Jeremy Clarkson 'begs forgiveness' over N-word footage


Recommended Posts

+NJ Louch

He didn't say the word.  Simple as that.

 

Unless "Curgh a nurgh burgh hurgh turgh" is suddenly offensive

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
LOC

Wait, the N word is in that nursery rhyme in the UK? I could have sworn here in the US that word should have been, uh...tiger?

Link to post
Share on other sites
MindTrickz

Oh you know how it goes in today's society. Something is only racist if a white man says it.

 

Yes, and lets completely forget that it was white men that enslaved black african men, and created that very word to derogate and disparage said black men. Yes indeed, let's forget all that, because white men are the true victims.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Phouchg

White men enslaved other white men long before they enslaved black men. Black men enslaved other black men long before they sold other black men to be enslaved by white men. In fact, they still do, by and large. And then there's all sorts of differently colored men that enslaved other men in between all that. But we'll have none of that, obviously, because it just might be inconvenient to know at best.

 

Stop banging the drums. None of that is going to help.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
FloatingFatMan

Yes, and lets completely forget that it was white men that enslaved black african men, and created that very word to derogate and disparage said black men. Yes indeed, let's forget all that, because white men are the true victims.

 

Let us also completely forget that those same black African men employed slavery themselves, and actually sold rather a lot of their fellow black African men to the evil evil white European & American men.

 

Slavery has always happened throughout history. You don't hear people crapping on the Romans/Italians for once enslaving most of Europe, do you?

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
leesmithg

Clarkson is a public school boy Nazi.

 

He is brash and boring an as far as I am concerned very very very far right, near touching the B.N.P.

 

I want him sacked from the B.B.C. I pay for them to employ him.

 

If I stopped paying a t.v. licence I could spend a month in jail.

 

He calling someone a N****R gets him wanted publicity.

 

I don't watch his crappy shoes on Dave as I ma not interested in cars.

 

I have noticed in Britian over the past 40 years, that racism has increased an it's because of morons like Clarkson.


Clarkson is a public school boy Nazi.

 

He is brash and boring an as far as I am concerned very very very far right, near touching the B.N.P.

 

I want him sacked from the B.B.C. I pay for them to employ him.

 

If I stopped paying a t.v. licence I could spend a month in jail.

 

He calling someone a N****R gets him wanted publicity.

 

I don't watch his crappy shoes on Dave as I ma not interested in cars.

 

I have noticed in Britian over the past 40 years, that racism has increased an it's because of morons like Clarkson.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Raa

If the video is accurate, I honestly can't see the issue here.

I'd be hard pressed to make the word out in the video, not to mention the fact it's not even aired!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dotdot

Nobody. Clarkson literally owns the show. Without him, there is no Top Gear.

 

This is all just a witch hunt anyway.. Seriously? People getting upset over a deliberately mumbled word that was NEVER AIRED but, in fact, left on the cutting room floor?

 

Sheesh...

 

Besides which, Top Gear thrives on controversy.. The Beeb love it.

This.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+NJ Louch
Clarkson is a public school boy Nazi.

 

Is where any right minded person should stop reading...

 

I want him sacked from the B.B.C. I pay for them to employ him.

 

You continue to completely misunderstand TV licensing, and use these false arguments ALL the time.

 

If I stopped paying a t.v. licence I could spend a month in jail.

 

Not at all.  Oh wait, you mean if you accessed their services without paying?  You mean if you went and broke the law?

 

He calling someone a N****R gets him wanted publicity.

 

 

Who exactly did he call that word??? Show me!

 

I don't watch his crappy shoes on Dave as I ma not interested in cars.

 

Irrelevant!?

 

I have noticed in Britian over the past 40 years, that racism has increased an it's because of morons like Clarkson.

 

Absolute toss!

 

Now, as for saying he is near BNP - you just made your entire argument a joke.  He mocks the right wing views, he doesn't subscribe to them.  That is his schtick - and if you can't understand that, then that is your problem, and not his.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K

He didn't say the word.  Simple as that.

 

Unless "Curgh a nurgh burgh hurgh turgh" is suddenly offensive

 

Yes!  Yes it is to narrow minded racist fools.

Link to post
Share on other sites
MikeChipshop

Let us also completely forget that those same black African men employed slavery themselves, and actually sold rather a lot of their fellow black African men to the evil evil white European & American men.

 

Slavery has always happened throughout history. You don't hear people crapping on the Romans/Italians for once enslaving most of Europe, do you?

 

Quoted because this is exactly what i was going to say. I'm not guilty of being white.

