Recommended Posts

MICROSOFT said its fiscal third-quarter profit had declined 6.5 per cent, dragged down by slumping personal-computer sales and a sales-boosting adjustment a year earlier for software upgrades.

 

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/wall-street-journal/microsoft-profit-slides-on-slumping-pc-sales/story-fnay3ubk-1226895572032

 

yeah, sure Microsoft, its all because those pesky PC makers can't sell PCs. Nothing to do with the software they run!

Yeah? Why not post an entire article instead of the very first clickbait heading that uses stupid words like "slide" ?

 

(Reuters) - Microsoft Corp (MSFT) said on Thursday fiscal third-quarter profit fell slightly as sales of personal computers continued to slide, hurting its consumer business, but it still managed to beat Wall Street's pessimistic forecasts.

The world's largest software company reported quarterly profit of $5.66 billion, or 68 cents per share, compared with $6.05 billion, or 72 cents, in the year-ago quarter.

The decline was exaggerated by deferred revenues boosting the year-ago figure, and the latest quarter's profit beat Wall Street's average estimate of 63 cents per share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

Sales fell 0.4 percent to $20.4 billion, meeting analysts' average estimate.

"We would characterize these results as solid in a choppy IT spending environment," said Daniel Ives, an analyst at FBR Capital Markets. "The company benefited from less PC headwinds in the quarter, which helped the overall bread and butter Windows business and contributed to a good top-line performance."

http://www.ibtimes.com/microsoft-msft-beats-wall-streets-estimates-fiscal-q3-although-sales-fall-1576093

Yup $5.66 billion in profit, beats estimates, stock up $1 (2.6%) in after hours trading

Yeah? Why not post an entire article instead of the very first clickbait heading that uses stupid words like "slide" ?

 

http://www.ibtimes.com/microsoft-msft-beats-wall-streets-estimates-fiscal-q3-although-sales-fall-1576093

Yup $5.66 billion in profit, beats estimates, stock up $1 (2.6%) in after hours trading. Clearly doom and gloom :rolleyes:

 

 

Itz coolz teh hates da M$.  All the kids are doing it.  You didn't get the memo?  :woot:

 

Good job Microsoft.  I will say this over and over again, when Microsoft is focused, they bring forth results.

Terrible OS design for desktops, no new functionality. The only reason to purchase the OS is when the old desktop dies - at that point most go for an Android or Apple tablet, I mean who would go for Windows - there have been terrible feedback from such and such in the office!

Terrible OS design for desktops, no new functionality. The only reason to purchase the OS is when the old desktop dies - at that point most go for an Android or Apple tablet, I mean who would go for Windows - there have been terrible feedback from such and such in the office!

That bad huh?

Terrible OS design for desktops, no new functionality. The only reason to purchase the OS is when the old desktop dies - at that point most go for an Android or Apple tablet, I mean who would go for Windows - there have been terrible feedback from such and such in the office!

 

Oh you know, only ~80% of the desktops/laptops on the planet. Not many.  Lol.

 

SUCH AND SUCH said that? OH NO! It must be true.

  • Like 2

Terrible OS design for desktops, no new functionality. The only reason to purchase the OS is when the old desktop dies - at that point most go for an Android or Apple tablet, I mean who would go for Windows - there have been terrible feedback from such and such in the office!

The only thing terrible is how poor a job Microsoft has done in educating users how to use Windows 8. When trained and shown how to customize the Start Screen, users see and enjoy the benefits and the time-savings. It's mainly when people attempt to apply their old methods of using a computer without objective (and dare I say, positive) guidance that you have negative feedback.

Instead of the "Hi" and "You can get new apps from the store" messages, a program should start that guides users in customizing their Start Screen with the programs, apps, people, websites, and content that matters to them. When people without a pre-conceived bias are shown how to do this, they generally like Windows 8.

-Forjo

  • Like 3

The only thing terrible is how poor a job Microsoft has done in educating users how to use Windows 8. When trained and shown how to customize the Start Screen, users see and enjoy the benefits and the time-savings. It's mainly when people attempt to apply their old methods of using a computer without objective (and dare I say, positive) guidance that you have negative feedback.

Instead of the "Hi" and "You can get new apps from the store" messages, a program should start that guides users in customizing their Start Screen with the programs, apps, people, websites, and content that matters to them. When people without a pre-conceived bias are shown how to do this, they generally like Windows 8.

-Forjo

My job actually exists because of Windows 8 I feel. I help bridge the gap for people to be able to get behind Windows 8. The problem is that I feel a lot of this shouldn't need explanation. I shouldn't get calls simply because someone can't figure out how to close an application.

 

Microsoft should have bridged the gap better, and it sucks when you're trying to sell a computer that has bad reviews, only for the reviews to be about Windows 8 and absolutely nothing to do with the hardware at hand. :/

Terrible OS design for desktops, no new functionality. The only reason to purchase the OS is when the old desktop dies - at that point most go for an Android or Apple tablet, I mean who would go for Windows - there have been terrible feedback from such and such in the office!

 

No idea what is bad about the OS design for windows. Have no problem at all and it's just sad I'll be stuck with that horrible and cluttered useless start menu soon just because a bunch of nitwit clowns decided to blow up a storm on a none issue.

