Missouri will fire 'sound cannons' at drivers to deter work zone speeding


Recommended Posts

Wont this lead to said speeding driver in wrong lane having some kind of panic attack and potentially crashing further into things?

Seems a bit unsafe. Shame they can only fire sounds, would be better if it was an electric signal that somehow disrupted the car and caused it to roll to a stop, (obv driver can still brake).

Might be an idea if such a device exists to combine the two. That way on older models with electronic immobilisers you`d still at least get the sound.


What sort of car was it?  I work in the industry, and sorry, but that sounds like absolute crap.

Seems to be a good bit of literature on this once googled, but im a little less than convinced....

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-news/85154/modern-cars-serious-risk-computer-hackers

 

this list`s a few of the hacks down the bottom..

http://www.caranddriver.com/features/can-your-car-be-hacked-feature

 

>

Seems a bit unsafe. Shame they can only fire sounds, would be better if it was an electric signal that somehow disrupted the car and caused it to roll to a stop, (obv driver can still brake).

>

A portable EMP gun for doing that is in development, though vehicles that have OnStar and similar services hardware can already be remotely shut down.

EMP

Bluetooth can be hacked, that's a fact.

Auto electronics outfits make bluetooth modules for dTPMS (direct tire pressure monitoring systems) and keyless entry.

http://www.epcos.com/epcos-en/542852/products/product-search/technical-parameter/product-catalog/rf-saw-components/mobile-communications/wireless-lan---bluetooth-modules?t=ps

And there are iPhone and Android apps that can access the sensors.

What's hard to believe?

 

That's great.  But they don't use BT to communicate with the major systems in the car.  TO suggest there is a link between tyre sensors and the CAN in the car is a little OTT.

I know what it is, just thought the term was funny.  I mean, you even wrote it in quotes...

I put it in quotes for those who probably have that mental image of LRAD.

That's great. But they don't use BT to communicate with the major systems in the car. TO suggest there is a link between tyre sensors and the CAN in the car is a little OTT.

Hacking cars was demonstrated at the 2013 DEFCON hackers conference, several times.

Attacks on a Prius included engaging the brakes, yanking the steering wheel or causing it to accelerate. On an Escape they disable the brakes. More was possible.

That would be great for trolling BMWs. I would build a transmitter to hack and cap them at school zone speeds.

 

Jealousy. It's such an ugly emotion, don't you think? :p

  • Like 2

Jealousy. It's such an ugly emotion, don't you think? :p

 

It's not that. I just find that an overwhelming majority of BMW drivers around here are jerks.

 

Had I said all luxury cars, then maybe you could say jealousy.

What sort of car was it? I work in the industry, and sorry, but that sounds like absolute crap.

It was some relatively new BMW and yes it's possible.

It's not that. I just find that an overwhelming majority of BMW drivers around here are jerks.

 

Had I said all luxury cars, then maybe you could say jealousy.

Over here BMW drivers are either drug dealers or old people. :D

this is a horrible and terribly unsafe idea. drivers are going to freak out, slam on their breaks and cause accidents. at the very least there's going to be huge traffic jams from people confused about wtf is happening.

It was some relatively new BMW and yes it's possible.

Over here BMW drivers are either drug dealers or old people. :D

 

Still don't believe it.  The bluetooth systems don't control the vehicle.

Still don't believe it.  The bluetooth systems don't control the vehicle.

 

I never said the Bluetooth system controls the vehicle, It is however an unsecured connection to the cars computer which can control the vehicle. That was how access to the cars main computer was gained. Via its connection to the wheels.

I never said the Bluetooth system controls the vehicle, It is however an unsecured connection to the cars computer which can control the vehicle. That was how access to the cars main computer was gained. Via its connection to the wheels.

Still don't believe it but for arguments sake let's say it was completely true.

It's still bluetooth. So you'd have to be right next to the car in order to hack into it and start controlling things...making it, essentially, a non-issue. Now those remote control starts from your phone. Nope nope nope. Sorry if I lose my phone I don't want to have to worry about losing my car too.

Right next to the vehicle using a transmitter at LEGAL power levels. Why would a hacker who is trying to do something illegal so limit themselves?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluesniping

Also, such attacks were demonstrated at last years DEFCON conference by a group whose project was funded by DARPA (DoD) to see if it were possible.

Still don't believe it but for arguments sake let's say it was completely true.

It's still bluetooth. So you'd have to be right next to the car in order to hack into it and start controlling things...making it, essentially, a non-issue. Now those remote control starts from your phone. Nope nope nope. Sorry if I lose my phone I don't want to have to worry about losing my car too.

 

Using a Bluesniper it's possible to get access to Bluetooth devices from a mile away.

Using a Bluesniper it's possible to get access to Bluetooth devices from a mile away.

With nothing in between sure. But we don't live out in an open field, there are buildings, other cars, trees etc all of which would seriously reduce your range. So like I already said, you'd have to be pretty close to the person.

With nothing in between sure. But we don't live out in an open field, there are buildings, other cars, trees etc all of which would seriously reduce your range. So like I already said, you'd have to be pretty close to the person.

Still has the potential to be dangerous, locking the brakes out on a corner or in populated traffic, from a potential attacker following the target car.

Still don't believe it.  The bluetooth systems don't control the vehicle.

I watched a video on this, it is entirely possible and I've seen it in action. It's quite scary tbh.

 

Regarding the topic, so Missouri is going to blast sound cannons into the jar, making them jump and potentially crash? Nice one government, hi5's all round.

The US is getting more and more aggressive in its law enforcement practices. This is an idea that is ludicrous at face value, so I have no idea how it could progress to actually being implemented. This sounds more like something that would be used by the military.

By aggressive tactics I guess you mean SWAT units, Special Weapons and Tactics.

The term SWAT originated in Philidelphia in 1964, but it took our "liberal" friends in Los Angeles to really start the ball rolling with a large scale use of such military like tactics. Spread wide after a TV show about LA's unit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!