Link to post
Share on other sites
MindTrickz

White men enslaved other white men long before they enslaved black men. Black men enslaved other black men long before they sold other black men to be enslaved by white men. In fact, they still do, by and large. And then there's all sorts of differently colored men that enslaved other men in between all that. But we'll have none of that, obviously, because it just might be inconvenient to know at best.

 

Stop banging the drums. None of that is going to help.

 

Yeah, in this reponse, which I feel is aimed at me, you're arguing against positions I didn't make at all. So I'm not going to go on the defensive on something I didn't say.

 

Onto my second point. This entire discussion is about the word Ni##er. Let's take it from the top: Someone brought up rappers using the word, in defense of Jeremy Clarkson using it. At this point ignoring the obvious difference between Nigger and Nigga. And then another poster cleaverly remarked that in today's society only white people can be racists. To which I pointed out that white men created this particuller derogatory to term for the black men that they were enslaving. I was pointing out the obvious historical context surrounding this word. How white men have used it for 400 years and to this very day to disparage black men.

 

 

Let us also completely forget that those same black African men employed slavery themselves, and actually sold rather a lot of their fellow black African men to the evil evil white European & American men.

 

Slavery has always happened throughout history. You don't hear people crapping on the Romans/Italians for once enslaving most of Europe, do you?

 

But the discussion is not about slavery as such. That is another discussion entirely. As I mentioned above you, the discussion is about the racial slur. Slavery was brought up to highlight the orirign of the word.

Link to post
Share on other sites
MikeChipshop

Clarkson is a public school boy Nazi.

 

He is brash and boring an as far as I am concerned very very very far right, near touching the B.N.P.

 

I want him sacked from the B.B.C. I pay for them to employ him.

 

If I stopped paying a t.v. licence I could spend a month in jail.

 

He calling someone a N****R gets him wanted publicity.

 

I don't watch his crappy shoes on Dave as I ma not interested in cars.

 

I have noticed in Britian over the past 40 years, that racism has increased an it's because of morons like Clarkson.

Clarkson is a public school boy Nazi.

 

He is brash and boring an as far as I am concerned very very very far right, near touching the B.N.P.

 

I want him sacked from the B.B.C. I pay for them to employ him.

 

If I stopped paying a t.v. licence I could spend a month in jail.

 

He calling someone a N****R gets him wanted publicity.

 

I don't watch his crappy shoes on Dave as I ma not interested in cars.

 

I have noticed in Britian over the past 40 years, that racism has increased an it's because of morons like Clarkson.

 

Maybe you should try watching the video before claiming he called some one a ni*****

Link to post
Share on other sites
+NJ Louch

Mindtrickz:  So you argue that it has changed context but also it has not changed context, dependant upon the skin colour of who is saying it (if a black man says it, it clearly has an "a" at the end, right?)...

 

Hmmmmmmmmmm

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
cacoe

Maybe you should try watching the video before claiming he called some one a ni*****

 

Sounds like either flamebait to me or someone really didn't like Clarkson before this little fiasco.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Soldiers33

Wheres the so called freedom of speech? I have never understood people who call up to complain. Yes sometimes I complain at TV's but I dont go ringing up companies to tell them Im not pleased with something.

Link to post
Share on other sites
dauma

He said "ni gger" or "negro"?
Edit: looked at wikipedia. And why there's an edit in neowin since "ni gger" isn't under law in my country?

Link to post
Share on other sites
blerk

 

 

Poetry as flamebait?

 

:laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites
+NJ Louch
Wheres the so called freedom of speech? I have never understood people who call up to complain. Yes sometimes I complain at TV's but I dont go ringing up companies to tell them Im not pleased with something.

 

You need to firstly understand what freedom of speech ACTUALLY means.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_by_country#United_Kingdom

 

But yeah, some people look to be offended and complain, and Top Gear is prime for it.

 

That said, if he got someone black on, berated him and called him that word, then yes, complaints are just.

Link to post
Share on other sites
cacoe

Maybe you should try watching the video before claiming he called some one a ni*****

 

 

 

Sounds like either flamebait to me or someone really didn't like Clarkson before this little fiasco.

 

I want him sacked from the B.B.C. I pay for them to employ him.

 

Oh really, you pay his whole wage? Nope, a tiny amount of the money you pay for your TV licence (probably a penny or less) goes to Clarkson. This does not mean you have a direct right to demand they sack someone (and actually expect it to happen). You would go to jail for not paying your TV licence because it is law that you must pay it if you watch live broadcast television. 

 

Two statements here, taken out of context to make people feel that they're been treated wrongly. You should write for The Daily Mail :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
MindTrickz

Mindtrickz:  So you argue that it has changed context but also it has not changed context, dependant upon the skin colour of who is saying it (if a black man says it, it clearly has an "a" at the end, right?)...