 

Windows 8 is by far superior to any previous OS, it runs smoother and on more hardware than 7 and 'just works' ..

 

Good luck using your Android or Apple tablets for any serious productivity work. All they do is basically be controllers for other hardware. And no, I did not miss the release of 'Office' for iPad.. I suggest you do a proper 1:1 compare with Office running on a Windows platform, including the tablets.

 

Most of the people providing the 'bad feedback' are going on hearsay and have not even really used windows 8. Just like with Xbox the loud minority managed to force MSFT to take out some innovative and great features or water them down. And I'll give you that MSFT is in part to blame for still not being able to sell their own product at their worth.

Yesterday after MS' earnings announcement, there were people making comments such as "They said that Microsoft was doomed." Others replied back with comments such as "Who said that" implying it never happened.

 

This is an example of one of those people who said "Microsoft is doomed" and you can find a good number of others that like it. But the next time around it will all be forgotten, and the attacks will start again.

My job actually exists because of Windows 8 I feel. I help bridge the gap for people to be able to get behind Windows 8. The problem is that I feel a lot of this shouldn't need explanation. I shouldn't get calls simply because someone can't figure out how to close an application.

 

Microsoft should have bridged the gap better, and it sucks when you're trying to sell a computer that has bad reviews, only for the reviews to be about Windows 8 and absolutely nothing to do with the hardware at hand. :/

You are absolutely correct. Microsoft has done a VERY poor job educating users. They should have worked harder to ease the transition.

In your example, for instance, Microsoft could have actually TOUTED "and new in Windows 8, don't WORRY about closing applications. We'll manage that for you. Just click or press the Start Flag to find your next destination."

But the OS was never properly introduced. So people resort to hating what they don't understand.

-Forjo

We already knew PC sales were in decline. The decline started before Windows 8.

 

Think of the PC decline before Windows 8 like a helium balloon slowly starting fall to the ground. Then think of "Windows 8" as a bazooka shot at that already in-trouble balloon.

  • Like 2

I don't see Windows existing in 5-10 years. It's just obsolete these days.

 

 

Thats just so laughable I would say windows going to around a long time.  In fact it will probable grow once windows 9 comes out.  Tablets disposble things. Not many people use them for serious work. In fact look at apples ipad sales they look to be going down. 

  • Like 3

Thats just so laughable I would say windows going to around a long time.  In fact it will probable grow once windows 9 comes out.  Tablets disposble things. Not many people use them for serious work. In fact look at apples ipad sales they look to be going down. 

Do people use smartphones for serious work? And how many of those are sold each year? The point being, serious work only makes up a tiny proportion of computing devices. Most of them are for content consumption and entertainment.

 

And even if that were the case, there's nothing stopping someone from docking their tablet or phone into a large screen and keyboard. They'll always be a place for high-end devices, but it will become more niche over time. Linux and OS X can easily fill that requirement anyway.

The only thing terrible is how poor a job Microsoft has done in educating users how to use Windows 8. When trained and shown how to customize the Start Screen, users see and enjoy the benefits and the time-savings. It's mainly when people attempt to apply their old methods of using a computer without objective (and dare I say, positive) guidance that you have negative feedback.Instead of the "Hi" and "You can get new apps from the store" messages, a program should start that guides users in customizing their Start Screen with the programs, apps, people, websites, and content that matters to them. When people without a pre-conceived bias are shown how to do this, they generally like Windows 8.-Forjo

So, users need to be guided on how to turn Windows 8, back into 7 .... :p

The point being, serious work only makes up a tiny proportion of computing devices. Most of them are for content consumption and entertainment. *snip *They'll always be a place for high-end devices, but it will become more niche over time. Linux and OS X can easily fill that requirement anyway.

Chuckling as I read this from my Windows tablet. Considering millions of people are using it for 'serious' work, millions of people are paying money hand over fist for gaming consoles instead of buying Flappy Bird, companies are even paying through the nose to make sure their XP systems which should have been dead and buried a few years back are still workable.. And wait.. you're saying Windows is going to be replaced because it's an outdated desktop paradigm... and it'll be replaced by Linux and OSX. Two other desktop OS's? Brilliant.

So, users need to be guided on how to turn Windows 8, back into 7 .... :p

Mm they did do a rather bad job with the transition with 8.0. "Hi!", which was essentially getting shoved into the deep end of the pool. Well, at least 8.2? 8.1 Update 2? Whatever it'll be called looks to get it back to something everybody's familiar with and then have the option to go the full Modern route if thats your thing.
  • Like 2

I don't see Windows existing in 5-10 years. It's just obsolete these days.

 

Windows as we know it today won't exist in 5-10 years, except for the people who refuse to stay current. There will still be a Microsoft computing platform though.

Windows as we know it today won't exist in 5-10 years, except for the people who refuse to stay current. There will still be a Microsoft computing platform though.

You can say that for everything Android and IOS will look very different then way they are now.

You can say that for everything Android and IOS will look very different then way they are now.

 

I'm not just talking about how it looks, I am talking about how Windows will be embedded inside everything from shoes to shower curtains.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!