Google is testing a completely redesigned Gmail interface


Recommended Posts

post-23147-0-62342700-1399755196.png

 

Gmail may soon look nothing like the Gmail we all know so well. Google has invited a select group of users to test a completely new interface for the webmail client, according to Geek.com, which appears to be part of the trial. The test version of Gmail ? which may never see an official release ? dispenses with design elements that have been present from the very early days of the email service. Most notably, the unwieldily sidebar has been replaced with a slide-in pane. Buttons like "compose" have been moved to the bottom right corner, and it looks like there's another new feature down there: reminders. Just like on Android, you should be able to tell Google to let you know about a date in the future or to respond to a certain email. Hangouts, of course, are also integrated into the design. And cosmetically, there are major changes afoot that make the interface look right at home next to Google Now.

 

Source: http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/10/5704452/screenshots-suggest-google-is-testing-a-completely-redesigned-gmail

  On 10/05/2014 at 21:06, simrat said:

I dont use gmail, but for some reasons this design looks cool, but for mobile mode only.

 

I'm pretty sure there isn't a single phone that doesn't have a mail client anymore... that's all gmail is useful for anyway. 

Look at all the space for ads! Google will probably go this route, using all the ads from their promotions tab.

  • Like 3

I wonder if there's a way to track how many people actually visit the web page for GMail versus how many people iMap/POP into it from client software like Outlook/Thunderbird/Evolution.  I know the only time I use the web interface is if I'm away from home.

Wonder if it's like on YouTube where you can click the menu thingy at the top and hide, unhide elements as you see fit 


  On 10/05/2014 at 21:54, Gerowen said:

I wonder if there's a way to track how many people actually visit the web page for GMail versus how many people iMap/POP into it from client software like Outlook/Thunderbird/Evolution.  I know the only time I use the web interface is if I'm away from home.

 

I know most of my mail is done on the phone or tablet, rarely go into the web interface anymore 

  On 10/05/2014 at 21:54, Gerowen said:

I wonder if there's a way to track how many people actually visit the web page for GMail versus how many people iMap/POP into it from client software like Outlook/Thunderbird/Evolution.  I know the only time I use the web interface is if I'm away from home.

I switched away from gmail because I hated its weird non-standard IMAP implementation :/

  On 10/05/2014 at 21:56, ViperAFK said:

I switched away from gmail because I hated its weird non-standard IMAP implementation :/

 

That's cool, but all the others blow chunks as an email service, so I've stuck with Gmail for quite a while now

  On 10/05/2014 at 21:56, ViperAFK said:

I switched away from gmail because I hated its weird non-standard IMAP implementation :/

 

Because IMAP assumes folders. Unfortunately, everyone that implements standard IMAP also uses folders, which really sucks compared to labels.

  On 11/05/2014 at 00:12, primexx said:

Because IMAP assumes folders. Unfortunately, everyone that implements standard IMAP also uses folders, which really sucks compared to labels.

I'd much rather use folders than deal with the quirkiness of labels with IMAP.

  • Like 1
  On 10/05/2014 at 22:00, Anibal P said:

That's cool, but all the others blow chunks as an email service, so I've stuck with Gmail for quite a while now

Outlook is better.

  • Like 2
  On 11/05/2014 at 01:20, ViperAFK said:

I'd much rather use folders than deal with the quirkiness of labels with IMAP.

 

I'd personally use folders over labels any time. more sense, more organized and you can still tag them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They forgot this slide: "If I get a Mac I won't be able to play games, therefore I will have more time for my studies."
    • It’s not desperation, it’s marketing. Companies do that…
    • Some AMD Ryzen users can get free Windows performance boost with this simple system tweak by Sayan Sen AMD understands that there is a lot of demand for its X3D processors and for good reason too, since they offer some of the best gaming experiences. As such, the company plans to launch a new 6-core Ryzen 5 9600X3D for those who may not want to spend top dollar on a 9800X3D. What makes X3D special is the densely packed last level cache (LLC) wherein the L3 (level 3) cache is 3D die-stacked such that there is a whole lot of it that the cores can access on demand all within the smallest footprint. This is said to help with latency especially, and games happen to be quite sensitive to it since they are a mixed workload and so there is a lot of to-and-fro. However, despite that fact, users have noticed micro-stuttering and freezes on Ryzen X3D CPUs. Although there is no official fix, some of the affected users have managed to resolve the issues by tweaking a motherboard setting. The tweak is related to a setting called "GLOBAL C-STATE CONTROL" (it may be called something else by your motherboard vendor) and changing it to 'Enabled' from 'Auto' could fix stuttering and lag-related issues in games. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states or C-states. While P-states or performance states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, are disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked. The Global C-state control setting helps users manage not only the DF and CPU core C-states but also the I/O C-states too. For those wondering, DF here refers to Data Fabric or AMD's high bandwidth Infinity Fabric interconnect between CPUs, GPUs, and more, on AMD systems. By default, this is set to "Auto" which also means that it is "Enabled" by default. However, in the case of X3D parts, Auto may set this setting to "Disabled" and thus manually toggling it to "Enabled" may be necessary. X3D processors, the dual CCD (core complex die) ones especially, have their V-cache on a single CCD. If the CPPC (Collaborative Processor Performance Control), which lets an OS like Windows control the "preferred core" and clock speed boost, isn't working optimally to assign the correct gaming CCD, then this fix could well work. Global C-State Auto: Global C-State Enabled: We ran a benchmark on our Ryzen 9 9950X3D to see if toggling the settings would make a difference, and well, it didn't in the case of AIDA64. However, since this is a synthetic test that measures cache and memory exclusively, we can't definitively conclude that the fix will also not make a difference in the case of games. Another remedy for stuttering is to disable the monitoring of the "Power percent" metric on MSI Afterburner if you have it on. This has been a long-known issue and in fact can help you even if you are not using an X3D CPU. Source: Reddit (link1, link2) via YouTube
    • I only have one contact on WhatsApp. And that contact has sms also. I have many more contacts that use WhatsApp also, but everyone defaults to use iMessage, SMS or RCS anyway. Not a loss for me. I'm in Norway where mostly nobody uses WhatsApp.
    • Apple is boring for a kid. Only fun is browsing websites for HTML games. A PC with steam is another story. Of course if the child plays video games all day then maybe that might not be a good idea. :-)
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DecaffKnight94 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      S.P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      adxnksd42031 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rising Star
      aphanic went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • Contributor
      GravityDead went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      663
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      261
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      234
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      157
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      151
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!