 

Hmmmmmmmmmm

 

No, I'm not. But that word has a changed context depending on the ending. One is the original ending with "ER", that even black people do not use. The other is the one black people/rappers use. It's context is similair to "dude" or "man". "What's up n-word", "What's up, dude", "What's up, man". So why exactly are black uncomfortable with white people using the later definition? Well supposedly because of how close the two words sound and the prelevant of racism and racists that still use the first definition.

 

Now, can a white person say either of those words without any malice? Absolutely. For example, If I'm on public transportation and a white kid whose rapping along a song says N**a, I'll probably side-eye him but think nothing of it. But if this same kid said "N**er", I'd probably think "WTF".

 

Returning to the topic. Jeremy Clarkson used the one that black peope themselves don't use.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+xrobwx71

Why not use the replacement word Tiger Like we did when I was a kid when the ol parents were around. I know,I know, those poor tigers.  :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
MindTrickz

Wheres the so called freedom of speech? I have never understood people who call up to complain. Yes sometimes I complain at TV's but I dont go ringing up companies to tell them Im not pleased with something.

 

Freedom of speech does not protect against hate speech. You should know that. You also can not call in bomb threat and cite freedom of speech. You can't call your boss an a-hole and cite free speech when you find yourself without a job. Freedom of speech protects you from the government. But it does not protect you from consequence outside of the government.

 

The BBC happens to be public and government owned, but this returns us to the first thing I mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites
timster

nobody should EVER have to apologize or beg for forgiveness for speaking, or inaudibly slurring a word.

 

####ing political correctness has turned everything into something offensive.

Link to post
Share on other sites
FloatingFatMan

He calling someone a N****R gets him wanted publicity.

 

He didn't call anyone that, but don't let facts or reality dissuade from your hatred of the guy.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zikalify
      UK creates a new unit in the CMA to regulate big tech
      by Paul Hill



      The UK government has announced the creation of the Digital Markets Unit that will oversee “a pro-competition regime” for tech giants such as Facebook and Google. The creation of such a body comes with numerous benefits and ensures that platforms like Google and Facebook don’t become too powerful.

      One of the duties of the new unit, which is being set up within the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), is that consumers will be given more choice and control over the use of their data. The regulator will ensure that platforms, including those funded through digital ads, are transparent about the services they provide and how consumer data is being used. It will also ensure consumers have a choice over whether they receive personalised ads and that companies can’t place restrictions on their customers that makes it difficult to use rival platforms.

      The regulator could be good for small businesses too as they’ll have fair access to things like digital advertising. Under the new code, firms would be prohibited from applying unfair terms, conditions or policies to certain business customers, including news publishers.

      Regarding news publishers, it is no secret that things have got tough as physical newspaper sales have declined. One way in which they gain readers is through services like Google News. The new regulator will be able to govern commercial arrangements between publishers and platforms to ensure things remain fair for both parties. The government believes these powers will “enhance the sustainability of high-quality online journalism and news publishing in the UK.”

      Commenting on the new regulator, Business Secretary Alok Sharma said:

      The government said that the Digital Markets Unit will begin work in April and will have the ability to suspend, block and reverse decisions of tech giants. It will also be able to issue orders to tech firms to take certain actions to achieve code compliance and impose fines on those that do not come into compliance.

    • By zikalify
      UK MPs criticise lacklustre tech sustainability efforts
      by Paul Hill



      A new report from UK Members of Parliament (MPs) has criticised Amazon and other online retailers for not pulling their weight when it comes to collecting electronic waste from consumers. They said that high streets are under “severe pressure” and new laws due in 2021 will only entrench online retailers’ unfair position.

      The report highlighted that the UK is currently the second-highest contributor of electronic waste driven by relentless consumption of new tech products, the inability to repair some devices, and relatively short software support. To add to the problems, a lot of this waste is going to landfill, being incinerated or dumped overseas which is sometimes illegal.

      According to the report, even if you send it off for recycling, the device still may be processed incorrectly:

      The report highlighted a wide range of solutions to address these issues, they include:

