Recommended Posts

Let's just hope it's not a poorly optimized mess like GTA IV.

 

It's supposedly well optimized and the graphics have been updated - according to Rockstar. Will have to wait and see what the reality is.

Let's just hope it's not a poorly optimized mess like GTA IV.

 

It's using the same engine as Max Payne 3 right? I expect that it'll be much better than GTA4 if that is the case. Super excited :happy:

 

Also, to all those who petitioned that it stay on consoles:

 

594.gif

It's using the same engine as Max Payne 3 right? I expect that it'll be much better than GTA4 if that is the case. Super excited :happy:

 

Also, to all those who petitioned that it stay on consoles:

 

594.gif

 

I never played Max Payne 3 (I should). So I don't know anything about it's engine.

 

And people really petitioned to keep it consoles only? Why on earth?

I never played Max Payne 3 (I should). So I don't know anything about it's engine.

 

And people really petitioned to keep it consoles only? Why on earth?

No idea, It sounds like good business sense to me, more people buying your product=more profit etc...

(My post was just an inside joke from an old console vs pc debate)

Yep I have to admit I wasn't aware of people petitioning to keep it on console and I certainly wouldn't support it either!

 

I'm really torn on this, I enjoyed the short time I had on GTA V but im not sure I would want to replay it and re-earn everything I did on XB360. This might be a game I pickup only if my friends do.

One less reason to get either of the next gen systems anytime soon for me.  Heck, with all the stuff coming in 2015 there's really very little reason to get either this year for me.

It's using the same engine as Max Payne 3 right? I expect that it'll be much better than GTA4 if that is the case. Super excited :happy:

 

Also, to all those who petitioned that it stay on consoles:

 

594.gif

Yeah, I've regained some confidence in rockstar's pc porting after playing Max Payne 3, that game looked amazing and ran very well.

And people really petitioned to keep it consoles only? Why on earth?

 

No idea, here's the petition: https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/rockstar-games-dont-make-a-pc-version-of-gta-v

 

It made the rounds on some websites a while back. Doesn't look like it gained much traction from anything other than trolls though :).

Me. Getting it on Xbox one.

 

I will be getting this for either PS 4 or Xbox One. I don't own either one.  I last had a PS2 and that's it.  I went xbox and didn't go back.   I really want a Xbox one, but I will wait.  If they say GTA 5 WILL be 1080p for X1, then I'll instantly go buy it.  If not, then I'll make my way back to PS.  This is the game that decides it for me.  

No idea, here's the petition: https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/rockstar-games-dont-make-a-pc-version-of-gta-v

 

It made the rounds on some websites a while back. Doesn't look like it gained much traction from anything other than trolls though :).

 

Petty children, that petition. :rolleyes:

Yeah, I've regained some confidence in rockstar's pc porting after playing Max Payne 3, that game looked amazing and ran very well.

 

The thing about Max Payne 3 was that each loaded environment wasn't as large and expansive as loading an entire city a-la GTA. I'm definitely hoping for a fluid game though!

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      119
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!