Dearborn man charged with second degree murder in death of soccer referee


Recommended Posts

The ref was from our city. Nice guy :(

Link....

Dearborn man charged with second degree murder in death of soccer referee

Press release from the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office:

Today Prosecutor Kym L. Worthy has amended charges for Bassel Abdul-Amir Saad, 36 (DOB: 2/28/78) of Dearborn, in connection with the death of 44-year-old soccer referee John Bieniewicz of Westland. On June 29, 2014 at approximately 11:59 a.m. at Mies Park, located at 32305 West Chicago in Livonia, Saad was participating in an adult soccer game when the referee determined he would automatically eject Saad from the game. It is alleged that Saad became upset and punched the referee in the head. Mr. Bieniewicz was immediately transported to a local hospital for treatment, however died as a result of his injuries.

Saad was originally charged with Assault with Intent to Do Great Bodily Harm and was arraigned on June 30, 2014 in 16th District Court in Livonia. Since the death of the victim, Saad is being held on a one million dollar cash/surety bond. As a result of the death of Mr. Bieniewicz, the Assault with Intent to Do Great Bodily Harm charge will be dismissed. Today Saad's charges have been amended to Second Degree Murder.

The entire soccer world mourns with the family upon the death of John Bieniewicz. This is especially tragic because it happened as the World Cup dominates our television screens, said Prosecutor Worthy. The alleged actions of this defendant cannot be tolerated and there must be action taken in our legislature to make sure that there are stronger penalties when a Referee is the victim during organized sport.

Saad is expected to be arraigned on the amended charges on Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Kathleen McCann in the 16th District Court in Livonia. The preliminary examination will be adjourned and a new date will be set by the court at the arraignment.

Perp

4089377_G.jpg

Why wouldn't they elaborate further on this?

 

Why was he ejected? Actions are prompted...

 

how's that relevant? because he was ejected did he had to resort into violence?

 

a referee's job is very stressful: everybody hates them.

  • Like 1

Why wouldn't they elaborate further on this?

 

Why was he ejected? Actions are prompted...

 

 

Even unfair refeeree does not deserve to be punched in a face, man!  Especially with so much strength to kill a man!    Nobody deserves to die like that over a GAME.

Saad was arraigned today; second degree murder. Cried as the charges were read.

Second degree murder in Michigan can get you anything from 25 years to life, and even our liberal judges will hammer this kind of thing into the ground.

how's that relevant? because he was ejected did he had to resort into violence?

 

a referee's job is very stressful: everybody hates them.

 

Even unfair refeeree does not deserve to be punched in a face, man!  Especially with so much strength to kill a man!    Nobody deserves to die like that over a GAME.

 

Let's break it down.

 

Scenario #1: I walk up to you and punch you in the head.

Scenario #2: You anger me so I punch you in the head.

 

You don't see a difference?

 

My point is:

determined he would automatically eject

is phrased in a way that leaves a lot of open ends. Did he decide he was going to eject this player because of race, beliefs, words exchanged, or previous relationship?

 

The man being charged with assault is named Bassel Abdul-Amir Saad. The referee's name was John Bieniewicz. The incident seemed to happen around Detroit...

 

Perhaps there was a bias against this man? I don't know... I'd like to know and I feel that is it very relevant to the story.

 

1+1+1=3. Put it together, it's not hard.

No. Just because you're angry makes no difference.

If #2 had physically attacked or was robbing you then it's self defense, same for stopping an escaping criminal, but just angering you absent those? No. Both are on you.

And no, there is no bias in the charging. Here you can be charged with second degree murder for killing someone while DUI.

White, black, green Andorian dancing girl - doesn't matter. The prosecutor is a minority, and many of her aides and the judges are middle eastern. They're just tough.

  • Like 1

If #2 had physically attacked or was robbing you (...)

 

well everybody says that a referee is robbing their teams  :rofl:

 

but yeah DocM: it doesn't matter because he was angry towards the referee's decision and acted upon that, even blindly i agree; doesn't make it right though.

And no, there is no bias in the charging. Here you can be charged with second degree murder for killing someone while DUI. White, black, green Andorian dancing girl - doesn't matter. The prosecutor is a minority, and a great many of her aides the judges are middle eastern.

 

lol.

 

Try reading what I said again...

 

Jesus...

Let's break it down.

 

Scenario #1: I walk up to you and punch you in the head.

Scenario #2: You anger me so I punch you in the head.

 

You don't see a difference?

 

My point is:

is phrased in a way that leaves a lot of open ends. Did he decide he was going to eject this player because of race, beliefs, words exchanged, or previous relationship?

 

The man being charged with assault is named Bassel Abdul-Amir Saad. The referee's name was John Bieniewicz. The incident seemed to happen around Detroit...

 

Perhaps there was a bias against this man? I don't know... I'd like to know and I feel that is it very relevant to the story.

 

Put it together, it's not hard.

 

 

Look i've seen many amateur and professional football (the word is football for us Europeans, not soccer!) to know that a referee is one of the most vulnerable persons in the field: the players, coaches, fans, everybody hates them. And many times a simple decision can make a man angry towards them and this could be the case. 

lol.

Try reading what I said again...

Jesus...

Did he decide he was going to eject this player because of race, beliefs, words exchanged, or previous relationship?

The man being charged with assault is named Bassel Abdul-Amir Saad. The referee's name was John Bieniewicz. The incident seemed to happen around Detroit...

Perhaps there was a bias against this man?

Kinda hard to parse it any other way than accusing the referee of bias, or accusing the prosecutor of overcharging for biased reasons. Neither makes sense for the reasons stated.

Let's break it down.

 

Scenario #1: I walk up to you and punch you in the head.

Scenario #2: You anger me so I punch you in the head.

 

You don't see a difference?

 

 

No really.    It is assault either way.   Anger is not a reason for assault.    Don't you get it???    Only reason for assault should be defense!  No reason to use force over your temper.

 

Think about it!   You are a bigger and better man, because someone upset your ego?  so you go on to punch him?     A better man will just leave or laugh it off.   

No reason to go punch every jerk that upset you.  A better man will only use strength to help people who cannot help themselves and to protect what is dear.  

Clearly this guy was doing neither.     Even a Racial deragotory remarks and discrimination should not be a reason for a direct attack.

 

Unless you take it personally, any such behavior should be the other persons issue, even if it is insulting to you...  

If you don't accept the insult, then the insult is the other persons issue, they can't make it your issue, unless YOU make it so.

 

This is not kindergarden, this is not highschool.    This man is 36 for pete's sake!!!   And he took a man's life!  Other some petty game thing!

 

I think he deserved the sentence.   No matter what the circumstance! 

Your not following but thanks for trying.

 

 

ME?   I am not following?  :rofl:  

 

I read what you said, and I understand you point. But there is nothing there to follow, unfortunately.  

 

Maybe elaborate your point a bit more?  

 

How a Jew threatened to throw out an Arab from the game because he hates him and discriminates him all the time, so the Arab went on and killed him??   

 

No... that does not make it sound any better.

Look at this in another way : 

 

If you walk down the street and someone calls you something ( any name you want ) and you decide you are a tuff guy or girl and hit them, and they die because they fall on something. You will go to jail for murder.

 

In this case, the referee got hit for a decision he took and died, something again for this man ( jail for murder ).

 

You guys and girls need to start growing up a bit !!!! You don't hit someone for any reason except when your life is in danger.

 

Your not teenagers or kids anymore your suppose to have a brains use it. 

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!