Recommended Posts

Let's just hope it's not a poorly optimized mess like GTA IV.

 

It's supposedly well optimized and the graphics have been updated - according to Rockstar. Will have to wait and see what the reality is.

Let's just hope it's not a poorly optimized mess like GTA IV.

 

It's using the same engine as Max Payne 3 right? I expect that it'll be much better than GTA4 if that is the case. Super excited :happy:

 

Also, to all those who petitioned that it stay on consoles:

 

594.gif

It's using the same engine as Max Payne 3 right? I expect that it'll be much better than GTA4 if that is the case. Super excited :happy:

 

Also, to all those who petitioned that it stay on consoles:

 

594.gif

 

I never played Max Payne 3 (I should). So I don't know anything about it's engine.

 

And people really petitioned to keep it consoles only? Why on earth?

I never played Max Payne 3 (I should). So I don't know anything about it's engine.

 

And people really petitioned to keep it consoles only? Why on earth?

No idea, It sounds like good business sense to me, more people buying your product=more profit etc...

(My post was just an inside joke from an old console vs pc debate)

Yep I have to admit I wasn't aware of people petitioning to keep it on console and I certainly wouldn't support it either!

 

I'm really torn on this, I enjoyed the short time I had on GTA V but im not sure I would want to replay it and re-earn everything I did on XB360. This might be a game I pickup only if my friends do.

One less reason to get either of the next gen systems anytime soon for me.  Heck, with all the stuff coming in 2015 there's really very little reason to get either this year for me.

It's using the same engine as Max Payne 3 right? I expect that it'll be much better than GTA4 if that is the case. Super excited :happy:

 

Also, to all those who petitioned that it stay on consoles:

 

594.gif

Yeah, I've regained some confidence in rockstar's pc porting after playing Max Payne 3, that game looked amazing and ran very well.

And people really petitioned to keep it consoles only? Why on earth?

 

No idea, here's the petition: https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/rockstar-games-dont-make-a-pc-version-of-gta-v

 

It made the rounds on some websites a while back. Doesn't look like it gained much traction from anything other than trolls though :).

Me. Getting it on Xbox one.

 

I will be getting this for either PS 4 or Xbox One. I don't own either one.  I last had a PS2 and that's it.  I went xbox and didn't go back.   I really want a Xbox one, but I will wait.  If they say GTA 5 WILL be 1080p for X1, then I'll instantly go buy it.  If not, then I'll make my way back to PS.  This is the game that decides it for me.  

No idea, here's the petition: https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/rockstar-games-dont-make-a-pc-version-of-gta-v

 

It made the rounds on some websites a while back. Doesn't look like it gained much traction from anything other than trolls though :).

 

Petty children, that petition. :rolleyes:

Yeah, I've regained some confidence in rockstar's pc porting after playing Max Payne 3, that game looked amazing and ran very well.

 

The thing about Max Payne 3 was that each loaded environment wasn't as large and expansive as loading an entire city a-la GTA. I'm definitely hoping for a fluid game though!

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!