Official Dogs vs Cats


Dogs or cats  

418 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you prefer

    • Dogs
      194
    • Catz
      191


Recommended Posts

 

You got: 2015 will be the BEST

If you haven

  • Like 1

Well good luck for 2015 cat folks! Cause we now know 2014 was a :

 

DOG YEAR of WIN!

 

If you're talking about how many dogs killed people in 2014 vs. how many were killed by cats, then yes, dogs won that title handily.

 

http://www.inquisitr.com/1712150/indiana-pit-bull/

 

Merry Christmas from "Man's Best Friend"!

If you're talking about how many dogs killed people in 2014 vs. how many were killed by cats, then yes, dogs won that title handily.

 

http://www.inquisitr.com/1712150/indiana-pit-bull/

 

Merry Christmas from "Man's Best Friend"!

Meh... pitbull deaths are over rated, a chichuaha could easily kill you if trained to do so..

 

 

 

Meh... pitbull deaths are over rated, a chichuaha could easily kill you if trained to do so..

 

A chihuahua?  My late Grandma had one, she was very touchy, but the worse she could do was give you a hard pinch that might bleed.  Though she did corner and kill a mouse once.   ;)

Meh... pitbull deaths are over rated, a chichuaha could easily kill you if trained to do so..

 

As someone who once shared a house with an insane murderous Chihuahua that hated everything I can honestly say with a high degree of certainty that a Chihuahua can not kill you. The only way a Chihuahua could kill you is if it had a disease that was transferred through a bite, but then I'd argue that it was the disease that killed you. The most a Chihuahua can do is draw a bit of blood and annoy the crap out of you.

 

Having said all of that, it was a pretty cute little dog.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!