      Online retailers must allow customers to send back electronic waste; Online marketplaces should ensure all electrical equipment sold on their website is compliant with the law and producers should pay the same responsibility fees they pay to sell offline; The government should ban the practice of intentionally shortening the lifespan of products through planned obsolescence; Devices should be labelled with their expected lifetime including how long they will receive software updates, how repairable they are, whether spare parts of accessible and affordable and how accessible repair manuals are; They said the government should give people the right to repair electronic products in law which would require producers to supply repair manuals, affordable spare parts for products, and for products to be designed so that repair is not prevented through limited access to physical or software tools; VAT charged on repairs should be reduced to make the option more attractive to customers; Manufacturers should ensure their products are recyclable and dismantlable by waste treatment operators. They should provide recyclers with information about the materials and quantities of the materials used in the products. To help achieve these, the government should offer incentives and fast-track the national material datahub to help monitor the movements of rare materials critical to our healthcare, defence, and low-carbon technologies; The government should spend more money on high-quality recycling methods that ensure that rare materials are recovered for reuse; The Environment Agency in England should undertake stronger enforcement and actively collect data to estimate the actual quantities of E-waste being exported illegally. In 2015, all 193 member states of the United Nations signed up to the Sustainable Development Goals which are supposed to be met by 2030. Goal 12 - Responsible consumption and production, has several indicators to see if countries are meeting their pledges. According to SDG Index, many areas including Europe, Canada, the US, Australia, New Zealand and several others have huge challenges to solve when it comes to electronic waste.

    • By zikalify
      UK government sets less ambitious gigabit broadband goal
      by Paul Hill



      The UK’s Chancellor, Rishi Sunak, has announced that the country’s original plan to bring gigabit broadband to every home in the country by 2025 has been scaled back so that the technology will be available in 85% of residences. While those in towns and cities around the country will likely be unaffected by the watering down of the plan, those out in more rural areas will be left with poorer internet connections.

      According to the BBC, commercial deployments of gigabit fibre are expected to reach more than 70% of premises by the end of 2025 without help from the government. Under the initial plans, the government would have helped with the last 30% of connections but this has now been reduced to 15%.

      Previously, the government cast doubt on whether it would ever have reached the 100% target because about 1% of very remote homes would have been really expensive to connect. Many of those living outside towns and cities typically have speeds under 30Mbps and over the next decade may begin to see the limitations of their network as they try to connect more Internet of Things devices such as smart home gadgets.

      Interestingly, the government has not scaled back the budget for this work, keeping it at £5 billion. What has changed, though, is that the amount it will spend next year is much lower. Up to 2024, only £1.2 billion of the £5 billion will be spent with the rest of the money coming nearer the deadline.

      Source: BBC News

    • By Jefferson Mangubat
      Samsung Chromebook 4 series is now available to purchase in the UK
      by Jefferson Mangubat

      Samsung has rolled out the Chromebook 4 and Chromebook 4+ to the UK market. The Chromebook 4 series was initially announced last year for budget-conscious consumers.

      Starting today, UK customers can purchase the Chromebook 4 in Platinum Titan for £299.99 via Samsung UK's online marketplace. If you opt for its larger and heavier sibling, you can snap up the Chromebook 4+ in the same color offered in two storage variants for £349.99 (32GB storage) and £379 (64GB variant).

      Both laptops are thin and lightweight, although the Chromebook 4+ weighs 3.7 pounds while the smaller variant comes in at 2.6 pounds. As a quick reminder, the Chromebook 4+ has a 15.6-inch FullHD display while the Chromebook 4 sports an 11.6-inch HD screen. Both variants have narrow bezels.

      This lineup is powered by Intel's Celeron N4000 (Gemini Lake) processor and feature Intel's UHD Graphics 600. The Chromebook 4 series come with 4GB of RAM. Of course, both laptops come with the Google Play Store preloaded to run Android apps. Finally, the Chromebook 4 series is integrated with Google Assistant to let you perform various tasks such as responding to a message or checking the news just by using your voice.

    • By Ather Fawaz
      U.K. considering banning the installation of Huawei equipment by September 2021
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via Dawn.com The United Kingdom is considering a ban on the installation of Huawei's 5G equipment as concerns over privacy issues linked to Huawei equipment continue to loom large. Citing people familiar with the matter, Bloomberg writes that the ban could come as early as September next year.

      Lawmakers from the Conservative Party have voiced these demands via a telecommunications bill that is due in parliament next week. The draft legislation proposes fines of as much as 10% of sales or 100,000 pounds ($133,000) a day for violations. This would affect prominent U.K. carriers like Vodafone and BT Group, who have already warned that the country could face blackouts if they’re forced to remove Huawei products from their networks over national security concerns.

      The government is due to publish more details about diversifying the U.K. 5G supply chain in the next few weeks. Should this bill pass, the pressure will shift to companies like Nokia Oyj and Ericsson as U.K. networks would seek their equipment.

      This proposal comes at a time when lawmakers are pushing for enforcing a stricter ban on the use of Huawei telecommunication equipment in the country. Earlier in July, the government decided that all existing 5G infrastructure from the Chinese electronics manufacturer must be removed from networks by 2027. This ban on installing Huawei equipment would also add to the strict legislation surrounding the buying of the firm's equipment that is meant to kick in next month.

      Source: Bloomberg