Missouri will fire 'sound cannons' at drivers to deter work zone speeding


Recommended Posts

Wont this lead to said speeding driver in wrong lane having some kind of panic attack and potentially crashing further into things?

Seems a bit unsafe. Shame they can only fire sounds, would be better if it was an electric signal that somehow disrupted the car and caused it to roll to a stop, (obv driver can still brake).

Might be an idea if such a device exists to combine the two. That way on older models with electronic immobilisers you`d still at least get the sound.


What sort of car was it?  I work in the industry, and sorry, but that sounds like absolute crap.

Seems to be a good bit of literature on this once googled, but im a little less than convinced....

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-news/85154/modern-cars-serious-risk-computer-hackers

 

this list`s a few of the hacks down the bottom..

http://www.caranddriver.com/features/can-your-car-be-hacked-feature

 

>

Seems a bit unsafe. Shame they can only fire sounds, would be better if it was an electric signal that somehow disrupted the car and caused it to roll to a stop, (obv driver can still brake).

>

A portable EMP gun for doing that is in development, though vehicles that have OnStar and similar services hardware can already be remotely shut down.

EMP

Bluetooth can be hacked, that's a fact.

Auto electronics outfits make bluetooth modules for dTPMS (direct tire pressure monitoring systems) and keyless entry.

http://www.epcos.com/epcos-en/542852/products/product-search/technical-parameter/product-catalog/rf-saw-components/mobile-communications/wireless-lan---bluetooth-modules?t=ps

And there are iPhone and Android apps that can access the sensors.

What's hard to believe?

 

That's great.  But they don't use BT to communicate with the major systems in the car.  TO suggest there is a link between tyre sensors and the CAN in the car is a little OTT.

I know what it is, just thought the term was funny.  I mean, you even wrote it in quotes...

I put it in quotes for those who probably have that mental image of LRAD.

That's great. But they don't use BT to communicate with the major systems in the car. TO suggest there is a link between tyre sensors and the CAN in the car is a little OTT.

Hacking cars was demonstrated at the 2013 DEFCON hackers conference, several times.

Attacks on a Prius included engaging the brakes, yanking the steering wheel or causing it to accelerate. On an Escape they disable the brakes. More was possible.

That would be great for trolling BMWs. I would build a transmitter to hack and cap them at school zone speeds.

 

Jealousy. It's such an ugly emotion, don't you think? :p

  • Like 2

Jealousy. It's such an ugly emotion, don't you think? :p

 

It's not that. I just find that an overwhelming majority of BMW drivers around here are jerks.

 

Had I said all luxury cars, then maybe you could say jealousy.

What sort of car was it? I work in the industry, and sorry, but that sounds like absolute crap.

It was some relatively new BMW and yes it's possible.

It's not that. I just find that an overwhelming majority of BMW drivers around here are jerks.

 

Had I said all luxury cars, then maybe you could say jealousy.

Over here BMW drivers are either drug dealers or old people. :D

this is a horrible and terribly unsafe idea. drivers are going to freak out, slam on their breaks and cause accidents. at the very least there's going to be huge traffic jams from people confused about wtf is happening.

It was some relatively new BMW and yes it's possible.

Over here BMW drivers are either drug dealers or old people. :D

 

Still don't believe it.  The bluetooth systems don't control the vehicle.

Still don't believe it.  The bluetooth systems don't control the vehicle.

 

I never said the Bluetooth system controls the vehicle, It is however an unsecured connection to the cars computer which can control the vehicle. That was how access to the cars main computer was gained. Via its connection to the wheels.

I never said the Bluetooth system controls the vehicle, It is however an unsecured connection to the cars computer which can control the vehicle. That was how access to the cars main computer was gained. Via its connection to the wheels.

Still don't believe it but for arguments sake let's say it was completely true.

It's still bluetooth. So you'd have to be right next to the car in order to hack into it and start controlling things...making it, essentially, a non-issue. Now those remote control starts from your phone. Nope nope nope. Sorry if I lose my phone I don't want to have to worry about losing my car too.

Right next to the vehicle using a transmitter at LEGAL power levels. Why would a hacker who is trying to do something illegal so limit themselves?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluesniping

Also, such attacks were demonstrated at last years DEFCON conference by a group whose project was funded by DARPA (DoD) to see if it were possible.

Still don't believe it but for arguments sake let's say it was completely true.

It's still bluetooth. So you'd have to be right next to the car in order to hack into it and start controlling things...making it, essentially, a non-issue. Now those remote control starts from your phone. Nope nope nope. Sorry if I lose my phone I don't want to have to worry about losing my car too.

 

Using a Bluesniper it's possible to get access to Bluetooth devices from a mile away.

Using a Bluesniper it's possible to get access to Bluetooth devices from a mile away.

With nothing in between sure. But we don't live out in an open field, there are buildings, other cars, trees etc all of which would seriously reduce your range. So like I already said, you'd have to be pretty close to the person.

With nothing in between sure. But we don't live out in an open field, there are buildings, other cars, trees etc all of which would seriously reduce your range. So like I already said, you'd have to be pretty close to the person.

Still has the potential to be dangerous, locking the brakes out on a corner or in populated traffic, from a potential attacker following the target car.

Still don't believe it.  The bluetooth systems don't control the vehicle.

I watched a video on this, it is entirely possible and I've seen it in action. It's quite scary tbh.

 

Regarding the topic, so Missouri is going to blast sound cannons into the jar, making them jump and potentially crash? Nice one government, hi5's all round.

The US is getting more and more aggressive in its law enforcement practices. This is an idea that is ludicrous at face value, so I have no idea how it could progress to actually being implemented. This sounds more like something that would be used by the military.

By aggressive tactics I guess you mean SWAT units, Special Weapons and Tactics.

The term SWAT originated in Philidelphia in 1964, but it took our "liberal" friends in Los Angeles to really start the ball rolling with a large scale use of such military like tactics. Spread wide after a TV show about LA's unit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      445
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!