, and make a killing.

Modern cars are so easy. My friend used to work with the section of the Air Force that tries to break into networks to test our own security etc. Out of curiosity when one of the guys got a new car with a computer in it that monitored everything they tried to gain access to the Cars computer. After 30 minutes of trying it turned out the computer talked to the wheels via bluetooth to record the tyre pressure etc, and once that was discovered, access was gained to the Car computer within minutes, from there it was possible to remotely activate the brakes, overheat the engine by messing with core functions etc. 

 

Dangerous stuff. They claimed the brakes could be locked independently. 

 

What sort of car was it?  I work in the industry, and sorry, but that sounds like absolute crap.

Bluetooth can be hacked, that's a fact.

Auto electronics outfits make bluetooth modules for dTPMS (direct tire pressure monitoring systems) and keyless entry.

http://www.epcos.com/epcos-en/542852/products/product-search/technical-parameter/product-catalog/rf-saw-components/mobile-communications/wireless-lan---bluetooth-modules?t=ps

And there are iPhone and Android apps that can access the sensors.

What's hard to believe?

Just plant a guy there with a radar, problem solved.

It doesn't even have to be a radar.  Just put a guy with a hairdryer to scare people into thinking they actually have a radar :laugh:

 

So as others have mentioned, how does this affect the drivers around the speeder?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!